Project Scope Recommendations April 12, 2016 Existing Site - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Project Scope Recommendations April 12, 2016

1

Existing Site Arrangement

 LRCC Replacement included in adopted FY2015-2024 CIP  April 2015 early community visioning and survey feedback  June-September, 2015 massing concepts and cost estimating  July 2015 County Board direction to explore including APS Pre-K  November 2015 joint AC/APS work session review of two massing concepts

Ba c kg ro und:

2

Spring/Summer 2015 Visioning & Survey

 Preserve and maximize green space  Improve site access and safety  Integrate the building into the park  Include multi-purpose athletic courts, exercise rooms, fitness and multi-

purpose flexible use spaces

 Improve outdoor courts and playground

Wha t we ’ ve he a rd:

3

Lubber Run Visioning Session

Fall/Winter 2015 Massing Concepts

 Ensure preservation of mature and cherished trees  Concerns about retaining open/green space

 Building size  Hardscape  Parking  County staff  Lack of DPR preschool

 Gym is needed

Wha t we ’ ve he a rd:

4

5

 Exercise & Fitness equipment  Swimming pool  Indoor sports  Gyms  Nature Center

Top 5 needs for indoor facilities

 Swimming pool  Exercise & Fitness equipment  Nature Center  Community Center  Gyms

Top 5 most important indoor facilities

POPS Surve y 2016

6

• Move forward without APS pre-kindergarten program; include DPR

preschool program

• Explore up to 4 stories to enable more green space and expanded recreation

program

• Explore underground parking to gain more green space
• Include a gymnasium
• Include flexible multipurpose spaces for intergenerational programs
• Upgrade current active park area with full court basketball and volleyball to

standards including ADA accessibility

• Upgrade playground to current standards with ADA accessibility
• Relocate Culpepper Garden Senior Center
• Consolidate DPR staff

Co unty Ma na g e r Re c o mme nda tio ns to Bo a rd

7

 Nature programs for all ages  Senior adult programs year round  Elementary and teen programs & camps  Family programs evenings and weekends  Tot camps  Creative preschool  Sports all ages  Pint size indoor playground  Classes all ages

Pro g ra m Oppo rtunitie s:

Walter Reed Center

8

 Three or four story building with gym  Gym adjacent to program spaces

 Gym at ground level  Construction above impractical with

need for column free space

 Gym on upper levels creates noise

disruption below

L RCC Co nc e pt

Arlington Mill Center Langston Center

9

 Parking requirements

 Zoning Ordinance: 480 parking spaces  Recommended with Use Permit: 150

 Parking Surface vs. Underground

 Surface lot for 150 vehicles: 48,000 sf  Alternate of surface drop off and 150 underground

 Paved area reduced to 1,000 sf drive aisle  150 underground spaces @ $60,000 ea. = $9.0 M

 Underground Parking Opportunity Cost: $9.0 M provides additional

1.1 acre open space

L RCC Co nc e pt

Maggie Daley Park, Chicago

10

FY 2015 – FY 2024 CIP – 37,500 sf with no gym nor improvements to outdoor amenities (2014 $) $28M Concept study estimates: Building Gymnasium S/Total $23.5 M $6.8 M $30.3 M Outdoor Amenities $2.9 M Underground Parking @ $60 K/space, 150 spaces $9.0 M Total Estimate 2015 $ $42.2 M Escalated 2017 $ @ 3% per year $44.8M

Orde r o f Ma g nitude E stima te s:

Open Issues

• Parking variance from Zoning Code
• Storm water management impacts on green space cost

11

Pro je c te d De live ry Sc he dule

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 BOARD GUIDANCE A/E RFP & SELECTION BOND REFERENDUM COMMUNITY PROCESS/CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT CMAR RFP AND SELECTION PFRC REVIEWS AND APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS & PERMITS CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION CONSTRUCTION OCCUPANCY MILESTONES BOARD ACTION COMMUNITY ACTION PROCUREMENT DESIGN CONSTRUCTION 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 ACTIVITY

 Submit CIP request with underground parking  Initiate RFP for designer in May, 2016  Engage community for concept and site development, including PFRC

process, following designer selection: Fall, 2016

 Issue RFP for Construction Manager at Risk: Fall, 2016

 Contractor selection based on prior experience and successful project deliveries  On Board prior to final concept decision  Contractor to participate in design completion to maintain total budget  Construction awarded after negotiation of guaranteed maximum pricing

Ne xt Ste ps:

12

13

• Design a 3 or 4 story building with a gym
• Design to maximize green space w/underground parking
• Include flexible multipurpose spaces for all ages programming
• Include DPR preschool
• Upgrade current active park area with
• utdoor ball courts & playground
• Relocate Culpepper Garden Senior Center
• Consolidate DPR staff

Summa ry o f Re c o mme nda tio ns:

Klimmendaal, Netherlands