MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mil it ary oce an t e rminal sunny point joint l and use
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST UDY NEED SOME SORT OF IMAGE ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NG AUGUST 28, 2018 ME E T I NG AGE NDA Study Upda te s Pub lic Me e ting Summa ry


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST UDY

ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NG AUGUST 28, 2018

NEED SOME SORT OF IMAGE

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Study Upda te s
  • Pub lic Me e ting Summa ry
  • Re vie w Co mpa tib ility Ana lysis
  • Se t Upc o ming Me e ting Da te s
  • Ge ne ra l Disc ussio n
  • Adjo urn

ME E T I NG AGE NDA

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ST UDY UPDAT E S

  • Brie fing to MG F

a rme n (SDDC Co mma nde r)

  • Sta ke ho lde r inte rvie w with NC DNCR

re pre se nta tive s:

– Chie f De puty Se c re ta ry – De puty Se c . fo r Arc hive s & Histo ry – Dire c to r o f Histo ric a l Re so urc e s – Dire c to r o f E

a ste rn NC Histo ric Site s

– NC Sta te Pa rks – Cle a n Wa te r Ma na g e me nt T

rust F und

– Offic e o f Sta te Arc ha e o lo g y – NC Aq ua riums

  • I

nte rvie w with c o nsulta nt pre pa ring Brunswic k Co unty E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt Pla n

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PROJE CT SCHE DUL E

Date Meeting

2018

February 23 Project Team Meeting April 11 Project Kickoff, Installation Tour & Committee Meetings May 21-24 Stakeholder Interviews June Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Background Research July 30 Public Meeting – Overview & Research - 1 Day (2 locations) August Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Compatibility Analysis October Advisory Committee Meeting - Review Conflict Resolution Strategies November Policy Committee Meeting – Review Conflict Resolution Strategies December Public Meetings – Interim Findings - 1 Day (2 locations) December Advisory Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations

2019

January Policy Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations February Advisory Committee Meeting – Present Draft Study Documents March Advisory & Policy Committee Meetings – Finalize Study Documents April/May Public Meetings – Final Presentation - 1 Day (2 locations)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

JUL Y 30 PUBL I C ME E T I NGS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

COMPAT I BI L I T Y ANAL YSI S

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Purpo se -b uilt a mmunitio n tra nsshipme nt

te rmina l – SAF

E T Y

  • Ammunitio n is sta g e d te mpo rarily a t the

te rmina l, while wa iting to b e shippe d.

  • Co mpo se d o f thre e g e o g ra phic a lly se pa ra te

a re a s:

– Ma in T

e rmina l: 8,600 a c re s

– Ple a sure I

sla nd Buffe r Zo ne : 2,200 a c re s

– L

e la nd I nte rc ha ng e Ya rd: 650 a c re s

  • Ma in T

e rmina l linke d to L e la nd I nte rc ha ng e b y a 16 mile ra il line .

I NST AL L AT I ON CHARACT E RI ST I CS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE MAIN TERMINAL RAIL CORRIDOR LELAND YARD BUFFER ZONE MOTSU Components

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Prima ry po ints o f po te ntia l c o mpa tib ility

c o nc e rn:

– Ma inta ining use o f the full e xte nt o f E

SQD fo r te mpo ra ry sta g ing , a s we ll a s lo a ding a nd unlo a ding ve sse ls during tra nsshipme nt

  • pe ra tio ns.

– Ma inta ining sa fe a nd e ffic ie nt

tra nspo rta tio n a c c e ss:

  • Hig hwa y
  • Ra il
  • Ma rine

– Ma inta ining minima l le ve ls o f e nviro nme nta l

c o nstra int.

MI SSI ON COMPAT I BI L I T Y

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • E

SQD = E xplo sive Sa fe ty Qua ntity Dista nc e

  • K

F a c to r = Assume d de g re e o f risk use d in c a lc ula ting E SQD.

  • E

xa mple E SQD Arc s:

– Pub lic T

ra ffic Ro ute (PT RD) (K 24/ 30)

– I

nha b ite d Building (I BD) (K 40/ 50)

– K

88

– Ab so lute Sa fe Dista nc e = K

328

  • E

SQD F

  • rmula : D=K

W1/ 3

– D = Dista nc e (ft.) – W = Ne t E

xplo sive We ig ht (lb s.)

E XPL OSI VE S SAF E T Y ZONE S

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • E

SQD Zo ne s a re no t a pplic a b le to munitio ns during the ir tra nspo rta tio n:

– T

ruc k tra ffic o n lo c a l hig hwa ys

– Ra il tra ffic , inc luding in the L

e la nd Ya rd a nd

  • n the Army ra ilro a d

– Ship tra ffic in the Ca pe F

e a r Rive r

  • Onc e o n the T

e rmina l, a mmunitio n is te mpo rarily sta g e d pe r the lic e nse a nd a pplic a b le E SQD a rc s fo r e a c h ho lding a re a .

  • E

SQD zo ne s e xpa nd a nd c o ntra c t a s munitio ns a re te mpo ra rily sta g e d a nd the n shippe d o ut.

E XPL OSI VE S SAF E T Y ZONE S

slide-12
SLIDE 12

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE Inhabited Building Safety Zone

Inhabited Building Distance Arc Blast Easements

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 / DA Pa mphle t 385-64

e sta b lish siting c rite ria fo r c e rta in use s within the I nha b ite d Building Dista nc e (a s we ll a s

  • the r sa fe ty zo ne s).
  • Prima rily fo c use d o n use s typic a lly fo und o n a

milita ry insta lla tio n / a mmunitio n fa c ility.

  • Be st g uida nc e a va ila b le , a nd c a n b e

tra nsla te d to a pply to c ivilia n use s.

I BD COMPAT I BI L I T Y

slide-14
SLIDE 14

DA PAM 385-64 USE T ABL E S

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DA PAM 385-64 USE T ABL E E XAMPL E S

RE CRE AT I ON USE S WAT E R ST ORAGE T ANK S

slide-16
SLIDE 16

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE IBD Non-MOTSU Uses

Non-MOTSU Uses Inhabited Building Distance Arc Blast Easements

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • I

de ntifie d 19 site s / use s / struc ture s within the I nha b ite d Building Dista nc e E SQD a rc .

– 17 pub lic / 2 priva te – 9 o n MOT

SU la nd (e xc lude s USAF Re c . Are a )

– USAF

re c re a tio n a re a is o n US Go ve rnme nt (no t MOT SU la nd) a nd is sub je c t to a se pa ra te c o mpa tib le use a g re e me nt

– 9 within c o mpa tib le use e a se me nts – Use s o n MOT

SU la nd sub je c t to lic e nse s g ra nte d b y the De pa rtme nt o f the Army

I BD USE CHARACT E RI ST I CS

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Pub lic wo rks fa c ilitie s (wa te r / wa ste wa te r)
  • Pub lic pa rk in K

ure Be a c h

  • USAF

Re c re a tio n Are a – no t pa rt o f MOT SU

  • F

AA Jo int Surve illa nc e Syste m Ra da r F a c ility

  • F
  • rt F

ishe r F e rry – la nding , a dmin b uilding , pa rking a re a , e tc .

  • NCWRC Bo a t Ra mp
  • Brunswic k T
  • wn / F
  • rt Ande rso n – histo ric site s

a nd struc ture s, visito rs c e nte r, suppo rt b ldg s.

  • Duke E

ne rg y firing ra ng e

I BD USE CHARACT E RI ST I CS

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Co mplia nc e with Do D / DA use g uida nc e
  • F

re q ue nc y o f use / time o f o c c upa tio n

  • De nsity o f o c c upa tio n
  • Ca n it b e re lo c a te d?
  • I

s it c ritic a l to pub lic sa fe ty?

  • Pub lic vs. priva te
  • E

xisting mitig a tio n me a sure s / a g re e me nts

  • Ab ility to impro ve c o mpa tib ility thro ug h de sig n
  • r o pe ra tio na l c o nside ra tio ns.

I BD COMPAT I BI L I T Y

slide-20
SLIDE 20

GL ASS F RAGME NT AT I ON HAZARDS

Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 E xtra c t

slide-21
SLIDE 21

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE Tall Structure Glass Fragmentation Hazard

Inhabited Building Distance Tall Structures (5+ stories)

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 / DA Pa mphle t 385-64

e sta b lish ide ntic a l “E me rg e nc y Withdra wa l Dista nc e s fo r No ne sse ntia l Pe rso nne l”

  • Dista nc e s a re inte nde d fo r initia l re spo nse to

a n inc ide nt invo lving a mmunitio n/ e xplo sive s.

  • Sub stitute g uida nc e in the a b se nc e o f E

SQD a rc s fo r the ra il line .

  • Applie s to b o th tra nspo rta tio n a nd fa c ilitie s

E ME RGE NCY E VACUAT I ON CRI T E RI A

slide-23
SLIDE 23

E VACUAT I ON DI ST ANCE S

  • Ra ilc a r inc ide nt

e va c ua tio n dista nc e whe n o ve r 500 lb s: 5,000 ft.

  • F

a c ility inc ide nt e va c ua tio n dista nc e whe n o ve r 55,285 lb s: D=105W1/ 3

slide-24
SLIDE 24

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE 5,000 Foot Emergency Withdrawal Distance Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Dista nc e a pplie s to a ny g ive n po int o n the line

whe re a n inc ide nt o c c urs, no t the e ntire line .

  • Withdra wa l dista nc e ma y b e inc re a se d b a se d o n

the spe c ific situa tio n.

  • Are a Cha ra c te ristic s:

– 2010 Po pula tio n: +/ - 11,200 – 2010 Dwe lling Units: +/ - 5,200

  • Co nc e rns:

– So uth Brunswic k Sc ho o l Ca mpus – No rthwe st Distric t Pa rk – US 17 Co mme rc ia l Are a – US 74/ 76 I

ndustria l Are a

RAI L I NCI DE NT WI T HDRAWAL ARE A

slide-26
SLIDE 26

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance: Developed Areas

Developed Land Cover

slide-27
SLIDE 27

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance: Population Density (2010)

High Low Population Density

slide-28
SLIDE 28

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE Facility Emergency Withdrawal Distance (D=105W1/3) Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Dista nc e a pplie s to a ny g ive n fa c ility – do c ks

we re use d a s a n e xa mple .

  • Withdra wa l dista nc e ma y b e inc re a se d b a se d
  • n the spe c ific situa tio n.
  • Are a Cha ra c te ristic s:

– 2010 Po pula tio n: +/ - 14,300 – 2010 Dwe lling Units: +/ - 10,850

  • Co nc e rns

– Brunswic k Nuc le a r Sta tio n – Ple a sure I

sla nd E va c ua tio n Ro ute

– So uth Brunswic k Sc ho o l Ca mpus

F ACI L I T Y I NCI DE NT WI T HDRAWAL ARE A

slide-30
SLIDE 30

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance: Developed Areas

Developed Land Cover

slide-31
SLIDE 31

JL US ST UDY ARE A

MAP GOES HERE Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance: Population Density (2010)

High Low Population Density

slide-32
SLIDE 32

E XAMPL E E VACUAT I ON PL AN

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Ca pe F

e a r ma in shipping c ha nne l a nd I CWW c ha nne l fro m Sno ws Cut (pa ss-b y tra ffic ) within sa fe ty zo ne s.

  • Re g io na l tra ffic c o ng e stio n c o nc e rns
  • F

lo o ding – ma inta ining ro a d a nd ra il a c c e ss

  • Gra de c ro ssing s o n the ra il line to L

e la nd

  • Brunswic k Nuc le a r Sta tio n

OT HE R ARE AS OF POT E NT I AL COMPAT I BI L I T Y CONCE RN

slide-34
SLIDE 34

UPCOMI NG ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NGS

slide-35
SLIDE 35

PROJE CT SCHE DUL E

Date Meeting

2018

February 23 Project Team Meeting April 11 Project Kickoff, Installation Tour & Committee Meetings May 21-24 Stakeholder Interviews June Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Background Research July 30 Public Meeting – Overview & Research - 1 Day (2 locations) August Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Compatibility Analysis October Advisory Committee Meeting - Review Conflict Resolution Strategies November Policy Committee Meeting – Review Conflict Resolution Strategies December Public Meetings – Interim Findings - 1 Day (2 locations) December Advisory Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations

2019

January Policy Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations February Advisory Committee Meeting – Present Draft Study Documents March Advisory & Policy Committee Meetings – Finalize Study Documents April/May Public Meetings – Final Presentation - 1 Day (2 locations)

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Oc to b e r 10: Adviso ry Co mmitte e
  • No ve mb e r 8 o r 13: Po lic y Co mmitte e
  • De c e mb e r 4:

– Adviso ry Co mmitte e Me e ting – Pub lic Me e ting s (Afte rno o n + E

ve ning )

PROPOSE D ME E T I NG DAT E S

slide-37
SLIDE 37

GE NE RAL DI SCUSSI ON

slide-38
SLIDE 38

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST UDY

ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NG AUGUST 28, 2018

NEED SOME SORT OF IMAGE