Metabolic programming Part I
COGS 163 Week 6 May 5, 2015 Janet Tung and Miguel Wang
Metabolic programming Part I COGS 163 Week 6 May 5, 2015 Janet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Metabolic programming Part I COGS 163 Week 6 May 5, 2015 Janet Tung and Miguel Wang You are what your mom eats? Does maternal diet matter? What effects does it have? How? When? Are these effects reversible? 2013: 1990:
COGS 163 Week 6 May 5, 2015 Janet Tung and Miguel Wang
www.stateofobesity.org 1990: 10-15% obese 2013: 35% obese Childhood obesity: 17% (tripled since 1980) Diabetes: 9.3% (29 million people)
Maternal obesity: 15-40% Maternal diabetes: 3-10% Gestational diabetes: 7-18 % In humans: offspring of obese, diabetic,
and hyperglycemic mothers
Increased risk of metabolic disorders
www.examiner.com
From Adena and Andrea’s presentation
Differential developmental course than
humans Mouse:
In utero: neuronal cells numbers are
determined
Lactation: formation of functional
neuronal networks, including ontogeny
connections
Offspring 8-12 weeks Maternal Postnatal Maternal Pregestation, Prenatal
NC or HF NC NC HF HF NC HF
“Exposure of mothers to HFD exclusively during the lactation phase exerts the strongest effects on alterations in energy and glucose homeostasis in offspring.”
ARC mRNA expression of POMC, AGRP, NPY: no difference
PVN expression of thyrotropine-releasing hormone (TRH): lower
Hypothalamic mRNA expression of inflammatory markers: no difference
ARC neuron cell numbers: no difference
POMC processing to αMSH: no difference
POMC neuron spontaneous firing rate, resting membrane potential, and synaptic input: no difference
ARC mRNA expression of POMC, AGRP, NPY: no difference
PVN expression of thyrotropine-releasing hormone (TRH): lower
Hypothalamic mRNA expression of inflammatory markers: no difference
ARC neuron cell numbers: no difference
POMC processing to αMSH: no difference
POMC neuron spontaneous firing rate, resting membrane potential, and synaptic input: no difference
α-MSH exerts anorexigenic functions in part by upregulating TRH
“Offspring of undernourished mothers share several metabolic impairments with offspring with
pancreatic parasympathetic activity” But – no detected differences in classical markers for inflammation
PVN – posterior (preautonomic) PVN – anterior (neuroendocrine,
including TRH)
DMH LA
HFD during lactation Increased glucose and insulin in milk Hyperinsulin- emia in
weeks
IR POMC neuron
Body weight: no difference Adiposity: higher in NCD/HFD Leptin levels: higher in NCD/HFD Insulin sensitivity: impaired in NCD/HFD
(insulin tolerance test and HOMA-IR)
No differences Except IR knockout rescues glucose
intolerance
?
POMC insulin receptor knockout during lactation improves insulin signaling What other players? Leptin – role in gestational diet
PVN anterior: no difference PVN posterior: rescue DMH: no difference LA: no difference
PVN anterior: no difference PVN posterior: no difference DMH: no difference LA: no difference
vAChT buttons per islet area: greatly
reduced by NCD/HFD offspring
Rescued by POMC IR knockout Glucose stimulated insulin secretion
decreased in NCD/HFD offspring
Rescued by POMC IR knockout (But impairments not seen with L-
arginine stimulation, GLP-1, or FFA)
No difference in βcell mass or islet size
disorders
(recall mouse cross fostering experiments)
posterior PVN
(leptin, FFAs, et al.)
knockout