Overview of OSPAR actual process for habitat assessment Pelagic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

overview of ospar actual process
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Overview of OSPAR actual process for habitat assessment Pelagic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overview of OSPAR actual process for habitat assessment Pelagic Habitat indicators : Co-lead: Abigail McQuatters-Gollop, SAFHOS, UK Marie Johansen, Swedish Meteo. & Hydro. Institute, SE Isabelle Rombouts, Musum National dHistoire


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Overview of OSPAR actual process for habitat assessment

HELCOM, CORESET II meeting Gdynia, 10-12/02, 2015

Co-lead: Laurent Guérin, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, FR Cristina Herbon, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, UK Alberto Serrano, Instituto Españole de Oceanografia, ES Nina Schroeder, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, DE

MNHN

Benthic Habitat indicators : Pelagic Habitat indicators :

Co-lead: Abigail McQuatters-Gollop, SAFHOS, UK Marie Johansen, Swedish Meteo. & Hydro. Institute, SE Isabelle Rombouts, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, FR

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Biodiversity assessment: OSPAR process

OSPAR, 2010. Quality Status Report http://qsr2010.ospar.org/ ICG-COBAM, 2011. “OSPAR’s MSFD advice manual on biodiversity. Approaches to determining good environmental status, setting

  • f environmental targets and selecting

indicators for MSFD descriptors 1, 2, 4 and 6”. Version du 05/03/2012. 114p. + annexes. ICG-COBAM, 2013. “Report by ICG-COBAM on the development of an OSPAR common set of biodiversity indicators.”. Version 18/02/2013. 196p. OSPAR, 2021. Quality Status Report. “In prep.”

Biodiversity = conservation (HD):

  • List of T&D Habitat/Species
  • MPA

Biodiversity = sustainable use (MSFD):

  • All habitats vs (almost) all pressures !
  • Ecosystem-based approach
  • Risk-based approach
  • Activities management

 2017 Joint Assessment & Monitor. Prg.  Adoption of OSPAR common set of indicators * by OSPAR june 2015 * by BDC 2-6/03/2015 !

ICG-COBAM, 2015. “Report by ICG-COBAM on the testing of OSPAR common set of biodiversity indicators.”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Regional Sea Conv.: link for MSFD

COREBAM (Göteborg, 1 Oct. 2014) OSPAR/COBAM-HELCOM/CORESET OSPAR-HELCOM: an ancient link e.g. convenors Ingo Narberhaus (DE), Ulla Li Zweifel (SE), Andrea Belgrano (SE) actual: Marie Johansen (SE), Nina Schroeder (DE), Mats Blomqwist (SE), etc. OSPAR-Barcelona: more recent link e.g. Sagrario Arieta (ES), Laurent Guérin (FR), Alberto Serano (ES), Anaïs Aubert (FR), etc.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

OSPAR requirement

Key tasks for developing priority “indicators” include:

  • to ensure scientific underpinning;
  • to update technical specifications (parameters, etc.);
  • To review each project plan (& evaluate participation);
  • Where possible, to agree on assessment criteria and

procedures (including where appropriate GES boundary setting methods);

  • to analyze the existing monitoring and identified gaps;
  • to give estimates on resources/cost implications and

practicability.

  • To test indicators in 2014 to prepare them implementation :

Contracting Parties engaged for common assessment JAMP 2017 => OSPAR QSR 2021

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OSPAR Pelagic Habitats Code Indicator BDC 2-6/03/15 proposal PH1 = FW5 Plankton life form index Core R 3-4 -> Wide PH2 Plankton biomass and/or abundance Core R 2 -> Wide PH3 Plankton diversity index Core R 4 -> Wide HELCOM synergies Pelagic Habitats Barcelona similarities Pelagic Habitats No indicators yet! Workshop planned…

  • Ratio of diatoms and dinoflagellates / PH1=FW5
  • Zooplankton mean size and total

biomass/abundance-/ PH2

  • Phytoplankton taxonomic diversity / PH3
slide-6
SLIDE 6

OSPAR Benthic Habitats Code Indicator BDC 2-6/03/15 proposal BH1 Typical species composition Candidate BH2 Condition of benthic habitat defining communities (MMI) Core Wide BH3 Physical damage of predominant and special habitats Candidate -> Core W? BH4 Area of habitat loss Candidate BH5 Size-frequency distribution of bivalve or other species Candidate HELCOM synergies Benthic Habitats Barcelona similarities Benthic Habitats Condition of habitat defining communities & species

  • State of soft Bottom / BH2
  • Cumulative effects / BH3
  • Population size structure / BH5
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Further possible inputs for subgroups:

DEMO Assessment sheet for OSPAR pelagic indicators

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Further works (project plan) e.g. for BH2 (MMI)

Basecamp tool / benthic habitats expert group e-mail alerts for milestones (e.g. meetings, workshops and review of drafts docs) Cooperation (Information, shared tasks?) with Benthoval, FP7 JMP-NS/CS, DEVOTES, ICES

slide-9
SLIDE 9

=BH2

OSPAR & EcApRHA project approach for benthic habitat

Ex: BH1/3 common habitat MSR II (Macoma balthica sandy shallow habitat) Ecological stakes: Application of selection criteria including risk-based approach through BH3/4 and BH1 for biological characteristics Sorry, no VMS yet available at relevant resolution in France. Many thanks to UK for this theoritical illustration of a case study versus physical pressure (sub-type= abrasion ; activity = fishing bottom trawling) = BH3

Assessment scales: 1=predominant habitats (EUNIS 3)= BH3+4

Pres A Pres B Pres C Pres X Hab 1 Hab 2 NA Hab N Sensitivity/vulnerability matrices Ground-truthing (state <-> pressure)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thanks for your attention! Questions ?