Level/Oblique Opposition and Raoyang Tonology Jinpang Song 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

level oblique opposition and raoyang tonology
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Level/Oblique Opposition and Raoyang Tonology Jinpang Song 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Level/Oblique Opposition and Raoyang Tonology Jinpang Song 1 Goals 1. Raoyang Tonal Structure Inadequacy of traditional tonal geometry The Theory of Contrastive Hierarchy 2. A Formal Analysis on Raoyang Tone Sandhi OT Account 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Level/Oblique Opposition and Raoyang Tonology

Jinpang Song

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Goals

  • 1. Raoyang Tonal Structure

Inadequacy of traditional tonal geometry The Theory of Contrastive Hierarchy

  • 2. A Formal Analysis on Raoyang Tone Sandhi

OT Account

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Raoyang Dialect

3

Map B2, the Language Atlas of China

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Raoyang Tones: Phonetics

4

Citation tone patterns and F0 curves:

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Raoyang Tones: Phonetics

5

Citation tone values: Two-tone sequence values:

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Auditory Discrimination Findings

(1) T1, T2 neutralization

qing(T1)tian(T1) qing(T2)tian(T1)

“blue sky” “cloudless sky”

tian(T1)di(T4)  tian(T2)di(T4)

“heaven and earth” “farm”

(2) T3, T4 neutralization

mai(T3)fang(T2) mai(T4)fang(T2),

“buy a house” “sell a house”

mai(T3)mi(T3mai(T4)mi(T3)

“buy rice” “sell rice”

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Informal Tone Sandhi Patterns

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Phonology: Traditional Tonal Geometry

8

Bao 1990

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Raoyang Tones: Phonology

  • 1. The predictability of register from sandhi position:

the feature for register in every category is redundant.

  • 2. The representation of four tones with the pitch

feature: T4: fall [+raised, -raised] T2: high level [+raised, -raised] T1: low level [-raised, -raised] T3: rise [-raised, +raised]

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Raoyang Tones: Phonology

10

Underlying Representation: Tone Sandhi Patterns:

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Level/Oblique (LO) Opposition in Raoyang

11

T1T2 T3T4

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Inadequacy of the Traditional Tonal Structure

  • 1. A node in feature geometry indicates a privative
  • pposition by means of its existence(T3, T4) and

non-existence(T1, T2).

  • 2. Pitch features are dependent on the node of
  • contour. If T1 and T2 lack this node, they also lack

the pitch features. How would they be contrastive?

12

From Bao 1990

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Inadequacy of the Traditional Tonal Structure

13

From Bao 1990

  • 3. Itinerary application of a specification rule is

arbitrary. To account for the T3, T4 neutralization, a rule specifying opposite values for pitch 1 and pitch 2 has to be applied successively; a single application would result LO conversion.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Level/Oblique Conversion in Tianjin

14

Trigger: contour dissimilation Target: LO conversion

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A Possible Solution and Further Problems

The level/oblique (LO) feature, instead of a contour node, is capable of equipollent

  • pposition.

The compatibility of contour node, pitch feature, register, and LO feature in one structure?

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The Theory of Contrastive Hierarchy

  • 1. Contrastive Specification: the featural content of a

segment is determined by contrastiveness.

  • 2. Feature hierarchy: specifications of features are not

made at one stroke, but in a certain order.

  • 3. How is the hierarchy decided: those at upper level
  • f the hierarchy have a bigger scope and their re-

specification may affect more phonemes.

Dresher, 2003a, 2003b

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Proposed Raoyang Tonal Structure

17

  • 1. Two independent features of LO and pitch are

present .

  • 2. LO and the left pitch can predict the right pitch.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Raoyang Contrastive Hierarchy

18

Regularity: Tone mapping is restricted to the pitch tier, while the LO feature remains constant.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

OT Constraints: Faithfulness

  • 1. Stability of the second tone:

IDENT-IO-T-HEAD: Tones at the head of prosody do not change.

  • 2. LO opposition:

IDENT-IO-LO: LO feature does not change.

  • 3. Stability of high pitch:

IDENT-IO-[+raised]: High pitch value does not change.

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

OT Constraints: Markedness

  • 4. The illegitimacy of T1.T1 and T3.T3

OCP-T: Same tones are not adjacent. *[-raised]: Low pitch is not allowed.

  • 5. The illegitimacy of T1.T4 and T3.T2

*[-raised]/[+raised]: High pitch and low pitch are not adjacent. *[-oblique]/[+oblique]: Levelness and obliqueness are not adjacent. {*[-raised]/[+raised], *[-oblique]/[+oblique]}ADJ

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

OT Constraints Hierarchy

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

OT Tableau for T1+T1

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

OT Tableau for T2+T3

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusions

  • 1. Analysis reveals LO Opposition in Raoyang,

which is equipollent in nature. A contour node

  • f privative nature does not capture it.
  • 2. LO feature is claimed to be present.
  • 3. Contrastive hierarchy of Raoyang tones: two

features are organized into a hierarchy: LO>>pitch.

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Remaining Questions

  • 1. Application of the Contrastive Hierarchy Theory

to a wide range of tone systems remains to be

  • done. See Barrie 2007 for analysis on several

cases.

  • 2. Theoretical compatibility with the

Underspecification Theory; Theoretical conflict with the UG Hypothesis and the Optimality Theory.

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Thank you!

songjinpang@hotmail.com

26