Representations of even cut matroids Irene Pivotto Department of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

representations of even cut matroids
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Representations of even cut matroids Irene Pivotto Department of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Representations of even cut matroids Irene Pivotto Department of Combinatorics and Optimization University of Waterloo January 8, 2010 Joint work with B. Guenin Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 1 / 31 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Definitions 3


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Representations of even cut matroids

Irene Pivotto

Department of Combinatorics and Optimization University of Waterloo

January 8, 2010

Joint work with B. Guenin

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 1 / 31

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

1 Motivation 2 Definitions 3 What we want to do (and did) 4 How we want to use it 5 Some work left to do Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 2 / 31

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

Why even cut matroids?

  • minor closed class
  • contains cographic matroids (cut matroids)
  • may help proving Seymour’s conjecture on 1-flowing matroids: when

does the max flow-min cut theorem extends to binary matroids?

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 3 / 31

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definitions

G: graph with labeled edges. The cut-matroid represented by G has: elements - edges of G cycles - cuts of G Denoted by cut(G, T).

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 4 / 31

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Definitions

G: graph with labeled edges. The cut-matroid represented by G has: elements - edges of G cycles - cuts of G Denoted by cut(G, T). Example

1 8 4 7 3 2 6 9 5

The elements of cut(G) are {1, 2, . . . , 9} 1, 2, 5, 6 is a cycle of cut(G)

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 4 / 31

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Definitions

For cut matroids we know: (1) excluded minors (Tutte 1959) (2) “unique” representation: Whitney-flips (Whitney 1933) G ∼W G ′

G G'

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 5 / 31

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Definitions

Example

1 4 12 2 6 5 7 11 13 9 8 10 3 1 4 12 2 6 5 7 11 13 9 8 10 3

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 6 / 31

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Definitions

Whitney-flips preserve cuts:

1 4 12 2 6 5 7 11 13 9 8 10 3 1 4 12 2 6 5 7 11 13 9 8 10 3

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 7 / 31

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Definitions

Whitney-flips preserve cuts:

1 4 12 2 6 5 7 11 13 9 8 10 3 1 4 12 2 6 5 7 11 13 9 8 10 3

same cuts ⇔ related by ∼W

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 7 / 31

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Definitions

Graft: pair (G, T) where G is a graph and T ⊆ VG, |T| even. A cut δ(U) ⊆ EG is even (resp. odd) if |U ∩ T| is even (resp. odd). The even cut matroid represented by (G, T) has elements - edges of G cycles - even cuts of (G, T) Denoted by ecut(G, T)

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 8 / 31

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Definitions

Graft: pair (G, T) where G is a graph and T ⊆ VG, |T| even. A cut δ(U) ⊆ EG is even (resp. odd) if |U ∩ T| is even (resp. odd). The even cut matroid represented by (G, T) has elements - edges of G cycles - even cuts of (G, T) Denoted by ecut(G, T) Note: cut matroids are even cut matroids.

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 8 / 31

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Definitions

Example

1 8 4 7 3 2 6 9 5

Boxed vertices are in T

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 9 / 31

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Definitions

Example

1 8 4 7 3 2 6 9 5

Boxed vertices are in T 1, 4, 7 is an odd cut

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 10 / 31

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Definitions

Example

1 8 4 7 3 2 6 9 5

Boxed vertices are in T 1, 4, 7 is an odd cut 1, 2, 5, 6 is an even cut

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 11 / 31

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Definitions

Example

1 8 4 7 3 2 6 9 5

Boxed vertices are in T 1, 4, 7 is an odd cut 1, 2, 5, 6 is an even cut 1, 4, 7, 6, 3, 8 is an even cut

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 12 / 31

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Idea for finding excluded minors

M : class of even cut matroids (a) Show: if M ∈ M, then M contains one of N1, . . . , Nk (b) For all i, characterize matroids M minimally not in M with Ni ≤ M.

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 13 / 31

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Idea for finding excluded minors

M : class of even cut matroids (a) Show: if M ∈ M, then M contains one of N1, . . . , Nk (b) For all i, characterize matroids M minimally not in M with Ni ≤ M. (a) We can pick excluded minors for cographic matroids

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 13 / 31

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Idea for finding excluded minors

M : class of even cut matroids (a) Show: if M ∈ M, then M contains one of N1, . . . , Nk (b) For all i, characterize matroids M minimally not in M with Ni ≤ M. (a) We can pick excluded minors for cographic matroids

(b) We want to use the fact that even cut matroids are represented by grafts. Hard: even cut matroids have many representations.

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 13 / 31

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Many representations

Example

1 8 10 7 9 6 14 13 12 11 15 5 4 3 2 9 2 7 10 1 6 14 13 15 11 12 5 4 3 8

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 14 / 31

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Minor operations

Matroid minors correspond to graft minors: M = ecut(G, T) ⇔ (G, T)

matroid minor

⇓ ⇓

graft minor

N = ecut(H, S) ⇔ (H, S)

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 15 / 31

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Minor operations Matroid contraction = graft deletion

M/e ⇒ (G \ e, T)

1 8 4 7 3 2 6 9 5

1 8 4 7 3 6 9 5

e = 2

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 16 / 31

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Minor operations Matroid deletion = graft contraction

M \ e ⇒ (G/e, T ′)

1 8 4 7 3 2 6 9 5

1 8 4 3 2 6 9 5

e = 7

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 17 / 31

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Minor operations

Representation (H, S) of N extends to M: M = ecut(G, T) ⇔ (G, T)

matroid major

⇑ ⇑

graft major

N = ecut(H, S) ⇔ (H, S)

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 18 / 31

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Finding excluded minors

N M

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 19 / 31

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Finding excluded minors

Idea: cover all the representations with equivalence classes.

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 20 / 31

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Finding excluded minors

Idea: cover all the representations with equivalence classes. Bundle: equivalence class of representations for some equivalence. N : even cut matroid Cover all the representations of N with bundles.

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 20 / 31

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Finding excluded minors

Idea: cover all the representations with equivalence classes. Bundle: equivalence class of representations for some equivalence. N : even cut matroid Cover all the representations of N with bundles. We want to study how the different bundles behave when taking majors. ⇒ stabilizer theorems (Whittle 1999).

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 20 / 31

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Stabilizer theorem

N, M even cut matroids, N ≤ M Bundle of

  • repr. of N

N M

Bundle of

  • repr. of M

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 21 / 31

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Stabilizer theorem

M N1 N

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 22 / 31

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Equivalence of grafts

Whitney flips: (G, T) ∼W (G ′, T ′) if

  • G ∼W G ′
  • every T-join of G is a T ′-join of G ′

G G'

Whitney flips preserve even cuts.

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 23 / 31

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Equivalence of grafts

Shuffle (Norine, Thomas) - preserves even cuts

a c d b a b c d a b c d a c d b

a' c' d' b' a' b' c' d' a' b' c' d' a c' d' b'

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 24 / 31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Equivalence of grafts

Shuffle - example

1 8 10 7 9 6 14 13 12 11 15 5 4 3 2 9 2 7 10 1 6 14 13 15 11 12 5 4 3 8

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 25 / 31

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Bundles

Types of bundles: WS-bundles: related by ∼W , generated by a substantial graft WN-bundles: related by ∼W , generated by a non-substantial graft S-bundles: related by ∼S

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 26 / 31

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Bundles

(G, T) is non-substantial if, for some u, v ∈ V (G), (G, T △ {u, v}) ∼W (G ′, {u′, v′})

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 27 / 31

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Bundles

(G, T) is non-substantial if, for some u, v ∈ V (G), (G, T △ {u, v}) ∼W (G ′, {u′, v′}) Example

u v u' v'

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 27 / 31

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Bundles

Non-substantial graft do not extend uniquely.

u' v' u v

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 28 / 31

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Bundles

Non-substantial graft do not extend uniquely.

u' v' u v

But then they become substantial

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 28 / 31

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Bundles

Non-substantial graft do not extend uniquely.

u' v' u v

But then they become substantial ⇒ at most one branching

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 28 / 31

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Bundles

Non-substantial graft do not extend uniquely.

u' v' u v

But then they become substantial ⇒ at most one branching ⇒ at most twice the number of representations

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 28 / 31

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Bundles

... and then you prove a stabilizer theorem for each bundle...

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 29 / 31

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Bundles

... and then you prove a stabilizer theorem for each bundle... WS-bundles

WN-bundles

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 29 / 31

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Bundles

... and then you prove a stabilizer theorem for each bundle... WS-bundles

WN-bundles

S-bundles: in progress

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 29 / 31

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Future work

Escape theorems (how to kill the representations)

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 30 / 31

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Future work

Escape theorems (how to kill the representations) Excluded minors

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 30 / 31

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Future work

Escape theorems (how to kill the representations) Excluded minors Isomorphism theorem

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 30 / 31

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Future work

Escape theorems (how to kill the representations) Excluded minors Isomorphism theorem Parallel work in progress (joint work with B. Guenin and P. Wollan): Same approach for even cycle matroids

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 30 / 31

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Grazie Merci Thanks

Irene Pivotto (UW) January 8, 2010 31 / 31