Re/Framing Disability American Association of Colleges & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

re framing disability
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Re/Framing Disability American Association of Colleges & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Re/Framing Disability American Association of Colleges & Universities Dr. Amanda Kraus To achieve meaningful and equitable inclusion, we must reflect on what we believe about disability with humility. Prevalent Thinking Due to a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Re/Framing Disability

American Association of Colleges & Universities

  • Dr. Amanda Kraus
slide-2
SLIDE 2

To achieve meaningful and equitable inclusion, we must reflect on what we believe about disability with humility.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Framing

Prevalent Thinking Due to a physiological difference, diagnosis, injury or impairment, individual is at a deficit. The individual is the problem - must be cured or pitied

  • r accommodated.

Fear, separateness, burden. Language, media, design, policy.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Reframing

Emerging Thinking The environment disables people with impairments by design. The environment is the problem and must be redesigned! Access is a right, not a special need. Social Justice, Civil Rights, Disability Studies, Universal Design

slide-5
SLIDE 5

How do we shift our thinking?

Pity Cure Compliance Social Justice Universal Design Disability Studies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Critically analyze language, media and design.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Identify Common Stereotypes (in Higher Ed)

Negative

  • Tragic, pitiful
  • Needy
  • Scary
  • Lazy
  • Liars
  • Angry

“Positive”

– Inspirational – Heroic – Special – Resilient – Preferential treatment

  • help, attention
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Disability Microaggressions

  • 1. Denial of identity
  • 2. Avoidance/Separateness
  • 3. Helpless/Secondary Gain
  • 4. De-sexualization
  • 5. Denial of privacy
  • 6. Patronization/Infantilization
  • 7. Spread effect
  • 8. Second class citizen/Burden
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Afflicted Sickly Maniac Lunatic Simpleton Needy Maladjusted

Abnormal

Stupid Turn a blind eye…

Lame

Vegetable Suffering

Deaf and dumb

Blind as a bat…

There but for the grace of God…

Freak

Brain Dead Maladjusted Invalid Insane

Psycho Retard

Gimp

Crazy

Spaz

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Metaphor

  • She turned a blind

eye…

  • It fell on deaf ears…
  • The company was

crippled with debt…

  • He’s a real stand-up

guy…

  • You’d have to be

crazy to…

  • Paralyzed with fear…
  • The economy limped

along…

  • He’s a lame duck

candidate…

  • She doesn’t have a

leg to stand on.

  • I can run circles

around…

  • Stand on your own

two feet…

  • Cut him off at the

knees…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

“Disability” Language

– disABILITY – Special needs – Differently-abled – Handicapable – Physically-challenged – Confined to a chair, wheelchair-bound – The disabled, the blind, the deaf, – Person-first language

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Person-first versus Identity-first Language

What are the implications?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Critical Media Representation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Media “Bingo”

  • She didn’t let her

disability stop her!

  • He suffers from…
  • Confined to a

wheelchair!

  • If you saw her doing

[anything], you’d never know she was disabled.

  • Defying the odds...

– Most of us could never imagine [insert horrific impairment] happening to us, but... – Through the miraculous assistance of [something cmopletely non-miraculous]... – Courageous battle... – ....proving you can achieve anything if you really try!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Helpless

Fear Angry Jokes Charity

Heroic

Supercrip Inspirational

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

How do we do the work?

– Disabled people share a history of oppression. – Consider disability an identity and community, a value-added perspective. – Seek out input and feedback from disability community. – Hold disability on par with other lived experiences. – Critically consume media. Question language and policy choices. – When there are barriers, ask why?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lessons from student development theory

– Involvement and engagement (Astin, 1984; Kuh, 1998) – Marginality and Mattering (Schlossberg, 1989) – Validation (Rendón, 1994) – Identity development – Role of environment

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How can design disable?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Curricular Physical IT Policy Social

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Letter of the Law vs. Spirit of the Law

What do we have to do? What can we do?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Communication & Info

– Include information on access features/requests on all marketing and materials – Hand-outs in advance, electronically, large font – Infuse disability and diversity content and images into marketing and programming – Captioning – Describe images in presentations – Accessible emails, PDF’s – Use the microphone! – Commit to inclusive language

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Physical Space

– Common entrances, exits, paths of travel – Accessible parking, transportation, elevators, restrooms – Good, clear signage for access features – Distributed seating

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Curricular

– Check our biases. – Hold all students to the same standards. – What is essential? – Multiple methods of assessment, engagement, participation.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Accessibility Statement

Events: To request disability-related accommodations or with questions about accessibility, please contact: Syllabi: At X, we strive to make learning experiences as accessible as possible. If you anticipate or experience physical or academic barriers based on disability or pregnancy, you are welcome to let me know so that we can discuss

  • ptions. You are also encouraged to contact

Disability Resources to explore reasonable accommodation.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Disabled by design, not impairment.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Access ≠ Equity