SLIDE 7 some in-depth interviews and partjcipant observatjon. The results indicates that the preference of the city life, the length of contracts and the neighbourhood relatjon have negatjve impact on returning home. Comparing with couple and family migrants, the individual migrants tend to be rather setuling down than returning home. Additjonally, we focus on the strategy “moving to other citjes” because many migrants only assume the current city as a transfer hub and tend to move to other citjes especially to some East citjes. We also focus on the “undecided” optjon because the signifjcance of undecided choice in the determinants of city/prefectures indicates migrants’ hesitatjon and uncertainty about their future. The estjmatjon implies the signifjcance of migrants ethnic identjty and social contexts of difgerent city/prefectures. Han migrants seem less undecided about their setulement intentjon than the minority migrants. Migrants in Lanzhou and Linxia show more undecided rather than setuling down. Policy implicatjons are presented in the discussion to facilitate the minority migrants’ setulement. Anne Marel Hilbers Valuatjon in combined infrastructure and regional development: "Pushing the envelope" How can we explicate concrete tools and instjtutjonal designs that are aimed at reaching consensus on the data basis for valuatjon; a valuatjon which serves to underpin the alternatjve choice? Because a wide range of values at difgerent spatjal levels is relevant in a partjcipatory planning environment, it is important to specify the degree and nature of consensus in more detail. The data basis for valuatjon needs to be 'consensus based': those involved in the evaluatjon must agree that the efgect does matuer and therefore must be measured, and the partjcipants need to fjnd the way of measuring intelligible (Sijtsma, 2006). The suggested (SCBA) informatjon to decision-makers strongly loses strength when on any of these matuers is no consensus. There does not expressly need to be consensus on the fjnal weight of the various value elements related to each other; this requires politjcal debate and public discussion. This means that a shared understanding is needed before talking about prioritjzatjon, as scientjsts and decision-makers. So, what knowledge/value brings new insights for decision-makers and stakeholders? Collaboratjve Colleague Consult (CCC) Round 2 Liliana Castjllo-Rivero Rural Depopulatjng Territories in Mexico During the period 2000-2010 around 40% of Mexican rural municipalitjes were in a depopulatjon process. Those municipalitjes are scatuered throughout the highly diverse country, from the northern deserts to the southern tropical environments, with heterogeneous paths of development, human setulements, industrializatjon and urbanizatjon. From mid last century, rural depopulatjon has been a reality as a consequence of rural exodus towards developing urban territories or towards abroad of the natjonal frontjers. Nevertheless; the phenomenon was recently considered as a new one due its geographic extent and its intensity of manifestatjon (Canales, 2010, Ochoa, 2008). Despite this, the knowledge on the main characteristjcs and the difgerences betweendepopulated territories has not been fully assessed yet.Although there are valuable efgorts investjgatjng Mexican territories experimentjng high rates of outmigratjon(Aguilar et al. 2011; Galvan, 2008; García-Barrios, et al. 2009; Klooster, 2003; López, et al.,2005), they do not focus explicitly, on the depopulated
- nes, given that territories with high rates of outmigratjon are not necessarily in a depopulatjon process.
Moreover, many of them are performed in territories exhibitjng an opposite situatjon from depopulatjon, such as those in which, facing adversity, the strategies of rural inhabitants, do not include abandoning, but rather, a diversifjcatjon of livelihood strategies, giving as a consequence the stability of rural populatjon. Some