SLIDE 1
Logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for irreducible sl n ( - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for irreducible sl n ( - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for irreducible sl n ( C ) -representations arXiv:1906.09633 June Huh, Jacob P. Matherne, Karola M esz aros, Avery St. Dizier Institute for Advanced Study, University of Oregon, Cornell
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Weight lattices
Integral weight lattice of sln(C): Λ := Z{e1, . . . , en}/ n
- i=1
ei = 0
- 1
SLIDE 4
Irreducible representations
Λ − → {irreducible representations of sln(C)} λ − → V (λ)
2
SLIDE 5
Dominant Weyl chamber
V (λ) is finite dimensional if and only if λ is dominant.
3
SLIDE 6
Weight multiplicities
Each V (λ) has a weight space decomposition V (λ) =
- µ
V (λ)µ. All V (λ)µ are finite dimensional.
4
SLIDE 7
Weight multiplicities
Each V (λ) has a weight space decomposition V (λ) =
- µ
V (λ)µ. All V (λ)µ are finite dimensional.
4
SLIDE 8
Weight multiplicities
5
SLIDE 9
Log-concavity of weight multiplicities
Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For λ, µ ∈ Λ with λ dominant, we have (dim V (λ)µ)2 ≥ dim V (λ)µ+ei−ej dim V (λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n].
6
SLIDE 10
Log-concavity of weight multiplicities
Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For λ, µ ∈ Λ with λ dominant, we have (dim V (λ)µ)2 ≥ dim V (λ)µ+ei−ej dim V (λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n]. It’s easy for sl2(C) because all weight spaces are one dimensional.
6
SLIDE 11
Counterexample in other types
The theorem fails for sp4(C)!
7
SLIDE 12
Antidominant Weyl chamber
If λ ∈ Λ is antidominant, then V (λ) = M(λ). ← Verma module
8
SLIDE 13
Antidominant Weyl chamber
If λ ∈ Λ is antidominant, then V (λ) = M(λ). ← Verma module Proposition (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any λ, µ ∈ Λ, we have (dim M(λ)µ)2 ≥ dim M(λ)µ+ei−ej dim M(λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n].
8
SLIDE 14
Antidominant Weyl chamber
If λ ∈ Λ is antidominant, then V (λ) = M(λ). ← Verma module Proposition (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any λ, µ ∈ Λ, we have (dim M(λ)µ)2 ≥ dim M(λ)µ+ei−ej dim M(λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n]. Proof idea. It is known that dim M(λ)µ = p(µ − λ), ← Kostant’s partition function which is the number of ways of writing µ − λ as a sum of negative roots.
8
SLIDE 15
Main conjecture
9
SLIDE 16
Main conjecture
Conjecture (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For λ, µ ∈ Λ, we have (dim V (λ)µ)2 ≥ dim V (λ)µ+ei−ej dim V (λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n].
9
SLIDE 17
Schur polynomials
SLIDE 18
Schur polynomials
Definition The Schur polynomial (in n variables) of a partition λ is sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =
- T∈ SSYT
xµ(T), xµ(T) := xµ1(T)
1
· · · xµ2(T)
2
.
10
SLIDE 19
Schur polynomials
Definition The Schur polynomial (in n variables) of a partition λ is sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =
- T∈ SSYT
xµ(T), xµ(T) := xµ1(T)
1
· · · xµ2(T)
2
. For λ = (2, 1), we have 1 1 2 1 2 2 So, s(2,1)(x1, x2) = x2
1x2 + x1x2 2. 10
SLIDE 20
Continuous theorem
Grouping terms with the same µ gives sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =
- µ
Kλµxµ. ← Kλµ, Kostka number
11
SLIDE 21
Continuous theorem
Grouping terms with the same µ gives sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =
- µ
Kλµxµ. ← Kλµ, Kostka number The normalization operator is given by N(xµ) = xµ µ! := xµ1 · · · xµn µ1! · · · µn! .
11
SLIDE 22
Continuous theorem
Grouping terms with the same µ gives sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =
- µ
Kλµxµ. ← Kλµ, Kostka number The normalization operator is given by N(xµ) = xµ µ! := xµ1 · · · xµn µ1! · · · µn! . Continuous Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ, we have N(sλ(x1, . . . , xn)) =
- µ
Kλµ xµ µ! is either identically 0 or log(N(sλ)) is a concave function on Rn
>0. 11
SLIDE 23
Discrete theorem
Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2
λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej
for any i, j ∈ [n].
12
SLIDE 24
Discrete theorem
Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2
λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej
for any i, j ∈ [n]. The Discrete Theorem implies our first theorem on weight multiplicities because dim V (λ)µ = Kλµ.
12
SLIDE 25
Okounkov’s Conjecture
Littlewood–Richardson coefficients cν
λκ are given by
V (λ) ⊗ V (κ) ≃
- ν
V (ν)cν
λκ.
13
SLIDE 26
Okounkov’s Conjecture
Littlewood–Richardson coefficients cν
λκ are given by
V (λ) ⊗ V (κ) ≃
- ν
V (ν)cν
λκ.
Conjecture (Okounkov 2003) The discrete function (λ, κ, ν) − → log cν
λκ
is a concave function.
13
SLIDE 27
Okounkov’s Conjecture
Littlewood–Richardson coefficients cν
λκ are given by
V (λ) ⊗ V (κ) ≃
- ν
V (ν)cν
λκ.
Conjecture (Okounkov 2003) The discrete function (λ, κ, ν) − → log cν
λκ
is a concave function. Counterexample due to Chindris–Derksen–Weyman in 2007.
13
SLIDE 28
Special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture
Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2
λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej
for any i, j ∈ [n].
14
SLIDE 29
Special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture
Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2
λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej
for any i, j ∈ [n]. The Discrete Theorem implies a special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture: Kλ, = c
,λ 14
SLIDE 30
Special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture
Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2
λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej
for any i, j ∈ [n]. The Discrete Theorem implies a special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture: Kλ, = c
,λ 14
SLIDE 31
Main theorem
Main Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ, the normalized Schur polynomial N(sλ(x1, . . . , xn)) is Lorentzian.
15
SLIDE 32
Lorentzian polynomials
SLIDE 33
Lorentzian polynomials
Definition (Br¨ and´ en–Huh 2019) A degree d homogeneous polynomial h(x1, . . . , xn) is Lorentzian if
- all coefficients of h are nonnegative,
- supp(h) has the exchange property, and
- the quadratic form
∂ ∂xi1 · · · ∂ ∂xid−2 (h) has at most one positive
eigenvalue for all i1, . . . , id−2 ∈ [n].
16
SLIDE 34
Examples of Lorentzian polynomials
Nonexample: s(2,0)(x1, x2) = x2
1 + x1x2 + x2 2
Its matrix is
- 1
1/2 1/2 1
- .
Eigenvalues are 3/2 and 1/2.
17
SLIDE 35
Examples of Lorentzian polynomials
Nonexample: s(2,0)(x1, x2) = x2
1 + x1x2 + x2 2
Its matrix is
- 1
1/2 1/2 1
- .
Eigenvalues are 3/2 and 1/2. Example: N(s(2,0)(x1, x2)) = x2
1
2 + x1x2 + x2
2
2
Its matrix is
- 1/2
1/2 1/2 1/2
- .
Eigenvalues are 0 and 1.
17
SLIDE 36
Consequences of the Lorentzian property
Theorem (Br¨ and´ en–Huh 2019) If f =
α cα α! xα is a Lorentzian polynomial, then
- f is either identically 0 or log(f ) is concave on Rn
>0, and
- c2
α ≥ cα+ei−ejcα−ei+ej for all α and for all i, j ∈ [n]. 18
SLIDE 37
Consequences of the Lorentzian property
Theorem (Br¨ and´ en–Huh 2019) If f =
α cα α! xα is a Lorentzian polynomial, then
- f is either identically 0 or log(f ) is concave on Rn
>0, and
- c2
α ≥ cα+ei−ejcα−ei+ej for all α and for all i, j ∈ [n].
This implies our Continuous Theorem and our Discrete Theorem.
18
SLIDE 38
Some words about the proof
Na¨ ıve attempt: induction Example: N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x2
1 x2
2
+ x1x2
2
2 ∂ ∂x1 N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x1x2 + x2
2
2 ← not symmetric! 19
SLIDE 39
Some words about the proof
Na¨ ıve attempt: induction Example: N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x2
1 x2
2
+ x1x2
2
2 ∂ ∂x1 N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x1x2 + x2
2
2 ← not symmetric!
Instead: We show N(sλ(x1, . . . , xn)) is a volume polynomial.
19
SLIDE 40
Conjectural Lorentzian polynomials
Polynomial Tested for Schubert: N(Sw(x1, . . . , xn)) n ≤ 8 Skew Schur: N(sλ/µ(x1, . . . , xn)) λ with ≤ 12 boxes and ≤ 6 parts Schur P: N(Pλ(x1, . . . , xn)) strict λ with λ1 ≤ 12 and ≤ 4 parts
- homog. Grothendieck:
N( Gw(x1, . . . , xn, z)) n ≤ 7 Key: N(κµ(x1, . . . , xn)) compositions µ with ≤ 12 boxes and ≤ 6 parts https://github.com/avstdi/Lorentzian-Polynomials
20
SLIDE 41
Conjectural Lorentzian polynomials
Polynomial Tested for Schubert: N(Sw(x1, . . . , xn)) n ≤ 8 Skew Schur: N(sλ/µ(x1, . . . , xn)) λ with ≤ 12 boxes and ≤ 6 parts Schur P: N(Pλ(x1, . . . , xn)) strict λ with λ1 ≤ 12 and ≤ 4 parts
- homog. Grothendieck: