Jonathan P. Dowling Jonathan P. Dowling Quantum Science & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

jonathan p dowling jonathan p dowling
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Jonathan P. Dowling Jonathan P. Dowling Quantum Science & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY: THE SECOND QUANTUM REVOLUTION* Jonathan P. Dowling Jonathan P. Dowling Quantum Science & Technologies Group Quantum Science & Technologies Group Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Hearne Institute for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY: THE SECOND QUANTUM REVOLUTION*

Jonathan P. Dowling Jonathan P. Dowling

Quantum Science & Technologies Group Quantum Science & Technologies Group Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State University Louisiana State University Unified QUEST, Emerging Technologies Seminar 08 OCT 08, McLean, VA quantum.phys.lsu.edu

* JPD & GJ Milburn, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 361 (2003) 1–20 (quant-ph/0206091)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Who Am I and Why Am I Here?

Principle Scientist, NASA Jet Propulsion Lab, Caltech, 1998–2004. Director, Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics, LSU, 2004–Present. Research Physicist, US Army Aviation and Missile Command, 1994–1998.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Who Am I and Why Am I Here?

NAS Panel on Digitization and Communications Science of NAS Panel on Digitization and Communications Science of the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board for Quantum Information, 2005 Board for Quantum Information, 2005–Present. resent. US Army Technical Advisor for Quantum Technologies, US Army Technical Advisor for Quantum Technologies, 1994 1994–2004. 004. NSA Technical Advisor for Quantum Information NSA Technical Advisor for Quantum Information Processing, 1994 Processing, 1994–2000. 000. NASA Technical Advisor for Quantum Technologies, NASA Technical Advisor for Quantum Technologies, 1998 1998–Present. resent. NSF Technical Advisor for Quantum Technologies and NSF Technical Advisor for Quantum Technologies and Cyber-Infrastructure, 2004 Cyber-Infrastructure, 2004–Present. resent.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

My Own Research in in Quantum Technolo logy

“Qua uantum ntum O Optic ptical S l Sensor nsors, s,” DA DARP RPA, 2 , 2007–2008. “Optic ptical Q l Qua uantum ntum C Com

  • mputing,

puting,” ARDA RDA/ARO RO/DT DTO/IA IARP RPA/NSA, 2 , 2000–Prese sent. nt. “Qua uantum ntum A Atom tomic ic G Gravity vity G Gradiom iometr try,” NRO RO, 2000 2000–20 2001. 1. “Qua uantum ntum O Optic ptical G l Gyrosc

  • scope
  • pe,” ONR, 2

R, 2000–20 2004. “Qua uantum ntum A Atom tomic ic G Gyrosc

  • scope
  • pe,” NRO

RO, 2 , 2002. “Qua uantum ntum M Magne gnetom tomete ter,” NRO RO, 2 , 2003. “Qua uantum ntum Im Imaging, ging,” ARO RO, 2 , 2005–2010 10.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Classical Battle Space of Today

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Quantum Battle Space of Tomorrow

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Army’s Role?

Quantum Technology will Drive Many of the Capabilities of the Warfighter for the Next 100 Years!

The US Army Can: A. LEAD! B. FOLLOW? C. GET THE %$#@ OUT OF THE WAY!?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Quantum Technology Quantum Computing Quantum Cryptography Quantum Sensors Quantum Imaging Foundations

  • f

Quantum Mechanics

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nano-Technolo logy

“There's 's Plenty o

  • f Room at the Bottom.”

— Richard Feynman (1960)

{1010010100101101}

Classical: All The Information in Every Computer in the World Can Be Stored in a Centimeter-Size Chunk of 1021 (1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) Silicon Atoms at One Bit Per Atom.

1.0 cm

Quantum Technolo logy

"There's Plenty "There's Plenty More More Room Room in the Quantum! in the Quantum!” Jon Dowling (2008) Jon Dowling (2008)

Quantum: All The Information in

Every Computer in the World Can

Be Stored in Seventy (70) Silicon Atoms at One Quantum Bit Per Atom!

|1010010100101101>

two nanometers Si - SILICON

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Frequently ly Asked Questio ion?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Quantum and Nanotechnolo logy are Self lf Enablin ling

QuTech: QuTech: Weirdness Weirdness NanoTech: NanoTech: Small Small Size ize

Nano- Electronics and Q-NEMS

NanoTech Drives QuTech QuTech Drives NanoTech

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Quantum Sciences — The First Revolution

1900s Planck Blackbody Law 1920s Quantum Mechanics Completed 1920s Relativistic Quantum Mechanics 1920s Dirac Quantizes Electromagnetic Field 1930s Bloch’s Theory of Solid State 1940s Quantum Electrodynamics Completed 1950s Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 1950s Masers and Atomic Clocks 1950s Theory of Superconductivity 1960s Invention of the Laser 1980s Laser Cooling of Atoms and Ions 1990s Bose-Einstein Condensates

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Quantum Technology — The Second Revolution

1994 1994 Quantum Cryptography Demonstrated over 10km Fiber 1994 Quantum Code-Breaking Algorithm Discovered 1996 DoD & Intel Funding for Quantum Information 1997 Quantum Transistors in Atoms and Photons 1999 Superconducting Quantum Transistor 2001 Quantum Cryptography Over 100km 2004 ARO Program in Quantum Imaging 2007 DARPA Program in Optical Quantum Sensors 2008 2008 Quantum Local Area Networks and Earth-to-Space Uplink

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Quantum Technology Quantum Computing Quantum Cryptography Quantum Sensors Quantum Imaging Foundations

  • f

Quantum Mechanics

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

How Does A Quantum Computer Work?

3 1 4 1 5 9

A Car’s Six ix Wheel l Odometer is is Lik ike a Cla lassic ical l Computer Regis ister: It Shows Only ly One Six ix-Dig igit it Number at a Tim ime.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A Quantum Odometer Can Store All ll 999,999 Six ix-Dig igit it Numbers at Once!

1 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Public lic-Key Secret Codes On The Internet

These Secret Codes Are Often Used by the Bad Guys!

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Makin ing Public lic-key Secret Codes Is Easy

Making a Secret Code is as Easy as Multiplication: 15,485,863 • 32,452,843 = 502,560,280,658,509

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Breakin ing Public lic-key Secret Codes Is Hard

Breaking a Public Key is as Hard as Long Division: 502,560,280,658,509 = 15,485,863 • 32,452,843

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Div ivid idin ing Big ig Numbers Is Very Hard!

If e If eve very pa partic ticle le in th in the Unive Universe se w was a s a cla classic ssical com

  • mpute

puter r running a unning at full spe t full speed for for th the e entir ntire life life of th

  • f the Unive

Universe se (a (about 12 bout 12 billion y billion years) th s) that would

  • uld be

be still insuffi still insufficie ient to d nt to divid ivide out (fa

  • ut (factor

tor) a ) a 2,0 ,000 d digit num igit numbe ber.

The Bad Guys are Safe! Or Are They!?

Be Best Inte st Interne net E t Enc ncryption Use ption Uses 1,0 s 1,000 Digit N Digit Num umbe bers. s.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Crackin ing The Code: Lif ife Imit itates Art

1992 Peter Shor, MIT (1994) Quantum Computer Could Factor a 2,000 Digit Number In Less Than a Second!

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Quantum Computing Hardware

Superconductor Atomic Photonic Semiconductor

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Quantum Artificial Intelligence Hypothesis Classical A.I. Quantum A.I. 2025 A.D. Your Laptop Your Quantum Computer You!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Quantum Technology Quantum Computing Quantum Cryptography Quantum Sensors Quantum Imaging Foundations

  • f

Quantum Mechanics

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The Origin of Quantum Weirdness

But Quantum Entanglement Also Exists in Atomic Gas Clouds Millimeters in Size and in Photon Pairs Separated by Tens-to-Hundreds of Kilometers! Collections of Quantum Particles Exhibit Bizarre, Non- Local, Action-At-A-Distance, Unreal, Correlations not Found in any Classical System. Such Quantum Correlations are Called “Entanglement”. Quantum Entanglement is a Feature of the Weirdness of Quantum Mechanics, not Necessarily the Size of the Particles. Quantum Entanglement is more Apparent in Semiconductor, Superconductor, and Nanomechanical Systems which are Nanometers in Size.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Schr Schrödin inger’s Cat

A sealed and insulated box (A) contains a radioactive source (B) which has a 50% chance during the course of the "experiment" of triggering Geiger counter (C) which activates a mechanism (D) causing a hammer to smash a fl flask of prussic acid (E) and killing the cat (F). An observer (G) must open the box in order to collapse the state vector of the system into one of the two possible

  • states. A second observer (H) may be needed to collapse

the state vector of the larger system containing the fi first

  • bserver (G) and the apparatus (A-F).
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Paradox? What Paradox!?

(1.) The State of the Cat is (1.) The State of the Cat is “Entangled ntangled” with the Atom. with the Atom.

(2.) The Cat is in a Simultaneous Superposition of Dead & Alive. (3.) Observers are Required to “Collapse” the Cat to Dead or Alive

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Einstein Attacks Quantum Mechanics! (1930)

Albert Einstein Boris Podolsky

“If, without in any way disturbing a system, we can predict with certainty ... the value of a physical quantity, then there exists an element of physical reality corresponding to this physical quantity.”

Nathan Rosen

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Ein instein in Offers Cla lassic ical l Alt lternativ ive

+

A B A B Can the Spooky, Weird, Action-at-a-distance, Can the Spooky, Weird, Action-at-a-distance, Entanglement Predictions of Quantum Mechanics Entanglement Predictions of Quantum Mechanics…

+

A B A B …Be Replaced by Some Sort of Local, Intuitive, e Replaced by Some Sort of Local, Intuitive, Statistical, Classical (Hidden Variable) Theory? Statistical, Classical (Hidden Variable) Theory?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

No! — John Bell ll (1960)

The physical predictions of quantum theory disagree with The physical predictions of quantum theory disagree with those of any local (classical) hidden-variable theory! those of any local (classical) hidden-variable theory! John Bell

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Clauser & Aspect Experiments (1980)

John Clauser

V= Vertical Polarization H = Horizontal Polarization

H

A V B + V A H B

A B H V H V

Two-Photon Atomic Decay Alain Aspect

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Bottom Line!?

Quantum is Right! Einstein was Wrong! Quantum Weirdness is Here to Stay — Let’s Put it to Work!

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Quantum Technology Quantum Computing Quantum Cryptography Quantum Sensors Quantum Imaging Foundations

  • f

Quantum Mechanics

slide-37
SLIDE 37

One-Tim ime Pad Priv ivate Secret Key System

Secret Code Invented by G.S. Vernan — An Army Telegraph Officer During the Civil War. Proven Unbreakable by Claude Shannon at Bell Labs in the 1940’s. Unbreakable by Even A Quantum Computer!

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Alic lice Sends a Copy of the Secret Key to Bob

ALICE BOB EVE Problem: Classically an Eavesdropper Can Always Copy the Pad!

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Eve Cannot Copy a Quantum Pad!

ALICE BOB EVE Solution: Pad Encoded in Quantum States of Photons!

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Anybody Can Buy a Quantum Crypto System!

For about $10K The Bad Guys Can Build an Unbreakable, Local-Area Communications System!

slide-41
SLIDE 41

The Quantum Internet Is Here!

Canary Islands Switzerland

Space-Based Quantum Relay

DC Boston

slide-42
SLIDE 42

The Quantum Skynet Is Here!

In 2008 — Austrian Scientists Transmitted Single Photons to a Japanese Communications Satellite and Back. The US Has a Similar

  • Project. The Goals are to

Re-Key Reconnaissance Satellites on the Fly and Connect Quantum Local Area Networks.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Quantum Technology Quantum Computing Quantum Cryptography Quantum Sensors Quantum Imaging Foundations

  • f

Quantum Mechanics

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Quantum Sensors

Quantum Entanglement Boosts Precision, Accuracy, and Sensitivity in a Wide Array of Sensors

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Quantum Sensors: Key Ideas

Classical Sensors Have an Ultimate Sensitivity in Signal-to-Noise Called the Shot-Noise Limit. Quantum Sensors Have an Ultimate Sensitivity in Signal-to-Noise Called the Heisenberg Limit. The Quantum Heisenberg Limit Can be Many Orders of Magnitude More Sensitive than the Classical Shot-Noise Limit. Quantum Entangled Sensors Can Hit the Heisenberg Limit!

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Quantum Super-Sensitivity

Signal-to-Noise = Slope of Curve The Quantum Slope is Much Steeper than Classical

Signal Gravity, Magnetism, Range, Time, Etc.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Quantum Optical Magnetometer

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Quantum Magnetometers Are so Sensitive they Can Detect Camouflaged Tanks From Orbit

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Quantum Atomic Gravity Gradiometer

Atom Trap Atom Chip Loading the Chip Quantum Atomic Interference

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Quantum Atomic Gravity Gradiometers Can Detect Man- Made Underground Structures From Orbit —

  • r Map them

Out from UAVs.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Navigation and the Quantum Atomic Gyroscope A GPS Jammer Can be Made at Radio Shack for $100! Atom Gyro Chip DARPA & the Navy is Preparing For All-Quantum Inertial Navigation:

  • Quantum Accelerometers
  • Quantum Gravimeters
  • Quantum Atomic Gyroscopes

What if the Bad Guys take

  • ut the GPS Satellites?
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Q u a n t u m L I D A R

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Quantum States of Light For Remote Sensing

Entangled Light Source

Delay Line

Detection Target Loss

Winning LSU Proposal

“DARPA Eyes Quantum Mechanics for Sensor Applications” — Jane’s Defense Weekly Super-Sensitive Ranging, Velocity, Etc.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Quantum Technology Quantum Computing Quantum Cryptography Quantum Sensors Quantum Imaging Foundations

  • f

Quantum Mechanics

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Quantum Imaging

Quantum Entanglement Boosts Resolution, Cancels Atmospheric Dispersion (Twinkling), and Produces Images in Total Darkness with no Photons at all! Quantum Microscope Quantum Seeing in the Dark Sub-Diffraction Resolution

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Quantum Super-Resolution Beats Diffraction Limit

Classical Quantum

  • /N

λ = optical wavelength λ/N = effective wavelength

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Classical Resolution

Targets with angular separation smaller than classical diffraction-limited beam width are not discernable.

? ?

θ = λ/d Classical Diffraction Limit

θ

d

Classical Light Source

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Quantum Resolution

Entangled photons beat the diffraction-limit; allowing for quantum resolution of the two targets!

! !

θ/Ν = λ/Nd = (λ/N)/d Quantum Diffraction Limit Photons Entangled N at a time. Two- to Ten-Fold Improvement!

θ/Ν

d

Quantum Light Source

θ/Ν

λ  λ/Ν

Ten Entangled Red Photons Behave Like One Ultraviolet One

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Quantum Photon Source Quantum Photon Imager All Photons Take Lower Path No Photons Take Upper Path

Imaging with No Photons at All!

Complete Image Reconstruction — Even Though No Photons Ever Interact with the Target at All!

Target in Upper Path

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Quantum Technology Quantum Computing Quantum Cryptography Quantum Sensors Quantum Imaging Foundations

  • f

Quantum Mechanics