New Market Tax Credits: Tax Issues for Investors and Developers in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New Market Tax Credits: Tax Issues for Investors and Developers in Structuring Transactions

Meeting IRS Program Compliance Requirements for NMTC Deals

Today’s faculty features:

1pm East ern | 12pm Cent ral | 11am Mount ain | 10am Pacific

Attendees seeking CPE credit must listen to the audio over the telephone.

Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for dial-in information. Attendees can still view the presentation slides online. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

WEDNES DAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2012

Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A

Michael I. S anders, Partner, Blank Rome, Washington, D.C. Megan A. Christensen, Atty., Blank Rome, Washington, D.C. Donald Nimey, CF A, FRM, Principal, The Reznick Group, Bethesda, Md.

Conference Materials

If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps:

• Click on the + sign next to “ Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-

hand column on your screen.

• Click on the tab labeled “ Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a

PDF of the slides for today's program.

• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

Continuing Education Credits

For CLE credits, please let us know how many people are listening online by completing each of the following steps:

• Close the notification box
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of

attendees at your location

• Click the S

END button beside the box For CPE credits, attendees must listen to the audio over the telephone. Attendees can still view the presentation slides online. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926- 7926 ext. 10.

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY

Tips for Optimal Quality

S

• und Qualit y

For this program, you must listen via the telephone by dialing 1-866-927-5568 and entering your PIN when prompted. There will be no sound over the web connection. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Y

• u may also send us a chat or e-mail sound@

straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. Viewing Qualit y To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

NEW MARKET TAX CREDITS:

Tax Issues for Investors and For-Profit and Non-Profit Developers Michael I. Sanders

202.772.5808 Sanders@BlankRome.com

5

NMTC Overview:

• Opportunity to subsidize or provide gap

financing in a qualified census tract.

• Benefits to developers, businesses and

charities.

6

• Major investors such as Goldman, JP

Morgan or PNC buy credits for cash infusion to the development which may not be paid back at the end of the 7-year compliance period.

• Under leverage structure, investor may

receive in excess of 9 to 10 percent return after tax.

7

New Markets Tax Credit – A Government Sponsored Joint Venture Vehicle

• - $29.5 billion in NMTC allocated through 2011; subject to renewal by Congress.

Purpose: The new markets tax credit (NMTC) serves as a way to provide subsidy or gap financing to real estate developments, business activities, or charitable operations planned in qualified census tracts (high unemployment or poverty rate, low median family income). What does it provide? 39% tax credit on the capital invested in a community development entity (CDE),

• ver 7 years (5% in yrs 1-3; 6% in yrs 4-7).

Who benefits from the credit? The investor (typically national banks, insurance companies) making an investment in a CDE gets a tax credit of $0.39 for every $1 invested and CRA credit, which under a “leveraged” structure yields in excess of a 10% after-tax

• return. The CDE directs capital into qualified projects or businesses. The investor

is not repaid its equity investment. Eligible Investments:

• Community businesses, including e.g. hospitals, charter schools.
• Commercial or mixed-use real estate projects (at least 20% of gross income

from commercial component). Examples:

• 105-Unit, The Bradford -- $45M affordable housing and ground floor retail space

in Bedford-Stuyvesant. Innovative structure allowed HDC and HPD financing to be used, with Goldman Sachs as the equity investor; BRP and Bedford- Stuyvesant Restoration Corp were the development partners.

• $100M charter high school in Mott Haven, Bronx. Robin Hood Foundation was

sponsor; JPMorgan Chase was investor. 8

Use of Leverage Debt and Alternative Capital Sources

• In structuring an NMTC transaction one
• f the most important elements in structuring

is the use of the leverage lender.

• Practitioners need to be creative in

structuring; in this regard it is important to recognize that the lender may take a security interest in the investment fund borrower’s assets, but not QALICB/developer’s property.

9

• And, typically the leverage lender will be

required to forbear from exercising any remedies during the 7-year NMTC compliance period.

• If leverage loan funds are not fully available at

closing or are conditioned upon the completion of the project, a bridge financing source may need to be lined up; e.g., banks making short term bridge loans, provided that there is an anticipated take-out through government funds, such as HUD 108 program/tax-exempt financing, etc.

10

• Leveraged lenders who are currently

making loans and what the general nature

• f the business is of these lenders (for profit,

nonprofit, government, etc.).

• The pros and cons of the leverage

structure compared to a single investor structure.

11

• The impediments keeping new investors from

making leveraged loans and how can the NMTC industry address these impediments; e.g., 7-year forbearance and collateral issues.

• Leverage lenders demand more protection

today than in the past, although they are not the direct lender. Assets that may be pledged in view

• f the IRS’ ruling position. How to protect the

leverage lender.

12

• Examine the risks that the leverage

loan will not be repaid. Use of the A note; how to handle the risks of foreclosure, casualty and condemnation. How to draft the consent provisions.

• The tax issues that nonprofits that act

as leverage lenders in transactions that they sponsor: UBIT.

13

• Key steps to ensure coordination

between all parties to make sure that key issues are being raised and addressed early in the process.

14

Unwind Exit Strategies: Put-Call Options, Planning Opportunities to Mitigate Burdens of Tax Consequences at Exit

• At the end of the 7-year compliance

period, when the investor has received all the NMTCs for which it is eligible, it, along with the CDE, will likely want to unwind the transaction and exit the structure.

• This is typically accomplished through

the use of a “put/call” technique that generates a subsidy or grant equivalent to the QALICB.

15

• Under one version of this technique,

the investor has the right to require the QALICB, over a specified period, to purchase the investor's interest in the Fund for a specified price (the “put”). In the event the put is not exercised, the QALICB (or an affiliate) has the right to purchase the investor’s interest in the Fund over a specified period for fair market value (the “call”).

16

• The put and call will likely be priced substantially

below the investor’s original investment in the Fund.

• If either the put or the call are exercised, the

investor would be removed from the structure. An affiliate of the QALICB typically would be substituted in place of the investor, thereby controlling the Fund, and would take steps to redeem the managing member of the CDE. The result here is a net benefit to the project measured by the amount of the investor’s original funds less fees, professional and administrative costs and the price of the put/call.

17

• After the investor is removed, the

QALICB may then cause the Fund to liquidate the CDE, often using the QLICI “A note” previously held by the CDE to repay the leverage lender, and subsequently liquidate the Fund, leaving the QALICB on its own and the leverage lender holding the A note.

18

• In the event that the leverage lender is

controlled by a §501(c)(3) entity or is itself a charity, it may decide to forgive all or a portion of the leverage loan at the end of the compliance period, but it must not be legally obligated to do so at inception.

• Alternatively the QALICB may also “refinance”

the property and use the funds it receives to repay to the CDE the QLICI note that mirrors the leverage loan (but not the QLICI note that reflects the investor's equity). The CDE will then use the funds received from the QALICB to repay the leverage lender.

19

• There is often tension manifested between the

equity investor and the QALICB in negotiating the put/call structure. Equity investors are interested in protecting the value of their cushion while the QALICB is interested in assurance that the investor will indeed exercise the put and may use techniques that would devalue the call (through the use of a fair market value formula, annual interest accruals and a significant partial payment in year 7). The investor, however, wants to be assured that it will be treated as the owner of the equity piece.

20

• There is additional concern at the

QALICB level that there could be a change

• f administration and attitude by the investor

at the end of the compliance period as compared to its present intent, especially by an institutional investor, who may decide not to exercise the put.

21

Cancellation of Indebtedness – COD Income

• Discharge of indebtedness: under Section

61(a)(12) a discharge of indebtedness, for example, by the debtors acquisition of its own debt for less than the principal amount of the debt, constitutes gross income to the debtor. Under Code Section 108(e)(4)(A) for purposes of determining income of the debtor of the discharge of indebtedness the acquisition of debt by a party “related” to the debtor is considered to be the acquisition of indebtedness by the debtor. If the QALICB has operating losses, it may

• ffset COD ordinary income.

22

• If not, the B note could be payable in

25-30 years which would defer the taxability. However, the QALICB would need to pay interest annually during the life of the note.

• Related party acquisition uses the

attribution and constructive ownership rules under Section 267(b) or 707(b)1.

23

• Exception for qualified real property

business indebtedness which would allow income realized pursuant to the related party rule to be excludable from gross income to the extent provided in Section 108(a), whereby gross income does not include discharge from indebtedness income if a taxpayer is not a C-corporation and the discharge indebtedness is “qualified real property business indebtedness.”

24

• Use of equity rather than debt.
• Use of nonprofit as QALICB or leverage

lender: no UBIT realized if project is substantially related to the exempt function, such as relief of the poor, underprivileged, relieves the burden of government, etc.

25

Opportunities for Nonprofits

Consistent with its charitable purpose, a Section 501(c)(3) organization may play various roles in NMTC transactions:

• As CDE
• As QALICB
• As Leverage Lender

26

TARGETED POPULATIONS

Megan Christensen

202.772.5897 Christensen@BlankRome.com

27

History

• 2000 – §45D enacted; §45D(e)(2) provides for Treasury to

designate any area within a census tract as a low-income community under certain conditions.

• 2004 - §45(e)(2) amended to provide that Treasury may

prescribe regulations to treat “targeted populations” as low- income communities.

• 2006 – Notice 2006-60 issued; taxpayers may rely on the

notice until regulations are issued.

• 2008 – IRS issues proposed regulations; taxpayers may

continue to rely on Notice 2006-60 until final regulations are issued.

• December 5, 2011 – Effective date of final regulations.

28

• Treas. Reg. §1.45D-1(d)(9)

– “For purposes of section 45D(e)(2), targeted populations that will be treated as a low- income community are individuals, or an identifiable group of individuals, including an Indian tribe, who are low-income persons as defined in paragraph (d)(9)(i) of this section or who are individuals who otherwise lack adequate access to loans or equity investments ad defined in paragraph (d)(9)(ii)

• f this section.”

29

• Treas. Reg. §1.45D-1(d)(9)
• Targeted Populations are either:

– Low-income Persons (“LIPs”)(1.45D-1(d)(9)(i)); or – Individuals who otherwise lack adequate access to loans

• r equity investments (1.45D-1(d)(9)(i))
• Remaining Discussion Only with Respect to

LIPs

– (d)(9)(ii) addresses only QLICIs made under the increase in NMTC limitation in response to Hurricane Katrina, nearly all of which has already been used, or will expire if not used in the next few months.

30

Low-Income Persons

• Determined based on the individual’s family income (“IFI”),

determined by one of three methods:

– Household income as measured by U.S. Census Bureau; – AGI as reported on Form 1040, including AGI of any family member residing with the individual; or – Household income determined under §8 of Housing Act of 1937.

• IFI must not be more than 80% of applicable area median

family income (“MFI”).

– New under the final regulations: Area MFI is determined in a manner consistent with such determinations under §8 of the Housing Act of 1937. – Taxpayers must use annual estimates released by HUD and may rely on those until later of 45 days after a new release or effective date of new list.

31

QALICBs

• Must meet general QALICB rules (§1.45D-1(d)(4)(i)): (a) Corporation or

partnership; (b) Engaged in active conduct of qualified business; (c) <5% property attributed to intangibles; (d) <5% property attributed to nonqualified financial property.

• Also, must meet one of three tests (§1.45D-1(d)(9)(i)(D)(2)):

– Gross Income Test;

• 50%+ derived from transactions with LIPs
• Exception (New): If sole business is rental of real property, gross income

test satisfied if entity treated as being located in low-income community under §1.45D-1(d)(9)(i)(D)(1) (see Rental of Real Property, below).

– Employee Test;

• 40%+ are LIPs
• (determined at time of hire)

– Ownership Test.

• 50%+ of entity owned by LIPs
• (determined at later of (i) time QLICI is made, or (ii) time ownership interest

is acquired)

32

Gross Income Test

• “Derived From” includes gross income derived from:

– Payments made directly by LIPs; and – Money & FMV of property or services provided to the entity primarily for the benefit of LIPs, but only if provider does not receive a direct benefit from the entity.

• If gross income is derived from transactions with

both non-LIPs and LIPs, gross income derived from transactions with LIPs includes the full FMV even if LIPs do not pay FMV.

33

120% Income Restriction

• Not a QALICB if located in census tract where MFI > 120% of

the applicable MFI (statewide or metropolitan) (“NQPCT”).

• Considered to be located in NQPCT if have:

– Non-qualifying gross income amount (50%) (“NQGIA”); – Non-qualifying tangible property usage (40%) (“NQTPU”); and – Non-qualifying services performance (40%) (“NQSP”).

• If NQTPU or NQSP is 50%+, considered to have NQGIA.
• If no employees, considered to have NQGIA and NQSP if

85%+ of use of tangible property is within 1+ NQPCTs.

• 120% income restriction does not apply if the population is <

2,000 and is either:

– is not in a metropolitan area; or – is in a metropolitan area and >75% of the tract is zoned commercial or industrial.

34

Rental of Real Property

• Entity will be treated as located in a low-

income community, and thus a qualified business if:

– Rents to others real property for low-income targeted populations; – Otherwise satisfies requirements to be a qualified business; – 50%+ of total gross income is derived from rentals to LIPs or to a QALICB that meets either the gross income test or employee test.

35

Donald Nimey Reznick Group

301-28-1846 Don.Nimey@ReznickGroup.com 7501 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 400E Bethesda, MD 20814

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making

• Facilitate greater investment into non-real estate

businesses (Treasury and IRS identified issues and invited comments)

– Investment returns to CDEs in non-real estate businesses allowed to be reinvested for the seven year compliance period if invested into certified CDFI (encourage short amortization loans – five years or shorter) – Reduce QALICB testing requirements required by second tier CDEs when lending NMTC proceeds into a small non-real estate businesses (reduce transaction costs for small transactions [$250K] that utilize a two tier CDE structure) – Modifications of reasonable expectations QALICB safe harbor (encourage equity investments)

37

HTC Equity $7.2 mm NMTC Equity $2.8mm Investment Fund

$10 million NMTC capital

HTC & NMTC credits/ Cash Flows from operations/ Profit & Loss from operations/ Exit Amounts (sale, put, or call) less fees to CDE

CDE $10 million allocation to Sub Sub-CDE Master Tenant Single Member LLC

Load 6% of allocation $.6mm at closing HTC credits/ Priority Payments/ Interest Payments/ Residual Cash Flow/ Profit & Loss from

• perations/ Debt Service on

Loans/Exit Amounts (sale, put, or call)

Landlord Qualified Project

$.5mm + Lease Pmts HTC Credits + Cash, P&L, Sale

Twinning HTC with NMTCs

$.5 mm

Sponsor & Lender Capital

fees over time to cover costs 38

Important Twinning Concepts

• NMTCs and HTCs are being received by the same

taxpayer (employing additional allocation and a leveraged lender increases the amount of NMTC benefit)

• The amount of equity invested and the amount of
• wnership will be limited to less than 50% of all other

equity invested (NMTC related party concern)

• Twinning relies on a pass-through of HTC to Master

Tenant from Landlord (requires an operating lease for 80% depreciable life of the building)

• Master Tenant must be a disregarded entity so that the

NMTC proceeds are financed into a qualified business

39

Innovative and Helpful Structure Ideas

• Combining Buildings - Multiple contiguous buildings

with identical ownership and management etc treated for depreciation purposes as single building (satisfy commercial building requirement)

• Dividing a Building - Condo a building so that LITHC or

“excess residential” component is outside the NMTC condo which qualifies for commercial building depreciation (satisfy commercial building requirement)

40

Innovative and Helpful Structure Ideas

• Use “one day loan” to monetize previously incurred

sponsor costs into a source of leverage debt at the investment fund (increase QEI)

• Use a grant anticipation note [either at the investment

fund level as a leveraged lender or as back leverage to an affiliate of the sponsor as the leveraged lender] to monetize future grant donation amounts for NMTC closing (increase QEI)

41

Innovative and Helpful Structure Ideas

• Renewable energy ITC can be twinned identically to

HTC

• Construct notes that utilizes deferred amortization

and/or cash flow sweep to help control cash flows, e.g., if an affiliate of the sponsor is a leveraged lender then the note to the investment fund can carry deferred interest and cash available amortization such that “over performance” in an equity deal (like HTC twinned) does not over compensate the NMTC investor

42