M 0 for 48 Ca from charge-exchange reactions Vadim Rodin DBD11, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

m 0 for 48 ca from charge exchange reactions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

M 0 for 48 Ca from charge-exchange reactions Vadim Rodin DBD11, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M 0 for 48 Ca from charge-exchange reactions Vadim Rodin DBD11, Osaka, 16 / 11 / 2011 Introduction Nuclear 0 -decay ( = ) strong in-medium modification of the basic process dd uue e ( e e ) e - Light


slide-1
SLIDE 1

M0ν for 48Ca from charge-exchange reactions

Vadim Rodin

DBD11, Osaka, 16/11/2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Nuclear 0νββ-decay (¯ ν = ν)

strong in-medium modification of the basic process dd → uue−e−(¯ νe¯ νe)

Light neutrino exchange mechanism

ν e- n n p p e- ν _

A,Z A,Z+2

continuum

0+ (A,Z) (A,Z+1) (A,Z+2) 0+ 0+ 1+ 1- 2-

virtual excitation

  • f states of all multipolarities

in (A,Z+1) nucleus

GT amplitudes to 1+ states — from charge-exchange reactions (H. Ejiri, D. Frekers, H. Sakai, R. Zegers, et al.)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

World status of M0ν, light neutrino mass mechanism

| | | | |

48Ca 76Ge 82Se 94Zr 96Zr 98Mo 100Mo 104Ru 110Pd 116Cd 124Sn 128Te 130Te 136Xe 150Nd 154Sm 160Gd

2 4 6 8

M

(R)QRPA (Tü) QRPA (Jy)

|

SM IBM-2 PHFB GCM+PNAMP

QRPA: (Tü)

  • F. Šimkovic, A. Faessler, V.R., P. Vogel and J. Engel, PRC 77 (2008);

150Nd,160Gd with deformation: D. Fang, A. Faessler, V.R., F. Šimkovic, PRC 82 (2010); PRC 83(2011)

(Jy) J. Suhonen, O. Civitarese, NPA 847 (2010) SM E. Caurier, J. Menendez, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, PRL 100 (2008) & NPA 818 (2009) IBM-2 J. Barea and F. Iachello, PRC 79 (2009); PHFB P.K. Rath et al., PRC 82 (2010); GCM+PNAMP T. R. Rodriguez and G. Martinez-Pinedo, PRL 105 (2010)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Measuring M0ν

F

Can one measure nuclear matrix elements of neutrinoless double beta decay?

V.R., A. Faessler, PRC 80 , 041302(R) (2009) [arXiv:0906.1759 [nucl-th]] PPNP 66, 441 (2011); arXiv:1012.5176 [nucl-th]

slide-5
SLIDE 5 ^ T
  • ^
T
  • ^
T + ^ V C j0 + i i jT T i j0 + f i jT 2 T 2i jI AS i jT T 1i jD I AS i jT T 2i
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Measuring M0ν

F

ˆ W0ν

F =

  • ab

Pν(rab)τ−

aτ− b = 1

e2 ˆ T −, [ ˆ T −, ˆ VC]

  • Isospin lowering operator ˆ

T − =

a τ− a;

Coulomb interaction ˆ VC = e2

8

  • ab

(1 − τ(3)

a )(1 − τ(3) b )

rab , isotensor Coulomb ˆ V(2)

C = e2

8

  • ab

1

rab (τ(3)

a τ(3) b − τaτb

3 )

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Measuring M0ν

F

ˆ W0ν

F =

  • ab

Pν(rab)τ−

aτ− b = 1

e2 ˆ T −, [ ˆ T −, ˆ VC]

  • Isospin lowering operator ˆ

T − =

a τ− a;

Coulomb interaction ˆ VC = e2

8

  • ab

(1 − τ(3)

a )(1 − τ(3) b )

rab , isotensor Coulomb ˆ V(2)

C = e2

8

  • ab

1

rab (τ(3)

a τ(3) b − τaτb

3 )

e2M0ν

F = 0+ f |

ˆ T −, [ ˆ T −, ˆ VC]

  • |0+

i

≈ T0 − 2T0 − 2|VC ˆ T −2 |T0T0 = T0 − 2T0 − 2| ˆ VC|T0T0 − 2 × T0T0 − 2| ˆ T −2 |T0T0

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Measuring M0ν

F

M0ν

F = −2

e2

  • s

¯ ωs0+

f | ˆ

T −|0+

s 0+ s | ˆ

T −|0+

i

¯ ωs = Es − (E0+

i + E0+ f )/2

used ˆ T −, [ ˆ T −, ˆ VC]

  • =

ˆ T −, [ ˆ T −, ˆ Htot]

  • assuming

ˆ T −, ˆ Hstr

  • = 0

ˆ Htot = ˆ K + ˆ Hstr + ˆ VC

M0ν

F ≈ −2

e2 ¯ ωIAS0+

f | ˆ

T −|IAS IAS | ˆ T −|0+

i ≈ 1 e2 0+

f | ˆ

VC|DIAS DIAS | ˆ T −2 |0+

i

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Measuring M0ν

F

Measure the ∆T = 2 isospin-forbidden matrix element 0+

f | ˆ

T −|IAS

charge-exchange (n, p)-type reaction

Challenge: IAS | ˆ T +|0+

f

IAS | ˆ T −|0+

i

∼ 0.001 M0ν

F (QRPA)

M0ν

F (S M)

≈ 3 ÷ 5 and M0ν

GT

M0ν

F

≈ −2.5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

48Ca→48Ti

IAS of 48Ca (T = 4, Tz = 3) in 48Sc

  • 1. is located at Ex =6.678 MeV ( ¯

ωIAS ≈8.5 MeV) under threshold of particle emission

  • 2. 100% γ-decay to 1+ state at Ex =2.517 MeV

(Eγ=4.160 MeV)

  • 3. a single state — no fragmentation

(too low density of T = 3 0+ states around the IAS)

Example Reaction: 48Ti(n,p)48Sc(IAS)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

48Ca→48Ti

IAS↓

slide-12
SLIDE 12

48Ca→48Ti

slide-13
SLIDE 13

48Ca→48Ti

IAS | ˆ T +|0f IAS | ˆ T −|0i = − e2M0ν

F

2 ¯

ωIASR ·

1

N − Z QRPA: M0ν

F = 0.6 ⇒

  • IAS | ˆ

T +|0 f IAS | ˆ T −|0i

  • 2

≈ 2 · 10−6

d2σpn dΩdE ≈ 10 mb/(sr MeV), Ep = 134 MeV (B.D.Anderson et al., PRC 31 (1985))

⇒ d2σnp dΩdE ≈ 20 nb/(sr MeV)

Unit cross section: ˆ σF ∝ E−2

p

Ep → 0.5Ep ⇒ σnp → 4σnp

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Reaction analysis

Basic requirements for a charge-exchange probe Measure cross section ≡ Know IAS | ˆ T +|0+

f

???

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Reaction analysis

Any hadronic probe adds isospin to nuclear system (weak interaction probe would be ideal)

to probe small admixture of |DIAS to |0+

f

⇒ must be forbidden to connect in reaction main components of |IAS and |0+

f (∆T = 2)

Only T = 1

2 probes ((n, p), (t,3He),. . . )

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Reaction analysis

σnp(0+

f → IAS ) ∝ IAS | ˆ

T +|0+

f

???

|0+

i = |T0 T0;

|IAS =

ˆ T − √

2T0|0+

i + α |T0 − 1 T0 − 1

|0+

f = |T0−2 T0−2+β |T0−1 T0−2+γ ( ˆ T −)2 √

4T0(2T0−1)|0+

i

= |DIAS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Reaction analysis

48Ca, 5ω s.p. space, QRPA

σnp(γDIAS → IAS ) is 100 times larger than for the

  • ther mechanisms via admixtures of IVMR

Assumptions: σpn(0+

i → IVMRs) = σ0

  • IVMRs| ˆ

R−|0+

i

  • 2,

ˆ R− =

a r2

a

R2 τ− a

and σpn(0+

i → IVMR) ≈ σpn(0+ i → IAS )

10

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusions

  • M0ν

F can be related to ∆T = 2 isospin admixture of the DIAS in

the final g.s. and can be extracted from measured Fermi m.e. IAS | ˆ T +|0 f

  • can help to discriminate between nuclear structure models

(difference in M0ν

F as much as the factor of 5)

  • Choice of a target: well-isolated IAS of 48Ca in 48Sc

(weak Coulomb mixing applies) Reaction: 48Ti(n,p)48Sc(IAS) Estimates: σnp ≈ 20 nb/(sr MeV) and σnp ∝ IAS | ˆ T +|0 f

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • Role of spread of IAS in heavy nuclei to be investigated

Supported by: DFG TR27 “Neutrinos and beyond”

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Backup

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Backup

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Spread of IAS

Why no fragmentation of IAS of 48Ca? Density of 0+ states around IAS

back-shifted Fermi-gas (BSFG) model: ρ(U, J, π) = 1

2F(U, J)ρ(U)

ρ(U) =

1 12

2 1

σa1/4 exp(2 √ aU) (U + t)5/4 , F(U, J) = 2J + 1

2σ2 exp

−J(J + 1)

2σ2

  • U = at2 − t,

U = E − δ, the level density parameter a; the spin cut-off parameter σ2 = Irigid

2 t ≈ 0.015A5/3t;

the backshift δ (> 0 even-even, ≈ 0 odd-A, < 0 odd-odd);

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Spread of IAS

46Sc

a = 5.96 MeV−1, δ = −2.37 MeV

(W. Dilg et al. NPA 217 (1973))

Ex =6.8 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 59 MeV−1 but at Ex = 3 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 5 MeV−1 (no J = 0 state is listed in ENSDF for 48Sc for Ex <3 MeV).

46Sc

a = 5.74 MeV−1, δ = −1.9 MeV

(RIPL-2)

Ex =6.8 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 33 MeV−1 at Ex = 3 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 3 MeV−1

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Spread of IAS

46Sc

a = 5.96 MeV−1, δ = −2.37 MeV

(W. Dilg et al. NPA 217 (1973))

Ex =6.8 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 59 MeV−1 but at Ex = 3 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 5 MeV−1 (no J = 0 state is listed in ENSDF for 48Sc for Ex <3 MeV).

46Sc

a = 5.74 MeV−1, δ = −1.9 MeV

(RIPL-2)

Ex =6.8 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 33 MeV−1 at Ex = 3 MeV → ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 3 MeV−1

76As

IAS at Ex = 8.24 MeV a = 10.81 MeV−1, δ = −1.45 MeV

(W. Dilg et al. NPA 217 (1973))

→ ρ(0+) + ρ(0−) ≈ 7000 MeV−1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Spread of IAS