procdure interventionelle Le cath-lab du futur frappe votre porte - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

proc dure interventionelle
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

procdure interventionelle Le cath-lab du futur frappe votre porte - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FFR CT et planification de procdure interventionelle Le cath-lab du futur frappe votre porte Jeroen Sonck, MD Cardiovascular Center, OLV Clinic Aalst Belgium DCLARATION DE LIENS D'INTRT AVEC LA PRSENTATION Intervenant : Jeroen


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FFRCT et planification de procédure interventionelle

Le cath-lab du futur frappe à votre porte

Jeroen Sonck, MD Cardiovascular Center, OLV Clinic Aalst Belgium

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DÉCLARATION DE LIENS D'INTÉRÊT AVEC LA PRÉSENTATION

Intervenant : Jeroen SONCK, Aalst

☑ Je n'ai pas de lien d'intérêt à déclarer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-6
SLIDE 6

MACE Myocardial infarction

Xaplanteris P et al. NEJM 2018

Patient selection using physiology at the vessel level is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The incremental value of CT-derived FFR on top of CCTA

  • 1/ Optimize patient selection for

the lab

– Vessel and lesion-specific physiology – Pre-lab MVD classification

  • 2/ Plaque assessment ∾

IVUS/OCT

  • 3/ Plan the percutaneous

approach

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Diagnostic performance of FFRCT: PACIFIC trial

Presented Euro PCR 2018, Driessen RS et al.

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-10
SLIDE 10

AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.90)

Sensitivity 95% (95% CI: 89% to 98%); specificity 61% (95% CI: 48% to 73%); positive predictive value 81% (95% CI: 76% to 86%) and negative predictive value 87% (95% CI: 74% to 94%).

n=178

Concordant (147) Discordant (31)

Collet, Sonck and Serruys, JACC 2018

Mean FFRCT 0.67 (IQR 0.5 -0.81)

SYNTAX II sub-study: Performance of FFRCT in patients with multivessel disease

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-11
SLIDE 11

4 5 10 15 20 Nǿrgaard et al. n=123 PROMISE n=50 Jensen et al. n=655* SYNTAX II n=32 PLATFORM n=117

Percentage (%)

90 days follow-up

Norgaard et al. JACC Imag. 2017

  • PLATFORM. JACC 2016

Jensen et al. EHJCI. 2017 Collet et al. JACC 2018 Lu, M. e.a. TCT 2015

12 months follow-up, n=977

0.2% adverse event rate at 12 months follow-up

Major Adverse Cardiac Events in patients with deferred lesions based on FFRCT

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Combined cCTA and FFRCT: ICA cancellations in high-risk patients

n=440 n=71 n=540 n=115

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Low-Intermediate Risk High-Risk

% of ICAs Cancelled

75% 91% 47% 75%

  • A frontline cCTA and FFRCT testing strategy cancelled 75% of ICAs in the high-risk group
  • The incremental impact of FFRCT was greater in high-risk as compared with the low-

intermediate risk group

– 60% in high-risk versus 21% in low-intermediate risk

Jensen et al, European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging 2017

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ratio of cath/PCI: Cath-lab efficiency

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Reclassification of the SYNTAX-score tertiles

Weighted Kappa 0.19 Weighted Kappa 0.32

NRI=0.1 8 NRI=0.2 6

Reclassification 30% Reclassification 23% versus

Coronary CTA ICA iFR FFRCT

Collet, Sonck, Serruys et al. JACC 2018

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-15
SLIDE 15

MVD classification before we enter the lab

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Ongoing trial: CABG Revolution CABG without ICA

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

In patients with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease, a heart team treatment decision-making based on coronary CTA showed an almost perfect agreement with the decision derived from conventional coronary angiography suggesting the potential feasibility of a treatment decision-making and planning based solely on this non-invasive imaging modality.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Coronary Imaging: from vessel to plaque

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Newby et al. NEJM 2018

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-19
SLIDE 19

High Risk Plaques and Clinical Outcomes

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Identification of High Risk Plaques

Adverse Hemodynamic characteristics (AHC) defined as lesions that have low FFRCT (<0.80), high ∆FFRCT (>0.06), high WSS (≥154.7 dyn/cm2 ), or high axial plaque stress (≥ 1,606.6 dyn/cm2 ).

Lee et al. EMERALD trial. JACC Imaging 2018

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Treatment planning based on FFRCT

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

Collet et al. Circulation 2018. Sonck et al. Circ Interv submitted.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Stent

Collet et al. Nature Reviews 2018.

Baseline LM PCI Mid LAD PCI Mid + distal LAD PCI

HeartFlow Interactive Revascularization Planner

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-23
SLIDE 23

FFR pre PCI 0,61 0,63 1,0

Case 1 Precise PCI Plan Study

1,0 0,94 0,88

3.5/20 stent

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR)

  • 40 year old sportive male
  • Asymptomatic

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

Case 2 Precise PCI Plan Study

24.0mm2 9.9 mm2 8.4 mm2 3.1 mm2 4.1 mm2

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

± 34 mm

Case 2 Precise PCI Plan Study

slide-26
SLIDE 26

FFR - One distal value Cardiovascular Center Aalst

Case 2 Precise PCI Plan Study

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

± 34 mm

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Invasive vs. non-invasive treatment planning

FFR post 0.87 FFR pre 0.79

FFRCT pre 0.79 FFRCT post 0.87

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The future of FFRCT: Mobile, On-Demand, Integrated & Interactive

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusion: FFRCT in the lab of tomorrow

  • FFRCT enhances the non-invasive assessment of myocardial ischemia.
  • Refine risk stratification with coronary physiology parameters on top of

anatomy and known adverse plaque characteristics.

  • May allow for decision-making between CABG and PCI and treatment

planning in the non-invasive setting.

  • Guide which lesions require an invasive assessment in the lab.
  • Select the optimal revascularization strategy.
  • Improve cathlab efficiency