Non-exchangeable potassium in southern African soils: a neglected - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

non exchangeable potassium in southern african soils a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Non-exchangeable potassium in southern African soils: a neglected - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Non-exchangeable potassium in southern African soils: a neglected reserve from a crop nutritional perspective Neil Miles 1 & Mart Farina 2 1 South African Sugarcane Research Institute University of KwaZulu-Natal 2 Consultant, Howick, South


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Non-exchangeable potassium in southern African soils: a neglected reserve from a crop nutritional perspective

Neil Miles1 & Mart Farina2

1South African Sugarcane Research Institute

University of KwaZulu-Natal

2Consultant, Howick, South Africa

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The cost squeeze in agriculture

Years

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The cost squeeze in agriculture

Years Improved efficiency In the use of inputs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Estimated current annual expenditure on NPK fertilisers in the South African sugar industry

N P K Total

R millions

448 212 489 1 149

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Soil testing for potassium

  • Most soils have relatively large amounts of total K,

but small amounts of plant-available K.

  • Soils may contain minerals (typically micas &

illites) that release K slowly and/or ‘fix’ it.

  • Routine soil testing involves extraction of

exchangeable / soluble K with salt solutions.

  • Slowly-available (‘reserve’) K may be estimated

using boiling HNO3 or sodium tetraphenylboron extraction.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Potassium pools in soils

K in clay structures ‘Fixed’ K in micas & illites Exchangeable K K in soil solution

‘Soil-test’ K Slowly available ‘Nitric K’

Exchange

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The issue…….

  • In soils containing micaceous clays, slow

release of K is a major reservoir of K for crop growth.

  • Although long known, this phenomenon not

accommodated in routine soil testing.

  • Potential for appreciable savings in K ?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

This presentation

  • Data from maize and sugarcane field trials
  • Boiling nitric-acid extractable K (‘nitric K’) in

429 topsoil samples from five Southern African countries

  • Prediction of nitric K using routinely-

measured soil properties and MIR

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Field trial results…

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Long-term maize trial at Bergville

  • Avalon soil, 36% clay
  • Nitric K = 2.08 cmolc/kg
  • No yield response over 25 years (all stover

and grain removed at harvests).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Bergville Maize Trial

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 5 10 15 20 25 30

K removal (kg K/ha) K soil test (mg K/L) Years K soil test K removal

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sugarcane response to potassium on a Glenrosa soil in Mpumalanga

  • Initial soil K = 150 ppm
  • Nitric K = 2.6 cmolc/kg
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Potassium response of sugarcane on a Glenrosa soil in Mpumalanga No response to K over three ratoons (estimated annual removal = 250 kg K/ha)

12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 75 150 225

ERC (t/ha) K (kg/ha)

LSD0.05

Sucrose yields in third ratoon

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Long-term sugarcane trial at Mt Edgecombe (BT1 Trial)

  • Arcadia (vertic)

soil

  • Nitric K = 1.52

cmolc/kg

  • No response

to NPK for 18 years

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sugarcane trial on the Umfolozi flood-plain

  • Dundee (alluvial)

soil (42% clay)

  • Soil test K: 110

mg/L

  • Nitric K = 3.84

cmolc/kg

  • No response to K

for 2 seasons

Top-yielding farmer: no K for 5 years

slide-16
SLIDE 16

So….. no responses to applied K in field trials with nitric K’s of 1.5 to 3.8

Overseas field trial findings…?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Criteria suggested for modification of K recommendations in Australia

  • Haysom (1971) field trial data interpretation:

Nitric K (cmolc/kg) Category Recommended K (%)

<0.8 Low 100 0.8 – 1.5 Medium 82 1.5 – 2.5 High 45 >2.5 Very high

  • Schroeder et al. (2006): Reduce K recoms by ±20%

if nitric K >0.70

Never implemented..?!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Nitric K levels in Southern African sugarcane topsoils

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Median nitric K levels in Southern African soils

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0

Nitric K (cmolc/kg)

100 40 30 92 30 72 38 27

SA field trials

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Nitric K: which soils have higher reserves?

  • Many soils in drier

irrigated areas

  • Alluvial soils (e.g.

Umfolozi flood-plain)

  • Structured soils in

rainfed areas

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The problem of soil heterogeneity

  • Frequent high soil

heterogeneity implies marked variations in K reserves over small distances.

  • Not possible to

extrapolate results

  • ver large areas.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Frequency distribution of nitric K in sugarcane fields on the North Coast of SA

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Frequency Nitric K (cmolc/kg)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Nitric K in profiles surrounding SASRI

Hutton Fernwood Arcadia Glenrosa Shortlands

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Hutton Fernwood Arcadia Glenrosa Shortlands

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Hutton Fernwood Glenrosa Arcadia Shortlands

Nitric K (cmolc/kg)

156 kg/ha K applied per ratoon (R1900/ha)

Nitric K in profiles surrounding SASRI

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Imperative: the routine prediction of nitric K in order to modify K recoms

  • Multiple regression based on routinely-measured

soil properties (R2 = 40.4)

  • Offer nitric K as an optional supplementary

analysis at additional cost?

  • Use MIR to routinely estimate nitric K on all

samples? How .… nitric K determination not suited to use in routine soil-testing lab

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Mid-infrared reflectance prediction of nitric K reserves in soil of the Southern African sugar industries

Predicted Measured

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Mid-infrared reflectance prediction of nitric K reserves in soil of the Southern African sugar industries

Predicted Measured

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Bad news for the fertiliser industry???

OPPORTUNITIES

 Improved efficiencies → enhanced sustainability.  More effectively address

  • ther crop nutrient

problems…N, S, micros.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Conclusions

  • Field trial results point to the unnecessary

use of K on many soils in Southern Africa

  • Exploiting slowly-available K reserves →

significant cost savings, without compromising production.

  • MIR → possible solution to the problem of

routine measurement of K reserves