On (2,3)-generated groups Maxim Vsemirnov Steklov Institute of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on 2 3 generated groups
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On (2,3)-generated groups Maxim Vsemirnov Steklov Institute of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z On (2,3)-generated groups Maxim Vsemirnov Steklov Institute of Mathematics at St. Petersburg Group Theory Conference in honor of V. D.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

On (2,3)-generated groups

Maxim Vsemirnov

Steklov Institute of Mathematics at St. Petersburg

Group Theory Conference in honor of V. D. Mazurov Novosibirsk, July 20, 2013

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Outline

1

Definitions and motivations

2

(2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups

3

(2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Outline

1

Definitions and motivations

2

(2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups

3

(2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

(2,3)-generated groups

Definition A (2,3)-generated group is a group generated by an involution and an element of order 3. Definition An (m, n)-generated group is a group generated by two elements of order m and n, respectively. Why is the (2,3)-generation problem interesting?

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Why do we look at (2, 3)?

The modular group PSL2(Z) is isomorphic to the free product of two cyclic groups, C2 and C3. PSL2(Z) = −1 1

  • ,

−1 1 −1

  • ≃ C2 ∗ C3.

Thus, apart from {1}, C2, and C3, all quotients of PSL2(Z) are exactly the (2, 3)-generated groups.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Comparison with PSLn(Z), n ≥ 3.

Remark The normal subgroup structure of PSL2(Z) differs dramatically from the normal subgroup structure of PSLn(Z), n ≥ 3. Namely, for n ≥ 3, any subgroup of finite index in PSLn(Z) is a so-called congruence subgroup, i.e., contains the kernel of PSLn(Z) → PSLn(Z/mZ) for some m. In contrast, PSL2(Z) contains many noncongruence normal subgroups (even of finite index).

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Outline

1

Definitions and motivations

2

(2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups

3

(2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Two different approaches

There are two different groups of methods in this area: constructive, i.e., when the corresponding generators are given explicitly; non-constructive, e.g., probabilistic, when only existence theorems are known (usually require a good knowledge of the characters and maximal subgroups). Constructive methods can be also applied to infinite groups.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Known results

1

For any m, PSL2(Z/mZ) is (2,3)-generated (trivial)

2

An, n ≥ 4, are (2, 3)-generated except A6, A7 , and A8 (Miller, 1901).

3

Sporadic groups are (2,3)-generated except M11, M22, M23, and McL (Woldar, 1989)

4

2B2(22k+1) are not (2,3)-generated (trivial, since they do

not contain elements of order 3)

5

Other exceptional Lie groups are (2, 3)-generated (Malle, 1990, 1995, Malle and Lübeck, 1999)

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Classical groups and the (2,3)-generation

Negative results for certain small groups: PSL2(9) ≃ Sp4(2)′ ≃ A6, PSL4(2) ≃ A8, PSL3(4), PSU3(9). For n large enough, SLn(q) are (2,3)-generated; Tamburini, J. Wilson (1994–1995), n ≥ 14; Di Martino, Vavilov (1994–1996) for n ≥ 5, q = 3, q = 2k. PSp4(pk) are (2,3)-generated if p = 2, 3 (Di Martino and Cazzola, 1993). PSp4(pk) are not (2,3)-generated if p = 2, 3 (Liebeck and Shalev, 1996). Almost all classical groups are (2, 3)-generated (Liebeck and Shalev, 1996).

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Probabilistic methods

Theorem (Liebeck, Shalev, 1996) Let G run through some infinite set of finite classical groups, G = PSp4(pk). Then lim

|G|→∞ Prob(x2 = y3 = 1 and G = x, y) = 1.

Moreover, the result remains true if we fix the field and let the rank tend to infinity; if we fix the type and let the size of the field tend to infinity.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

New examples of non (2,3)-generated groups

Theorem (V., 2011) PSU5(4) is not (2, 3)-generated. |PSU5(4)| = 13, 685, 760 = 210 · 35 · 5 · 11 A sketch of the proof.

  • 1. dim ker(x − 1) = 3 and y ∼ diag(1, ω, ω, ω−1, ω−1),

ω2 + ω + 1 = 0.

x =       1 c 1 −c 1 d 1 −d 1       , y =       1 a b −1 1 −1 −1 1 −1       ,

for some a, b, c, d.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

A sketch of the proof (cont.)

  • 2. If det

  3 + a ac + bd − b a + b −1 b + cd + c c − a − 1 −1 1 − c + d2 + d 1 + d   = 0, then

x, y has a 1-dimensional invariant space.

  • 3. If x, y preserves a hermitian form then

a = −d − dσ − 1, b = −c + cσ + d + dσ + d2 + ddσ − 1.

  • 4. There are 16 pairs of parameters (c, d).

For four of them, the group is defined over F2. For ten of them, det(· · · ) = 0. For the remaining two, setting z = yx we have z11 = x2 = (zx)3 = (z4xz6x)2 = 1, a well-known presentation of PSL2(11).

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

New examples of non (2,3)-generated groups

Theorem (Pellegrini, Tamburini Bellani, V., 2012) PSU4(9) is not (2, 3)-generated. Theorem (V., 2012) Ω+

8 (2), PΩ+ 8 (3) are not (2, 3)-generated.

|PSU4(9)| = 3, 265, 920 = 27 · 36 · 5 · 7 |Ω+

8 (2)| = 174, 182, 400 = 212 · 35 · 52 · 7

|PΩ+

8 (3)| = 4, 952, 179, 814, 400 = 212 · 312 · 52 · 7 · 13

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Non (2,3)-generated finite simple groups

1

PSp4(2k)

2

PSp4(3k), in particular PSp4(3) ≃ PSU4(4)

3

2B2(22k+1)

4

A6 ≃ PSL2(9) ≃ Sp4(2)′, A7, A8 ≃ PSL4(2)

5

PSL3(4), PSU3(9) ≃ G2(2)′

6

M11, M22, M23, McL

7

PSU5(4)

8

PSU4(9)

9

Ω+

8 (2), PΩ+ 8 (3)

10 ?

I strongly believe that the list is complete.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Outline

1

Definitions and motivations

2

(2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups

3

(2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

The main Theorem

Theorem The groups SLn(Z) and GLn(Z) are (2, 3)-generated precisely when n ≥ 5

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

An overview of results

SL2(Z) is not (2, 3)-generated as it contains no non-central involution. SL4(Z) and GL4(Z) are not (2, 3)-generated as SL4(2) = GL4(2) ≃ A8 is not (Miller, 1901) SL3(Z) and GL3(Z) are not (2, 3)-generated (Nuzhin, 2001, Tamburini, Zucca, 2001). SLn(Z) and GLn(Z) are (2, 3)-generated for n ≥ 14 (Tamburini, et al. 1994–1995, 2009) For SL5(Z), GL5(Z) and SL6(Z) there are at most finitely many conjugacy classes of (2, 3)-generators (Luzgarev, Pevzner, 2003, Vsemirnov, 2006). The groups SLn(Z) and GLn(Z), n = 5, . . . , 13 are (2, 3)-generated (Vsemirnov, 2007–2009).

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

An idea of the proof

Two difficult problems: to guess the shape of (2, 3)-generators; to show that they actually generate SLn(Z). The main idea: show that x, y contains some generating set

  • f SLn(Z).

For instance, one can show that x, y contains elementary transvections tij(α) = I + αeij, i = j.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

One rather complicated example

x =       −3 4 4 −1 −1 4 −1 2 1 2 −2 −1 −6 −1 1 2       , y =       2 −2 1 1 3 −2 −1 1 −2 2 −1 −1 1 −1 2 −2 −1 −3 1       . h1 = (yx)3(y2x)3yxy2x, h2 = h−4

1

= t52(2), h3 = yxy2xyxy2, h4 = yxyxyxy2xyxyxy2, . . . h51 = h47h48h49h50h6

2h−1 20 h−13 21 h−15 29 h15 12h−8 36 = t53(1)

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Two special cases

Let M = Matn(Q). If x, y is absolutely irreducible then dim CM(x) + dim CM(y) + dim CM(xy) ≤ n2 + 2. Further analysis depends on whether dim CM(x) + dim CM(y) + dim CM(xy) < n2 + 2

  • r

dim CM(x) + dim CM(y) + dim CM(xy) = n2 + 2. In the latter case it is possible to classify all (2, 3)-generating pairs of SLn(Z) up to conjugation. This happens precisely when n = 5 and n = 6.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

SL5(Z)

Theorem (V., 2007) Any (2, 3)-generating pair of SL5(Z) is conjugate in GL5(Z) to

  • ne of the pairs −X, Y, and any (2, 3)-generating pair of

GL5(Z) is conjugate to one of the pairs X, Y, where

X =       −1 −1 −1 1 1 1 1       , Y =       1 a1 −1 −1 a2 1 a3 −1 −1 a4 1       ,

and (a1, a2, a3, a4) is one of the sets

(1, −1, −2, −2), (0, −1, −2, −2), (−1, 1, −2, −2), (0, 1, −2, −2), (1, −1, 1, −3), (0, −1, 0, −1).

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

SL6(Z)

Theorem (V., 2012) Any (2, 3)-generating pair of SL6(Z) is conjugate in GL6(Z) to

  • ne of the pairs ±X, Y, where

X =   I2 B I2 −B I2   , Y =   I2 A −I2 I2 −I2   , A = a1 a2 a3 a4

  • ,

B = b1 b2 b3 b4

  • ,

and (b1, b2, b3, b4, a1, a2, a3, a4) is either (0, 2, −2, −3, 3, 1, −1, 1) or (1, −3, 3, −4, 1, 1, −1, 3).

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

A version of the ping-pong lemma

Lemma (V., 2007) Let x, y ∈ GLn(Z), n > 3, x2 = y3 = I. Assume that for some W ⊆ Rn and w ∈ Rn \ W, we have (i) xyW ⊆ W, xy2W ⊆ W ; (ii) xy · w ∈ W, xy2 · w ∈ W. Then x, y ≃ PSL2(Z). In particular, x, y = GLn(Z), x, y = SLn(Z).

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Definitions and motivations (2,3)-generated finite (simple) groups (2,3)-generated classical groups over Z

Symplectic case

Theorem (Vasiliev, Vsemirnov, 2008–2011) Sp2(Z), Sp4(Z), and Sp6(Z) are not (2, 3)-generated. Sp8(Z), Sp10(Z) are (2, 3)-generated. Sp2n(Z) are (2, 3)-generated for n ≥ 25. Cases 2n = 12, 14, . . . , 48 remain open. We expect the positive answer.

  • M. Vsemirnov

On (2,3)-generated groups