Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4D Ising and 4 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

marginal triviality of the scaling limits
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4D Ising and 4 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4D Ising and 4 4 models Michael Aizenman Princeton Univ. Talk based on a joint work with Hugo Duminil-Copin. Quantissima in the Serenissima Venice, 22 Aug. 2019. 1 /10 Different


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Marginal triviality of the scaling limits

  • f critical 4D Ising and φ4

4 models

Michael Aizenman

Princeton Univ. Talk based on a joint work with Hugo Duminil-Copin. Quantissima in the Serenissima Venice, 22 Aug. 2019.

1 /10

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Different perspectives and a common statement

Continuum field theories with local interaction are of interest from a number

  • f perspectives:
  • 1. Field theory: This concept plays a basic role in the physics discourse,

ranging from quantum field theory to condensed matter physics. Field theory’s mathematical formulation poses difficulties which so far have been only partially addressed. Beyond Gaussian fields, which exist in any dimension, “non-trivial” field theories have been constructed over R2 and R3. However it was also proved that the approach used there does not yield the desired result for d > 4 dimensions (Aiz. ‘81, Fröchlich ‘82). Partial result have indicated that the same may hold true for the critical dimension d = 4, however a sweeping statement such as proved for d > 4 has remained reminded open. In this work we address this case.

2 /10

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 2. Functional integration – the Euclidean version of the above challenge.

Make sense of probability measures on the space of distributions over Rd, of the form F(φ) =

  • F(φ)e−
  • Rd λ(P(φ(u))+J|∇φ|2(u) du

x∈Rd

dφ(x)/Norm with P(φ) a polynomial, of which the lowest order even deviation from the trivial case would be P(φ) = λφ(u)4 + Bφ2 (with B possibly negative). One can spot a number of problems with this informal expression. Partially successful attempts at their resolution has been the focus of substantial body of work, employing different means (regularizing cutoffs, scale decomposition, renormalization group flows, the theory or regularity structures, etc.), with results like those mentioned above. Beyond one dimension such measures are not support on continuous

  • functions. Basic measurable quantities are functionals

Tg(φ) :=

  • Rd g(x)φ(x) dx ,

associated with g ∈ C0(Rd). Expectation values of products take the form:

  • n
  • j=1

Tgj (φ) =

  • Rn dx1...dxn Sn(x1, ..., xn)

n

  • j=1

g(xj) with the correlation functions Sn(x1, ..., xn), a.k.a the field theory’s Schwinger functions.

3 /10

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The correlation functions encode properties of the field such as translation invariance, reflections positivity, and various characteristic exponents. In the cases under considerations here odd correlation functions vanish, and S2(0, x) is locally integrable. The variables Tg(φ) are then jointly Gaussian (of zero mean) and variance readable from S2(x1, x2) if and only if the field’s correlation functions satisfy Wick’s law: Sn(x1, ...x2n) =

  • Π

n

  • j=1

S2(xΠ(2j−1), xΠ(2j)) := Gn[S2](x1, ...x2n) the sum being over pairing permutations. Such field theories are colloquially referred to as trivial; their n point functions are given by a simple functional of two point function, and a relatively simple admissibility test is required of S2. As mentioned above the challenge to construct non-trivial examples was met in dimensions d < 4. For d > 4 we have negative results (which Alan Sokal termed “deconstructive field theory”).

4 /10

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • J. Glimm and A. Jaffe, Positivity of the φ4

3 hamiltonian., Forts. der Physik ‘73.

  • F. Guerra, L. Rosen and B. Simon, The P(φ)2 Euclidean Quantum Field

Theory as Classical Statistical Mechanics, Ann. Math. ‘75.

  • M. Aizenman Proof of the Triviality of φ4

d Field Theory and Some Mean-Field

Features of Ising Models for d > 4, PRL ‘81.

  • M. Aiz., Geometric analysis of ϕ4 fields and Ising models. I, II, CMP ‘82.
  • J. Fröhlich, On the triviality of λφ4

d theories and the approach to the critical

point in d >

(−)4 dimensions, Nuc. Phys. ‘82.

  • D. Brydges, J. Fröhlich, and T. Spencer, The random walk representation of

classical spin systems and correlation inequalities, CMP ‘82.

  • C. Gawedzki, A. Kupiainen, Massless lattice φ4

4 theory: Rigorous control of a

renormalizable asymptotically free model, CMP ‘85.

  • H. Tasaki and T. Hara, A rigorous control of logarithmic corrections in

four-dimensional φ4 spin systems, JSP ‘87.

  • R. Bauerschmidt, D.C. Brydges, and G. Slade, Scaling limits and critical

behavior of the 4-dimensional n-component |φ4| spin model, JSP ‘14. Note: the papers in this list addressing φ4

4 focused on weakly non-quadratic

interactions.

5 /10

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Statistical mechanics: Euclidean field theory is of relevance for the theory of critical phenomena. A guiding example is provided by the Ising model on Zd, with ( J > 0) H(σ) = J

  • {u,v}; |u−v|=1

|σu − σv|2/2 − h

  • x

σx . The system’s Gibbs equilibrium states are probability measures defined by F(σ) =

  • σ

F(σ)e−βH(σ/Norm . For any β = βc: σx1; σx2β := σx1σx2 − σx1 σx2 ≤ A(β) e|x1−x2|/ξ(β) However, at βc that changes to power-law decay. It is then of interest to consider τg;ℓ,β(σ) := α(ℓ)

  • u∈Zd

g

  • u/ℓ
  • σu

with g ∈ C0(Rd), and α(ℓ) selected so that the second moments are bounded above and below, uniformly in ℓ < ∞. Then

  • n
  • j=1

τgj ;ℓ,β(σ) =

  • dx1...dxn Sn;ℓ,β(x1, ..., xn)

n

  • j=1

g(xj) [1 + o(1 ℓ )] with the rescaled correlation functions Sn;ℓ,β(x1, ..., xn) = α(ℓ)n

n

  • j=1

σ⌊xj ℓ⌋β .

6 /10

slide-7
SLIDE 7

For the Ising model we proof that in d = 4 dimensions, in the limit ℓ → ∞ the above variables are jointly Gaussian, in the sense that their correlation functions asymptotically obey Wick’s law: Theorem: There exists Cn > 0 such that for every x1, . . . , x2n ∈ R4,

  • Sℓ,βc(x1, . . . , x2n) −
  • π pairing

Sℓ,βc(xπ(1), xπ(2)) · · · Sℓ,βc(xπ(2n−1), xπ(2n))

Cn (log L)c Sℓ,βc(x1, . . . , x2n). A similar bound holds for Φd

4 functional intervals with lattice cutoff, uniformly

in the model’s bare parameters.

7 /10

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The proof for d > 4 relied heavily on: Proposition 1 The infrared bound (GJ ‘73, FSS ‘76): for the model on Zd σ0σxβc ≤ Cd/|x|d−2 with Cd < ∞ for any d > 2. Proposition 2 The tree diagram bound (Aiz. ‘82) For the Ising model on any finite graph, and any β ≥ 0 u(β)

4 (x1, x2, x3, x4) := σx1σx2σx3σx4−

[σx1σx2 σx3σx4 + σx1σx3 σx2σx4 + σx1σx4 σx2σx3] satisfies |u4(x, y, z, t)| ≤ 2

  • u

σxσu σyσu σzσu σtσu For a heuristic explanation of the criticality of d = 4 notice that, at a somewhat sloppy level of estimate, for a quadruple of points at distances of

  • rder L the bound on u4 differs from the full 4-point function σx1σx2σx3σx4 by:

i) a volume factor of Ld, due to the summation over U, ii) two pair correlations which by the infrared bound do to exceed C/Ld−2. This suggests that |U(β)

4

(x1, x2, x3, x4)| ≤ 1 Ld−4 S(β)

4 (x1, x2, x3, x4)

where

1 Ld−4 = Ld−4 L2(d−2) 8 /10

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The above indicates that in d > 4 dimensions, in the limit L → ∞, Wick’s relation holds at least for the 4-point function. The implication then extends to all orders through the following general result. Proposition 3 Bounds for higher moments (Aiz. ‘82): For the Ising model on any finite graph 0 ≤ − [Sn;ℓ,β(x1, ..., xn) − Gn[S2;ℓ,β](x1, ..., xn)] ≤ 3 2

  • 1≤i<j<k<l≤n

Sn;ℓ,β(x1, .,✚ xi, .,✓ xj, .,✚

xk, .,✚ xl, . . . xn) |U4(xi, Xj, xk, xl)| with Gn[S2](x1, ...x2n) :=

  • Π

n

  • j=1

S2(xΠ(2j−1), xΠ(2j)) . The new result which enables to extend the triviality of the scaling limit to d = 4 is based on an improvement of the tree diagram bound by the factor C/[log L]c. This is accomplished through a version of multi-scale analysis. For further discussion we move to the board

9 /10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thank you for your attention.

10 /10