PLACES OF WORSHIP: THE CHALLENGE OF CONTINUING USE St. Werburghs - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PLACES OF WORSHIP: THE CHALLENGE OF CONTINUING USE

• St. Werburgh’s Seminar

Michael O’Boyle B.Arch MUBC MRIAI

Bluett & O’Donoghue Architects The Coach House, Dublin Castle 23rd November 2010

THE CHALLENGE OF CONTINUING USE

• Introduction & context
• Church redundancy flow chart (2004)
• Relevant examples

INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

Problems . . . . . . . with roofs . . . . . . . windows . . . . . . and with stonework

INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

Problems with water ingress

INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

Problems with the previous use of inappropriate materials

INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

Problems with the cost of heating

INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

Problems with underuse

CHURCH REDUNDANCY FLOW CHART

CHURCH REDUNDANCY FLOW CHART

• The Heritage Council identified the problem of under-use and eventual

redundancy in church buildings as a major issue that would face all denominations during the first half of the 21st Century.

• This presents major challenges and risks to an important group of buildings

that are part of Ireland’s architectural and artistic heritage.

• A working group was established by the Heritage Council in January 2004 to

examine this issue. The group met several times over a three month period.

• One of the key points that emerged from the discussion was the importance
• f early identification. This gives churches, parishes and organisations time

to act.

• A flow chart was developed to assist parish groups, select vestries, etc. in

working through the issues.

CHURCH REDUNDANCY FLOW CHART

SOME IMPORTANT POINTS:

• The outcome was not predetermined – by using the flow chart, parish

groups were not placing their building on an irreversible path to redundancy.

• The flow chart is all about forward planning.
• The identification of stakeholders was vitally important. There may be

useful contacts and allies within the wider community who would be able and willing to help.

• The significance of the building is a key factor.
• There are a range of outcomes – including continued use as a place of

worship; shared used; the identification of appropriate new uses; temporary mothballing until a new use is found; and redundancy.

CHURCH REDUNDANCY FLOW CHART

RELEVANT EXAMPLES

RELEVANT EXAMPLES

• Case study of Eglish Church, Co. Offaly
• Case study of a cluster of churches in Co. Laois
• Identification of examples of appropriate and inappropriate new uses.
• Buildings I have encountered since 2004

EGLISH CHURCH

Eglish Church, Co. Offaly The church has been redundant since c.1984. Falling populations and a preference on the part of some families to attend the church in nearby Birr triggered the redundancy. Eglish Church Restoration Group Ltd. acquired the building in 2000 as a short term protective measure. The group were actively searching for an appropriate new use for the building.

EGLISH CHURCH

Consultation with stakeholders:

• Local families (both C. of I. and R.C. who are

known to have relatives buried in the church graveyard)

• Graves Department of Offaly Co. Council (who are

responsible for the care and upkeep of the graveyard)

• Planning Department and Conservation Officer of

Offaly Co. Council

• The Heritage Council (who funded an earlier report
• n the building by Chris Southgate & Assoc. and

who have facilitated the current exercise)

• The Department of Environment Heritage and

Local Government (the site appears to contain the remains of pre-1700 buildings and is likely to be rich in archaeology)

• West Offaly Partnership (who donated funds that

were used to purchase the church from the RCB)

• Local benefactors of the Eglish Church Restoration

Group Ltd.

• The Representative Church Body of the Church of

Ireland

• FAS (who previously carried out maintenance work
• n the church)
• Shannon Development; The Leader Programme;

etc

EGLISH CHURCH

Significance: Building: The building is a relatively simple single volume nineteenth century church with attractive and important features including the limestone rubble walls, leaded clear glass windows, plaster ceiling cornice, fixed pews and a timber pulpit. Although simple in design, it has architectural significance that merits its inclusion on the Record of Protected Structures. Setting: Eglish has been an important ecclesiastical site from early Christian times. The church grounds include the remains of several earlier churches and adjoin the medieval Eglish Castle. The church sits on relatively spacious grounds, which are entirely

• ccupied by graves, which probably date back to

early Christian times. The site contains a number of mature trees and a range of other plants. Fittings: The fittings include fixed timber pews and a pulpit. There is a small nineteenth century organ, which is poor repair. The interior is plainly detailed and does not feature any notable memorials.

EGLISH CHURCH

The early strands of the flow chart were followed but were not all directly relevant as the church was no longer in use Put preventative maintenance regime in place The restoration group currently undertakes a limit amount of preventative maintenance. This should be formalised and a system

• f regular maintenance checks

should be put in place. Explore a shared use Not applicable Decide to continue use infrequently Not applicable

EGLISH CHURCH

The Eglish Church Restoration Group Ltd. were committed to the search for an appropriate new

• use. The case study looked at the appropriateness
• f the following potential new uses.
• Religious use by another denomination.
• Chapel of rest
• Venue for secular events
• Artists residence & studio
• Non-licenced restaurant & café
• Small office
• Private residence

EGLISH CHURCH

The appropriateness of the above (and any other) new uses would need to be carefully assessed in consultation with the relevant parties identified at the top of the flow chart as appropriate. The owners should engage a conservation architect to advise them during this process. There is a real risk that the church could fall into rapid neglect and decline if a purchaser is unable to obtain planning permission and/or a fire safety certificate for their proposed use. In view of the complexities of the site – particularly drainage, water supply, and parking –the sale of the property should be conditional

• n the purchaser obtaining planning

permission and a fire safety certificate. The current regime of mothballing will continue indefinitely until a purchaser or tenant for an appropriate new use emerges.

CLUSTER OF CHURCHES IN COUNTY LAOIS

CLUSTER OF CHURCHES IN COUNTY LAOIS

One of the churches was constructed in the 1970’s and was of limited architectural

• r historical significance. The remaining four churches and the parish hall date

from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (possibly earlier in one case) and are buildings of architectural significance. The case study was intended to use this cluster to test the usefulness of the flow chart as a mechanism for assessing the issues affecting a cluster of churches in a parish where the closure of a number of churches appears to be inevitable. The buildings were reviewed collectively so that the range of issues facing each church could be viewed in comparison with the other churches. The parish hall was included in the interests of compiling a complete review of all of the church buildings within the parish. This was a case study only and did not involve or reflect any decision on the part of the parish. The study showed the case study to be a useful mechanism in looking at a cluster

• f buildings. It is important to note that architectural significance is not the only
• consideration. The case study revealed other issues that would come into play.

CLUSTER OF CHURCHES IN COUNTY LAOIS

EXAMPLES OF APPROPRIATE AND INAPPROPRIATE NEW USES

• St. Andrew’s (C. of I.) Church, Suffolk Street, Dublin 2 –

1860’s Gothic Revival church; converted into headquarters of Dublin Tourism in 1994.

• The Black Church (St. Mary’s Chapel of Ease), St.

Mary’s Place, Dublin 1 – 1833 Gothic Revival church by John Semple; deconsecrated and passed onto Dublin Corporation in 1962; converted to office use in c.1990.

• Former (R.C.) church at Killballyporter, Co. Meath –

large early nineteenth century T-plan church; deconsecrated in 1984; converted to workshop use with inappropriate industrial doors and Upvc windows during the 1980’s.

• St. Peter’s Church, North Main Street, Cork – converted

to use as an interpretive centre (The Vision Centre) under the Cork Historic Centre Action Plan in 1994.

• Former community chapel of the Poor Clare Convent in

Cavan – mid-nineteenth century convent chapel converted to use as Adoration Chapel in c.2000, with new entrance from public car park of shopping centre.

• Church converted to library use in Ballinrobe
• Church converted to use as Heritage Centre in Carrick-
• n-Shannon.
• Former Church in Foxford, Co. Mayo – converted to

museum use (Michael Davitt Museum) by The Office of Public Works in 2000; featured in Irish Architecture Awards 2001.

• The Belfry Restaurant, Mullingar

OTHER EXAMPLES

Mothballing may provide breathing space to allow an appropriate solution to emerge

PLACES OF WORSHIP: THE CHALLENGE OF CONTINUING USE

• St. Werburgh’s Seminar

Michael O’Boyle B.Arch MUBC MRIAI

Bluett & O’Donoghue Architects The Coach House, Dublin Castle 23rd November 2010