Logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for irreducible sl n ( - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for irreducible sl n ( - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for irreducible sl n ( C ) -representations arXiv:1906.09633 June Huh, Jacob P. Matherne, Karola M esz aros, Avery St. Dizier Institute for Advanced Study, University of Oregon, Cornell


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Logarithmic concavity of weight multiplicities for irreducible sln(C)-representations

arXiv:1906.09633

June Huh, Jacob P. Matherne, Karola M´ esz´ aros, Avery St. Dizier

Institute for Advanced Study, University of Oregon, Cornell University Geometric Methods in Representation Theory AMS Fall Western Sectional Meeting University of California at Riverside

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation from representation theory

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Weight lattices

Integral weight lattice of sln(C): Λ := Z{e1, . . . , en}/ n

  • i=1

ei = 0

  • 1
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Irreducible representations

Λ − → {irreducible representations of sln(C)} λ − → V (λ)

2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Dominant Weyl chamber

V (λ) is finite dimensional if and only if λ is dominant.

3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Weight multiplicities

Each V (λ) has a weight space decomposition V (λ) =

  • µ

V (λ)µ. All V (λ)µ are finite dimensional.

4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Weight multiplicities

Each V (λ) has a weight space decomposition V (λ) =

  • µ

V (λ)µ. All V (λ)µ are finite dimensional.

4

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Weight multiplicities

5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Log-concavity of weight multiplicities

Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For λ, µ ∈ Λ with λ dominant, we have (dim V (λ)µ)2 ≥ dim V (λ)µ+ei−ej dim V (λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n].

6

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Log-concavity of weight multiplicities

Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For λ, µ ∈ Λ with λ dominant, we have (dim V (λ)µ)2 ≥ dim V (λ)µ+ei−ej dim V (λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n]. It’s easy for sl2(C) because all weight spaces are one dimensional.

6

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Counterexample in other types

The theorem fails for sp4(C)!

7

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Antidominant Weyl chamber

If λ ∈ Λ is antidominant, then V (λ) = M(λ). ← Verma module

8

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Antidominant Weyl chamber

If λ ∈ Λ is antidominant, then V (λ) = M(λ). ← Verma module Proposition (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any λ, µ ∈ Λ, we have (dim M(λ)µ)2 ≥ dim M(λ)µ+ei−ej dim M(λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n].

8

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Antidominant Weyl chamber

If λ ∈ Λ is antidominant, then V (λ) = M(λ). ← Verma module Proposition (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any λ, µ ∈ Λ, we have (dim M(λ)µ)2 ≥ dim M(λ)µ+ei−ej dim M(λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n]. Proof idea. It is known that dim M(λ)µ = p(µ − λ), ← Kostant’s partition function which is the number of ways of writing µ − λ as a sum of negative roots.

8

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Main conjecture

9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Main conjecture

Conjecture (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For λ, µ ∈ Λ, we have (dim V (λ)µ)2 ≥ dim V (λ)µ+ei−ej dim V (λ)µ−ei+ej for any i, j ∈ [n].

9

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Schur polynomials

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Schur polynomials

Definition The Schur polynomial (in n variables) of a partition λ is sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =

  • T∈ SSYT

xµ(T), xµ(T) := xµ1(T)

1

· · · xµ2(T)

2

.

10

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Schur polynomials

Definition The Schur polynomial (in n variables) of a partition λ is sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =

  • T∈ SSYT

xµ(T), xµ(T) := xµ1(T)

1

· · · xµ2(T)

2

. For λ = (2, 1), we have 1 1 2 1 2 2 So, s(2,1)(x1, x2) = x2

1x2 + x1x2 2. 10

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Continuous theorem

Grouping terms with the same µ gives sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =

  • µ

Kλµxµ. ← Kλµ, Kostka number

11

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Continuous theorem

Grouping terms with the same µ gives sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =

  • µ

Kλµxµ. ← Kλµ, Kostka number The normalization operator is given by N(xµ) = xµ µ! := xµ1 · · · xµn µ1! · · · µn! .

11

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Continuous theorem

Grouping terms with the same µ gives sλ(x1, . . . , xn) =

  • µ

Kλµxµ. ← Kλµ, Kostka number The normalization operator is given by N(xµ) = xµ µ! := xµ1 · · · xµn µ1! · · · µn! . Continuous Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ, we have N(sλ(x1, . . . , xn)) =

  • µ

Kλµ xµ µ! is either identically 0 or log(N(sλ)) is a concave function on Rn

>0. 11

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Discrete theorem

Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2

λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej

for any i, j ∈ [n].

12

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Discrete theorem

Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2

λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej

for any i, j ∈ [n]. The Discrete Theorem implies our first theorem on weight multiplicities because dim V (λ)µ = Kλµ.

12

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Okounkov’s Conjecture

Littlewood–Richardson coefficients cν

λκ are given by

V (λ) ⊗ V (κ) ≃

  • ν

V (ν)cν

λκ.

13

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Okounkov’s Conjecture

Littlewood–Richardson coefficients cν

λκ are given by

V (λ) ⊗ V (κ) ≃

  • ν

V (ν)cν

λκ.

Conjecture (Okounkov 2003) The discrete function (λ, κ, ν) − → log cν

λκ

is a concave function.

13

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Okounkov’s Conjecture

Littlewood–Richardson coefficients cν

λκ are given by

V (λ) ⊗ V (κ) ≃

  • ν

V (ν)cν

λκ.

Conjecture (Okounkov 2003) The discrete function (λ, κ, ν) − → log cν

λκ

is a concave function. Counterexample due to Chindris–Derksen–Weyman in 2007.

13

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture

Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2

λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej

for any i, j ∈ [n].

14

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture

Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2

λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej

for any i, j ∈ [n]. The Discrete Theorem implies a special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture: Kλ, = c

,λ 14

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture

Discrete Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ and µ ∈ Nn, we have K 2

λµ ≥ Kλ,µ+ei−ejKλ,µ−ei+ej

for any i, j ∈ [n]. The Discrete Theorem implies a special case of Okounkov’s Conjecture: Kλ, = c

,λ 14

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Main theorem

Main Theorem (Huh–M.–M´ esz´ aros–St. Dizier 2019) For any partition λ, the normalized Schur polynomial N(sλ(x1, . . . , xn)) is Lorentzian.

15

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Lorentzian polynomials

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Lorentzian polynomials

Definition (Br¨ and´ en–Huh 2019) A degree d homogeneous polynomial h(x1, . . . , xn) is Lorentzian if

  • all coefficients of h are nonnegative,
  • supp(h) has the exchange property, and
  • the quadratic form

∂ ∂xi1 · · · ∂ ∂xid−2 (h) has at most one positive

eigenvalue for all i1, . . . , id−2 ∈ [n].

16

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Examples of Lorentzian polynomials

Nonexample: s(2,0)(x1, x2) = x2

1 + x1x2 + x2 2

Its matrix is

  • 1

1/2 1/2 1

  • .

Eigenvalues are 3/2 and 1/2.

17

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Examples of Lorentzian polynomials

Nonexample: s(2,0)(x1, x2) = x2

1 + x1x2 + x2 2

Its matrix is

  • 1

1/2 1/2 1

  • .

Eigenvalues are 3/2 and 1/2. Example: N(s(2,0)(x1, x2)) = x2

1

2 + x1x2 + x2

2

2

Its matrix is

  • 1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2

  • .

Eigenvalues are 0 and 1.

17

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Consequences of the Lorentzian property

Theorem (Br¨ and´ en–Huh 2019) If f =

α cα α! xα is a Lorentzian polynomial, then

  • f is either identically 0 or log(f ) is concave on Rn

>0, and

  • c2

α ≥ cα+ei−ejcα−ei+ej for all α and for all i, j ∈ [n]. 18

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Consequences of the Lorentzian property

Theorem (Br¨ and´ en–Huh 2019) If f =

α cα α! xα is a Lorentzian polynomial, then

  • f is either identically 0 or log(f ) is concave on Rn

>0, and

  • c2

α ≥ cα+ei−ejcα−ei+ej for all α and for all i, j ∈ [n].

This implies our Continuous Theorem and our Discrete Theorem.

18

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Some words about the proof

Na¨ ıve attempt: induction Example: N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x2

1 x2

2

+ x1x2

2

2 ∂ ∂x1 N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x1x2 + x2

2

2 ← not symmetric! 19

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Some words about the proof

Na¨ ıve attempt: induction Example: N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x2

1 x2

2

+ x1x2

2

2 ∂ ∂x1 N(s(2,1)(x1, x2)) = x1x2 + x2

2

2 ← not symmetric!

Instead: We show N(sλ(x1, . . . , xn)) is a volume polynomial.

19

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Conjectural Lorentzian polynomials

Polynomial Tested for Schubert: N(Sw(x1, . . . , xn)) n ≤ 8 Skew Schur: N(sλ/µ(x1, . . . , xn)) λ with ≤ 12 boxes and ≤ 6 parts Schur P: N(Pλ(x1, . . . , xn)) strict λ with λ1 ≤ 12 and ≤ 4 parts

  • homog. Grothendieck:

N( Gw(x1, . . . , xn, z)) n ≤ 7 Key: N(κµ(x1, . . . , xn)) compositions µ with ≤ 12 boxes and ≤ 6 parts https://github.com/avstdi/Lorentzian-Polynomials

20

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Conjectural Lorentzian polynomials

Polynomial Tested for Schubert: N(Sw(x1, . . . , xn)) n ≤ 8 Skew Schur: N(sλ/µ(x1, . . . , xn)) λ with ≤ 12 boxes and ≤ 6 parts Schur P: N(Pλ(x1, . . . , xn)) strict λ with λ1 ≤ 12 and ≤ 4 parts

  • homog. Grothendieck:

N( Gw(x1, . . . , xn, z)) n ≤ 7 Key: N(κµ(x1, . . . , xn)) compositions µ with ≤ 12 boxes and ≤ 6 parts https://github.com/avstdi/Lorentzian-Polynomials - Thanks!

20