neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimers Disease in cognitively normal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

neuroimaging biomarkers of alzheimer s disease
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimers Disease in cognitively normal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Short Physical Performance Battery relates to neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimers Disease in cognitively normal elderly patients Aline Mendes INSIGHT-PreAD study group CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE I have no potential conflict of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Short Physical Performance Battery relates to neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease in cognitively normal elderly patients

Aline Mendes INSIGHT-PreAD study group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE

I have no potential conflict of interest to report

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Gait and Cognition

Attention Executive Function Visuospatial functions Motor processing functions

Interrelationship between gait and cognition

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Alzheimer’s Disease Continuum

Gait / physical function changes as early markers

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Gait and Cognition

Motor slowing may predict the onset of cognitive impairment.

  • Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1496-8

Increased gait variability has been reported in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease.  subtle changes only assessed by quantitative methods

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1633-7.

Determine if physical function assessed by SPPB is related to neuroimaging biomarkers of preclinical AD.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Short Physical Performance Battery

SPPB

Balance Gait Speed Chair Stand

J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Short Physical Performance Battery

SPPB

 SPPB < 10  all-cause mortality  Disability  Hospital Admission  COGNITION

BMC Med. 2016 Dec 22;14(1):215.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Methods

INSIGHT PRE-AD

Observational physical function/ gait analysis

Ongoing prospective monocentric cohort of 318 elderly people with a subjective cognitive decline – with NO cognitive impairment

Quantitative automated multimodal neuroimaging assessment Cross-sectional analysis

SPPB

MRI Hippocampal volume FDG PET SUV Amyloid PET SUVR

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results

  • characteristics of the study population

Characteristics Total n=318 Female, n (%) 204 (64.2) Age, mean (SD) 76.08 (3.5) Education level, mean (SD) 6.19 (2.062) ApoE4, n (%) 59 (18.6) Comorbidities total, mean (SD) 2.37 (1.46) 0-1 comorbidity, n (%) 95 (29.9) ≥2 comorbidities, n (%) 223 (70.1)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results

  • characteristics of the study population

Characteristics Total n=318 Female, n (%) 204 (64.2) Age, mean (SD) 76.08 (3.5) Education level, mean (SD) 6.19 (2.062) ApoE4, n (%) 59 (18.6) Comorbidities total, mean (SD) 2.37 (1.46) 0-1 comorbidity, n (%) 95 (29.9) ≥2 comorbidities, n (%) 223 (70.1) SPPB Total score (0-12), mean (SD) 10.84 (1.32) Gait speed m/s, mean (SD) 1.025 (0.22) Chair stand sec, mean (SD) 11.645 (2.95) Balance score (0-4), mean (SD) 3.85 (0.41)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results

  • SPPB total score

SPPB total score (0-14) Univariate Multivariate Coeff (SE) P value Adj R2 Coeff (SE) P value Adj R2 Hippocampal volume cm3 0.47 (0.24) 0.05 0.009 0.44 (0.26) 0.09 0.026 FDG PET SUV 0.70 (0.3) 0.019 0.01 0.73 (0.31) 0.02 0.03 Amyloid PET SUVR

  • 0.43 (0.4)

0.29 0.0005 na na na

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results - GAIT SPEED (m/sec)

Hippocampal volume cm3

P = 0.89 Adj R2 = - 0.003

Amyloid PET SUVR

0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

AMYLOIDSUVR

0.5 1.0 1.5

GaitSpeed

s s it

Fit Plot for GaitSpeed

1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Hippocampalvolumecm3

0.5 1.0 1.5

GaitSpeed

s s it

P = 0.24 Adj R2 = 0.001

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results - GAIT SPEED (m/sec)

FDG PET SUV

P = 0.01 Coeff = 0.1 (0.05) Adj R2 = 0.08

2.0 2.5 3.0

FDG_SUV

0.5 1.0 1.5

GaitSpeed

s s it

Fit Plot for GaitSpeed

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results – CHAIR STAND TEST (sec)

2.0 2.5 3.0

FDG_SUV

5 10 15 20 25

5chairstands temps sec

s s it

Fit Plot for _chairstands_temps_sec

FDG PET SUV

P = 0.02 Coeff = -1.4 (0.7) Adj R2 = 0.03

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hippocampal volume cm3

P = 0.05 Adj R2 = - 0.009

Amyloid PET SUVR

P = 0.14 Adj R2 = 0.004

Results – CHAIR STAND TEST (sec)

1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Hippocampalvolumecm3

5 10 15 20 25

5chairstands temps sec

s s it 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

AMYLOIDSUVR

5 10 15 20 25

5chairstands temps sec

s s it

Fit Plot for _chairstands_temps_sec

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Short Physical Performance Battery

SPPB

  • 1. Balance
  • 2. Gait Speed
  • 3. Chair Stand

FDG PET SUV

Hippocampal volume cm3 Amyloid PET SUVR

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Discussion & Perspectives

 Gait changes should be part of a multimodal model of assessment of preclinical AD phases, combined to neuroimaging, CSF, etc.  SPPB scores, gait speed and the chair stand test are independently associated with brain metabolism, with no association with amyloid deposition.  Increasing accuracy in determining preclinical phases can help new effective preventive strategies, as well as reduce the burden of dementia.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thank you