Pr Pres esent entatio ation con ontents tents The ballast - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Landfill 2015 The use of geosynthetics in the installation of ballast layers Ch Charl Ci Cilliers, s, Pr Pr Eng Jones & Wagener (Pty) Ltd Engineering & Environmental Consultants Pr Pres esent entatio ation con ontents tents
Landfill 2015 The use of geosynthetics in the installation of ballast layers Ch Charl Ci Cilliers, s, Pr Pr Eng Jones & Wagener (Pty) Ltd Engineering & Environmental Consultants
Pr Pres esent entatio ation con ontents tents • The ballast layer – Why install a ballast layer – Types (conventional and geosynthetic) – Positive and negative aspects of GBL – Cost comparison of different GBLs • The site trial • Conclusions and recommendations September 2015 Conference & Exhibition Landf ndfil ill 2015 2015
Wh Why ins nsta tall ll a b a bal allast ast lay ayer er • Intimate contact – Prevention of waves and folds • Protection from mechanical damage (allows desilting and maintenance) • Protection from UV degradation and temperature effects Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Wh Why ins nsta tall ll a b a bal allast ast lay ayer er • Intimate contact – Prevention of waves and folds • Protection from mechanical damage (allows desilting and maintenance) • Protection from UV degradation and temperature effects Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Wh Why ins nsta tall ll a b a bal allast ast lay ayer er • Intimate contact – Prevention of waves and folds • Protection from mechanical damage (allows desilting and maintenance) • Protection from UV degradation and temperature effects Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Wh Why ins nsta tall ll a b a bal allast ast lay ayer er • Intimate contact – Prevention of waves and folds • Protection from mechanical damage (allows desilting and maintenance) • Protection from UV degradation and temperature effects Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Int ntimate imate con ontact tact Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Ty Types s of ballast ast layer • Conventional ballast layers – Rock – Sand – Cement stabilised sand – Precast concrete blocks Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Ro Rock k ballast ast layer Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Ro Rock k ballast ast layer Drainage nage Layer • Protectio tection n Layer r Req • Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Sa Sand nd ba ballast ast lay ayer er Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Sa Sand nd ba ballast ast lay ayer er Particl ticle e size e < 3mm • No Prote tect ction on Layer r Req • Drainage nage • Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
St Stab abilised ilised san and d ba ballast ast lay ayer er Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Stab St abilised ilised san and d ba ballast ast lay ayer er Particl ticle e size e < • 3mm No Prote tect ction • Layer r Req No Drainag age • Req Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Pr Prec ecas ast t con oncr crete ete ba ballast ast lay ayer er Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Pr Prec ecas ast t con oncr crete ete ba ballast ast lay ayer er High cost • Protectio tection n Layer r • Req Req No Drainag age • Req Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Pr Prec ecas ast t con oncr crete ete ba ballast ast lay ayer er Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Ty Types s of ballast ast layer • Geosynthetic ballast layers (GBLs) – Protection geotextile – Concrete filled geocells – Fibre reinforced concrete – Double woven propylene tubes (local) – Double woven propylene tubes (international) Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Co Concrete ete fille lled d geocells ells ballast last layer er Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Co Concrete ete fille lled d geocells ells ballast last layer er High cost • Protectio tection n Layer r • Req Req No Drainag age • Req Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Fi Fibre reinfo forced rced concr crete ete ballast ast layer Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Fi Fibre reinfo forced rced concr crete ete ballast ast layer Extreme remely y • High cost No Prote tect ction • Layer r Req No Drainag age • Required red Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Fi Fibre reinfo forced rced concr crete ete ballast ast layer Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Do Doub uble e wo woven en ba ballast ast lay ayer er (loc ocal) al) Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Do Doub uble e wo woven en ba ballast ast lay ayer er (loc ocal) al) UV stability bility • Stren ength gth of • interla rlaci cing Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Do Doub uble e wo woven en ba ballast ast lay ayer er (Int nt.) .) Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Do Doub uble e wo woven en ba ballast ast lay ayer er (Int nt.) .) Importe orted • Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Do Doub uble e wo woven en ba ballast ast lay ayer er (Int nt.) .) Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
As Aspe pects cts of of GB GBL • Positive Aspects – Less risk of damage to the geomembrane – Airspace savings Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Da Dama mage ge from om cov over er lay ayers ers ELL survey data from 300 sites – over 3M m 2 of GM • Nosko et al.(2000) GSI CQA Course: Part 3 Geomembrane Placement, Seaming and Field Testing Slide 84 Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Da Dama mage ge from om cov over er lay ayers ers Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
As Aspe pects cts of of GB GBL • Negative Aspects – UV degradation – Veneer stability – Anchorage – Time to fill geosynthetics – Cost Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
GBL Cos GB L Cost com ompa parison rison Cost per m 3 % m more Cost per m 2 % m more No. No. Alter ernati native e descripti ption: on: of waste e than n of liner er than n stored ed lowest footpr print nt lowest 300mm cement stabilised sand 1 R 129 8.4% R 885.11 4.4% ballast layer with protection geotextile Fibre Reinforced Concrete Ballast 2 R 189 59% R 1347.99 59% Layer Double polypropylene tubes (local), 3 filled with cement stabilised material, R 124 4.2% R 872.57 3.0% 100mm thick. Double woven tubes 4 (international), filled with tailings R 119 - R 847.44 - (thickness negligible) Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
GBL Cos GB L Cost com ompa parison rison Cost per m 3 % m more Cost per m 2 % m more No. No. Alter ernati native e descripti ption: on: of waste e than n of liner er than n stored ed lowest footpr print nt lowest 300mm cement stabilised sand 1 R 129 8.4% R 885.11 4.4% ballast layer with protection geotextile Fibre Reinforced Concrete Ballast 2 R 189 59% R 1347.99 59% Layer Double polypropylene tubes (local), 3 filled with cement stabilised material, R 124 4.2% R 872.57 3.0% 100mm thick. Double woven tubes 4 (international), filled with tailings R 119 - R 847.44 - (thickness negligible) Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Th The s e site te trial al • Hazardous waste facility in KZN • R&D on GBL to be filled with tailings • Full scale site trial • 4 Samples 15m long by 4.8 wide – 2 double layer (woven geotextile) – 2 triple layer (double woven with non-woven) – 5 tubes of 93cm separated by 8cm weave Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Si Side de slop ope e trial al Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Si Side de slop ope e trial al 26% Shrinkag inkage • Consolida olidati tion on • in 24 hours Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Si Side de slop ope e trial al Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Ba Basin n trials als Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Ba Basin n trials als 7.5% Shrinkage nkage • Difficu ficulty lty in • fillin ing Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Co Conclusio lusions ns and Re Recomm mmendation dations Conclusions: • Site trial shows technical feasibility • Time to fill the bag still a major concern Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Co Conclusio lusions ns and Re Recomm mmendation dations Conclusions: • Site trial shows technical feasibility • Time to fill the bag still a major concern Recommendations: • Approach a geosynthetic manufacturer • Engage with design approval authority • Carry out a full scale test Conference & Exhibition Landfill 2015 September 2015
Landfill 2015 Thank you for your attention. Any questions? Ch Charl Ci Cilliers, s, Pr Pr Eng Jones & Wagener (Pty) Ltd Engineering & Environmental Consultants
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.