Multistate Collaborative to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multistate Collaborative to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment (MSC) Results from 2015-2016 Demonstration Year Tara Rose, Ph.D., Director, Office of University Assessment The results are not generalizable in any way. Please use appropriately .

UK Overall 4 3.34 3.5 3.17 2.86 2.74 3 Average Rubric Score 2.24 2.21 2.5 2.16 1.81 External 2 Internal 1.5 1 0.5 0 Civic Engagement Critical Thinking Quantitative Literacy Written Communication

N= External 16, Internal 17 CIVIC ENGAGEMENT

Civic Engagement Score 4 3.5 3 2.24 2.16 2.5 Score 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 External Internal

Civic Engagement by Criteria 4 3.5 2.65 3 2.56 2.5 2.5 2.41 2.31 2.35 2.5 2 1.94 1.88 Score 1.69 1.59 2 1.5 1 External Score 0.5 Internal Score 0

Civic Engagement by Gender 4 3.5 3.08 3 2.58 2.12 2.5 2.1 External Score Internal 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Male Female

Civic Engagement by Age 4 3.5 3 3 2.5 2.33 2.19 2.5 2.17 2.11 External Score 2 Internal 1.5 1 0.5 0 18-25 26-30 31+

Civic Engagement by Race 4 3.5 3.08 Score 2.75 3 2.5 2.5 2.14 2.05 External 1.83 2 Internal 1.5 1 0.5 0 Asian White or Caucasian Unknown

Civic Engagement by PELL Eligibility 4 3.5 3 Score 2.27 2.25 2.14 2.5 External 1.83 Internal 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Yes No

N= External 78, Internal 79 CRITICAL THINKING

Critical Thinking Score 4 3.5 Score 3 2.21 2.5 1.81 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 External Internal

Critical Thinking by Criteria 4 3.5 3 2.57 2.38 2.28 2.5 2.19 2.18 1.99 Score 1.89 1.81 2 External Scores 1.44 1.33 Internal Score 1.5 1 0.5 0 Explanation of Evidence Influence of Student's Conclusions Issues Context and Position and Related Assumptions Outcomes

Critical Thinking by Gender 4 3.5 3 2.52 Score 2.28 2.5 2.03 External Internal 2 1.57 1.5 1 0.5 0 Male Female

Critical Thinking by Age 4 3.5 3 2.26 2.5 External 1.85 Score Internal 2 1.6 1.51 1.5 1 0.5 0 18-25 26-30

Critical Thinking by Race 4 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.8 3 2.4 2.4 Score 2.5 2.2 2.13 2 1.83 1.8 1.75 2 External 1.6 Internal 1.5 1 0.6 0.5 0 0 Asian Black or Hispanic or Multi-Racial White or Decline to Unknown African Latino Caucasian Respond American

Critical Thinking by PELL Eligibility 4 3.5 3 2.33 2.5 External 1.86 Score 1.76 Internal 1.64 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Yes No

N = External 129, Internal 131 QUANTITATIVE LITERACY

Quantitative Literacy Score 4 3.34 3.17 3.5 Score 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 External Internal

Quantitative Literacy by Criteria 4 3.55 3.53 3.53 3.44 3.34 3… 3.28 3.25 3.24 3.5 3.02 2.84 2.72 3 Average Rubric Score 2.5 2 1.5 External Scores Internal Scores 1 0.5 0

Quantitative Literacy by Gender 4 3.35 3.33 3.19 3.5 3.13 3 Score 2.5 External Internal 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Male Female

Quantitative Literacy by Age 3.83 4 3.5 3.34 3.25 3.5 3.17 2.75 3 Average Rubric Score 2.5 External 2 Internal 1.5 1 0.5 0 18-25 26-30 31+

Quantitative Literacy by Race 4 3.46 3.44 3.38 3.5 3.22 3.2 3.13 3.13 3.08 3.07 2.96 2.92 2.9 2.88 3 2.5 2.5 Score 2 External Internal 1.5 1 0.5 0 Asian Black or Hispanic or Multi-Racial White or Decline to Unknown African Latino Caucasian Respond American

Quantitative Literacy by PELL Eligibility 3.65 4 3.3 3.3 3.15 3.5 3 Score 2.5 External Internal 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Yes No

N= External 201, Internal 202 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION

Written Communication Score 4 3.5 2.86 2.74 3 Score 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 External Internal

Written Communication by Criteria 4 3.5 3.21 3.07 2.86 2.88 2.85 2.79 2.74 2.73 3 2.56 2.29 2.5 Score 2 External Scores Internal Scores 1.5 1 0.5 0 Context of and Content Genre and Sources and Control of Purpose for Development Disciplinary Evidence Syntax and Writing Conventions Mechanics

Written Communication by Gender 4 3.5 2.92 2.77 2.62 2.64 3 2.5 External Score Internal 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Male Female

Written Communication by Age 4 3.5 2.91 2.87 2.84 2.81 2.74 2.71 3 Score 2.5 External 2 Internal 1.5 1 0.5 0 18-25 26-30 31+

Written Communication by Race 4 3.5 3.17 2.91 2.88 2.78 2.75 2.75 3 2.69 2.68 2.37 2.3 2.27 2.25 2.5 Score 2 External Internal 1.5 1 0.5 0 Asian Black or Hispanic or Multi-racial White or Unknown African Latino Caucasian American

Written Communication by PELL Eligibility 4 3.5 2.91 2.84 2.8 3 2.58 2.5 Score External Internal 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Yes No

Interpretation: Data Sharing Activity What does this data mean? How might/should we respond to this data? What other questions occur to you as you look at this chart?