Northwest Area Contingency Plan for Oil Spill Response - Status of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

northwest area contingency plan for oil spill response
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Northwest Area Contingency Plan for Oil Spill Response - Status of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Northwest Area Contingency Plan for Oil Spill Response - Status of ESA Consultation with NMFS Scott A. Hecht, Ph.D. Chief, Washington Coast-Lower Columbia River Branch National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered S Speci cies Act


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Northwest Area Contingency Plan for Oil Spill Response - Status of ESA Consultation with NMFS

Scott A. Hecht, Ph.D. Chief, Washington Coast-Lower Columbia River Branch National Marine Fisheries Service

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Endangered S Speci cies Act Consultation P Proce cess

  • Action Agencies: U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency

  • Pre-consultation Discussions
  • Biological Assessment
  • Draft Biological Opinion
  • Review and discussion with Action Agencies
  • Final Biological Opinion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

BNSF/UP trains transport 154,000 barrels of crude oil from North Dakota/Wyoming to Ferndale/Anacortes Refineries Trans-Mountain pipeline delivers bitumen crude oil from Alberta to Ferndale/Anacortes refineries Olympic pipeline transports refined oil (diesel, gasoline and jet fuel) form Ferndale/Anacortes refineries to Seattle, Tacoma, and Portland. Kinder Morgan pipeline transports refined oil from Portland to Eugene. Tidewater barges deliver refined

  • il from Portland to Pasco

Action Area: >11,000 gallon spill in transportation corridors

Tankers deliver crude oil to Ferndale/ Anacortes refineries Tankers and towed barges transport refined oil from refineries to Seattle/Tacoma Tankers and barges transport refined oil along the West Coast

Red lines = Railways Black lines = Pipelines

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Proposed A Act ctions i in n Respo ponse to an n Oil Spi Spill

Spills into salmonid freshwater spawning, rearing and migration habitat:

  • Vessels and Booms to control oil
  • Sorbents to collect surface oil
  • Vehicles and heavy equipment in

staging areas, riparian buffer and floodplain

  • Pits and trenches to collect oil
  • Excavation of contaminated

sediment, vegetation and LWD

  • Manual collection of contaminated

sediment,

  • Ambient temperature low pressure

washing of oiled streambanks into pits and trenches

  • Transportation of solid waste
  • Decontamination of vessels, vehicles

and equipment

  • Transportation of liquid hazardous

waste Spills into small freshwater tributaries:

  • All of the previously mentioned
  • Underflow dams and berms for

tributaries less than 10 feet wide

  • Block Culverts for culverts less than 2

feet diameter Spills into Columbia River, Willamette River, Puget Sound and Pacific Ocean:

  • All of the previously mentioned
  • In situ burn

Puget Sound, Strait of Juan de Fuca and Pacific Ocean:

  • All of the previously mentioned
  • Chemical Dispersants
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Use of dispersants is pre-approved Use of dispersants must be authorized by regional review team

Action Area: In Open Ocean and Coastline

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ESA Listed Species

Likely to Adversely Affect (LAA)

  • Puget Sound salmon and steelhead
  • Puget Sound yelloweye and boccacio
  • Lake Ozette sockeye
  • LCR, MCR, U Columbia River salmon and

steelhead

  • Oregon Coast salmon and steelhead
  • Snake River salmon and steelhead
  • Eulachon
  • Green sturgeon

Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA)

  • Southern Resident Killer Whale
  • All other Pacific Ocean whales
  • All Pacific Ocean turtles
  • O. keta
  • O. nerka
  • O. mykiss
  • O. tshawytscha

Oncorhynchus kisutch Thaleichthys pacificus NMFS ESA-listed species within OCNMS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

NOAA Fisheries pre-approved monitoring and three hazing actions that the Unified Command will use if killer whales have been observed or are likely to be within 50 miles of an oil spill. 1. Designate a killer whale liaison to initiate communications with killer whale experts, researchers, sighting networks and advocacy groups to monitor/track the whale’s movements relative to cleanup activities and the spill trajectory. 2. Dispatch a trained whale observer to identify the type of killer whales and, if residents, which members of the Southern Resident killer whale population are present. 3. Order real-time reconnaissance (vessels or aircraft) for continuous monitoring if killer whales appear to be moving toward the spill, the spill trajectory, or clean-up activities and/or are found within 20 to 30 miles (6 hours) of oil or trajectory. 4. Ready hazing assets for deployment and staged to be on scene if whales are expected to approach within 10 miles (2 hours) of oil or spill trajectory. 5. Use helicopters, Oikami pipes, and underwater firecrackers deployed from vessels to prevent killer whales from entering oil. (Oikami pipes are reverberating pipes suspended from a vessel into the water and struck with a hammer. They have been effective tools for herding killer whales in near-shore or enclosed waters).

NOTE: Keeping Killer Whales Away from Oil spills

slide-8
SLIDE 8

River Steelhead populations Chinook populations Coho populations Chum populations 2000 barrel oil spill concentration after 10 hour of turbulent mixing (ppm)

Columbia River

Steelhead: UCR; Wenatchee River, Entiat River,Crab Creek, Methow River, Okanogan River, Sanpoil River, Kettle River, Pend Oreville, Kooteney River, Spokane River, Hangman Creek. LCR; Tilton River, Upper Cowlitz, Lower Cowlitz, Cispus, NFTR, SFTR, Coweeman, Kalama, NF Lewis, EF Lewis, Salmon Creek Washougal, Sandy, Upper Gorge Tribs, Lower Gorge Tribs, Hood River,

  • Clackamas. Willamette:

Molalla, North Santiam, South Santiam, Calopooia. Chinook: UCR; Wenatchee River, Entiat river, Methow River, Okanogan River, Sanpoil River, Kettle River, Kooteney River, Spokane River, Hangman Creek. LCR; Youngs Bay, Big Creek, Grays, Elochoman, Mill Creek, Clatskanie, Scappoose, Lower Cowlitz, Upper Cowlitz, Toutle, Coweeman, Kalama, Lewis, Salmon Creek, Washougal, Sandy, Lower Gorge Tribs, Upper Gorge Tribs, Hood River, White Salmon River. Willamette: Clackamas, Mollalla, North Santiam, South Santiam, Calapooia, McKenzie, Middle Fork Willamette Youngs Bay, Big Creek, Chinook and Grays, Elochoman, Mill Creek, Clatskanie, Scappoose, Lower Cowlitz, Tilton, Upper Cowlitz, Cispus, North Fork Toutle, South Fork Toutle, Coweeman, Kalama, North Fork Lewis, East fork Lewis, Salmon Creek, Washougal, Sandy, Lower Gorge Tribs, Upper Gorge Tribs, Hood River, White Salmon River. Youngs Bay, Big Creek, Grays and Chinook, Elochoman, Mill Creek, Clatskanie, Scappoose, Cowlitz, Kalama, Lewis, Salmon Creek, Washougal, Sandy, Lower Gorge Tribs, Upper Gorge Tribs.

200

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Environmental Baseline

Mechanical Dispersion of 2000 Barrel Railroad Spill in Columbia River One dimensional simulation of a 2000 barrel train (80,000 gallons) derailment oil spill between the Dalles Dam and the Bonneville Dam with flow velocity of 0.18 meters per second and longitudinal dispersion coefficient of 35 square meters per second.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Effec ects o

  • f the

e Proposed Action i in Fr Fres eshwater

Action Adverse Effects Coast Guard and EPA will ensure: Vessels and booms Anchors on benthic habitat/redds Environmental Unit consults NMFS on spawning at the spill site Sorbents Concentrated NAPL if sunk or lost Sorbent monitoring and replacement Vehicles and heavy equipment to construct pits and trenches Sediment exposed to erosion, removal of vegetation, lost shade Engineered erosion control Leave lightly oiled vegetation Mechanical excavation and manual removal of contaminated sediment Sediment exposed to erosion, lights at night, removal of benthic organisms, transfer contamination deeper into sediment, workers in streams Equipment and foot traffic restrictions Engineered erosion control Ambient temperature low pressure washing of oiled substrate Sediment Engineered erosion controls Skimming and vacuum May entrain eggs, larvae, small fish EU consults with NMFS Duckbill nozzles Dams and Berms in creek up to 10 meters wide Block or delay migration Consult with NMFS on spawner/smolt presence Culvert blocks Block migration Consult with NMFS on spawner/smolt presence

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Effec ects o

  • f the

e Proposed A Action in C Columbia River, Puge get Sou

  • und, an

and P Pac acif ific ic Oc Ocean

Action Effect Conservation measures In-situ burn Exposure to burn residue Retrieve burn residue when possible Environmental Unit consults with NMFS Chemical dispersants Increased oil exposure to fish in the water column Rapid dilution Consult with NOAA except in pre-authorized area

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Chemical Dispersant Oil Complex Dilutes Rapidly

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Chemical Dispersants are authorized only after consultation with NMFS Case-by-Case Authorization Zones are areas where RRT 10 must approve each application of dispersants, which is done on the first day after a spill

  • ccurs and includes:
  • All US marine waters in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca that

are both within 3 nautical miles from the coastline or an island shoreline, and greater than 10 fathoms (60 ft) in depth;

  • Waters designated as a part of a the Olympic Coast National Marine

Sanctuary and waters that are part of the Makah Tribe Usual and Accustomed marine area and that are also greater than 10 fathoms (60 ft) in depth;

  • The Strait of Juan de Fuca and North Puget Sound from Point Wilson to

Admiralty Head and north, and greater than 10 fathoms (60 ft) in depth; and

  • Waters within 5 km (3 miles) of the border of the country of Canada or

the Makah Tribe Usual and Accustomed marine area.

Chemical Dispersant Conservation Measures

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Proposed Action Adverse Effect Best Management Practices Effects Analysis

Use of vessels to move responders and equipment around the spill and position booms Vessels and vessel anchors can disturb shoreline and channel bottom habitat Vessels will not be used in small, shallow spawning streams. NMFS will advise responders on spawning in the stream Anchor damage to channel or benthic substrate will recover during the next bedload moving event. Establish access points from staging areas to the spill. Cut vegetation to construct trails so that vessels and equipment can get to the spill Removing vegetation destabilizes soil and reduces shade to keep water cool. Trails expose sediment that can be eroded into the stream Deploy silt fences to capture eroded sediment until the streambank is restored by Responsible Party The removal of a vegetation to provide access to the spill is unlikely to reduce shade enough to increase the water

  • temperature. In the long run, the

responsible party will be required to restore vegetation destroyed in the response. Vacuuming to remove oil concentrated by booming or herding oil in the water

  • r flushing oil on the streamband into

the water Vacuums can entrain early life stage salmonid species and eulachon Vacuums use flat head nozzles to minimize the amount of water collected decrease fish entrainment Vacuuming is done is small areas behind booms where oil is concentrated by booms, herding or flushing to be recovered. Response activity should discourage fish away from this area. Entrainment of small fish will be minimal and not anticipated to produce population level impacts

Effects Analysis: Examples of Response Actions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proposed Action Adverse Effect Best management practices Effects Analysis

In situ burning will be used to remove

  • il that cannot be

recovered by skimmers or vacuums In situ burning adds heat the re water column and creates a residue that sinks to the bottom and buries critical habitat. Responders will capture and remove as much of the in situ residue as possible. Studies show that minimal in situ burn heat is transferred into the water column. The toxic constituents in the oil are combustible so the residue is non-toxic. In most cases, it will be dispersed naturally over time. In large water bodies where in-situ burns are feasible, the fraction of benthic habitat buried by residue is to small to affect fish foraging. Chemical dispersants will be used to accelerate the mechanical dispersion of oil spills if they threaten to reach sensitive shoreline habitat Chemical dispersants disperse oil vertically so that fish in the water column are more exposed than they are when the slick is floating, and exposed fish may experience toxicity Responders will consult with NMFS to assess trade offs between exposing fish in the water columan to oil and oiling the shoreline. Chemical dispersants are used in large water areas where the probability of fish exposure is much lower than in freshwater streams. Chemical dispersants are not very toxic to fish but the do increase fish exposure to toxic constituents in oil in the upper 10 meters of the water column. Models show that chemically dispersed oil dilutes below toxic concentrations in 1-2 days.

Effects Analysis: Examples of Response Actions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Action agencies delivered final BA to NMFS and USFWS NMFS and Action Agencies initiate consultation BiOp due (135 Days) Federal Shutdown New BiOp due date Start Draft BiOp internal review Complete Draft BiOp internal Review Action Agencies Complete Review of Draft BiOp Final Signed BiOp July 16, 2018 Sept 17,2018 Jan 16, 2018 Dec 22, 2018 to Jan 28, 2019 March 1, 2019 March 12, 2019 April 12, 2019 May 12, 2019 June 1, 2019

Where Are We now? ESA Consultation Timeline (draft)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank You and Questions Welcome

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Extra slides

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Effects of Response Actions in Freshwater

Response Actions

  • Actions that create sediment effects to salmon, steelhead and eulachon spawning substrate and redds
  • Actions that create suspended sediment effects to fish
  • Actions remove oiled streambank vegetation, cobble and LWD
  • Actions that concentrate spilled oil
  • Response actions entrain salmon, steelhead and eulachon eggs, larvae and juveniles
  • Response actions (lights) alter salmon, steelhead and eulachon behavior

Conservation Measures

  • NMFS guidance on spills in spawning habitat
  • Engineered erosion controls
  • Sorbent monitoring
  • NMFS guidance and duckbill nozzles on vacuums
  • Short response times
slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • In 1964 a barge carrying 56,000 barrels of gasoline, diesel and stove oil from the Ferndale refineries grounded on a sandbar several hundred yards
  • ffshore between Moclips and Pacific Beach just south of the Quinault Indian Reservation. 28,572 barrels of petroleum leaked into the water.
  • In 1972 the USS General M.C. Meigs got loose from tow and drifted into rocks offshore the southwest corner of the Makah Indian Reservation spilling

54,763 barrels of heavy fuel oil into the water over 10 months.

  • In September 1983 Olympic pipeline spilled 4000 barrels of diesel fuel at the Allen pump station in Skagit County.
  • In November 1985, 738 barrels of jet fuel spilled into Des Moines Creek near Sea-Tac Airport south of Seattle.
  • In May 1986, 1785 barrels of gasoline, jet fuel and diesel fuel leaked from the Olympic pipeline in the Renton Area of south King county.
  • In February 1988, 4000 barrels of diesel fuel spilled from an Olympic pipeline rupture at the Allen Station. The oil was contained in an adjacent field

and didn’t reach surface water.

  • In February1990, 285 barrels of diesel fuel spilled from a failed gasket at the Olympic pipeline Woodinville pump station.
  • In 1985 the tanker ship Mobiloil leaked 5548 barrels of heavy fuel oil into the Columbia River when rudder failure caused it to ran aground and rip a

long gash through its starboard cargo tanks, ten miles downstream from Portland.

  • In 1985 the Arco Anchorage ran aground while anchored in Port Angeles Harbor, tearing two long holes in the hull and spilling 5690 barrels of Alaskan

crude had spilled into the harbor.

  • In 1988 the tank barge MCN-5 capsized and sank in Rosario Strait spilling 1595 barrels of heavy cycle gas oil while being towed from the Texaco

refinery in Anacortes to Seattle.

  • In 1988 the barge Nestucca spilled 5500 barrels of bunker fuel when it ran aground and collided with its tug.
  • In 1991 the Japanese vessel Tenyo Maru sank with 11,309 barrels of fuel with it collided with the Chinese freighter Tuo Hai about 25 miles northwest
  • f Cape Flattery.
  • In 1994 a Crowley Marine Services’ barge cargo tank ruptured after running aground somewhere on Clements Reef north of Sucia Island and leaked

641 barrels of diesel oil into Rosario Strait north of Anacortes.

  • In 1999, the Olympic pipeline ruptured and spilled 4762 barrels of gasoline into Whatcum creek in Bellingham (NTSB, 2002).
  • In 2011 the barge Davy Crockett Par sank near Camas, Washington and leaked fuel oil. Cleanup efforts recovered 1.6 million gallons of oily water and

an additional 904 barrels of bunker oil.

  • In 2015 16 Union Pacific tank cars derailed near Moisier, Oregon spilling 1000 barrels of crude oil. An unknown amount of oil entered the Columbia

River.

Environmental Baseline

Spill History in Washington State

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Chain of command Chart

Federal On Scene Coordinator Planning Environmental Unit