+ Michael Bates Michael Furlong Mosaic Network, Inc. QRIS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

michael bates michael furlong mosaic network inc qris
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

+ Michael Bates Michael Furlong Mosaic Network, Inc. QRIS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

+ Michael Bates Michael Furlong Mosaic Network, Inc. QRIS National Meeting July 23, 2014 Denver, Colorado Improve. Perform. Achieve. Kindergarten Student Entrance Profile Improve. Perform. Achieve. + 1. Need and Rationale for School


slide-1
SLIDE 1

+

  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

Kindergarten Student Entrance Profile

Michael Bates Michael Furlong Mosaic Network, Inc.

QRIS National Meeting July 23, 2014 Denver, Colorado

  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.
slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

Agenda

  • 1. Need and Rationale for School

Readiness in QRIS

  • 2. The Kindergarten Student Entrance

Profile (KSEP)

  • a. Context
  • b. Evidence Base
  • c. Data Collection
  • 3. KSEP in QRIS Contexts
  • a. Santa Barbara First 5
  • b. Fresno County
  • 4. Implications and Lessons Learned
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

Goals

n Participants will learn about tools and

procedures for school readiness assessment and their place within broader early childhood QRIS

n Participants will increase their increase

knowledge of approaches be in used to assess school readiness with children from diverse backgrounds

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

Acknowledgements

KSEP Development, Validation, and Application

UCSB—Matt Quirk UCSB—Erika Felix UCSB—Karen Nylund-Gibson First 5 Santa Barbara Santa Maria-Bonita USD First 5 Fresno Fresno County Fresno County Office of Education Central, Clovis, Fresno, and Sanger, School Districts Fresno Area Strive Storyteller Children’s Center Center for School-Based Youth Development

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

+

  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

The Need for School Readiness

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Importance of School Readiness

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

6

Distribution of kindergartners by poverty status and race/ethnicity 2010–2011

Source: ECLS-K, Kindergarten Class of 2010-2011 (National Center for Educational Statistics)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Achievement gap

“. . . half of the achievement gap in fourth grade exists when students walk through the door in kindergarten”

Rumberger & Arellano, 2007, p. 71

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

7

Latino/a students

n

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Gap of 32-million words!

8

Number, Depth, Context Gap starts early

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Developing KEAs

n Operationalization of “school

readiness”

n Use of data n Planning and instruction n Student status at K entry n Systems for reporting and

using data

9

Ongoing state efforts and challenges Universal adoption

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Race to the Top

n Are our children “ready” for

school?

n Which children need additional

educational supports?

n What is the path forward for K

teachers to support children?

n How to provide guidance and

participation of parents?

10

Guiding KEA principles

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+National Research Council

n Match with its intended uses and decisions n Used as intended n High quality psychometric properties n Appropriate for all sociocultural and socioeconomic backgrounds n Within data-based decision making structure n Within a system of planned support and services n Professional development is ongoing n Linked with progress monitoring and case management n Implemented and sustained with fidelity

11

Quality assessment

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

The KSEP: Context

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP principles

n Observation based tool in a

naturalistic setting

n Produces a “rating” not a

“score”

n Sampling key indicators:

physical, social-emotional, and school-ready knowledge

n Screener n Informs follow-up action—linked

with district assessment process

n A test or judgment tool

(no-blame approach)

n An ability measure n A tracking screener n Once-and-out n Perfect predictor n Disconnected from other

assessments/instructional strategies Is Is not

13

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Background information

14

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Social-Emotional items

15

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+School Ready Knowledge items

16

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+1. Seeks adult help when appropriate

Example: Shoes or clothes untied or unbuttoned

n Not Yet

Child doesn’t appear to notice

n Emerging

No talking, child shows teacher button or shoe

n Almost Mastered

Child tries to button, generally asks for teacher “Help”

n Mastered

Child asks specifically, “Tie my shoe,” “Please help me,” “I want to know how to…”

17

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+ 10. Writes own name

n Not Yet

Unable to do

n Emerging

Scribble-write first name with some letter-like forms

n Almost Mastered

Writes first name with letters and some phonetically appropriate letter/sounds (e.g., first letter)

n Mastered

Writes first name phonetically

  • correct. Exact spelling and capital

letters not required

18

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP rating categories

Immediate Follow-up Monthly Monitoring Quarterly Monitoring Ready to Go

19

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP category cut points

n Immediate Follow-up

All students were rated 1 (not yet) or 2 (emerging) on a majority of items

n Monthly Monitor

All students were rated a 3 (almost mastered) on at least 1 item

n Quarterly Monitor

All students were rated as mastering (rating of 4) fewer than 7 items

n Ready to Go

All students were rated as mastering 7 or more items

Based on a longitudinal study of 1,000+ students

20

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

Weeks 1-3

Enter student information

  • n individual KSEP forms

(paper or data portal) Periodically make notes of

  • bservations of

each student

End of Week 4

Complete and record final KSEP ratings for each student

21

Completing the KSEP

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Link KSEP with district assessment

Targeted, early progress monitoring

22

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

The KSEP: Research

Evidence Base 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+How KSEP was developed

Community-district-university partnership

24

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP research

First 5 Santa Santa Barbara in 2000s UCSB and Santa Maria-Bonita School District (SMBSD)

n Ongoing, successive cohorts of

incoming K students in SMBSD

n K-8 district in mostly low SES,

agricultural community of ~100k

n First 5 Santa Barbara County

n Core psychometrics and

covariates

n Predict reading fluency and

academic achievement

n Path modeling n Closing the gap analysis n Profiles of KSEP strengths and

weaknesses

n Linking KSEP profiles to latent

growth trajectories

Initial development KSEP studies

25

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Grade K phonemic awareness skills

Source: Quirk et al. (2011)

26

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

KSEP and Grade 1-2 reading fluency

B B B B B B

J J J J J J H H H H H H

F F F F F F

Ñ Ñ Ñ Ñ Ñ Ñ Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

H H H H H H 1 1 1 1 1

Gr1–F G1–W G1–S G2–F G2–W G2–S 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Average Words per Minute over 2 Probes Benchmark Measurements

B

J 1-3 H 4-6

F

7-9 Ñ 10-12 Ö 13-15

H

16

1

Norm

!

End-Grade 2-Goal

KSEP ITEMS MASTERED Source: Lilles et al. (2009)

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP: Grade K fall 2005 cohort

E-LA CST Grade 2 spring 2008 (N = 1,069)

28

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP: Grade K fall 2006 cohort

E-LA CST Grade 2 spring 2009 (N = 1,052)

29

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+2005 cohort CST English–LA

Percent Proficient or Advanced

30

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+2005 cohort CST mathematics

Percent Proficient or Advanced

31

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Closing the Gap study

12 16 19 21 22 30 25 30 37 40 47 47 43 51 57 72 75 82 83 88 89 102 111 116

26 30 38 50 52 66 61 73 73 92 98 110

24 48 72 96 120 144 Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring

Words Per Minute

Low KSEP , Low WPM High KSEP , High WPM Low KSEP , Catching Up

GRADE 1 GRADE 2

32

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Grade 4 reading words per minute

33

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+CSTs Grade 2

% Proficient + Advanced

34

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP Profiles

n Purpose

n School r eadiness is a

multifaceted construct, likely students have different patterns of strengths and weaknesses

n Profiles can enhance

precision of screening, inform early and/or targeted interventions

n Analysis

n Latent Class Analysis (LCA)

to identify commonly

  • ccurring patterns of

strengths and weaknesses

n Inclusion of predictor

variables to understand who comprises emergent classes

n Odds ratios identifying

characteristics of class membership

Purpose Analysis

35

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

Source: Quirk, Nylund-Gibson, & Furlong (2013)

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Five-Class Readiness Profiles

36

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

Source: Quirk, Nylund-Gibson, & Furlong (2013)

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Mean Number of KSEP Items Mastered

n Balanced High Class 14.0 (Higher Achievement) n Mod SE, Mod Cog

9.4 (Higher Achievement)

n Mod SE, Low Cog

8.2 (Lower Achievement)

n Low SE, Low Cog

3.8 (Lower Achievement)

n Extremely Low

0.9 (Lower Achievement)

Source: Quirk, Nylund-Gibson, & Furlong (2013)

37

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Performance on Grade 2 CST

38

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

Source: Quirk, Nylund-Gibson, & Furlong (2013)

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Profile Results

n Patterns emerged that were consistent with previous research

n Preschool experience + English proficiency differentiate top and

bottom classes

n Extremely Low vs. Balanced High: significantly younger n Extremely Low vs. Balanced High: 50 times less likely to have

preschool experience

n Some KSEP items (e.g., identifying shapes) did not discriminate

between groups

39

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

Source: Quirk, Nylund-Gibson, & Furlong (2013)

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+Takeaways

n The KSEP brief and cost-effective school readiness screener n Has been used universally at the school and district levels n Has shown it can be sustained n Multiple studies demonstrate that the KSEP predicts:

n phonological awareness in mid-kindergarten n reading fluency in Grades 1 and 2 n English language arts and mathematics achievement in Grades 2 through 4

n Additional analyses have introduced that different KSEP rating profiles

may have value in refining how school readiness is related to later

  • utcomes

40

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP research

n Quirk, M., Mayworm, A., Rebelez, J., & Furlong, M. J. (2014). Examining the dimensionality

and measurement invariance of a school readiness screener by gender and parent education

  • levels. Manuscript under review.

n Nylund-Gibson, K., Grimm, R., Quirk, M., & Furlong, M. J. (2014). A latent transition mixture

model using the three-step specification. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 1–16.

n Quirk, M., Rebelez, J., & Furlong, M. J. (2014). Exploring the dimensionality of a brief school

readiness screener for use with Latino/a children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 259–264.

n Quirk, M., Nylund-Gibson, K., & Furlong, M. J. (2013). Exploring patterns of Latino/a

children’s school readiness at kindergarten entry and their relations with grade 2

  • achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 437–449.

n Quirk, M., Nylund-Gibson, & Furlong, M. J., (2012). It isn’t as simple as ready or not: A latent

class analysis of children’s school readiness profiles. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.

n Furlong, M. J., & Quirk, M. (2011). The relative effects of chronological age on Hispanic

students’ school readiness and grade 2 academic achievement. Contemporary School Psychology, 14, 81–92. 41

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP research

n Quirk, M., Furlong, M. J., Lilles, E., Felix, E., & Chin, J. (2011) Preliminary development of a

kindergarten school readiness assessment for Latino students. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 77–102.

n Quirk, M., & Furlong, M. J. (2011) Getting a head start on closing the achievement gap:

universal screening of children’s school readiness at kindergarten entry. California Association of School Psychologists Today, 61, 5–10.

n Lilles, E., Furlong, M. J., Quirk, M., Felix, E., Dominguez, K., & Anderson, M. (2009).

Preliminary development of the kindergarten student entrance profile. California School Psychologist, 14, 71–80.

n Bates, M. P., Greif, J. L., & Furlong, M. F. (2005). School readiness needs of Latino

preschoolers: a focus on parents’ comfort with homeschool collaboration. California School Psychologist, 10, 105–116.

n Pyle, R. P. (2002). Best practices in assessing kindergarten readiness. California School

Psychologist, 7, 63–73.

n Abstracts available from http://www.michaelfurlong.info/KSEP/research/ksep-research/

42

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+

The KSEP: Data collection

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP data portal

7/23/14

KSEP.info

44

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP data portal

KSEP.info

45

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP data portal

KSEP.info

46

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP data portal

KSEP.info

47

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP data portal

Tablet Version

48 Serena Lopez

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • Improve. Perform. Achieve.

+KSEP reports

49

BUILD Conference—July 23, 2014