MISTREAT: MotIon Simulator in proton-therapy TREATment. Paul Morel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mistreat motion simulator in proton therapy treatment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MISTREAT: MotIon Simulator in proton-therapy TREATment. Paul Morel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MISTREAT: MotIon Simulator in proton-therapy TREATment. Paul Morel February, 27 2014 Workshop on Bioinformatics and Stringology 2014 Advisors: Guillaume Blin, PhD (LIGM, Universit e Paris-Est Marne La Vall ee, France) St ephane


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MISTREAT: MotIon Simulator in proton-therapy TREATment.

Paul Morel February, 27 2014 Workshop on Bioinformatics and Stringology 2014

Advisors: Guillaume Blin, PhD (LIGM, Universit´ e Paris-Est Marne La Vall´ ee, France) St´ ephane Vialette, PhD (LIGM, Universit´ e Paris-Est Marne La Vall´ ee, France) Xiaodong Wu, PhD (University of Iowa, USA)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 1 / 34

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Radiation Therapy

Radiation Therapy Cancer treatment relying on radiations aiming at killing cancerous cells. Examples of radiation therapy modalities:

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 2 / 34

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Radiotherapy and Proton-Therapy

Radiotherapy External X-ray (photon) cone beam rotating around a patient. Proton-therapy External beam of protons rotating around a patient, stopping at specific angles to deliver a prescribed treatment.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 3 / 34

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 4 / 34

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 4 / 34

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 4 / 34

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 4 / 34

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 4 / 34

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 4 / 34

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 4 / 34

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Proton-Therapy

Why protons?

Figure 1: Comparison of spinal fields for medullblastoma: photons (upper panels) versus protons (lower panels) [?]

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 5 / 34

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Proton-Therapy

Why not only protons?

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 6 / 34

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Proton-Therapy

Protons - a summary

Water pressure = Proton energy = depth of Bragg Pic Water quantity = Dose = Number of protons Some water drops are deposited on the way = Some dose too Dose is cumulative along the way

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 7 / 34

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Proton-Therapy

Protons - a summary

Water pressure = Proton energy = depth of Bragg Pic Water quantity = Dose = Number of protons Some water drops are deposited on the way = Some dose too Dose is cumulative along the way

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 7 / 34

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proton-Therapy

Protons - a summary

Water pressure = Proton energy = depth of Bragg Pic Water quantity = Dose = Number of protons Some water drops are deposited on the way = Some dose too Dose is cumulative along the way

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 7 / 34

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Proton-Therapy

Protons - a summary

Water pressure = Proton energy = depth of Bragg Pic Water quantity = Dose = Number of protons Some water drops are deposited on the way = Some dose too Dose is cumulative along the way

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 7 / 34

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Proton-Therapy

Protons - a summary

Water pressure = Proton energy = depth of Bragg Pic Water quantity = Dose = Number of protons Some water drops are deposited on the way = Some dose too Dose is cumulative along the way

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 7 / 34

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Proton-Therapy

Pencil Beam Discrete Scanning

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 8 / 34

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Proton-Therapy

Pencil Beam Discrete Scanning

The beam is turned off between the spot positions

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 8 / 34

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Proton-Therapy

Pencil Beam Discrete Scanning

The beam is turned off between the spot positions

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 8 / 34

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 9 / 34

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 10 / 34

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 11 / 34

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Plan: ... Step k: Energy, x coordinate , y coordinate, duration ...

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 12 / 34

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Plan: ... Step k: Energy, x coordinate , y coordinate, duration ...

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 12 / 34

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Plan: ... Step k: Energy, x coordinate , y coordinate, duration ...

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 12 / 34

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Plan: ... Step k: Energy, x coordinate , y coordinate, duration ...

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 12 / 34

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Proton-Therapy Treatment Planning

Treatment Planning

Plan: ... Step k: Energy, x coordinate , y coordinate, duration ...

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 12 / 34

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Proton-Therapy Motion

Sensitivity to motion

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 13 / 34

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Proton-Therapy Motion

Sensitivity to motion

Inter-fraction motions: loss/gain of weight, tumor swelling/shrinkage, bladder, intestinal gas... Intra-fraction motions: breathing, heart beat ... ⇒ Interplay Effect

Figure 2: Results of irradiations without (left) and with (right) motion on a radiographic film.[?]

⇒ Overall treatment degraded

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 14 / 34

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Proton-Therapy Motion

Motion mitigation - Gears

During treatment planning: chose beam direction, use several beams, safety margins. Motion reduction:

Abdominal press Anesthesia Fixation devices Breathing control techniques (Breath-Holding + Gating)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 15 / 34

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Proton-Therapy Motion

Motion mitigation - Gears

During treatment planning: chose beam direction, use several beams, safety margins. Motion reduction:

Abdominal press Anesthesia Fixation devices Breathing control techniques (Breath-Holding + Gating)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 15 / 34

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Proton-Therapy Motion

Motion mitigation - Gears

During treatment planning: chose beam direction, use several beams, safety margins. Motion reduction:

Abdominal press Anesthesia Fixation devices Breathing control techniques (Breath-Holding + Gating)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 15 / 34

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Proton-Therapy Motion

Motion mitigation - Gears

During treatment planning: chose beam direction, use several beams, safety margins. Motion reduction:

Abdominal press Anesthesia Fixation devices Breathing control techniques (Breath-Holding + Gating)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 15 / 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Proton-Therapy Motion

Motion mitigation

Rescanning (for interplay effect):

One energy slice: Iso-Layered Repainting Dose per spot visit is kept under an upper limit. It is characterized by tmax the time limit per spot per visit. Scaled Repainting The prescribed dose of every spots is divided by a constant N (repainting factor:number of repaintings). Applicable to the whole volume.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 16 / 34

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Proton-Therapy Motion

A GPS for the body: Calypso (Varian)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 17 / 34

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Proton-Therapy Motion

A GPS for the body: Calypso (Varian)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 17 / 34

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Proton-Therapy Motion

A GPS for the body: Calypso (Varian)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 17 / 34

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Proton-Therapy Simulator

MISTREAT: MotIon Simulator in proton-therapy TREATment

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 18 / 34

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Proton-Therapy Simulator Overview

Simulator overview

Main objective Quantify the impact of intra-fraction motions for given treatment plans. ⇒ Choice of the most robust plan. Implemented in Python with subroutines is C.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 19 / 34

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Proton-Therapy Simulator Patient Data

Patient data

Patient data: conversion CT # to mass densities and structure set information.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 20 / 34

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Proton-Therapy Simulator Physical Data

Physical Data

Depth dose curve generated from dose distributions in a water tank simulated in RayStation (RaySearch lab.) for energies ranging from 30MeV to 225MeV (step 5MeV). Missing energies: Approximation of the depth-dose curve from computed data.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 21 / 34

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Proton-Therapy Simulator Dose calculation for heterogeneous media

Dose calculation for heterogeneous media

Analytical model[?],[?]: Main functions d(x, y, z) = Sm

w

ρm

w

C(z)O(x, y, z)

C(z) = DDw(rpl(z), E0) ∗ ssd0 + rpl(z) z 2

O(x, y, z) = 1 2π(σtot(z))2 ∗ exp

x2 + y2 2(σtot(z))2

  • Auxiliary functions

σtot(z) =

  • σ2

size + σpt(z)2

σpt(z) = y0(rpl(z))

y0(t) = y0(R) ∗

  • 0.69 ∗

t R 2 + 0.33 t R

  • y0(R) = 0.12085 × 10−4 ∗ R2 + 0.02275 ∗ R

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 22 / 34

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Proton-Therapy Simulator Model evaluation

Model evaluation

Comparison to RayStation results: Single beamlets in water tank, energies from 30MeV to 225MeV: Dose profile of Bragg Peak: Comparison mean (mm) min(mm) max(mm)

  • std. dev.(mm)
  • RaySt. vs Simul.

1.1 2.73 1.15 Table 1: Absolute difference between the BP locations.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 23 / 34

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Proton-Therapy Simulator Model evaluation

Model evaluation

Comparison to RayStation results: Single beamlets in water tank, energies from 30MeV to 225MeV: Lateral profile at Bragg Peak: mean (mm) min(mm) max(mm)

  • std. dev.(mm)

2.3 × 10−3 3.4 × 10−4 7.6 × 10−3 2 × 10−3 Table 2: Absolute difference between the std. dev. of the lateral profiles.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 24 / 34

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Proton-Therapy Simulator Model evaluation

Model evaluation

Treatment simulation:

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 25 / 34

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Proton-Therapy Simulator Motion

Motion

We consider a patient moving during the treatment and being monitored: f (x, y, z, t) → (x′, y′, z′)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 26 / 34

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Proton-Therapy Simulator Motion

Motion

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 27 / 34

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Motion Compensation Compensation principle

Compensation principle

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 28 / 34

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Motion Compensation Approaches Studied

Approaches Studied

Compensated Repainting Compensated unlimited rescanning with combining these methods:

Use margins for spot positions with or without map update. Figure 3: Map of original scanning positions (green) with a margin (red) for an energy layer.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 29 / 34

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Motion Compensation Experiments for 2D Motions

Experiments for 2D Motions

Experiment: Motion parameters:

X Y Z τ : Period(s) 4 3.5 A : Ampl (cm) 2 1.5 φ : Phase (rad)

(a) 2D Motion parameters

Delivery of 1 energy layer. Noise:

Amplitude: σx = 0.25cm, σy = 0.2cm Period: σx = 0.2s, σy = 0.1s

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 30 / 34

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Motion Compensation Experiments for 2D Motions

Experiments for 2D Motions

Interest of the compensation method:

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 31 / 34

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Motion Compensation Experiments for 2D Motions

Experiments for 2D Motions

Noise added to the measure provided by motion monitor: (σ = 0cm,σ = 0.4cm,σ = 1cm in both directions)

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 32 / 34

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Conclusion

Conclusion

Current state: Simulate different treatment plans to render the effect of the motion. Dose distribution in the patient at each instant. Basic compensation technique: adapt the weight. Improvements for the future: Make use of all the dose information computed. Improve the compensation technique to be able to compensate at each unit of time. Offer improvements for the treatment plan.

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 33 / 34

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Bibliography

Bibliography

Paul Morel MISTREAT February, 27 2014 34 / 34