Proposal to Research the Feasibly of Implementing a Campus Wide - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

proposal to research the feasibly of implementing a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Proposal to Research the Feasibly of Implementing a Campus Wide - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Proposal to Research the Feasibly of Implementing a Campus Wide Recycling Program JMLT Consultants Current Status of TTU Recycling Texas Tech University (TTU) is the only Big 12 school that has no campus wide recycling program.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Proposal to Research the Feasibly

  • f Implementing a Campus Wide

Recycling Program

JMLT Consultants

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Current Status of TTU Recycling

  • Texas Tech University (TTU) is the only Big 12

school that has no campus wide recycling program.

  • Currently there is a small recycling program

localized to the library, the Bledsoe Gordon Sneed (BGS) housing complex, McClellan Hall, the horticulture greenhouse and the Biology building.

  • The University does not support any kind of

recycling program.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Grassroots

  • The recyclables that are collected on the campus

are collected by a small independent organization called Grassroots.

  • According to Grassroots president Melanie

Walden, usually about 5 or 6 large garbage bags of recyclables are collected every two weeks from each of the three residence halls

  • Plastic bottles make up the largest volume of the

material recycled.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why Should TTU Recycle?

  • In 2000, recycling resulted in an annual

energy savings equal to the amount of energy used in 6 million homes.

  • Every bit of recycling makes a difference.

For example, one year of recycling on just one college campus, Stanford University, saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons

  • f iron ore, coal, and limestone.
  • If we do not start recycling, our landfill

space will fill up and we will have to recycle.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Other Big 12 Schools

  • TTU is one of the largest colleges in the

state of Texas, yet is the only Big 12 School that does not have a campus-wide recycling program (Brinker, Sept. 23, 2005).

  • A quick glance at some other Big 12

recycling programs demonstrates a pattern

  • f recycling success that Texas Tech may

be able to emulate.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Other Big 12 Schools

  • University of Texas

The University of Texas in Austin started off with one building committed to recycling paper. Now they are one of the leading colleges devoted to recycling all types of products. In the 05-06 academic year they recycled a total of 2,912,560 pounds of paper.

  • The University of Baylor

Baylor’s recycling is smaller than most college recycling programs. It

  • nly consists of paper products only. Baylor recycles paper products

consisting of white paper, newspaper and cardboard. Cardboard boxes are placed in each office and by every copy machine. The only paper products which are not to be recycled are carbon paper and blue prints. Housekeeping empties the boxes as necessary into recycling dumpsters.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Other Big 12 Schools

  • The University of A&M

The recycling program was started in 1990 as a pilot program in six buildings

  • n campus collecting only white paper and aluminum. In 1991 the project

went campus-wide. It now operates in 135 buildings with 120,000 pounds of recycling material collected every month. The products are collected by the Physical Plant and are than taken to the Sorting Facility to be sorted, baled, and shipped to recycling plants all over the country.

  • The University of Oklahoma

Program first started in 1990 with only white and green paper on the Norman

  • campus. In 1998 President David L. Boren announced an expansion of the

program to include dorms, and initiated collection of aluminum, plastic, newspaper, and cardboard in addition to paper. In 1999 the program acquired a larger facility, purchased a baler and forklift. In 2000 “Oklahoma City Earth Day” recognized the University of Oklahoma’s recycling program with an “Environmental Excellence” award.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proposed Plan

  • 1) Conduct a survey to determine student attitudes

toward the likelihood of recycling

  • 2) Audit the garbage output on campus
  • 3) Conduct a pilot project to determine the volume
  • f what is recycle
  • 4) Ascertain the best way to dispose of the

recyclable material

  • 5) Conduct a cost audit.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Survey

  • A survey will be designed to assess the

level of willingness of students to recycle

  • n campus, and to see what their feelings

are toward a tuition hike to pay for the recycling program.

  • We conducted a preliminary convenience

survey of 15 people.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Survey Questions

– Do you recycle? – If you recycle, what do you recycle? – Where do you recycle? – Would you be willing to participate in recycling on the TTU campus? – Where would you be willing to recycle on campus? – Is recycling beneficial to our environment? – Would you be willing to see a small increase in tuition to support recycling on campus?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results of Survey

  • 4 of 15 recycle in general (meaning mostly at

home.)

  • 11 of the 15 people surveyed said they would

recycle if TTU had a campus recycling program.

  • 6 of the 15 support a small increase in tuition to

help fund the program

  • 13 of the 15 said they would recycle at the Student

Union Building.

  • All said recycling is beneficial for our

environment.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Auditing Garbage

  • We need to audit the garbage output on

campus to see how much the garbage actually produced is recyclable.

  • If only a small minority of garbage

produced on campus is recyclable, then it would not be financially beneficial for TTU to recycle.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Pilot Project

  • A recycling pilot project will be carried out during

April 2007, in the latter half of the spring semester.

  • Recycling bins will be placed in select locations

around campus.

  • Our group will collect the material put in the bins
  • nce weekly for four weeks and estimate the

volume of what is recycled, and adjust the location

  • r size of bins to evaluate the effect of bin

placement and spacing.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pilot Program Cont.

  • In each place the certain levels will be

ascertained: The type and volume of recyclables put in the bins. How much non-recyclable garbage is disposed

  • f in the bins

The amount of participation  How often the bins will needed to be emptied.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Pilot Program Cont.

  • The pilot bins will be set up in the following

places:

– Bledsoe-Gordon-Sneed and Chitwood Weymouth – Holden Hall – The Student Union Building – Drane Hall – The Civil Engineering Building – The Education Building – Dan Law Field

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pilot Program Cont.

  • In each of these places, except Dan Law Field, a set of six

bins will be placed together in the hallway.

  • The bins will be made of blue plastic. Each of the bins will

be 11" deep, 20" wide, and 30" high, with a total volume

  • f 23 gallons and a light weight (9 pounds).
  • Each bin will be labeled for a different recycling product:

plastic, white paper, newspaper, aluminum, glass, and cardboard.

  • This necessitates a separate dumpster for each material. If

a campus wide recycling program is approved, six 16' x 7' x 3', will need to be put somewhere on campus

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ascertain the Best Way to Dispose

  • f the Recyclable Material
  • We will consult with the director of the physical

plant, Max Hinihosa, to allocate a pickup to haul the recyclables to the on-campus dumpsters as needed, and allocate forklift to load the dumpsters

  • nto a 16' flatbed truck to haul to Lubbock's

recycling center.

  • Our group's pilot project will provide a reasonable

estimate for how often the bins should be emptied from each building, and "scale up" the volume of recyclables collected from pilot project buildings

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cost Audit

  • Our group will conduct a cost audit to determine

the cost of the recycling program and whether or not a full scale recycling program is financially feasible for TTU

  • Funding the program is another consideration: our

group will evaluate which federal, state, municipal and private grants this recycling program at TTU may qualify for.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Time Frame

  • Two weeks for the trash audit
  • Four weeks for the pilot project
  • Two weeks for the cost audit
  • Two weeks for interviews and outside research
  • TOTAL: Ten weeks
  • 8 hrs a day,5 days a week, 10 weeks=

400 hrs

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Budget

  • Consulting fee: $75 an hr (Smith, 2006)

400hrs x $75= $30,000

  • Materials and Misc.: $1000
  • TOTAL COST: $31,000
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Qualifications

  • Thomas Arce:

– Introduction to Technical Writing ENGL 2311 – Recycles at workplace (Car Dealership)

  • John Gottula:

– Introduction to Technical Writing ENGL 2311 – Introduction to Sales AAEC 3305 – Four years Sales Experience – Marketing Internship – Actively involved in composting

  • Laura Gottschalk:

– Introduction to Technical Writing ENGL 2311 – Professional Business Report Writing ENGL 3365

  • Marie Smyth:

– Introduction to Technical Writing ENGL 2311 – Biology I BIOL 1403 – Recycles at Home

slide-22
SLIDE 22

References

  • Bell, Andrew (2003, November, 6). Library Brings Back Small Recycling Program On Campus. Daily Toreador,

Campus News, Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.dailytoreador.com/media/storage/paper870/news/2003/11/06/CampusNews/Library.Brings.Back.Small.R ecycling.Program.On.Tech.Campus- 1277617.shtml?norewrite200611201704&sourcedomain=www.dailytoreador.com

  • Brinker, Sarai (2005, September, ). BRINKER: Recycling In Lubbock Requires Initiative, Involvement. Daily

Toreador, Opinions, Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.dailytoreador.com/home/index.cfm?IE=ISO-8859- 1&BUTTONPUSHED=1&Q=recycling+on+campus&EVENT=displaySearchResults&OE=ISO-8859- 1&COF=GALT%3A%23008000%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23666666%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter %3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BALC%3A0000FF%3BLC%3A0000FF%3BT%3A000000%3BG FNT%3A0000FF%3BGIMP%3A0000FF%3BLH%3A37%3BLW%3A310%3BFORID%3A1%3B&FLAN_SEARC H=Submit&FORID=1&CLIENT=testing-testing&HL=en&iStartRow=21&orderfieldname=&orderfielddirection=

  • Brinker, Sarai (2005, November, 9). BRINKER: College Generation Not As Apathetic As Many Think. Daily

Toreador, Opinions, Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.dailytoreador.com/media/storage/paper870/news/2005/11/09/Opinions/Brinker.College.Generation.Not.A s.Apathetic.As.Many.Think-1282029.shtml?norewrite200611201714&sourcedomain=www.dailytoreador.com

  • Cobb, Clara (2005, February, 28). Studnet, City Officials Discuss Recycling In Lubbock. Daily Toreador, Life and

Leisure, Retrieved November 19, 2006, from http://www.dailytoreador.com/media/storage/paper870/news/2005/02/28/LifeLeisure/Students.City.Officials.Discuss. Recycling.In.Lubbock-1280410.shtml?norewrite200611201715&sourcedomain=www.dailytoreador.com

  • Smith, Christopher, W. (2006). How Much Are You Worth?. Ezine Articles, Retrieved November 19. 2006, from

http://ezinearticles.com/?How-Much-Are-You-Worth:-Consulting-Fees&id=85065