May 2017 AGM PRESENTATION Anthony (Tony) Makuch, President & CEO
KLGOLD.COM TSX: KL OTCQX: KLGDF
TIER ONE GOLD PRODUCTION | DISTRICT SCALE EXPLORATION | VALUATION UPSIDE
1
May 2017 AGM PRESENTATION Anthony (Tony) Makuch, President & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
KLGOLD.COM TSX: KL OTCQX: KLGDF May 2017 AGM PRESENTATION Anthony (Tony) Makuch, President & CEO TIER ONE GOLD PRODUCTION | DISTRICT SCALE EXPLORATION | VALUATION UPSIDE 1 KLGOLD.COM FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS TSX:KL
1
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Operating cash cost per ounce sold, all-in sustaining costs per ounce sold, average realized gold price per ounce and working capital are Non-GAAP measures. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but do not have any standardized meaning, and are considered Non-GAAP measures. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS" or "GAAP"), certain investors use such Non-GAAP measures to evaluate the Company's performance and ability to generate cash
reconciliation of operating costs per ounce and AISC per ounce to total operating costs for the most recent reporting period, the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2016, is set out on the Company's MD&A for the period ended March 31, 2017 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and available on the Company’s website at www.klgold.com.
This presentation contains statements which constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements regarding the plans, intentions, beliefs and current expectations of Kirkland Lake Gold with respect to future business activities and operating performance. Forward-looking information is often identified by the words “may”, “would”, “could”, “should”, “will”, “intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect” or similar expressions and include information regarding: (i) the amount of future production over any period; (ii) assumptions relating to revenues, operating cash flow and other revenue metrics set out in the Company's disclosure materials; and (iii) future exploration plans (iv) the temporary suspension of operations at the Cosmo Mine and the anticipated effects thereof . Investors are cautioned that forward-looking information is not based on historical facts but instead reflect KL Gold’s management’s expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the statements are made. Although Kirkland Lake Gold believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, such information involves risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on such information, as unknown or unpredictable factors could have material adverse effects on future results, performance or achievements of the combined company. Among the key factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information are the following: the ability
anticipated; the potential impact on exploration activities; the potential impact on relationships, including with regulatory bodies, employees, suppliers, customers and competitors; the re-rating potential following the consummation of the merger; changes in general economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets; changes in applicable laws; and compliance with extensive government regulation. This forward-looking information may be affected by risks and uncertainties in the business of Kirkland Lake Gold and market conditions. This information is qualified in its entirety by cautionary statements and risk factor disclosure contained in filings made by Kirkland Lake Gold , including Kirkland Lake Gold’s annual information form, financial statements and related MD&A for the first quarter ended March 31, 2017 and their interim financial reports and related MD&A for the period ended March 31, 2017 filed with the securities regulatory authorities in certain provinces of Canada and available at www.sedar.com. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should assumptions underlying the forward-looking information prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as intended, planned, anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. Although Kirkland Lake Gold has attempted to identify important risks, uncertainties and factors which could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be others that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Kirkland Lake Gold does not intend, and do not assume any obligation, to update this forward-looking information except as otherwise required by applicable law.
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
1.Refer to Slide 2 “Forward Looking Information. 2. See Kirkland Lake Gold News Release dated April 12, 2017 for additional details. 3 Source: Company filings, FactSet and available equity research at April 28, 2017. Production and Cash Flow are broker consensus averages exclude Kirkland Lake
1
3
5.6 8.6
KL Gold Peer Average
$2,536 $4,000
KL Gold Peer Average
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
4
Below guidance of $1,000 - $1,050 Below guidance of $600 - $650
(1) Full Year 2016 results include the results of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (“former Kirkland Lake”) operations for the full year; the results of the Newmarket operations for December 2016, being the period following the completion of the business combination between the former Kirkland Lake and Newmarket; and the results of the St Andrew operations for the period starting on January 26, 2016, being the period following the completion of the acquisition of St Andrew by former Kirkland Lake. (2) Non GAAP Measures Operating cash cost per ounce sold, all-in sustaining costs per ounce sold, average realized gold price per ounce, working capital and free cash flow are Non-GAAP measures. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but do not have any standardized meaning, and are considered Non-GAAP measures. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS” or “GAAP”), certain investors use such Non-GAAP measures to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, they are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. A reconciliation of operating cost per ounce and AISC per ounce to total operating costs for the most recent reporting period, the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and the eight months ended December 31, 2015, is set out on the Company’s MD&A for the period ended December 31, 2016 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and at www.klgold.com. Please refer to the “Forward Looking Statements”
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
5
2 2 2 , 3
(1) Full Year 2016 results include the results of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (“former Kirkland Lake”) operations for the full year; the results of the Newmarket operations for December 2016, being the period following the completion of the business combination between the former Kirkland Lake and Newmarket; and the results of the St Andrew operations for the period starting
(2) Non GAAP Measures Operating cash cost per ounce sold, all-in sustaining costs per ounce sold, average realized gold price per ounce, working capital and free cash flow are Non-GAAP measures. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but do not have any standardized meaning, and are considered Non-GAAP measures. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS” or “GAAP”), certain investors use such Non-GAAP measures to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, they are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation
December 31, 2016 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and at www.klgold.com. Please refer to the “Forward Looking Statements” on page 61. (3) Adjusted net earnings (and adjusted basic share) excludes the items that do not reflect the underlying operations of the Company, including the transaction costs associated with the acquisition of Newmarket and the business combination with St Andrew, as well as one time severance costs associated with the transition of Stawell to care and maintenance.
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
1.Refer to Slide 2 “Forward Looking Information revised 2017 estimated production guidance 530,000 – 570,000 ounces . 2. See Kirkland Lake Gold News Release dated May 4, 2017 for additional details. 3. Refer to appendix for NI 43-101 Disclosure and News Release dated March 28, 2017 for additional year-end 2016 Mineral Reserve and Resource details 3. See Non-GAAP Measures sections in forward looking statements; Operating Cash Costs per ounce and AISC per ounce reflect an average USD to CAD exchange rate of 1.35 and a USD to AUD exchange rate of 1.325, for additional detail see Kirkland Lake Gold Press release dated March 29, 2017 for additional detail.4.Cash position as at March 31, 2017 5. Payable on July 14, 2017 to shareholders of record on June 30, 2017
1
6
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
7
1) See Non-GAAP Measures sections in forward looking statements; 2) Operating Cash Costs per ounce and AISC per ounce reflect an average USD to CAD exchange rate of 1.35 and a USD to AUD exchange rate of 1.325. 3. See Kirkland Lake Gold News release dated May 4 2017
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
8
100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000
Canadian Operations Australian Operations
50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 600,000
Consolidated Q1/17 Production
1.Pro forma information operating results from: (i) the former Newmarket Gold Inc. (“Newmarket”) assets for the entire 12-month period ended December 31, 2016 including the period from January 1, 2016 to November 29, 2016 prior to the merger with Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (“KLG”) on November 30, 2016 (See Newmarket Press Release dated November 3, 2016); and (ii) the Holt Mine Complex for the entire 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, including the period of January 1, 2016 to January 25, 2016 prior to the acquisition of St Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“SAS”) by KLG on January 26, 2016 (See KLG press release dated May 12, 2016). See Press Releases dated January 9, 2017 and February 27, 2017 filed on the SEDAR profile of the Company
cost per ounce2 of $571, below the the guidance of US$600- $650
guidance of US$1,000-1,050 On track to meet 2017 guidance of
1 1
(Guidance of 270k – 290k oz) (Guidance of 225k – 235k oz)
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
9
1 Cash position as at March 31, 2017, see News Release dated April 12, 2017 2 Non-GAAP measures, refer to slide 2 “Cautionary Language”, Canadian: US Dollar exchange $0.7229
(April 17, 2017)
(April 17, 2017)
Quarterly dividend of C$0.01 per common share
Payable on July 14, 2017 to shareholders of record on June 30, 2017
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Costs per ounce and AISC per ounce reflect an average USD to CAD exchange rate of 1.35 and a USD to AUD exchange rate of 1.325, Full Year 2016 Operating Costs and All-In Sustaining Costs as reported March 29, 2017 10
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
11
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 55,000
$1,003 $959 $834 $782
$644 $546 $421 $514
detail reporting Q1 2017 operating and AISC results
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
12
has been in production for + 100 years
camps in the world
produced to date, from seven mines
former producing high grade mines with historical production of ~22 Moz’s of gold
South Mine Complex Gold Deposit
SMC
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
See News Releases dated January 19, 2016 and November 7, 2016 filed on the sedar profile of Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd on www.sedar.com
13
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
14
4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0
20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000
2016 reporting Q4 2016 operating and AISC see slide 2 forward looking information regarding non gap measures. 3. Resources are inclusive of Reserves – refer to slide 41.
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
15
Harrier Drill Drive
12.5 g/t Au over 2.4m 12.75 g/t Au over 4.5m
Lower Phoenix
Drill Targets Harrier Decline Harrier
4.4 g/t Au over 6.1m 6.5 g/t Au over 25m 9.3 g/t Au over 3.3m 9.2 g/t Au
7.3 g/t Au
6.2 g/t Au over 1.9m
22.1 g/t Au over 3.3m
First recorded visible gold from Harrier 16.6 g/t Au
11.99 g/t Au over 3.4m 14.25 g/t Au over 3.6m 11.1 g/t Au over 4.9m 12.8 g/t Au over 8.5m 112 g/t Au over 11.9m 501 g/t Au over 4.5m 386 g/t Au over 3.4m 16.4 g/t Au over 16.5m 73.2 g/t Au over 7.8m 64.80 g/t Au over 4.3m (VG) 46.2 g/t Au
283 g/t Au over 2.8m 13.4 g/t Au over 3.8m 75.7 g/t Au over 5.4m 194 g/t Au over 3.1m 550 g/t Au over 3.5m 129 g/t Au
645 g/t Au
1,429 g/t Au over 4.97m
Mineral Resources, Reserves and mining as at December 31, 2016
Lower Phoenix North with grade increasing at depth on all zones
All intercepts presented are estimated true width
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
16
Harrier Drill Drive
= Visible gold elevation depth, increasing with depth Current Mining Front
BLOCK A BLOCK C BLOCK D BLOCK B Lower Phoenix Phoenix
Fosterville underground Reserve of 490,000 ounces at 9.8 g/t Au (1,560,000 tonnes) with Measured and Indicated resources from the high grade Phoenix and Lower Phoenix where Fosterville is currently being mined of of 1.08 million ounces grading 10.1 g/t Au (3,310,000 tonnes) as of Dec 20162
With additional drilling success blocks A,B,C and D are targeted to add +5 years of additional mine life on top of current reserves and resources (Block B drilling underway testing 1000 metres down plunge from current resources/reserves)
Mill Capacity +850k tpa, currently at ~700k tpa. opportunity to open additional mining fronts (three total) in Block A and Block D
Additionally there are over 20 kilometers of potential gold bearing structures on the 505km2
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
17
* Refer to appendix NI 43-101 technical disclosure, technical reports filed on sedar March 30, 2017 and Year-end 2016 Resource and Reserve News release filed March 28, 2017
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
18
1) See Non-GAAP Measures sections in forward looking statements; 2) Operating Cash Costs per ounce and AISC per ounce reflect an average USD to CAD exchange rate of 1.35 and a USD to AUD exchange rate of 1.325. Prior Foreign exchange guidance on Operating Cash Costs per ounce and AISC per ounce reflect an average USD to CAD exchange rate of 1.28 and a USD to AUD exchange rate of 1.28 3. See Non-GAAP Measures sections in forward looking statements
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
19
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
21 Source: Company filings, FactSet, Bloomberg, and available equity research, market data as of April 28, 2017 1. NAV, Production, and Cash Flow based on broker consensus; Averages exclude Kirkland Lake
$4,876 $4,802 $4,628 $4,271 $3,943 $3,557 $3,506 $3,462 $3,416 $2,997 $2,536 Guyana Alamos Torex Detour Richmont Regis New Gold OceanaGold Northern Star Klondex Kirkland Lake
Peer Avg. US$3,946/oz
13.0x 10.4x 9.0x 8.6x 8.3x 7.7x 7.6x 6.9x 5.8x 5.6x 5.0x Alamos Guyana Richmont Detour Klondex Regis Torex Northern Star New Gold Kirkland Lake OceanaGold
Peer Avg. 8.2x
1.23x 1.22x 1.04x 1.02x 1.01x 0.98x 0.97x 0.93x 0.90x 0.89x 0.83x Regis OceanaGold Northern Star Kirkland Lake New Gold Klondex Guyana Richmont Torex Alamos Detour
Peer Avg. 1.00x
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
22
Firm Anonymous GMP Barclays CIBC Merrill TD RBC ITG Instinet Shares Traded 9.6 million 4.9 million 4.6 million 4.5 million 2.7 million 2.4 million 2.2 million 1.6 million 1.3 million
Opinions estimates or forecasts regarding Kirkland Lake Gold performance made by these analysts are theirs alone and do not represent the opinions estimates or forecasts of the Company or its management.
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
23
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Q4/16 Canadian Operating Results Tonnes Milled Grade (g/t Au) Recovery (%) Production (oz) MACASSA MINE COMPLEX1 102,289 16.3 97.6 52,318 HOLT MINE 113,499 4.6 94.5 15,761 HOLLOWAY MINE 65,215 5.4 87.3 9,825 TAYLOR MINE 48,254 6.7 96.1 10,048
24
1.Pro forma information operating results from: (i) the former Newmarket Gold Inc. (“Newmarket”) assets for the entire 12-month period ended December 31, 2016 including the period from January 1, 2016 to November 29, 2016 prior to the merger with Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (“KLG”) on November 30, 2016KLG (See Newmarket Press Release dated November 3, 2016); and (ii) the Holt Mine Complex for the entire 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, including the period of January 1, 2016 to January 25, 2016 prior to the acquisition of St Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“SAS”) by KLG on January 26, 2016 (See News Release dated May 12, 2016). See News Release dated January 9, 2017 filed on the SEDAR profile of the Company at www.sedar.com.
and pending successful exploration programs being completed (See News Release dated December 12, 2016).
Q1/17 Canadian Operating Results Tonnes Milled Grade (g/t Au) Recovery (%) Production (oz) MACASSA MINE 91,460 17.1 97.1 48,723 HOLT MINE 105,629 4.8 94.9 15,318 TAYLOR MINE 63,289 5.6 96.7 10,942 HOLLOWAY MINE 2 2,676 3.5 89.9 267
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Q4/16 Australian Operating Results Tonnes Milled Grade (g/t Au) Recovery (%) Production (ozs)
FOSTERVILLE GOLD MINE 176,242 8.48 92.4 44,406 COSMO GOLD MINE 157,770 2.78 94.5 13,307 STAWELL GOLD MINE 2 172,049 1.49 84.5 6,971 CONSOLIDATED PRODUCTION 64,684
Q1/17 Australian Operating Results Tonnes Milled Grade (g/t Au) Recovery (%) Production (ozs)
FOSTERVILLE GOLD MINE 137,788 11.1 93.7 46,083 COSMO GOLD MINE 120,047 2.5 95.2 9,092 CONSOLIDATED PRODUCTION 55,175
25
1.Pro forma information operating results from: (i) the former Newmarket Gold Inc. (“Newmarket”) assets for the entire 12-month period ended December 31, 2016 including the period from January 1, 2016 to November 29, 2016 prior to the merger with Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (“KLG”) on November 30, 2016 (See Newmarket Press Release dated November 3, 2016); and (ii) the Holt Mine Complex for the entire 12-month period ended December 31, 2016, including the period of January 1, 2016 to January 25, 2016 prior to the acquisition of St Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“SAS”) by KLG on January 26, 2016 (See News release dated May 12, 2016). 2. The Company officially transitioned the Stawell Gold Mines into care and maintenance and in a state of operational readiness to possibly recommence operations with activities focused on exploration programs within the Aurora B discovery (See News Release dated December 12, 2016).
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
26
Management Discussion & Analysis and Financial Statements as at December 31, 2016 available on the companies website www.klgold.com and on www.sedar.com under the companies profile
(In thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 TWO MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 EIGHT MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 2015
Revenue $134,225 $27,860 $406,664 $115,796 Production costs $66,152 $15,399 $198,369 $64,730 Net earnings before taxes $11,194 $1,888 $73,263 $12,802 Net earnings $3,076 $609 $42,107 $5,731 Earnings per share – basic $0.02 $0.01 $0.35 $0.07 Earnings per share – diluted $0.02 $0.01 $0.34 $0.07 Cash flow from operations $65,014 $11,388 $180,928 $39,358 Cash investment on mine development & PPE $23,885 $5,178 $73,694 $26,258 Adjusted net earnings $27,909 $609 $75,282 $5,731 Adjusted net earnings per share $0.19 $0.01 $0.62 $0.07
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 TWO MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 EIGHT MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 2015
Tonnes milled 469,968 62,158 1,304,037 225,729 Grade (g/t Au) 7.5 14.1 7.9 14.4 Recovery (%) 93.6 97.2 95.1 97.1 Gold produced (oz) 106,609 27,604 314,495 102,597 Gold sold (oz) 111,690 25,284 329,489 101,094 Average realized price ($/ oz sold) $1,202 $1,102 $1,234 $1,145 Operating cash cost per ounce ($/ oz sold) $533 $604 $571 $638 AISC ($/ oz sold) $883 $1,006 $923 $970
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Refer to Reserve and Resource Statements in Appendix of this presentation. Refer to Slide 31 “NI 43-101 Disclosure”. 27
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Prior to 2016 the Company’s year end was May 1 to April 30
F2014A F2015A 2016A Cash Costs (US$/oz) $812 $625 $527 AISC (US$/oz) $1,141 $803 $902
Resources are exclusive of Reserves. Refer to Reserve and Resource Statements Slide 31 “NI 43-101 Disclosure”. Refer to Slide 2 “Use of Non-GAAP Measures”.
1 Adjusted to reflect calendar-year production and grade. 1
#3 Shaft #2 Shaft 155,226
28
155,226 175,167
30,000 80,000 130,000 180,000 230,000
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
See press release dated November 3, 2015, as filed on SEDAR
29
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
30
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
31
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
32
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Holt Property Holloway Property
33
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
34
90,676 107,733 127,860 2014A 2015A 2016A
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
35
Tousignant Deposit Zone 6 Zone 4 Mattawasaga Pits Zone 7 Surface
1075m Level 925m Level 435m Level
Current drift development
Zone 4 West Extension
500 m 1 km 2 km 3 km 1 km 1.5 km
Zone 7 Target ZONE 4 TARGET
Cascade Deposit
TOUSIGNANT TARGET
2 surface drills targeting Tousignant West and Cascade Deposit Surface Shaft Bottom (867m)
LIGHTNING DEEP TARGET (down plunge) BLACKTOP TARGET (west extension) HOLLOWAY NORTH TARGET
500 m 1 km 3 km
DEEP THUNDER TARGET (along strike)
Longsection looking North at Holloway Mine
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
36
77,740 63,255 55,765 2014A 2015A 2016A
ETW - Estimated True Width (1) Visible gold present in drill intercept (2) Previously reported intercept - See News Release dated July 22, 2015 (3) Operating results from previous owners (4) 2016 operating costs and AISC refer to the
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
37
Note: For further information on drill results see News Release dated March 6, 2017 at www.klgold.com
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
38
EA us using US$1,200/oz
gol
price and nd AUD:USD 0.77 Pre-Tax NPV5% US$155 million IRR (Pre-tax) 116% After-Tax NPV5% US$105 million Internal Rate of Return (After-tax) 80% Pay Back 1.25 years Pre-Production Capital Cost US$32 million Mine Life 9.5 years Diluted Gold Grade 4.2 g/t gold Gold Recovery (Oxide/Transitional) 85% Gold Recovery (sulphide) 95% LOM Recovered Gold 496,000 ounces Average Annual Production 52,000 ounces LOM Cash Operating Cost US$632
The PEA is preliminary in nature and is based on a number of assumptions that may be changed in the future as additional information becomes available. The PEA includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. The Maud Creek Gold Project PEA Technical Report is available on Sedar and www.newmarketgoldinc.com and was compiled by Peter Fairfield, Principal Consultant (Project Evaluation), BEng (Mining), FAusIMM CP (Mining) of SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd. By virtue of his education, membership to a recognized professional association and relevant work experience, Peter Fairfield is an independent "Qualified Person" as such term is defined in NI 43-101. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. For full details please see press release dated May 16, 2016. Refer to Slide 2 “Forward Looking Information”.
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
39
39,230 36,321 32,204 2014A 2015A YTD2016A
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
40
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
41
PROVEN PROBABLE PROVEN & PROBABLE Tonnes (000’s) Gold Grade (g/t ) Gold Ounces Tonnes (000’s) Gold Grade (g/t ) Gold Ounces Tonnes (000’s) Gold Grade (g/t ) Gold Ounces Macassa
610 16.9 332 2,390 21.8 1,670 3,000 20.8 2,010
Taylor
743 5.4 129 743 5.4 129
Holt
1,450 4.2 194 2,500 4.7 376 3,950 4.5 570
Holloway
57 5.7 10 57 5.7 10
Hislop
176 5.8 33 176 5.8 33
Total Canadian Assets
2,060 8.0 526 5,870 11.8 2,220 7,930 10.8 2,750
Fosterville
896 7.9 229 1,280 10.1 414 2,170 9.2 643
Northern Territory
98 3.0 9 2,310 2.3 168 2,400 2.3 177
Stawell
2,700 1.5 132 2,700 1.5 132
Total Australian Assets
994 7.5 238 6,280 3.5 713 7,280 4.1 952
Total Reserves
3,050 7.8 764 12,200 7.5 2,940 15,200 7.6 3,700
Notes CIM definitions (2014) were followed in the calculation of Mineral Reserves Mineral Reserves were estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,200/oz (C$1,500/oz; A$1,500/oz) Cut-off grades for Canadian Assets were calculated for each stope, including the costs of: mining, milling, General and Administration, royalties and capital expenditures and other modifying factors (e.g. dilution, mining extraction, mill recovery. Cut-off grades for Australian Assets from 0.4 g/t Au to 3.1 g/t Au, depending upon width, mining method and ground conditions; Dilution and mining recovery factors varied by property Mineral Reserves estimates for the Canadian Assets were prepared under the supervision of P. Rocque, P. Eng. Mineral Reserves estimates for the Fosterville property were prepared under the supervision of Ion Hann, FAusIMM. Fosterville CIL Residues are stated as Proven contained ounces. Mill recovery of 25% are planned, based on operating performance. Mineral Reserves estimates for the Northern Territory property were prepared under the supervision of Jason Keily, FAusIMM (CP). Mineral Reserves estimates for the Stawell property were prepared under the supervision of Ian Holland, FAusIMM. Totals may not add exactly due to rounding
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
42
Notes 1) CIMM definitions (2014) were followed in the calculation of Mineral Resource 2) Mineral Resources are reported Exclusive of Mineral Reserves 3) Mineral Resource estimates were prepared under the supervision of D. Cater, P. Geo. Vice President Exploration Canada 4) Canadian Assets consist of Macassa, Holt, Taylor, Holloway, Canamax, Ludgate, Hislop, Aquarius 5) Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,200/oz (C$1,500/oz) 6) Mineral Resources were estimated using a 8.57 g/t cut-off grade for Macassa, a 2.9 g/t cut-off grade for Holt, and a 2.6 g/t cut-off grade for Taylor, a 3.9 g/t cut-off grade (Holloway), a 2.5 g/t cut-off grade for Canamax and Ludgate, a 2.2 g/t cut-off grade for Hislop and 0 g/t cut-off grade for Aquarius 7) Totals may not add up due to rounding
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
43
MEASURED INDICATED MEASURED & INDICATED INFERRED Tonnes (000’s) Gold Grade (g/t) Gold Ounces Tonnes (000’s) Gold Grade (g/t) Gold Ounces Tonnes (000’s) Gold Grade (g/t) Gold Ounces Tonnes (000’s) Gold Grade (g/t) Gold Ounces
Fosterville 2,760 4.8 427 12,600 5.8 2,360 15,300 5.7 2,790 5,400 4.6 792 Northern Territory 2,520 4.2 344 28,200 2.0 1,840 30,700 2.2 2,180 15,140 2.3 1,110 Stawell 81 3.7 10 3,620 2.0 236 3,700 2.1 246 1,130 2.9 104 Totals 5,360 4.5 781 44,400 3.1 4,440 49,700 3.3 5,220 21,700 2.9 2,000
Notes
1) CIM definitions (2014) were followed in the estimation of Mineral Resource. 2) Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,200/oz (A$1,500/oz) 3) Mineral Resources for the Australian assets are reported Inclusive of Mineral Reserves. 4) Mineral Resources at Fosterville were estimated using cut-off grades of 0.7 g/t Au for oxide and 1.0 g/t Au for sulfide mineralization to potentially open-pitable depths of approximately 100m, below which a cut-off grade of 3.0 g/t Au was used. 5) Carbon-In-Leach Residues at Fosterville is stated as contained ounces – 25% recovery is expected based on operating performances. 6) Mineral Resources in the Northern Territory were estimated using a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au for potentially open-pitable mineralization and cut-offs of 1.5 to 2.0g/t Au for underground mineralization. 7) Mineral Resources at the Stawell property were estimated using a 0.35g/t Au cut-off grade for potentially open-pitable mineralization and a range of cut-offs (2.0 to 2.3 g/t Au) for underground mineralization. 8) Mineral Resource estimates for the Fosterville property were prepared under the supervision of Troy Fuller, MAIG. 9) Mineral Resource estimates for the Northern Territory properties, excluding the Maud Creek Deposit, were prepared under the supervision of Mark Edwards, FAusIMM (CP). 10) Mineral Resource estimates for the Maud Creek property in the Northern Territory, was prepared by Danny Kentwell, FAusIMM. 11) Mineral Resource estimates for the Stawell property were prepared under the supervision of John Winterbottom, MAIG. 12) Totals may not add up due to rounding.
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
44
Non GAAP Measures Operating cash cost per ounce sold, all-in sustaining costs per ounce sold, average realized gold price per ounce and working capital are Non-GAAP measures. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but do not have any standardized meaning, and are considered Non-GAAP measures. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS" or "GAAP"), certain investors use such Non-GAAP measures to evaluate the Company's performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, they are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. A reconciliation of operating cost per ounce and AISC per ounce to total operating costs for the most recent reporting period, the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and the eight months ended December 31, 2015, is set out on the Company's MD&A for the period ended December 31, 2016 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and at www.klgold.com. Operating Cash Cost per Ounce Sold (“OCC”) Operating cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration, but exclude royalty expenses, depreciation and depletion, share based payment expenses and reclamation costs. Operating cost per ounce is based on ounces sold and is calculated by dividing operating cash costs by gold ounces sold. All-In Sustaining Costs per Ounce Sold (“AISC”) While there is no standardized meaning across the industry for this measure, the Company's definition conforms to the definition of all-in sustaining costs as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance note dated June 27,
Corporate expenses include general and administrative expenses, net of transaction related costs, severance expenses for management changes and interest income and certain other income. AISC excludes growth capital, reclamation cost accretion not related to current operations, interest expense, debt repayment and taxes. The costs included in the calculation of all-in sustaining costs are divided by gold ounces sold. Average Realized Price per Ounce Sold Average realized price per ounce sold is a Non-GAAP measure. In the gold mining industry, average realized price per ounce sold is a common performance measures but does not have any standardized meaning. The most directly comparable measure prepared in accordance with GAAP is revenue from gold sales. Average realized price per ounce sold should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measure is intended to assist readers in evaluating the total revenues realized in a period from current operations. Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow per share In the gold mining industry, free cash flow and free cash per share are common performance measures with no standardized meaning. Free cash flow is calculated by deducting capital cash spending (capital expenditures for the period, net of expenditures paid through finance leases) from cash flows from operations; free cash flow per share is calculated by dividing free cash flow for the period by the weighted average number of outstanding shares for that period. The Company discloses free cash flow and free cash flow per share as it believes the measures provide valuable assistance to investors and analysts in evaluating the Company’s ability to generate cash flow. The most directly comparable measure prepared in accordance with GAAP is cash flows generated from operations. Adjusted Net Earnings (Loss) and Adjusted Net Earnings (Loss) per Share Adjusted net earnings (loss) and adjusted net earnings (loss) per share are used by management and investors to measure the underlying operating performance of the Company. Presenting these measures from period to period helps management and investors evaluate earnings trends more readily in comparison with results from prior periods. Adjusted net earnings (loss) is defined as net earnings (loss) adjusted to exclude specific items that are significant, but not reflective of the underlying operations of the Company, including transaction costs, executive severance payments, and severance costs associated with transitioning the Stawell Gold Mine and Holloway Mine to care and maintenance. Adjusted basic net earnings (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of loss per share as determined under IFRS. Working Capital In the gold mining industry, working capital is a common performance measures but does not have any standardized meaning. The most directly comparable measure prepared in accordance with GAAP is current assets and current liabilities. Working capital is calculated by deducting current liabilities from current assets. Working capital should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measure is intended to assist readers in evaluating Company’s liquidity. EBITDA As a performance measure, EBITDA is an indicator of the Company’s ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA is calculated as Earnings Before Tax plus interest expense plus depreciation and amortization expense. EBITDA gauges a Company’s operating profitability, meaning earnings it generates in the normal course of doing business, without capital expenditures and financing costs.
Qualified Persons
Pierre Rocque, P.Eng., Vice President, Technical Services is a “qualified person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in this Presentation.
KLGOLD.COM TSX:KL
Kirkland Lake Gold Qualified Person and QA/QC All production information and other scientific and technical information in this presentation with respect to Kirkland Lake Gold and its assets were prepared in accordance with the standards
verified and compiled by Kirkland Lake Gold’s mining staff under the supervision of, Pierre Rocque P. Eng., Kirkland Lake Gold’s Vice President, Technical Services. The exploration programs across Kirkland Lake Gold’s land holdings in Kirkland Lake were prepared, reviewed, verified and compiled by Kirkland Lake Gold’s geological staff under the supervision of Doug Cater, P.Geo., the Company’s Vice President of Exploration, Canadian Operations. All reserve and resource estimates for the Kirkland Lake Properties as at December 31, 2014 have been audited and verified, and the technical disclosure has been approved, by Kirkland Lake Gold’s independent reserve and resource engineer, Glenn R. Clark, P. Eng., of Glenn R. Clark & Associates Limited. Mr. Clark is a ‘qualified person’ under NI 43-101. The QP’s for the mineral reserves and resources outlined under the PDFZ Properties are Doug Cater, P. Geo, and,Pierre Rocque P. Eng., the Vice President of Technical Services respectively. Sample preparation, analytical techniques, laboratories used and quality assurance-quality control protocols used during the exploration drilling programs are done consistent with industry standards and independent certified assay labs.
REFER TO KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM DATED MARCH 30, 2017, AVAILABLE ON SEDAR (www.sedar.com) FOR COMPLETE NI 43-101 NOTES AND DISCLOSURE PERTAINING TO THE RESOURCE AND RESERVE STATEMENTS QUOTED HEREIN. All updated NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORTS IN SUPPORT OF THE COMPANY’S NEWS RELEASES ISSUED ON MARCH 30, 2017, ENTITLED “KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INCREASES MINERAL RESERVES AT FLAGSHIP MACASSA MINE BY 37% AND FOSTERVILLE MINE BY 66%” WILL BE FILED ON MARCH 30, 2017 ON SEDAR AT WWW.SEDAR.COM
Qualified Persons Pierre Rocque, P.Eng., Vice President, Technical Services is a "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved disclosure of the Mineral Reserves technical information and data for all Kirkland Lake Gold assets in this News Release. Simon Hitchman, FAusIMM (CP), MAIG, Principal Geologist, is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the Mineral Resources technical information and data from the Australian Assets included in this News Release. Doug Cater, P. Geo Vice President, Exploration, Canada is a "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved disclosure of the Mineral Resources technical information and data for the Canadian Assets included in this News Release.
45
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors - Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates
All resource and reserve estimates included in this news release or documents referenced in this news release have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the "CIM") - CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended (the "CIM Standards"). NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators, which established standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. The terms "mineral reserve", "proven mineral reserve" and "probable mineral reserve" are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101 and the CIM Standards. These definitions differ materially from the definitions in SEC Industry Guide 7 ("SEC Industry Guide 7") under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act. In addition, the terms "mineral resource", "measured mineral resource", "indicated mineral resource" and "inferred mineral resource" are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101 and the CIM Standards; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. "Inferred mineral resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in very limited circumstances. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of a mineral resource exists, will ever be converted into a mineral reserve or is or will ever be economically or legally mineable or recovered.
46