Public Acceptability of CCS The ACCSEPT Project Ole Andreas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

public acceptability of ccs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public Acceptability of CCS The ACCSEPT Project Ole Andreas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public Acceptability of CCS The ACCSEPT Project Ole Andreas Flagstad EU-OPEC Roundtable on CDM, September 21- 2006, Riyadh, Saudi-Arabia Contributions from: Simon Shackley (Tyndall), Heleen de Coninck (ECN), Heleen Groenenberg (ECN), Jason


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Public Acceptability of CCS

The ACCSEPT Project

Ole Andreas Flagstad EU-OPEC Roundtable on CDM, September 21- 2006, Riyadh, Saudi-Arabia

Contributions from: Simon Shackley (Tyndall), Heleen de Coninck (ECN), Heleen Groenenberg (ECN), Jason Anderson (IEEP), Paul Curnow (B&McK), David Reiner (Cambridge) O.A. Flagstad (DNV),T.Flach (DNV), Stein B. Jensen (DNV), S. Selmer- Olsen (DNV),

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 2 September 21st - 2006

About DNV

A global certifier within a broad range of

industrial activities and standards

300 offices worldwide 6000 employees Accredited for all major sectors DNV and CCS

  • Leading CDM validation/verification body

50% market share

  • Over 200 trained GHG auditors
  • R&D projects with EU and USA
slide-3
SLIDE 3

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 3 September 21st - 2006

DNV’s CCS Strategy - Ongoing Initiatives -

DNV is member of:

WBCSD, Working Group on Energy and Climate International Emission Trading Association (IETA) Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) The Norwegian MPE’s Reference Group to CSLF, IPHE and US-NO MoU

Key R&D projects:

CO2Net (EU) (lead WP on “Best Practices”) http://www.co2net.com/ CO2Sink Demo (EU) (lead WP on “Risk Management”) http://www.co2sink.org/ CO2ReMoVe (EU) (Risk, Monitoring, Verification) (proposal) ACCSEPT Policy (EU) (Social, Legal, Regulatory, Environmental, Costs) US-NORWAY MoU: http://www.westcarb.org/ and

http://www.southwestcarbonpartnership.org/

Client Projects: Statoil (Sleipner), PTRC (Weyburn), UK DTI, IEA GHG.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 4 September 21st - 2006

The ACCSEPT project

Acceptance of CO2 Capture and Storage Economics, Policy and Technology =>ACCSEPT Initiated by the European Commission (6th FP - Scientific Support for Policy) :

To address social, economic, legal and regulatory implications of

implementing CCS technology in the EU and at the world level,

To measure the social acceptance of CCS, To assess the costs of CCS at the EU and world level, To help establish guidelines and recommendations on CCS

  • in the context of the EU Emission Trading Scheme, and
  • in the framework of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum – CSLF

Started January 2006 – ends December 2007

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 5 September 21st - 2006

ACCSEPT - Consortium

Coordinator:

  • DNV is a global certifier within a broad range of industrial activities and

standards, and is a world leader in verification for GHG emissions trading schemes.

Partners:

  • Baker & McKenzie is a leader in environmental law and one of the

world’s experts on legal issues related to emissions trading and has contributed to the development of several trading systems.

  • ECN is the largest energy institute in the Netherlands with technological

expertise on CCS and technical experts in economic and policy aspects

  • f GHG mitigation.
  • IEEP focuses on the implementation of European regulations and is an

independent non-profit institute with close relationships to a range of stakeholders whom it regularly consults.

  • Tyndall Centre (University of Manchester) is one of the world’s leading

research centres on climate issues, spanning activities from predictive climate modelling to social science studies.

  • Cambridge/Judge Business School is a leading partner on research

activities combining social and technological aspects

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 6 September 21st - 2006

Importance of Public Acceptance

Public perception may have a very

significant, effect upon major planned projects involving new technologies and structures.

  • Brent Spar disposal
  • Ongoing debate over genetically

modified organism

“Although a number of technical

issues dealing with storage safety, monitoring and longevity are still

  • utstanding, the public acceptance of

geological storage is probably the

  • verriding issue”

The Royal Society of Chemistry The risks of CCS must hence be

assessed, and the results must communicated to the public

slide-7
SLIDE 7

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 7 September 21st - 2006

Social and Public Acceptability

The ACCSEPT Project will consider acceptability to the public and

“stakeholders” separately

Stakeholders are agents which have an professional interest in CCS

through employment or personal engagement in a voluntary capacity,

  • i.e. industry, industry associations, environmental and other non-

governmental organisations, governmental and research organisations.

Stakeholders contrary to the lay public, have a defined agenda or set of

preferred policy objectives in mind when evaluating CCS

Lay public cannot be expected to hold an viewpoint before the “project”

becomes important to their every day life. Their opinions and perceptions are shaped by the media and efforts of stakeholders

slide-8
SLIDE 8

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 8 September 21st - 2006

Project Organisation and Methodology

WP 0: Project Coordination (DNV)

Stakeholder Engagement

WP 1: Desired Situations for CCS

CEC Consultation

WP 4: Cross-Disciplinary Coverage of Gaps WP 5: Recommendations WP 6: Dissemination

WP 0: Project Coordination (DNV)

Legal (B&M)

Regulatory (IEEP)

Social (Tyndall) Economic (ECN) Cross

  • cutting

(DNV) Legal (B&M)

Regulatory (IEEP)

Social (Tyndall) Economic (ECN) Cross

  • cutting

(DNV)

WP 2: Thematic Area State-of-the Art

WP 3: Thematic Area Gap Identification

slide-9
SLIDE 9

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 9 September 21st - 2006

First findings -a review from ACCSEPT

Social issues

  • The awareness and knowledge of CCS is generally low with the public
  • The initial reaction is sceptical; information generally improves view
  • The public is volatile – NGOs also
  • The successes of the first few projects will be important to establish a positive
  • perception. A single failure may lead to a sharp rise in public opposition.
  • CCS could be seen as a “first aid” solution, whereas renewables are the

sustainable solution. If the public does accept the need for emergency responses to disasters, it might accept CCS if framed in those terms.

  • Level of trust in key institutions important

Legal

  • Extend and apply national legislation to CCS?
  • Clarification (and amendment of) international legislation needed
  • CCS under CDM
  • -remediation and liability
slide-10
SLIDE 10

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 10 September 21st - 2006

First findings -a review from ACCSEPT

Regulatory issues

  • Requirements for site selection and long time monitoring
  • i.e. levels of leakage from underground storage
  • Baseline identification tools

Economic issues

  • Big difference in costs for CCS used in different models
  • Consequences of increased electricity price

Cross-cutting issues

  • Reservoir suitability
  • Energy penalty
  • Accounting along value chain
slide-11
SLIDE 11

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 11 September 21st - 2006

Stakeholder perceptions

Large number of CCS policies, programmes and projects include some form of

stakeholder participation.

Few independent studies of the involvement in, and perceptions of stakeholders

regarding CCS.

The position of NGOs on CCS is presently rather contingent and hard to

characterise with any degree of certainty

The position of the NGOs may often be inspired by conditional aspects as e.g.

“CCS should not divert resources from renewable energy and energy efficiency”

Ongoing ACCSEPT stakeholder survey:

  • Climate change: need for large CO2 reduction in the medium- to long-term (2020-2050)
  • Energy security/supply in Europe
  • Energy costs: the rising price in general / “equity” (effect upon less affluent consumers)
  • Risks: the whole CCS value chain as such and/or alternatives to it
slide-12
SLIDE 12

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 12 September 21st - 2006

To summarise……

  • Deployment of CCS
  • If incentives in place, CCS could deploy rapidly
  • Regulatory framework urgently needed to ensure safety and permanence
  • Public still volatile; could probably be persuaded that CCS is necessary,

but could also be dissuaded easily in case of irregularities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

OPEC-EU Roundtable on CDM - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Slide 13 September 21st - 2006

Thank you. Please visit: www.accsept.org

  • le.andreas.flagstad@dnv.com