of Aichi Biodiversity Targets 11 & 12 Capacity-building workshop - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
of aichi biodiversity targets 11 12
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

of Aichi Biodiversity Targets 11 & 12 Capacity-building workshop - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 26, 2022 372 likes •778 views

Sub-regional Analysis of the Status of Aichi Biodiversity Targets 11 & 12 Capacity-building workshop for East Asia and Southeast Asia on achieving Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 and 12 Yanji City, Jilin Province, China Dr. Sarat Babu Gidda

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sub-regional Analysis of the Status

  • f Aichi Biodiversity Targets 11 & 12

Capacity-building workshop for East Asia and Southeast

Asia on achieving Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 and 12 Yanji City, Jilin Province, China

  • Dr. Sarat Babu Gidda

Convention on Biological Diversity

15 September 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Explanation of the Elements for Aichi Targets 11

By 2020, at least 17 % of terrestrial and inland water areas, and 10 % of coastal and marine areas, … especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, … are conserved through … protected areas that are… … effectively and equitably managed, … ecologically representative, … well connected systems, integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes, … and other effective area-based conservation measures

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Target 11- quantitative aspects

17% terrestrial and 10 % of coastal and marine areas ?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Target 11

What are areas of particular importance for biodiversity? Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

  • Important Bird Areas
  • Important Plant Areas
  • Alliance for Zero Extinction sites
  • Areas rich in wild relatives of crops

Vulnerability and Irreplaceability

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Target 11

Ecosystem services of Protected Areas

  • Water security
  • Food and health security
  • subsistence, livelihoods
  • CC adaptation & mitigation
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ecologically Representative

.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ecological Gap Assessment

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Target 11

What is effectively managed ?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Effective management

By 2020, areas are conserved through effective management…

  • Conservation needs equity: a fair sharing of the costs

and benefits of preserving biodiversity and managing natural resources in a sustainable way

  • Conservation needs respect to human rights: “do not

harm”…and have a positive impact on livelihoods wherever possible

  • So…what can we do to avoid further loss of habitats,

species and natural resources?

  • How can we ensure the very base of life, of livelihoods,

and development ?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Equitable Management: IUCN matrix of protected areas categories and governance types

Governance type Category (mngmt.

  • bjective)
  • A. Governance by

Government

  • B. Shared Governance
  • C. Private

Governance

  • D. Indigenous Peoples &

Community Governance

Federal

  • r

national ministry

  • r

agency Local/ municipa l ministry

  • r agency

in change Governm ent- delegated managem ent (e.g. to an NGO) Trans- boundary managem ent Collabora tive managem ent (various forms of pluralist influence) Joint management (pluralist management board) Declared and run by individu al land-

  • wner

…by non- profit

  • rganisat

ions (e.g. NGOs, univ. etc.) …by for profit

  • rganisatio

ns (e.g. corporate land-owners )

Indigenous bio- cultural areas & Territories- declared and run by Indigenous Peoples Community Conserved Areas

  • declared and

run by traditional peoples and local communities

I - Strict Nature Reserve/ Wilderness Area II – National Park (ecosystem protection; protection of cultural values) III – Natural Monument IV – Habitat/ Species Management V – Protected Landscape/ Seascape VI – Managed Resource

slide-11
SLIDE 11

i.e. Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas, ICCA

WCPA

Equitable Management

ICCA

Community Management

Government Private Community Shared governance

By 2020, areas are conserved through equitably managed…

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Integration and Connectivity

By 2020, areas are conserved through well connected systems, integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Target 11

What are other effective area-based conservation measures?

  • ICCAs including LMMAs
  • Private PAs
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Building on tradition, tenure and social capital

Ngella, Solomon Islands Siviri, Vanuatu

Photos: Hugh Govan

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Aichi Biodiversity Target 12

By 2020, …the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and… …their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Status of Target 11s and 12

17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water are protected 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas are protected Areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services are protected Protected areas are ecologically representative Protected areas are effectively and equitably managed Protected areas are well connected and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape Extinction of known threatened species has been prevented The conservation status of those species most in decline has been improved and sustained

slide-17
SLIDE 17

15.37% 8.4% 10.9% 13.07% 2.20% 7.83%

0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00%

Percentage of global areas protected in 2004 (red) and 2014 (blue)

Land Areas within national jurisdiction (0-200 nautical miles) Territorial Seas (0-12 nautical miles)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

65 46 83 79 49 66 20 40 60 80 100 0-7.99% 8-16.99% >17%

Number of CBD Parties at different levels of protection (percentage) for terrestrial areas in 2004 (red) and 2014 (blue)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

15.4% 28.1% 24.4% 16.0% 15.2% 14.8% 14.5% 13.9% 12.3% 11.7% 13.1% 27.3% 18.3% 14.9% 15.0% 11.1% 11.1% 13.7% 11.8% 10.9% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% World Central America South America Europe Middle East Africa Oceania Caribbean Asia North America

Percentage of terrestrial area protected in 2004 (red) and 2014 (blue)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

59 46 49 72 44 38 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0-1.99% 2-9.99% >10%

Number of CBD Parties at different levels of protection (percentage) for territorial seas up to 12 nauticle miles in 2004 (red) and 2014 (blue)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

10.9% 18.7% 18.3% 17.9% 14.3% 9.0% 7.9% 4.3% 4.2% 3.1% 7.8% 13.8% 11.5% 14.1% 9.1% 7.9% 4.9% 2.5% 3.3% 2.7% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% World Europe Oceania South America Central America North America Africa Asia Middle East Caribbean

Percentage of territorial seas protected in 2004 (red) and 2014 (blue)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

88 111 150 124 221 129

50 100 150 200 250 <2% 2-4.99% 5-9.99% 10-16.99% 17-39.99% >40%

Number of terrestrial ecoregions at different levels of protection (2014)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

80 40 34 78

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 <2% 2-4.99% 5-9.99% >10%

Number of marine ecoregions at different levels of protection (2014)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

48 88 85 26 28 31 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0-16.99% 17-49.99% >50%

The number of countries with different levels of protected area coverage for Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites (red) and Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (blue)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Percentage of Protected Areas in East Asia and Southeast Asia

By 2020, (globally) at least 17 % of terrestrial and inland water areas, and 10 % of coastal and marine areas, are conserved through protected areas National targets should be accumulative to reach global target

4.6 3.6 4.8 16.1 16.9 14.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Total East Asia + Southeast Asia East Asia Southeast Asia % Terrestrial PA % Marine PA

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Percentage of terrestrial protected areas in 2004 and 2014 in East Asia and Southeast Asia

17.0 2.5 19.4 17.2 7.6 44.1 26.0 14.6 16.7 18.4 7.2 11.0 5.8 18.8 8.7 6.5 16.9 2.5 18.9 13.6 5.4 44.1 25.4 14.4 16.6 18.3 6.9 10.9 5.8 17.3 3.4 6.4

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 China DPR of Korea Japan Mongolia Republic of Korea Brunei Darussalam Cambodia Indonesia Lao PDR Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Timor-Leste Viet Nam % PA 2004 % PA 2014

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Percentage of marine protected areas in 2004 and 2014 in East Asia and Southeast Asia

2.3 0.1 5.1 4.3 1.5 0.5 5.8 2.3 0.2 2.5 1.4 5.2 3.8 1.8 2.0 0.1 5.0 3.8 1.5 0.5 2.7 2.0 0.2 2.5 1.4 5.0 1.7

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 China DPR Korea Japan Republic of Korea Brunei Darussalam Cambodia Indonesia Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Timor-Leste Viet Nam % PA 2004 % PA 2014

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Protection Status of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) in East Asia and Southeast Asia

By 2020, areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved

552 282 270 546 266 280 237 169 68

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Total East Asia + Southeast Asia East Asia Southeast Asia Number of IBAs with complete protection Number of IBAs with partial protection Number of IBAs with no protection

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Protection Status of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) in East Asia and Southeast Asia

125 26 64 35 32 15 92 8 14 36 53 1 11 8 31 148 7 83 21 7 4 23 70 15 41 11 41 2 44 5 24 137 19 12 1 1 2 36 3 4 11 5 3 3

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Number of IBAs with complete protection Number of IBAs with partial protection Number of IBAs with no protection

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Protection Status of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in danger (IBAs in danger) in East Asia and Southeast Asia

19 1 18 3 3 4 4

5 10 15 20 25 30 Total East Asia + Southeast Asia East Asia Southeast Asia Number of IBAs in danger with complete protection Number of IBAs in danger with partial protection Number of IBAs in danger with no protection

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Protection Status of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in danger (IBAs in danger) in East Asia and Southeast Asia

1 1 4 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 2 1 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 DPR Korea Japan Cambodia Indonesia Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Thailand Viet Nam

Number of IBAs in danger with complete protection Number of IBAs in danger with partial protection Number of IBAs in danger with no protection

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Protection Status of Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites (AZEs) in East Asia and Southeast Asia

26 7 19 23 9 14 25 13 12

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Total East Asia + Southeast Asia East Asia Southeast Asia

Number of AZEs with complete protection Number of AZEs with partial protection Number of AZEs with no protection

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Protection Status of Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites (AZEs) in East Asia and Southeast Asia

6 1 1 14 1 3 1 6 3 3 7 2 2 3 11 2 2 10 2

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 China DPR Korea Japan Indonesia Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Viet Nam Number of AZEs with complete protection Number of AZEs with partial protection Number of AZEs with no protection

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Ecological Representativeness in East Asia and Southeast Asia

Number of terrestrial ecological regions (ER) and level of protection

58 21 37 47 24 23 125 50 75

50 100 150 200 250 Total East Asia + Southeast Asia East Asia Southeast Asia Number of terrestrial ER with >10% protection Number of terrestrial ER with 5% to 10% protection Number of terrestrial ER with < 5% protection

slide-35
SLIDE 35

14 4 2 1 1 5 2 2 11 5 3 8 18 1 4 1 11 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 30 8 11 1 4 7 22 6 10 6 5 11 4

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Number of terrestrial ER with >10% protection Number of terrestrial ER with 5% to 10% protection Number of terrestrial ER with < 5% protection

Ecological Representativeness in East Asia and Southeast Asia

Number of terrestrial ecological regions (ER) and level of protection

slide-36
SLIDE 36

48 15 33 4 4 9 2 7

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Total East Asia + Southeast Asia East Asia Southeast Asia Number of marine ER with >10% protection Number of marine ER with 5% to 10% protection Number of marine ER with < 5% protection

Ecological Representativeness in East Asia and Southeast Asia

Number of marine ecological regions (ER) and level of protection

slide-37
SLIDE 37

3 2 6 3 1 10 6 3 4 1 3 5 1 2 1 2 5 1 1

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Number of marine ER with >10% protection Number of marine ER with 5% to 10% protection Number of marine ER with < 5% protection

Ecological Representativeness in East Asia and Southeast Asia

Number of marine ecological regions (ER) and level of protection

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Group Work

Element of Aichi Target 11 and 12 Status Gaps Opportunities Quantitative aspects i.e. % of total protected areas for terrestrial and marine i.e. % to reach national target i.e. % gap between current status + implementation and national target Improving ecological representation i.e. % of ecoregions protected to national target i.e. % of ecoregions needing protection to reach national target i.e. tools and partnerships needed to develop ecological gaps assessment i.e. 20% of 5 endemic ecoregions will be protected i.e. partnership with X for national training

  • n ecological mapping

….

Summarize quantitative information collected from the questionnaire in one

  • r two points.

What is needed to complete conservation gap? Points made can be:

  • tangible/ quantitative
  • in-tangible/ qualitative

What specific elements are feasible? Points made can be:

  • tangible/ quantitative
  • in-tangible/ qualitative