Research Productivity of Canadian Business Schools For Discussion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

research productivity of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Research Productivity of Canadian Business Schools For Discussion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Research Productivity of Canadian Business Schools For Discussion at CFBSD Meeting Toronto, 7 December 2010 Ali Dastmalchian Gustavson School of Business @ UVic Purposes of Project 1. To compare research productivity across business


slide-1
SLIDE 1

For Discussion at CFBSD Meeting Toronto, 7 December 2010 Ali Dastmalchian Gustavson School of Business @ UVic

Research Productivity of Canadian Business Schools

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Purposes of Project

1. To compare research productivity across business schools in Canada. 2. To assess whether the business research landscape has changed since data was collected more than 10 years ago (Beamish, 2000) 3. Additionally, to use the results to measure one of Gustavson School’s aims (to be the best small-sized research business school in Canada)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Process

  • Schools were contacted in late summer/fall 2010 and

invited to participate

  • Scope: Initially the 20 schools with either AACSB or

EQUIS accreditation (a few other schools were also contacted and have provided data)

  • The hope is to collect data from as many schools as

possible…

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Process

  • Schools were asked to provide:
  • a list of the school’s peer reviewed journal

publications from 2005-2009

  • their faculty FTE for 2005-2009
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hiccups

  • A few schools opted not to participate or just didn’t

respond

  • Some schools reported incomplete data
  • Issues with consistency in defining FTE
  • to standardize, we opted to use the number that schools

report to AACSB in their annual Business School Questionnaire (BSQ), where possible

  • When not available, we used (1) FTE reported to us by the

school, or (2) FTE listed on web site, or (3) FTE from the nearest year we did know for that school

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Data – small schools

Data collected? FTE (2009) EQUIS AACSB 0-79 FTE Carleton yes 64 Dalhousie limited 37 Yes Laurentian yes 22 Manitoba limited 75 Yes McMaster not participating 72 Yes Ottawa yes 68 Yes Yes Saskatchewan yes 32 UVic yes 38 Yes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Data – medium-sized schools

Data collected? FTE (2009) EQUIS AACSB 80-139 FTE Brock yes 111 Yes Calgary yes 80 Yes Laval yes 121 Yes Yes Memorial yes 104 Yes Queen's yes 94 Yes Yes Simon Fraser yes 118 Yes Yes

  • St. Mary's

no reply 86 Yes UBC yes 121 Yes Yes

  • W. Ontario

yes 93 Yes

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Data – large schools

Data collected? FTE (2009) EQUIS AACSB 140 + FTE Alberta yes 184 Yes Concordia yes 208 Yes HEC yes 331 Yes Yes Toronto no reply 196 Yes UQAM limited 240 Yes Wilfred Laurier yes 149 Yes

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results

  • In collecting this data, we are able to make:
  • Comparisons among Canadian Biz Schools
  • Comparisons among size groupings
  • Comparisons among schools with AACSB and/or

EQUIS accreditation

  • Comparisons using FT40 (and FT45?) publication

rates and/or total journal publication rates

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results – sorted by school size

0,00 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,10 0,12 0,14 0,16

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

FT40 pubs/FTE faculty members

FT40 pubs/FT faculty, averaged by school grouping

0-79 FTE 80-139 FTE 140 + FTE

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results – sorted by school size

0,00 0,10 0,20 0,30 0,40 0,50 0,60 0,70 0,80 0,90

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

FT40 pubs/FTE faculty members

Total pubs/FT faculty, averaged by school grouping

0-79 FTE 80-139 FTE 140 + FTE

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results – sorted by AACSB status

0,00 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,10 0,12 0,14 0,16 0,18 0,20 0,22

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

FT40 pubs/FTE, average across group

FT40 output by years accredited with AACSB

Not AACSB Accredited AACSB for 1-5 years AACSB for 5-9 years AACSB for 10 + years

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results – sorted by AACSB status

0,00 0,10 0,20 0,30 0,40 0,50 0,60 0,70 0,80 0,90 1,00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Total pubs/FTE, average across group

Total output by years accredited

Not AACSB Accredited AACSB for 1-5 years AACSB for 5-9 years AACSB for 10 + years

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusion

  • We will be working with this data further
  • The more complete our data is, the more

informative the results – please consider participating

  • Contact us at Gustavson School of Business to

update or complete your data

  • If there is interest, we may consider collecting

this information annually

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Schools for Which we have no Data Yet….

From Beamish’s List: Other: 1. McGill

  • 7. UNB (2)
  • 13. Trent

2. Waterloo

  • 8. St. Fr. Xavier
  • 14. RRU

3. York

  • 9. Acadia

15.U of F.V. 4. Lethbridge 10.Sherbrooke

  • 16. TRU

5. UPEI

  • 11. Regina
  • 17. UOIT

6. Guelph

  • 12. Windsor
  • 18. TWU
  • 19. Nipissing
  • 20. Kwantlen
  • 21. Moncton
  • 22. UNBC
  • 23. Bishop’s
slide-16
SLIDE 16

What is required?

  • Schools are asked to provide:
  • a list of the school’s peer reviewed

journal publications from 2005-2009

  • their faculty FTE for 2005-2009
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank you!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Publications per FT Faculty 2005-2009

0,00 0,25 0,50 0,75 1,00 1,25 1,50 Ottawa Dalhousie Simon Fraser Carleton UQAM UBC Saskatchewan Brock Calgary HEC Concordia Western Ontario Laval Laurentian Victoria Manitoba Alberta Queen's Memorial Wilfrid Laurier

  • Avg. total pubs/faculty

member per year, 2005-09

  • Avg. FT40/faculty member

per year, 2005-09