MongoDB and Mysql: Which one is a better fit for me? Room 204 - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mongodb and mysql which one is a better fit for me
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MongoDB and Mysql: Which one is a better fit for me? Room 204 - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MongoDB and Mysql: Which one is a better fit for me? Room 204 - 2:20PM-3:10PM About us Adamo Tonete MongoDB Support Engineer Agustn Gallego MySQL Support Engineer Agenda What are MongoDB and MySQL; NoSQL


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Room 204 - 2:20PM-3:10PM

MongoDB and Mysql: Which

  • ne is a better fit for me?
slide-2
SLIDE 2

About us

  • Adamo Tonete

○ MongoDB Support Engineer

  • Agustín Gallego

○ MySQL Support Engineer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

  • What are MongoDB and MySQL;
  • NoSQL and Relational concepts;
  • Main differences between MySQL and MongoDB;
  • MongoDB and MySQL similarities;
  • Query Language;
  • Performance comparison;
  • Security;
  • Best usage cases;
  • Q&A
slide-4
SLIDE 4

What are MongoDB and MySQL

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What is MongoDB

  • Document Oriented Database
  • NoSQL
  • Open source
  • It is currently the most common NoSQL database out there.
  • High Performance Database
  • Different storage engines for different use cases
slide-6
SLIDE 6

What is MySQL

  • Relational Database Management System
  • The "M" in LAMP stack
  • Second most popular RDBMS

○ According to DB-Engines' ranking

  • Its architecture supports use of different storage engines
  • Many different kinds of topologies used:

○ Master - Slave ○ Master - Master (active and passive) ○ Multimaster - Slave ○ Ring replication ○ Tree or pyramid ○ Multimaster Cluster (Group Replication or Galera Cluster)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

NoSQL and Relational concepts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Database Concept

A database is an organized collection of:

  • Data
  • Schemas
  • Tables
  • Queries
  • Reports
  • Views
  • Other elements.

Wikipedia

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Relational Database Concept

  • Written in the early 70s
  • Records and attributes define relations
  • Uses normalizations
  • SQL Language
  • Procedures
  • Triggers
  • Foreign keys
  • Transactions - ACID
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Non-Relational Database Concept

  • Started in the 2000s;
  • Non-relational concept. No tables or normalization;
  • Query language is different than standard SQL;
  • Made for new programming languages.
  • Fast development;
  • Relies on CAP theorem.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Main differences between MySQL and MongoDB

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Differences between MongoDB and MySQL

  • Some features we will compare:

○ Normalization ○ Transactions ○ Query language ○ Data storage and retrieval ○ Indexes differences ○ How to distribute and scale

slide-13
SLIDE 13

How different is MongoDB from MySQL/RDBS

  • NoSQL and SQL are not enemies

○ they are meant to complete each other


  • While MongoDB is a young NoSQL database, MySQL is a mature relational

database.

  • In some cases, using MongoDB as the main database is not the best thing to

do.

  • However, MongoDB can offer a very fast growing environment without too

much effort.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How different is MongoDB from MySQL/RDBS

  • Comparing Data distribution:


○ MongoDB expects data to grow beyond machine limitations. ○ MySQL does have a few add-ons to allow data distribution among instances. ○ MySQL expects to work in a single machine (at least for writes). ○ MongoDB doesn't allow ACID transactions, but it works with the CAP theorem.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Normalization

Normal forms

  • MongoDB features best practices to organize your data, but there are no hard

rules to do so.

  • MySQL strongly suggests using 3rd normal form (3NF) to avoid data

duplication.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Normalization

@ each intersection is a single scalar value

slide-17
SLIDE 17

{
 "_id" : ObjectId("507f1f77bcf86cd799439011"),
 "studentID" : 100, 
 "firstName" : "Jonathan",
 "middleName" : "Eli",
 "lastName" : "Tobin",
 "classes" : [
 { "courseID" : "PHY101",
 "grade" : "B",
 "courseName" : "Physics 101",
 "credits" : 3 },
 { "courseID" : "BUS101",
 "grade" : "B+",
 "courseName" : "Business 101",
 "credits" : 3 }
 ] }

Normalization

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ACID transactions

  • What is ACID?

○ Atomicity

■ transactions should function as a single, indivisible unit of work

○ Consistency

■ the database should always move from one consistent state to the next

○ Isolation

■ the results of a transaction are (usually) invisible to other transactions until the transaction is finished

○ Durability

  • nce committed, a transaction's changes are permanent
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • How is ACID represented in MySQL?

○ Atomicity

■ if autocommit=ON (default), every statement is committed immediately ■ if not, COMMIT or ROLLBACK should be used explicitly

○ Consistency

■ uses the doublewrite buffer and crash recovery

○ Isolation

■ various isolation levels from which to choose from: RU, RC, RR and S

○ Durability

■ there are many configuration options available for this, among which are: innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit and sync_binlog

ACID transactions

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • How is ACID represented in MongoDB?

○ Atomicity

■ single document level & no snapshotting for reads

○ Consistency

■ primary = strong ■ secondaries = your choice

○ Isolation

■ not really, but $isolated can help

○ Durability

■ configurable w:majority and/or j:true

ACID transactions

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CAP theorem

  • CAP theorem was proposed by Eric

Allen in 2000

  • A distributed system can't have the 3

guarantees at the same time. One must be sacrificed

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CAP theorem

  • Consistence
  • Availability
  • Partition Tolerant

Anyone will get the same response, data is consistent among instances

A P C

slide-23
SLIDE 23

CAP theorem

  • Consistence
  • Availability
  • Partition Tolerant

System will always respond to requests, no downtime.

A P C

slide-24
SLIDE 24

CAP theorem

  • Consistence
  • Availability
  • Partition Tolerant

System can handle errors (network, hardware failure)

A P C

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CAP theorem

A P C Relational Databases
 MySQL
 Postgres Cassandra
 Riaki MongoDB
 Redis

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • MySQL has predefined table definitions
  • Each column can have one (and only one) data type assigned to it
  • There are some limits imposed:

○ columns: 4096 ○ row length: 64 Kb ○ these can change depending on which storage engine is used

  • SQL is a declarative language
  • We can tell MySQL what we want, without worrying about how it is looked for
  • From the application side, there are connectors available for communicating

with the server

○ https://www.mysql.com/products/connector/

Data Storage and Data Retrieval

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Unlike MySQL, MongoDB doesn't have a predefined schema but it does use

declarative query language.

  • Documents can have different fields with different data types, for example

{x : 1, y : ['test']} and {x : 'percona', y : ISODate('2018-01-01')} are both valid MongoDB documents for the same collection.

Data Storage and Data Retrieval

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • MongoDB doesn't use 3rd form normalization but MySQL does.
  • All documents must contain as much information as possible. There are no

joins, only linked documents.

  • Max document size is 16 MB.

Data Storage and Data Retrieval

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Replica-sets
  • Clusters and shards
  • Master Slave

Comparing topologies

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • What is scalability?

○ "the ability to add capacity by adding resources"

  • Scale up (a.k.a.: vertically)

○ improve hardware resources

  • Scale out (a.k.a.: horizontally)

○ add more nodes

Scalability

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • MongoDB:

○ uses shards to scale writes ○ uses secondaries to scale reads

  • MySQL:

○ can use partitioning and sharding to scale writes (but it's not easy to implement) ○ uses slaves to scale reads

Scalability

slide-32
SLIDE 32

MongoDB and MySQL similarities

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • But these databases are not completely different
  • They share:

○ Security ○ Indexing ○ Multi-user access ○ Concurrency

How similar is MongoDB to MySQL

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Database terms and concept mapping

How similar is MongoDB to MySQL

MySQL MongoDB Database Database Table Collection Row Document Column Key

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Security:

  • Granular security level
  • User roles

Different storage engines:

  • Both mongodb and MySQL share the idea of pluggable storage engine
  • MongoDB engines are: WiredTiger, MMAPv1, InMemory, RocksDB
  • MySQL engines are: InnoDB, MyISAM, MyRocks, Memory, and many more

How similar is MongoDB to MySQL

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Query Language

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • We will compare mongo SQL and mysql SQL languages briefly
  • and we'll see simple workflow for both:

○ create schema ○ create table ○ insert into table ○ select from table ○ update and delete ○ select with join (mysql only)

Query Language

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Query Language - MySQL

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Query Language - MySQL

slide-40
SLIDE 40

https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/select.html

SQL Definition

slide-41
SLIDE 41

MongoDB Query Language

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • NoSQL
  • CQL
  • Graph
  • Javascript

"NoSQL" Query Language

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Security

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Both databases feature user and roles as well as enhanced security such as

LDAP integration, certificates, and audits

  • Percona Server for MongoDB and Percona Server for MySQL do offer

entreprise-grade authentication plugins for free

Security

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • MongoDB has roles since version 2.4
  • Currently we can set collection at table level granularity
  • LDAP is only available on MongoDB Enterprise but Percona server comes

with this plugin free of charge.

  • Audit plugin

Security - MongoDB

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • Roles will be available on version 8.0+
  • We can set permission at database and table-level granularity
  • Grants can be further refined into more atomic privileges

○ CREATE ○ SELECT ○ INSERT ○ UPDATE ○ ...

  • MySQL Enterprise functionality (provided to some extent by Percona Server):

○ LDAP authentication ○ Encryption ○ Audit

Security - MySQL

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Performance comparison

slide-48
SLIDE 48

There is no way to compare both performance. Each database has its own features and some are faster than others. As a document oriented database MongoDB doesn't a predefined schema and neither a relationship among collections which makes finds really fast (when reading only one document) For example: If using lookups in mongodb the query can be very slow. In the other hand, mysql does that with majesty as it is design to work with tables and conjunctions...

Performance

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Generic concepts to keep best performance

  • Create indexes (not for all the fields)
  • Split or purge data to keep the database small
  • Be precise on your query (avoid reading unnecessary documents, columns)
  • Use fast disks when the working set doesn't fit in RAM
  • More cores means more parallel job and so on...

Performance

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Best usage cases

slide-51
SLIDE 51
  • There is no right nor wrong answer here although mongodb tend to be more

used in application that doesn't require transactions (as its nature) mysql are

  • ften used when ACID is required.

https://www.percona.com/about-percona/customers https://www.percona.com/about-percona/case-studies

Best Use case

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Q&A

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Q&A

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Rate Our Session

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Thank You!