OPECS Market Role: Changing Signs? James L. Smith Southern - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

opec s market role changing signs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

OPECS Market Role: Changing Signs? James L. Smith Southern - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

15 th IAEE European Conference, September 5, 2017 OPECS Market Role: Changing Signs? James L. Smith Southern Methodist University, Dallas Texas jsmith@smu.edu Summary of OPECs Historical Market Role Restrict production to elevate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

15th IAEE European Conference, September 5, 2017

OPEC’S Market Role: Changing Signs?

James L. Smith Southern Methodist University, Dallas Texas jsmith@smu.edu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Summary of OPEC’s Historical Market Role

  • Restrict production to elevate price above competitive level.
  • 1994-1982:

Fixed posted price with agreed differentials

  • 1982-2015:

Official production quotas with member allocations

  • 2015-2016:

Abandon quotas: Maintain OPEC market share despite falling price

  • 2017-2018:

Return to official production quotas, include Russia, etc.

  • 2018- :

???

  • Slow development of incremental production capacity, to alleviate “cheating.”

(If they have it, they’ll use it).

  • Hold and manage spare capacity to offset shocks and dampen price volatility.

(Pierru, Smith, and Zamrik, forthcoming in The Energy Journal)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Summary of OPEC’s Historical Market Role

  • Restrict production to elevate price above competitive level.
  • 1994-1982:

Fixed posted price with agreed differentials

  • 1982-2015:

Official production quotas with member allocations

  • 2015-2016:

Abandon quotas: Maintain OPEC market share despite falling price

  • 2017-2018:

Return to official production quotas, include Russia, etc.

  • 2018- :

???

  • Slow development of incremental production capacity, to alleviate “cheating.”

(If they have it, they’ll use it).

  • Hold and manage spare capacity to offset shocks and dampen price volatility.

(Pierru, Smith, and Zamrik, forthcoming in The Energy Journal)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Summary of OPEC’s Historical Market Role

  • Restrict production to elevate price above competitive level.
  • 1994-1982:

Fixed posted price with agreed differentials

  • 1982-2015:

Official production quotas with member allocations

  • 2015-2016:

Abandon quotas: Maintain OPEC market share despite falling price

  • 2017-2018:

Return to official production quotas, include Russia, etc.

  • 2018- :

???

  • Slow development of incremental production capacity, to alleviate “cheating.”

(If they have it, they’ll use it).

  • Hold and manage spare capacity to offset shocks and dampen price volatility.

(Pierru, Smith, and Zamrik, forthcoming in The Energy Journal)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Defense of the Market Share Strategy

“Today OPEC is at or near the limits of its power. It is in a market share trap.”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Defense of the Market Share Strategy

“Today OPEC is at or near the limits of its power. It is in a market share trap.” “If they raise the price too high, they lose so much in sales that on balance they lose revenue. They can only find the

  • ptimal price or the monopoly ceiling by, again, trial and

error.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Defense of the Market Share Strategy

“Today OPEC is at or near the limits of its power. It is in a market share trap.” “If they raise the price too high, they lose so much in sales that on balance they lose revenue. They can only find the

  • ptimal price or the monopoly ceiling by, again, trial and

error.”

  • - M. A. Adelman, 1992

“Deja Vu All Over Again,” Energy Journal, vol. 36, Special Issue 1, 2015

slide-8
SLIDE 8

More Defense of the Market Share Strategy

  • “By my assessment, high prices were unsustainable. If prices

had not collapsed, OPEC production might have all but vanished.

  • “Inroads from competing sources, both oil and non-oil,

would have continued.”

  • “How low should prices be in order to ensure growing future

markets for OPEC’s oil? Is $14/barrel the ‘safe’ price?”

  • - Thomas Stauffer, 1994

“OPEC prices and non-OPEC oil production: Survivors and casualties

  • f the ‘market share’ strategy,” OPEC Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 4
slide-9
SLIDE 9

More Defense of the Market Share Strategy

  • “By my assessment, high prices were unsustainable. If prices

had not collapsed, OPEC production might have all but vanished.

  • “Inroads from competing sources, both oil and non-oil,

would have continued.”

  • “How low should prices be in order to ensure growing future

markets for OPEC’s oil? Is $14/barrel the ‘safe’ price?”

  • - Thomas Stauffer, 1994

“OPEC prices and non-OPEC oil production: Survivors and casualties

  • f the ‘market share’ strategy,” OPEC Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 4
slide-10
SLIDE 10

More Defense of the Market Share Strategy

  • “By my assessment, high prices were unsustainable. If prices

had not collapsed, OPEC production might have all but vanished.

  • “Inroads from competing sources, both oil and non-oil,

would have continued.”

  • “How low should prices be in order to ensure growing future

markets for OPEC’s oil? Is $14/barrel the ‘safe’ price?”

  • - Thomas Stauffer, 1994

“OPEC prices and non-OPEC oil production: Survivors and casualties

  • f the ‘market share’ strategy,” OPEC Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 4
slide-11
SLIDE 11

More Defense of the Market Share Strategy

  • “By my assessment, high prices were unsustainable. If prices

had not collapsed, OPEC production might have all but vanished.

  • “Inroads from competing sources, both oil and non-oil,

would have continued.”

  • “How low should prices be in order to ensure growing future

markets for OPEC’s oil? Is $14/barrel the ‘safe’ price?”

  • - Thomas Stauffer, 1994

“OPEC prices and non-OPEC oil production: Survivors and casualties

  • f the ‘market share’ strategy,” OPEC Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 4
slide-12
SLIDE 12

More Defense of the Market Share Strategy

  • “By my assessment, high prices were unsustainable. If prices

had not collapsed, OPEC production might have all but vanished.

  • “Inroads from competing sources, both oil and non-oil,

would have continued.”

  • “How low should prices be in order to ensure growing future

markets for OPEC’s oil? Is $14/barrel the ‘safe’ price?”

  • - Thomas Stauffer, 1994

“OPEC prices and non-OPEC oil production: Survivors and casualties

  • f the ‘market share’ strategy,” OPEC Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 4
slide-13
SLIDE 13

ALESSI BALSAMIC VINEGAR

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Available in My Local Market

  • A. Aged 4 years in wood

$3.69 /bottle

  • B. Aged 20 years in wood

$12.99 /bottle Alessi Balsamic Vinegar (Modena, Italy)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sell More Now... or Save for the Future?

  • A. Aged 4 years in wood

$3.69 /bottle

  • B. Aged 20 years in wood

$12.99 /bottle $3.69 = $12.99 / 1.0816 Current Sale = Present Value of Future Sale Alessi Balsamic Vinegar (Modena, Italy) Seller's Indifference:

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Available in the World Oil Market?

  • A. Sell Now (2015 spot)

$100 /bbl

  • B. Sell Later (save until 2050) $1,400 /bbl

??? Saudi Arabian Light Crude Oil (Persian Gulf)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sell More Oil Now... or Save for Future?

  • A. Sell Now (2015 spot)

$100 /bbl

  • B. Sell Later (save until 2050) $1,400 /bbl

??? $100 - $5 = ($1,400-$5) / 1.0835 Current Sale = Present Value of Future Sale Saudi Arabian Light Crude Oil (Persian Gulf) Seller's Indifference:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Does $60/Barrel Pass the Long-Run Test?

  • A. Sell Now (2017 target)

$60 /bbl

  • B. Sell Later (save until 2050)

$700 /bbl ??? $60 - $5 = ($700-$5) / 1.0833 Current Sale = Present Value of Future Sale Saudi Arabian Light Crude Oil (Persian Gulf) Seller's Indifference:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How Do High Oil Prices Impact OPEC?

Short-Run Mostly favorable impacts, due to demand and supply rigidities and long lead times. Long-Run Mostly negative impacts, due to demand and supply reactions.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How Do High Oil Prices Impact OPEC?

Short-Run Mostly favorable impacts, due to demand and supply rigidities and long lead times. Long-Run Mostly negative impacts, due to demand and supply reactions (stranded assets).

slide-21
SLIDE 21

How Do High Oil Prices Impact OPEC?

Short-Run Mostly favorable impacts, due to demand and supply rigidities and long lead times. Long-Run Mostly negative impacts, due to demand and supply reactions (stranded assets).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

How Do High Oil Prices Impact OPEC?

Short-Run Mostly favorable impacts, due to demand and supply rigidities and long lead times. Long-Run Mostly negative impacts, due to demand and supply reactions (stranded assets).

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A Lesson Learned Too Late?

  • If OPEC doesn’t expect oil to reach $1,400/barrel by 2050 (and who

does?), they should produce more now.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

A Lesson Learned Too Late?

  • If OPEC doesn’t expect oil to reach $1,400/barrel by 2050 (and who

does?), they should produce more now.

  • To produce more now, OPEC must accept low prices—substantially

below $100/barrel, and expand investment in new capacity.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

A Lesson Learned Too Late?

  • If OPEC doesn’t expect oil to reach $1,400/barrel by 2050 (and who

does?), they should produce more now.

  • To produce more now, OPEC must accept low prices—substantially

below $100/barrel, and expand investment in new capacity.

  • Texas shale oil producers stand up and applaud every time the

Saudis urge OPEC production cuts.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A Lesson Learned Too Late?

  • If OPEC doesn’t expect oil to reach $1,400/barrel by 2050 (and who

does?), they should produce more now.

  • To produce more now, OPEC must accept low prices—substantially

below $100/barrel, and expand investment in new capacity.

  • Texas shale oil producers stand up and applaud every time the

Saudis urge OPEC production cuts.

  • That alone should be the most obvious signal of OPEC’s mistake!
slide-27
SLIDE 27

My View of Long-Term Prices, circa 2005

  • J. L. Smith, “Oil Prices, OPEC Wealth, and Cartel Cohesion,” CEEPR, MIT, April 21, 2005

3,200 3,600 4,000 4,400 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60

OPEC Profit ($billion 2013) World Oil Price

slide-28
SLIDE 28

My View of Discord Within OPEC

  • J. L. Smith, “Oil Prices, OPEC Wealth, and Cartel Cohesion,” CEEPR, MIT, April 21, 2005

700 1,000 1,300 1,600 1,900 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60

Segment Profit ($billion 2013) World Oil Price

Saudi Arabia Other Core Fringe

slide-29
SLIDE 29

My Conclusions Have Hardly Changed Since 2005:

  • The OPEC price represents a broad compromise among

conflicting interests. The economic interests of OPEC members are not aligned.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

My Conclusions Have Hardly Changed Since 2005:

  • The OPEC price represents a broad compromise among

conflicting interests. The economic interests of OPEC members are not aligned.

  • Prior to October 2014, the Saudis willingly accepted

most of the burden of compromise, despite a natural interest in lower prices and risk of stranded assets.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

My Conclusions Have Hardly Changed Since 2005:

  • The OPEC price represents a broad compromise among

conflicting interests. The economic interests of OPEC members are not aligned.

  • Prior to October 2014, the Saudis willingly accepted

most of the burden of compromise, despite a natural interest in lower prices and risk of stranded assets.

  • Three years later, have the Saudis already forgotten

about the risk of stranded assets? Will they wake up in time?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Thank You!

jsmith@smu.edu