Mount Vernon City School District 2016-2017 Fiscal Plan for Academic Excellence
Presented by
- Dr. Kenneth R. Hamilton
Superintendent of Schools
- Dr. Jeff C. Gorman
Deputy Superintendent
- Mr. Ken Silver
Assistant Superintendent for Business
1
Mount Vernon City School District 2016-2017 Fiscal Plan for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Mount Vernon City School District 2016-2017 Fiscal Plan for Academic Excellence Presented by Dr. Kenneth R. Hamilton Superintendent of Schools Dr. Jeff C. Gorman Deputy Superintendent Mr. Ken Silver Assistant Superintendent for Business 1
Mount Vernon City School District 2016-2017 Fiscal Plan for Academic Excellence
Presented by
Superintendent of Schools
Deputy Superintendent
Assistant Superintendent for Business
1
2
3
Omar McDowell, Chairperson Darcy Miller
Rick Powers
This 2016-2017 school budget has been carefully developed to ensure alignment with Board goals and the Superintendent’s 20/20 vision. As promised, the 2016-2017 budget presents a spending plan that grows programs, retains staff and ensures a focus on student achievement, while at the same time, maintaining the same tax levy for the third consecutive year. This plan is consistent with everything that was presented during the bond presentations. It includes all contractual obligations, an increase in health benefit costs, support for the K-8 reconfiguration plan, improving professional development, creating systems for increased accountability and efficiency, and raising expectations for staff and students).
8
9
year tax increase
money
11
10 20 30 40 50 60 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Percentage of Students On or Above Grade Level
Beginning of Year Middle of Year Grade 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 District Winter Performance, Early On-Level Placement or Higher 42% 47% 26% 28% 30% 23% 22% National Winter Performance, Early On-Level Placement or Higher 55% 61% 41% 44% 40% 41% 42%
14
District Mandela MVHS NTHS 2009 Total Cohort - 4 Year Outcome -August 2013 58% 26% 58% 79% 2010 Total Cohort - 4 Year Outcome -August 2014 53% 21% 54% 73% 2011 Total Cohort - 4 Year Outcome -August 2015 62% 16% 72% 82% 58% 26% 58% 79% 53% 21% 54% 73% 62% 16% 72% 82%
5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% 65% 75% 85% Percent of Cohort that Graduated within 4 years
Cohort Graduation Rates 2013-2015 Through August of each year. This is the NYS measure of Accountability
16
17
Disabilities
Learning Modules
18
19
school athletics)
– Fall - Volleyball – Winter – Wrestling – Spring – Baseball , Softball
20
mobile devices
Davis, MVHS, and BTMS
21
The Technology Department will be reorganized to meet our challenges
– Role of CIO has gone unfilled for many years contributing to poor data management
data accountability
– Our Finance and HR system needs to be replaced with a system that serves us better.
preparation for our migration to a new system( Finance Manager) which is a prerequisite for implementing several efficiencies including improved staff attendance tracking.
22
The Technology Department will be reorganized to meet our challenges
inefficiencies
walkthroughs by our new full time technical support manager to ensure increased accountability and customer service.
friendly cloud based service.
while we execute our technology upgrades and improvements as part of the district’s plans.
23
– Grades 6,7,8
24
New York State Aid 39% Other Revenue 4% Property Tax 56% Fund Balance 1%
25
26
17% 83%
FACILITIES INSTRUCTION
have 373 children going to 10 or more charter schools in 2016- 2017
Increase
and other Benefits
Five Year Plan
27
curriculum models aligned with college and career readiness standards
System for at-risk students
and Mathematics Assessments
teachers and principals to teach and design instruction aligned with the new standards and assessments
28
– The two primary aids that vary depending upon state allocations are Foundation Aid and GEA (Gap Elimination Adjustment). For the first time in five years, the State of New York will take no GEA Aid. This increases our aid by $933,000 for 2016-2017.
– The amount of money taken from savings (Fund Balance) which is used to balance the budget and keep taxes from going higher. For 2016- 2017, this is 1% of our revenues. This maintains our fund balance at the full 4% authorized by law.
– The assessed value of all the taxable property
– The total spending plan for the ensuing year
29
30
31
$132,400,000 $132,900,000 $133,400,000 $133,900,000 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
$133,410,421 $134,077,473 $134,077,473 $134,077,473
33