managing evaluations for influence

Managing evaluations for influence - beyond utilization - focused - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Managing evaluations for influence - beyond utilization - focused evaluation Uganda Evaluation Week 2014 Kampala, Uganda May 21, 2014 Alexander Erich (Evaluation Officer, GIZ) Seite 1 A. Introductory remarks New M+E Policy of GIZ


  1. Managing evaluations for influence - beyond “utilization - focused evaluation” Uganda Evaluation Week 2014 Kampala, Uganda May 21, 2014 Alexander Erich (Evaluation Officer, GIZ) Seite 1

  2. A. Introductory remarks • New M+E Policy of GIZ (January 2014) offers huge opportunity for innovation , since ‚ nuts and bolts ‘ of M+E instruments are still work in progress • Key question: How can evaluations be managed to maximise their potential for influencing policy, programming and implementation? Seite 2

  3. A. Introductory remarks (2) • Management… • … is what managers do! • … comprises planning, organizing, staffing, leading and controlling an organization or initiative (Wikipedia) • … is the transformation of resources into utility (F. Malik) Seite 3

  4. A. Introductory remarks (3) • Evaluation management … • … encompasses several functions , including planning, organizing, staffing, coordinating and controlling of evaluations • … is directed at achieving the objectives of the evaluation • … is thus more than procurement and administration • … is largely undertheorised in the literature Seite 4

  5. B. Utilisation and influence • First things first - utilisation of evaluation findings is the precondition for evaluations to be influential • The starting point for „Utilization -Focused Evaluation “ (UFE) (M . Patton) are thus identifying „intended uses by intended users“ • But identifying users and uses is not a „magic bullet“ - evaluation management must be geared towards and actively take steps to promote use of evaluations Seite 5

  6. B. Utilisation and influence (2) • UFE is based on a linear logic regarding the formulation of evaluation objectives • UFE does not sufficiently take into account complexity and embeddedness of evaluations in political, institutional and cultural contexts • Instead, a systemic understanding of the role evaluations can play in bringing about change is required ( theory of change for evaluations ) • From “planning intended use” to “ enhancing potential influence ” Seite 6

  7. B. Utilisation and influence (3) • Research indicates that high quality of evaluative evidence is not enough to stimulate use (Johnson et al 2009, Innvaer et al 2002) • Stakeholder involvement in evaluation process is key. • But additional considerations are needed (e.g. good timing, effective communication, political climate) Seite 7

  8. C. Towards influential evaluation management • Analyse context factors , including • …stakeholder interests • …politics • …institutional structures • … organisational (evaluation) culture • …and others? Seite 8

  9. C. Towards influential evaluation management (2) • Managerial decisions in regard to • …stakeholder participation • …governance structure • …role of evaluators • …timing • …budget • …and others! Seite 9

  10. 4. Towards influential evaluation management (3) • Approaches and tools , such as • … various evaluation designs and methodologies • … advisory groups • … dialogue and communication formats • … and many others more! Seite 10

  11. C. Towards influential evaluation management (4) • stakeholder interests • political processes Context factors • institutional processes • organisational culture • governance structure • stakeholder participation Managerial decisions • role of evaluators • timing and budget • design and methodology • advisory groups Approaches and tools • communication formats Seite 11

  12. Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit! Thank you for your attention! Seite 12

Recommend


More recommend


Explore More Topics

Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.