SLIDE 1 North Queensland Return to Work Conference
Scott Falvey
28 April 2017
SLIDE 2 Managing an aging workforce
Why is the averaging working age going up?
- Baby boom post World War II
- Life expectancy is going up
- Retirement age is going up
- Birth rate is going down
SLIDE 3 Why is this a concern for employers?
- Because aging will eventually cause a worker’s physical, mental and
motor skills to decline.
- Creates new risks and issues for both the employer and worker to
manager together:
– Muscle strength and elasticity declines, meaning worker may be at greater risk of muscular skeletal injuries – Balance can decline, meaning the worker may be at greater risk of slip, trip, fall injuries – Bone density declines, meaning that if an accident occurs, the worker may be at greater risk of significant injury – Cartilage deteriorates, leading to greater risk of joint damage
SLIDE 4 What to consider
Equipment Do you have the right equipment for your workforce?
- PPE – braces, strapping and supports
- Lifting aids – do you have sufficient aids, are they always
used? Workplace Have you considered potential workplace redesign?
- Storage – no lifting above head or shoulders
- Slip, trip, fall hazards
Role redesign Do you need to consider redesigning the worker’s role?
- Can we rotate or remove strenuous tasks?
- Shift length/work breaks
- Roster patterns
- Repetitive tasks
Training Up skilling and/or reinforcement
- Up skilling to transition to new role
- Retraining to reinforce correct techniques and methods
SLIDE 5 What to consider
Health & Education Can you assist your workers to arrest the effects of aging?
- Promote healthy lifestyle
- Provide education on the effects of aging
- Programs to encourage exercise
- Access to health and fitness professionals
Rehabilitation Supporting workers to return to work
- Stay in contact
- Educate workers on the importance of rehabilitation
- Enforce rehabilitation programs
- Encourage rehabilitation / arrestment after return to work
SLIDE 6 Competing obligations
Source Obligation / Risk Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) (WHS Act)
- Failure to do all things reasonably
practical to ensure the safety of the worker and others Anti‐Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) (AD Act)
- Discrimination due to impairment
Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) (DD Act)
- Discrimination due to disability
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act)
- Termination due to a temporary
absence
- Adverse action claim
- Unfair dismissal
Workers’ compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) (WCR Act)
- Misuse of a workers’ compensation
document
- Termination due to workplace injury
within 12 months of its occurrence
SLIDE 7
Six steps – Be patient, be kind
Step 1 Do any time restrictions apply? Step 2 Can the worker meet the genuine occupational requirements of their role? Step 3 Are there adjustments that I can make to the role, or does the worker require special services/facilities? If so, would making/allowing these adjustments, or providing these services/facilities, place an unjustifiably hardship on the business? Step 4 What evidence do I have and can I use it? Step 5 Have I afforded the worker procedural fairness? Step 6 Has the relationship become frustrated?
SLIDE 8 Step 1 – Are there any time restraints?
S352 FW Act – temporary absence
- An employer must not dismiss an worker because the worker is temporarily
absent from work due to absence or injury.
- A ‘temporary absence’ includes any absence due to illness or injury not
exceeding more than three months, or three months in any 12 month period, unless the worker was on paid personal/carers’ leave for the duration of the absence.
- An worker must provide a medical certificate or statutory declaration within
24 hours of the illness or within such longer period as is reasonable in the circumstances.
SLIDE 9 Step 1 – Are there any time restraints?
S232 WCR Act – termination due to workplace injury
- S232B – an employer must not, within 12 months after a worker sustains an
injury, dismiss the worker solely or mainly because the worker is not fit for employment.
- S232D(2) – a worker who has been dismissed due to injury, may apply to the
employer, within 12 months after the injury occurs, for reinstatement to the worker’s former position.
- S232D(3) – the worker must provide a doctor’s certificate certifying his/her
fitness for work in the former position.
SLIDE 10 Step 2 – Meeting the genuine requirements
FW Act ‐ Offence
- Section 351 ‐ A person must not take
adverse action against another because the person has a physical or mental disability Exemption
- not unlawful under any anti‐
discrimination law in force in the place where the action is taken OR taken because of the inherent requirements
- f the particular position concerned;
- r
DD Act ‐ Offence
- Section 15 – A person must not
discriminate directly or indirectly in the area of employment. Exemption
- Section 21A ‐ The person is unable to
carry out the inherent requirement of the role, even if reasonable adjustments are made
- Section 21B ‐ If avoiding the
discrimination would result in an unjustifiable hardship
SLIDE 11 Step 2 – Meeting the genuine requirements
AD Act ‐ Offence
- Section 15 – A person must not
discriminate in the areas of work.
- This includes:
- in any variation in terms of work;
- by dismissing the person;
- by denying or limiting access to
- pportunities for promotion,
transfer or training benefits; or
- by treating the person unfavorably
Exemption
- Section 11 – the discrimination is caused
by the imposition of a reasonable term
- Section 25 – the discrimination is caused
by the imposition of a genuine
- ccupation requirement
- Section 35 – the person would require
special services or facilities the supply of which would impose an unjustifiable hardship
- Section 108 ‐ the act is necessary to
protect the health and safety of people at a place of work
SLIDE 12 Step 2 – Meeting the genuine requirements Chivers v State of Queensland [2014] QCA 141
- The worker was a trainee nurse working in a hospital operating 24 hours per
day, seven days per week.
- Due to a pre-existing injury, the worker was permanently unable to undertake
nightshift duties.
- At the end of her training program the worker sought to be appointed to a
permanent role.
- The employer did not offer a permanent role and instead notified the worker that
they were extending her probation.
SLIDE 13 Step 2 – Meeting the genuine requirements
Chivers v State of Queensland
- In deciding what a genuine occupational requirement is, an employer should
consider: – what does the worker’s employment contract require them to do? – what tasks is the worker actually required to carry out and the skills the worker is required to hold/maintain? – in what circumstances are those tasks and skills to be performed; and – what function does the worker perform as part of the employer’s overall undertaking?
SLIDE 14 Step 2 – Meeting the genuine requirements
Chivers v State of Queensland
- Establishing a genuine occupation requirement can be difficult threshold to
meet.
- Is it a requirement or is it just how it’s always been done?
- Must consider whether the particular job requirements can be adapted so
that they meet both the employer’s and worker’s needs.
- An employer can make limited temporary exceptions to a genuine
- ccupational requirement. For example, accommodating a short term
temporary illness or injury.
SLIDE 15 Step 3 – Reasonable adjustment/special services
- Must consider whether there are any ‘reasonable adjustments’ which can be
made, or special services/facilities that could be provided, that would allow the worker to undertake the role.
- When considering this employer the must have regard to all relevant
circumstances of the case, including: – the nature of the services, facilities or adjustment; – the cost to the business; – the financial circumstances of the business; – any disruption the supply or adjustment may cause; and – the nature of any benefit or detriment to all people concerned.
SLIDE 16 Step 4 – What evidence do I have and can I use it?
What evidence do I need?
- Ideally, medical evidence confirming:
– the nature of the worker’s injury. – whether the worker is fit to undertake the ‘genuine occupational requirements’ of his / her role? – if not, how long will it be before the worker is fully fit to undertake the ‘genuine occupational requirements’ of his/her role? – are there any adjustment that the employer can make to the worker’s role? – are there any special services or facilities that would assist the worker to perform their role?
SLIDE 17 Step 4 – What evidence do I have and can I use it?
Section 572A WCR Act
- A person must not use or obtain a ‘worker’s compensation document’ for a
purpose relating to the employment of a worker by the person or another person
- Penal section - breach = criminal penalty – up to 100 penalty units
- “Employment” means any process for selecting a person for employment or
for deciding whether the employment of a person is to continue
- A “worker” is a person who is or was a claimant or worker for any provision
- f the WCR Act
- A ‘worker’s compensation document’ is any document relating to the
worker’s application for compensation or claim for damages.
SLIDE 18 Step 4 – What evidence do I have and can I use it?
CFMEU v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2012] FMCA 487
- The worker was a operator working Leighton’s Moorvale coal mine.
- In August 2011, the worker claimed to have suffered a workplace injury
(severe whiplash), while driving over a bumpy road surface.
- Workers statutory claim for compensation accepted by insurer.
- In September 2011, the employer received information that the worker may
be being disingenuous about the extent and nature of his injury.
- In October 2011, Leighton required the worker to undertake an independent
medical examination.
- In November 2011, Leighton received a report from a private investigation
firm, which indicated that the worker was being disingenuous in the reporting of his symptoms.
SLIDE 19 Step 4 – What evidence do I have and can I use it?
CFMEU v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd
Leighton commenced disciplinary action against the worker.
- The CFMEU filed an application for injunctive relief against Leighton
claiming that: – Leighton was taking “adverse action” against the worker because the worker had exercised his workplace right to make a workers’ compensation claim; and – both the investigator’s report and the independent medical report, were ‘workers’ compensation documents’.
- FM Burnett agreed that both the investigator’s report and the independent
medical report, were ‘workers’ compensation documents’, as they both related to whether or not the worker was entitled to compensation.
- FM Burnett declined to grant injunctive relief but also found that Leighton
had not engaged in adverse action.
SLIDE 20 Step 4 - What evidence do I have and can I use it?
Columbine v GEO Group Australia t/a GEO [2014] FWC 6604
- The worker worked for GEO as a correctional officer.
- Suffered a workplace injury in September of 2011 and was allowed to return
to work on ‘light duties’ performing administrative work.
- In March 2014 the worker was advised that the administrative role was no
longer required and that she would need to be returned to her original role.
- The worker provided a medical certificate stating that she could return to
work for four hours a day, with a 10 minute limitation on standing, and a 20 minute limitation on walking.
- The employer advised that it was considering terminating her employment.
SLIDE 21 Step 4 - What evidence do I have and can I use it?
Columbine v GEO Group Australia t/a GEO
Within two weeks the worker provided a new medical certificate stating that she was fit to return to work as a correctional officer.
- In response, the Employer demanded:
– That the worker’s doctor provide a report, setting out the reasons and basis for the doctor’s change in prognosis; and – That the worker provide an authority to allow GEO to speak/correspond with the worker’s doctor directly.
- The worker refused to comply.
- The worker was dismissed for failing to comply with a reasonable and lawful
direction.
SLIDE 22
Step 4 - What evidence do I have and can I use it
Columbine v GEO Group Australia t/a GEO
Fair Work Commission held: – that GEO’s request for both a further report, and authorisation to discuss the workers injury with her doctor were reasonable and lawful directions. – a request that the worker assist GEO to be confident that her return to work would not cause a risk to herself and others, in the context of a prison environment, cannot be construed as unreasonable; – accordingly, worker was not unfairly dismissed.
SLIDE 23 Step 5 – Procedural fairness
Best practice:
- Advise the person of the medical evidence and what you believe this means
for the employment relationship.
- Allow the person an opportunity to have a support person present.
- Provide the person with a reasonable time frame and opportunity to
respond.
- Give appropriate consideration to any response.
SLIDE 24 Step 6 – Has the relationship become frustrated?
- Is the incapacity of such a nature, or is likely to continue for such a period,
that the further performance by the worker of their obligations is impossible
- r something radically different.
- Must consider:
– the terms of the contract, including the provisions made for sick pay; – how long the employment would have continued; – the nature of the employment; – the nature and effect of the illness; – the length of the worker’s past employment
SLIDE 25
Summary
Step 1 Do any time restrictions apply? Step 2 Can the worker meet the genuine occupational requirements of their role? Step 3 Are there adjustments that I can make to the role, or does the worker require special services/facilities? If so, would making/allowing these adjustments, or providing these services/facilities place an unjustifiably hardship on the business? Step 4 What evidence do I have and can I use it? Step 5 Have I afforded the worker procedural fairness? Step 6 Has the relationship become frustrated?
SLIDE 26 For more information, please contact: Scott Falvey, Principal or James Christensen, Senior Associate
sfalvey@mcw.com.au jchristensen@mcw.com.au