Navy Outlook 2013 The RCNs Requirement Priorities, Trends & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

navy outlook 2013
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Navy Outlook 2013 The RCNs Requirement Priorities, Trends & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Navy Outlook 2013 The RCNs Requirement Priorities, Trends & Challenges 11 April 2013 Captain Art McDonald, RCN Director Naval Requirements (DNR) 1 V4.1 101010APR13 Outline (aka the NavPlan) Introduction RCN-Industry


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Navy Outlook 2013

The RCN’s Requirement Priorities, Trends & Challenges

11 April 2013

Captain Art McDonald, RCN Director Naval Requirements (DNR)

V4.1 – 101010APR13

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline (aka the NavPlan)

  • Introduction
  • RCN-Industry Partnership
  • About DNR

– Team & Responsibilities – Requirement Drivers

  • Class Requirements
  • Capability/Domain Requirements

– Challenge, Opportunity, Focus – Projects/Initiatives of note

  • Priorities
  • Challenges
  • Capability Roadmaps
  • “Asks”
  • Conclusion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Disclaimer

  • Images used in this

presentation may be of real or imaginary equipment and are intended to be representative of the general capabilities described

  • Their appearance here

does not imply that Canada favours or will acquire that specific equipment

Representative Image Only

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

RCN-Industry Partnership – My Family

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Outline (aka the NavPlan)

  • Introduction
  • RCN-Industry Partnership
  • About DNR

– Team & Responsibilities – Requirement Drivers

  • Class Requirements
  • Capability/Domain Requirements

– Challenge, Opportunity, Focus – Projects/Initiatives of note

  • Priorities
  • Challenges
  • Capability Roadmaps
  • “Asks”
  • Conclusion
slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Directorate of Naval Requirements (DNR)

Maritime Domain Awareness and ISR Platform Requirements, & MCDV, MCM, Diving, etc Above and Underwater Warfare Requirements Canadian Surface Combatant Halifax Class Modernization Submarine Requirements Arctic Offshore Patrol Ship Joint Support Ship

DNR Capt A. McDonald, RCN 819-939-3954 DNR 3 Cdr R. Klein 819-939-3946 DNR 8 Cdr S. Godin 819-939-3973 DNR 7 Cdr J. Wilson 997-2257 A/DNR 4 LCdr M. McEntee 819-939-3986 DNR 2 Cdr F. Moger 819-939-3949 DNR 9 Cdr B. May 819-939-3976 DNR 5 Cdr J Armstrong 819-939-3969 DNR 10 Cdr D. Soule 997-7370 DNR 11 Cdr F. Caron 997-7622 DNR 6 Cdr A. Samoluk 819-939-3971 CPC Cdr D. Coffey 819-939-3951

Under Water Warfare Requirements C4I, Trainers and Simulators

Capability Areas Class

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

DNR Responsibilities

  • Managing the Requirements Portfolio

– Unforecasted Operational Requirements – Joint Requirements – Matrix-ing (working in NDHQ) – Allies and their Capital Programmes – Engagement with Industry – Engagement of Allies – Engagement of R&D Staffs

  • Capability Development

– Future Capital Acquisition

  • Project Directorship

– Underway Capital Acquisition – Requirements Definition

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Requirements – The Context

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Requirements – The Context

10

98

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

RCN Requirement Drivers

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The RCN Capital Equipment Programme

12

Total Demand: >$50B

  • 56 major projects
  • 41 miscellaneous/minor capital projects

Capital Projects

  • 11 projects (value: > $35B)

Non-Strategic Capital Projects

  • Approved and spending: 20 (value: > $700M)
  • Includes 2 PSAT-funded (IMIC3 & MSOC)
  • Additional 9 being staffed (value: >$350M)
  • Annual apportioned allocation ~$65M (decreasing)

Minor Capital Projects

  • 8 sponsored Minor Capital Projects (formerly

Miscellaneous Requirements (MRs) = ~$15M

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Outline (aka the NavPlan)

  • Introduction
  • RCN-Industry Partnership
  • About DNR

– Team & Responsibilities – Requirement Drivers

  • Class Requirements
  • Capability/Domain Requirements

– Challenge, Opportunity, Focus – Projects/Initiatives of note

  • Priorities
  • Challenges
  • Capability Roadmaps
  • “Asks”
  • Conclusion
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

DNR Support to MCP

MCP

  • Support to MCPs is a significant, vital and largely

unseen tasking that must receive a high priority;

  • But, if not DNR, “Qui?”

DNR

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Submarine Capability – DNR 9

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Improved collection capability:

– Upgrade to Electronic Warfare systems and periscope imagery – Improved sonar systems inclusive of post mission analysis

  • Improved communication capacity:

– Large bandwidth satellite communications system

Underwater Warfare (Sub Warfare) - Outlook

Opportunities

  • Tech refreshes instead of complete replacement
  • Rapid environmental assessment
  • Off-board surveillance systems
  • Unmanned underwater vehicles
  • Anti-torpedo defence systems

Challenges

  • Modern, stealthy submarines
  • Advanced submarine combat

systems

  • High contact density

environments

Future Focus Improvement to Victoria Class Information Warfare (C4ISTAR) capability

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Naval Mine Countermeasures (NMCM) – DNR 3

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 18

Naval Mine Countermeasures (NMCM) & Diving – Outlook

Opportunities:

  • Access to robust COTS technologies
  • Technological advances in:
  • Unmanned Systems
  • Synthetic Aperture Sonar
  • Low Frequency Broadband Sonar
  • Automated detection/classification
  • U/W communications
  • Signature Management Systems
  • Leveraging opportunities with allies

Challenges:

  • Stockpiles of legacy sea mines
  • Proliferation of modern sea mines
  • Advanced sea mine sensors
  • Ease of deployment
  • Requirement to operate in the littoral
  • Requirement to operate in the Arctic
  • Maritime IEDs are easy to construct ,yet

pose challenges to render safe

Future Focus

Achieve Full NMCM operational capability

Enhance the Kingston Class remote mine hunting and disposal systems

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 19

Enablers & Multipliers – Outlook

Opportunities:

  • Access to robust COTS technologies
  • Technological advances in:
  • Unmanned Systems
  • Diving systems
  • Shipbuilding Industry
  • ISSC
  • Leveraging opportunities with allies

Challenges:

  • Ever evolving ships’ small boats’ role
  • Improved crewing protection (clothing)
  • Harbour services to meet the needs of

recap fleet e.g. tugs, crane barges

  • Recapitalising unique capabilities e.g.

diving, FP, UUVs

Future Focus Leverage current technology to provide operational support, including clothing and equipment required for naval operations ashore or at sea replace obsolete and aging support equipment, systems, auxiliary vessels and clothing to support the requirements of the recapitalized fleet

DNR 3 – Legacy Platforms, Auxiliary Vessels, MCDVs, NMCM & Diving, Seamanship, Operational Clothing, EOD, FP

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Naval Large Tug

  • Update
  • Project in Options Analysis
  • Procurement Strategy
  • Competitive
  • Migrate afloat harbour fire protection

into tugs

  • 6 tugs (3 ea coast)

To provide sufficient large tug capacity to Queen’s Harbour Masters in HMC Dockyards to support naval operations over the next 25 years

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Surface Combatant Boat (SCB)

  • Update
  • Initiative
  • Procurement Strategy
  • Competitive
  • Up to 30 ship’s boats systems

Replace the Halifax Class Hurricane RHIB and ship’s davit with a higher capacity launch & recovery system

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Above Water Warfare (AWW) – DNR 4

slide-23
SLIDE 23

02/04/2013

Above Water Warfare – Outlook

Opportunities:

  • Multi-sensor fusion

– Technology Demonstrations: C3MADD/CORALS – Networked sensors

  • Enhanced Electronic Attack

– USV

  • Phased Array Radar technology
  • Directed Energy Weapons:

– LOCATES

  • Joint Fires
  • Ballistic Missile Defence

Challenges:

  • Proliferation of Anti-ship Missiles
  • Ultra and Hypersonic weapons
  • Missiles with small (marble-sized) RCS
  • Enhanced naval strike platforms
  • Precision guided munitions (GPS)
  • ASM firing submarines
  • Littoral Operations
  • Fast Attack Craft (FAC)
  • PIRACY
  • High density surface traffic

Future Focus

Integrated Air and Missile Defence (IAMD) as well as Joint Fires in the Littoral

  • IAMD:

– Cross platform integration using netted sensor technology – Radar suite design and requirements – Future SAM capability

  • Joint Fires (Naval Fires Support)
slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Under Water Warfare (UWW) – DNR 5

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Underwater Warfare (ASW) – Outlook

Opportunities:

  • Multi-Static Sonar technology
  • Signature Awareness Systems
  • Improved processing systems
  • Anti-torpedo defence (hard kill)
  • ASROC and improved weaponry
  • Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Challenges:

  • Arctic and Littoral waters
  • More capable submarine threat

weapons

  • More sophisticated submarine

launched acoustic countermeasures

  • Submarine proliferation

Future Focus

Networking sensors in the underwater realm

  • UWW System Processing:

– Underwater Warfare Suite Upgrade (UWSU) Project (HCM & CSC)

  • Multi-Statics:

– Advancing Multi-static Active Sonar Employment (AMASE) Technology Demonstration Project (TDP) (HCM & CSC)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Underwater Warfare Suite Upgrade (UWSU)

  • Update
  • Definition Phase
  • Capability & costs under review
  • Procurement Strategy
  • Competitive
  • MOTS

Improve the Halifax Class Underwater Suite through modern signal processing and improved sensors

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

C4, Trainers & Simulators – DNR 6

slide-28
SLIDE 28

SATCOM –OUTLOOK

Opportunities:

  • Improved multi-band antennas
  • Dual band is good. Is Tri-band feasible?
  • Eliminate m

anual swap of feed horns at topside

  • Merging single-purpose Sat Com systems,

e.g. Sat TV, into other Sat Com systems

  • Develop Joint SATCOM

modems (and agree to common modem settings lexicon)

  • WGS certification improves marketability
  • Develop Arctic SATCOM space segment

C hallenges:

  • RCN has never experienced so many

SATCOM projects at the sam e tim e

  • No single SATCOM solution meets all

requirements

  • System diversity impact on training load and

life cycle support

  • Topside space & weight constraints
  • Potential for interference with other systems
  • Compatibility with RCAF, CA, 5-EYES
  • Capability insertion during HCM

programme

  • Lim

ited Arctic SATCOM coverage

Future Focus

  • Continue evolving from single service provider/single band (L) to

multiple service providers/multi-band (X, Ku, Q, Mil Ka, L)

  • Interoperability with RCAF, CA, 5-EYES (AUSCANNZUKUS)

Wideband SA TCOM

– M aritime Sat Co m Upgrade (MSCU ) Project

OTHER COMMS – OUTLOOK

Opportunities:

  • Software definable radios
  • Growth path for new waveforms
  • Offers some future-proofing
  • Develop scalable solutions for small to large

ships

  • Improve training methods – simulated/PC-

based training rather than hardware

Challenges:

  • Aging legacy systems such as HF, UHF, and

control systems – how to address in fiscally and HR-constrained environment?

  • Ensuring compatibility with changes to shore

infrastructure

  • Ensuring some compatibility with RCAF and

CA (e.g. support to forces ashore)

  • Ensuring new radios, crypto, antennas, etc

can be centrally and automatically controlled

  • Strong desire for equipment commonality

across new ship classes

  • Capability insertion during HCM programme

Future Focus

  • Conduct business case for HF (Internet Protocol)
  • Investigate options for legacy equipment replacement

Line of Sight Comms

– UHF Sub Net Relay (SNR) Project

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Maritime Sat Com Upgrade (MSCU)

  • Update
  • Staffing for Implementation in

progress

  • So What?
  • Procure shipboard X/Ku terminals

for Halifax, Kingston, and Protecteur classes Provide an X/Ku SATCOM fit to all warships; Upgrade Naval Network Operations Centres

Forward: Sat TV Middle: X/Ku Aft: Inmarsat NERA-B or FBB

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Kingston Class High Speed Data Connection (KHSDC)

  • Update
  • In Implementation
  • Will deliver a complete virtual solution with

virtual desktops

  • Key Milestones
  • Implementation approved Mar 2013
  • So What?
  • Competitive procurement for equipment

Provide the Kingston Class vessels with DND designated and classified wide area networks.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Maritime Integrated Network Management System (MINeMS)

  • Update
  • In Definition
  • Cyclical Project Approach:
  • Cycle 1: Network Mgt System
  • Cycle 2: Dynamic Routing
  • Cycle 3: Communications System

Mgt

  • Key Milestones
  • Cycle 1 Implementation,
  • Cycles 2-3 Definition
  • So What?
  • Cycles 2 & 3: Competitive bid

Provide the Navy with an integrated end-to-end management, monitoring and control capability of computer networks and radios

  • !"
slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Maritime Domain Awareness & ISTAR – DNR 2

slide-33
SLIDE 33

RCN C4ISR OUTLOOK

Opportunities:

  • Design/Implement CF’s Service Oriented

Architecture for RCN expeditionary ops

  • Implementing foundation C4ISR

architecture and capabilities in existing RCN platforms

  • Payload configurable UAS to sp

Operational & Tactical C4ISR needs

  • Policy based prioritized info traffic mgmt

Future Focus

MDA, ISR Integration, UAV, CTG Applications (Joint Fires/MTC2)

  • MDA:

– MSOC, GL MSOC, IMIC3, Space Based Services

  • ISR Integration:

– CSD, IICB, SC2PS, TCDL

  • UAV:

– Collaboration with CA SUAS (end 2013) - Joint RCN/CA SUAS contracts

  • CTG Applications (Joint Fires/MTC2):

– Battlespace TDP, Naval Fires ARP, Combined Task Group Commander Case Study

Challenges:

  • Achieving balance between Strategic,

Operational & Tactical ISR requirements

  • Preventing stovepipe capabilities vice

adapt & and improve current architecture

  • Overcoming network stoppages in a

satellite denied environment

  • Defending RCN assets against Cyber

Threat.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Sensor Control

Get the Information Exploit the Information Disseminate the Information CF ISTAR BACKBONE

Army RCAF

Intelligence SOFCOM CEFCOM AURORA INGRESS SEOSS

RCN CSD CSD CSD CSD

Allies

CWIS Camera SNIPER POD MARITIME REMOTE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS FMV

PRIORITY 05:00 05:30 06:00 06:30 07:00 07:30 08:00 08:30 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11;30 12:00 12:30 13:00 NAI 1 2 RADAR SAT NAI 2 2 RADAR SAT NAI 3 3 NAI 4 1 RADAR SAT NAI 10 1 RADAR SAT NAI 19 3 NAI 23 2 NAI 25 3 RADAR SAT RADAR SAT NAI 32 1 RADAR SAT NAI 31 1 CRESO CRESO J-STARS J-STARS NAI 29 2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 28 2 J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 27 2 U2 GLOBAL HAWK HORIZON RADAR SAT HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 26 3 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR EAGLE NAI 24 2 CRESO CRESO GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 22 2 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 21 2 ASTOR GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR NAI 15 2 U2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 9 1 HORIZON HO RIZON RADAR SAT U2 NAI 7 1 RADAR SAT U2 HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 6 1 RADAR SAT ASTOR ASTOR NAI 5 1 U2 RADAR SAT J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS PRIORITY 05:00 05:30 06:00 06:30 07:00 07:30 08:00 08:30 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11;30 12:00 12:30 13:00 NAI 1 2 RADAR SAT NAI 2 2 RADAR SAT NAI 3 3 NAI 4 1 RADAR SAT NAI 10 1 RADAR SAT NAI 19 3 NAI 23 2 NAI 25 3 RADAR SAT RADAR SAT NAI 32 1 RADAR SAT NAI 31 1 CRESO CRESO J-STARS J-STARS NAI 29 2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 28 2 J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 27 2 U2 GLOBAL HAWK HORIZON RADAR SAT HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 26 3 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR EAGLE NAI 24 2 CRESO CRESO GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 22 2 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 21 2 ASTOR GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR NAI 15 2 U2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 9 1 HORIZON HO RIZON RADAR SAT U2 NAI 7 1 RADAR SAT U2 HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 6 1 RADAR SAT ASTOR ASTOR NAI 5 1 U2 RADAR SAT J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS PRIORITY 05:00 05:30 06:00 06:30 07:00 07:30 08:00 08:30 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11;30 12:00 12:30 13:00 NAI 1 2 RADAR SAT NAI 2 2 RADAR SAT NAI 3 3 NAI 4 1 RADAR SAT NAI 10 1 RADAR SAT NAI 19 3 NAI 23 2 NAI 25 3 RADAR SAT RADAR SAT NAI 32 1 RADAR SAT NAI 31 1 CRESO CRESO J-STARS J-STARS NAI 29 2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 28 2 J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 27 2 U2 GLOBAL HAWK HORIZON RADAR SAT HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 26 3 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR EAGLE NAI 24 2 CRESO CRESO GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 22 2 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 21 2 ASTOR GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR NAI 15 2 U2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 9 1 PRIORITY 05:00 05:30 06:00 06:30 07:00 07:30 08:00 08:30 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11;30 12:00 12:30 13:00 NAI 1 2 RADAR SAT NAI 2 2 RADAR SAT NAI 3 3 NAI 4 1 RADAR SAT NAI 10 1 RADAR SAT NAI 19 3 NAI 23 2 NAI 25 3 RADAR SAT RADAR SAT NAI 32 1 RADAR SAT NAI 31 1 CRESO CRESO J-STARS J-STARS NAI 29 2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 28 2 J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 27 2 U2 GLOBAL HAWK HORIZON RADAR SAT HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 26 3 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR EAGLE NAI 24 2 CRESO CRESO GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 22 2 GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR U2 NAI 21 2 ASTOR GLOBAL HAWK ASTOR NAI 15 2 U2 HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS NAI 9 1 HORIZON HO RIZON RADAR SAT U2 NAI 7 1 RADAR SAT U2 HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 6 1 RADAR SAT ASTOR ASTOR NAI 5 1 U2 RADAR SAT J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON RADAR SAT U2 NAI 7 1 RADAR SAT U2 HORIZON HO RIZON NAI 6 1 RADAR SAT ASTOR ASTOR NAI 5 1 U2 RADAR SAT J-STARS J-STARS HORIZON HO RIZON J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS J-STARS

CXP

TRACKS & mgt msgs (J-series)

CYCLONE

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Short Term

  • Linkage into the CA SUAV Project
  • Very similar ‘requirements’
  • Persistency and payload capacity

Medium Term

  • Solution focussed on MLR Frigates
  • Permanent EC / EMI

(fitted for but not with?)

  • Continued leveraging of CA SUAV?
  • Analysis of Micro/Mini UAV Capability

Long Term

  • Maritime Remote Autonomous System

(MRAS) driven solution

  • CFMWC lead
  • CSC/AOPS/JSS
slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Outline (aka the NavPlan)

  • Introduction
  • RCN-Industry Partnership
  • About DNR

– Team & Responsibilities – Requirement Drivers

  • Class Requirements
  • Capability/Domain Requirements

– Challenge, Opportunity, Focus – Projects/Initiatives of note

  • Priorities
  • Challenges
  • Capability Roadmaps
  • “Asks”
  • Conclusion
slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

RCN Requirement Priorities

  • Context: IP13
  • Holistic Priorities

– Returning the Fleet to Sea (HCM & VCS) – MCPs: Building the Future Fleet – Traditional Strengths Renewed

  • COMMS/C4ISTAR (IW)
  • UWW
  • Key Initiatives/Projects

– Strategic: UWSU – Non-Strategic: MSCU, NLTP, UMM, UAV, SCB

  • Process Considerations

– Commonality – Academic Rigour in Requirements Definition

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Ambition: right-size/right-cost Prioritize Effort: HR Current Driver

TBS

CADSI

Requirements Challenges for RCN - 2013

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Requirements Challenges for RCN

  • Prioritizing Work

– Focused & Industry-Advised

  • Critical Paths

– Engineering design – Purchase contract flexibility

  • Navy in Transition

– Balancing priorities and effort

  • Commonality Across Classes

– HCM + JSS + AOPS + CSC

  • Costing Acquisition

– Getting it right – the first time

  • Capability Insertion

– Timely introduction to the Fleet

  • Capacity and Experience

– Information Warfare

  • Ambition: right-size/right-cost

– Affordable balanced capability?

  • Prioritize Effort

– HR capacity current driver – $ avail for the well-manged – Requirements Bow Wave fading?

  • Transformations Everywhere

– On-fly process remapping nec

  • Capability Insertion

– Timely introduction to the Fleet

  • Commonality Across Classes

– HCM + JSS + AOPS + CSC

  • Capacity and Experience

– Growing; leverage Industry

2013

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

THE RCN’S CAPABILITY ROADMAPS

  • DEFINING THE

PROCESS/RYHTYM

  • FEATURES COLLABORATIVE

DEVELOPMENT

  • WILL SHARE INSIGHTS
  • PERIODIC INDUSTRY INPUTS

Intelligence N5 Readiness Industry R&D DND/CF

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

“ASKS” OF INDUSTRY

  • Advice & Participation

– re Costing our Ambition – re Capability Roadmap – re shaping our industry engagement (ie; best-practices; encouragement!)

  • Engagement with DNR Staff

– No brochures please; we need details – Think as we do: in capability terms, not in terms of products – Consider our limitations and constraints – If you have put pen-to-paper and can share – most beneficial; especially if we can share it – Regret we can’t get you a written reply

  • Commonality

– Mutually beneficial? How? – How achieve?

slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

we put capability to sea Conclusion: “The Cause of Effects”

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

See you at ...

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Merci / Thank You