RIVER VALE SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 15, 2019 C ollege and Career - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

C

• llege and

Career Readiness

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT REPORT

RIVER VALE SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 15, 2019

DISTR IC T ASSESSMENTS ◼Formative assessments to drive instruction and grouping (TC reading level assessments, Renaissance Learning, IXL math, exit tickets, etc.) ◼Tests, quizzes, exams ◼Experiential assessments (plays, concerts, art shows, curriculum showcases) ◼Labs

◼2019 marks the 1st administration of the NJSLA-ELA/Math/Science ◼River Vale students took NJSLA English Language Arts & Literacy assessments in grades 3 – 8 ◼River Vale students took NJSLA Mathematics assessments in grades 3 – 8 and/or the End of Course Assessment in Algebra ◼The future of the NJSLA - Math/ELA is unknown

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

R ESOUR C ES FOR PAR ENTS

◼Unde nderstandi nding ng stude dent nt score r repo ports: unde nderstandt ndthe hescore.org/

S ample report

❏ Indi ndividu dual Stude dent nt Repo ports: N NJ P Parent nt P Portal - nj nj- resu sults. s.pearso sonaccessn ssnext.com

◼Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations ◼Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations ◼Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations ◼Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations ◼Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

NJSLA PERFORMANCE LEVELS

Not Y

• t Yet

t Meeting (Level 1 1) Part rtially lly Meeting (Level 2 2) Approac aching (Level 3 3) Meeting (Level 4 4) Exceeding (Level 5 5) Dist strict % % >= Level 4 4 NJ % % > >= Level 4 4

Grade 3 (99)

2.0% 9.1% 17.2% 56.6% 15.2% 71. 71.7% 50. 50.3%

Grade 4 (117)

0.9% 5.1% 15.4% 49.6% 29.1% 78. 78.6% 57. 57.4%

Grade 5 (134)

0% 6.0% 17.2% 56.7% 20.1% 76. 76.9% 57. 57.9%

Grade 6 (148)

1.4% 3.4% 19.6% 54.7% 20.9% 75. 75.7% 56. 56.2%

Grade 7 (119)

1.7% 3.4% 11.8% 35.3% 47.9% 83. 83.2% 62. 62.8%

Grade 8 (138)

3.6% 5.8% 13.0% 40.6% 37.0% 77. 77.5% 62. 62.8%

R IV ER V ALE’S 2019 NJSLA GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Not Y

• t Yet

t Meeting (Level 1 1) Part rtially lly Meeting (Level 2 2) Approac aching(L evel 3 3) Meeting (Level 4 4) Exceeding (Level 5 5) Dist strict % % >= Level 4 4 NJ % % > >= Level 4 4

Grade 3 (99) 1.0% 6.1% 17.2% 50.5% 25.3% 75. 75.8% 55. 55.1% Grade 4 (117) 1.7% 5.1% 24.8% 51.3% 17.1% 68. 68.4% 51. 51.0% Grade 5 (134) 0% 13.4% 28.4% 40.3% 17.9% 58. 58.2% 46. 46.8% Grade 6 (146) 4.8% 15.1% 25.3% 42.5% 12.3% 54. 54.8% 40. 40.5% Grade 7 (118) 0% 12.7% 31.4% 40.7% 15.3% 55. 55.9% 42. 42.1% Grade 8* (74) 9.5% 10.8% 21.6% 56.8% 1.4% 58. 58.1% 29. 29.3% Algebra I (65) 0% 0% 0% 53.8% 46.2% 100 100% 42. 42.9%

R IV ER V ALE’S 2019 NJSLA GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS

C OMPAR ISON OF RIVER VALE’S SPRING 2017, SPRING 2018, AND SPRING 2019 PARCC/NJSLA ADMINISTRATIONS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) Meeting (Level 4) Exceeding (Level 5) % Level 4/5 % Level 4/5 % Level 4/5 Avg. Score (2017) Avg. Score (2018) Avg. Score (2019)

2018 201 2019 2018 201 2019 2018 201 2019 2018 201 2019 2018 201 2019 2017 2018 2019 2017 2018 2019 Grade 3 0.9% 2.0% 2.7% 9.1% 14.2% 17.2% 61.1% 56.6% 21.2% 15.2% 75% 82.3% 71.7% 775 780

768

Grade 4 2.3% 0.9% 2.3% 5.1% 15.6% 15.4% 39.8% 49.6% 39.8% 29.1% 78% 79.7% 78.6% 774 779

773

Grade 5 0.7% 0% 4.8% 6.0% 13.6% 17.2% 59.9% 56.7% 21.1% 20.1% 84% 81% 76.9% 777 776

773

Grade 6 1.7% 1.4% 4.3% 3.4% 15.7% 19.6% 54.8% 54.7% 23.5% 20.9% 75% 78.3 75.7% 767 771

769

Grade 7 1.4% 1.7% 4.3% 3.4% 13% 11.8% 42.8% 35.3% 38.4% 47.9% 70% 81.2% 83.2% 766 775

780

Grade 8 0.7% 3.6% 5% 5.8% 13.6% 13.0% 44.3% 40.6% 36.4% 37.0% 69% 80.7 77.5% 769 781

778

*The River Vale School District considers 2% (+2% or -2%) to be within the margin of error and therefore “EQ”

9

C OMPAR ISON OF RIVER VALE’S SPRING 2017, SPRING 2018, AND SPRING 2019 PARCC/NJSLA ADMINISTRATIONS MATHEMATICS

Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2)

Approaching

(Level 3) Meeting (Level 4) Exceeding (Level 5) % Level 4/5 % Level 4/5 % Level 4/5 Avg. Score

(2017)

Avg. Score (2018) Avg. Score (2019)

2018 2019 2019 2018 2019 2019 2018 2019 2019 2018 2019 2019 2018 2019 2019 2017 2018 2019 2017 2018

2019 Grade 3 0% 1.0% 5.3% 6.1% 17.7% 17.2% 47.8% 50.5% 29.2% 25.3% 73% 77% 75.8% 769 774 768 Grade 4 3.1% 1.7% 4.7% 5.1% 18.8% 24.8% 57% 51.3% 16.4% 17.1% 74% 73.4% 68.4% 764 767 765 Grade 5 4.1% 0% 12.2% 13.4% 17.7% 28.4% 53.1% 40.3% 12.9% 17.9% 57% 66% 58.2% 759 759 759 Grade 6 3.5% 4.8% 10.5% 15.1% 29.8% 25.3% 40.4% 42.5% 15.8% 12.3% 66% 56.1% 54.8% 761 757 753 Grade 7 1.4% 0% 10.8% 12.7% 18.7% 31.4% 49.6% 40.7% 19.4% 15.3% 63% 69.1% 55.9% 758 761 758 Grade 8* 5.8% 9.5% 10.1% 10.8% 20.3% 21.6% 62.3% 56.8% 1.4% 1.4% 62% 63.8% 58.1% 752 752 749 Algebra I 0%^ 0% 0% 0% 1.4% 0% 66.2% 53.8% 32.4% 46.2% 97% 98.6% 100% 786 797 805

11

QUESTIONS TO G UIDE NJSLA DATA R EFLEC TION

◼How will we use NJSLA data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in our curriculum and instruction?

• District E

vidence R eport, S tudent C lass R

• sters, R

eleased Items ◼How will we use NJSLA data as a tool to address areas in need

• f improvement or enhancement?
• District E

vidence R eport, curricular alignment, staff feedback ◼How can we provide additional resources and support for our educators to meet the learning needs of all our students?

• S

tudy Island, R enaissance Learning, standards-based resources

15

EL ELA Concep eptual area eas t tes ested ed: ◼ Det eter ermining c critical el elem emen ents of tex ext ◼ Int ntegrating ng i ide deas and i nd inf nformation n from t tex ext ◼ Cons nstruc ucting ng unde understandi nding ngs of text ◼ Using ng writing ng to communi unicate G rade 3 ELA - Students can show their achievement in 80 skills related to 16 Essential Elements. G rades 4/5 ELA - Students can show their achievement in 85 skills related to 17 Essential Elements.

*For more information regarding the DLm Assessment, please visit https://www.nj.gov/education/assessment/apa/dlm/

Dynamic Learning Maps Assessment

Gradi ding ng: ◼ Em Emerging ◼ Appr pproachi hing ng t the he T Target ◼ At At T Target ◼ Adv dvanc nced

Gr Grade 3 3 ◼ 50% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in n the he “ Emergent nt” be benc nchm hmark. ◼ 50% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in n the he “ At T Target” be benc nchm hmark. Gr Grade 4 4 ◼ 33.3% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in t n the he “ Emerging ng” be benc nchm hmark. ◼ 66.7% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in t n the he “ Adv dvanc nced” d” be benc nchm hmark. Gr Grade 5 5 ◼ 100% of s stude dent nts s scored d in n the he “ “ Adv dvanc nced” d” be benc nchm hmark.

Ma Math Concep eptual a area eas tes ested ed: ◼ Unde nderstand nding ng nu numbe ber structures ◼ Solving ng pr probl blems i inv nvolving ng area, per erimet eter er, and volume ◼ Repr present nting ng and nd int nterpr preting ng da data di displ plays ◼ Unde nderstand nding ng pa patterns ns a and nd func nctiona nal thi hink nking ng ◼ Cal alculat ating g ac accurat ately an and efficiently u using g simpl ple arithm hmetic o

• pe

perations ns ◼ Unde nderstand nding ng and nd using ng measurement nt pr princ ncipl ples and u nd uni nits of m measure ◼ Using ng ope perations ns and m nd mode dels t to s solve pr probl blems

G rade 3 Math - Students can show their achievement in 55 skills related to 11 Essential Elements. G rade 4 Math - Students can show their achievement in 80 skills related to 16 Essential Elements. G rade 5 Math - Students can show their achievement in 75 skills related to 15 Essential Elements

Dynamic Learning Maps Assessment

Gradi ding ng: ◼ Em Emerging ◼ Appr pproachi hing ng the he T Target ◼ At At T Target ◼ Adv dvanc nced

Gr Grade 3 3 ◼ 50% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in n the he “ Emergent nt” be benc nchm hmark. ◼ 50% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in n the he “ At T Target” be benc nchm hmark. Gr Grade 4 4 ◼ 33.3% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in t n the he “ Emerging ng” be benc nchm hmark. ◼ 66.7% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in t n the he “ Adv dvanc nced” d” be benc nchm hmark. Gr Grade 5 5 ◼ 100% 100% of s students s scored in the “ “ At T Tar arge get” be benc nchm hmark.

Sci cience ce Concep eptual a area eas t tes ested ed: ❏ Earth a h and S nd Spa pace Scienc nce ❏ Physica cal S Sci cience ce ❏ Li Life S e Scien ence G rade 5 Math - Students can show their achievement in 27 skills related to 9 Essential Elements

Dynamic Learning Maps Assessment

Gradi ding ng: ◼ Em Emerging ◼ Appr pproachi hing ng the he T Target ◼ At At T Target ◼ Adv dvanc nced

Gr Grade 5 5 ◼ 50% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in n the he “ Emerging ng” be benc nchm hmark. ◼ 50% o

• f s

stude dent nts s scored d in n the he “ Appr pproaching ng the he Target” be benc nchm hmark.

According to https://www.scribd.com ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 is an English language proficiency assessment for students in Kindergarten—Grade 12. The test is administered every year to help school districts monitor the English language development of students identified as English language learners. Proficient level scores are reported as numbers that range from 1.0-6.0. 1.0 is thought as a “beginner” score, while 6.0 can be considered an “advanced” English proficiency score. Students who score between a 4.5 and 6.0 will be considered for exiting the program.

WIDA/ACCESS 2.0 Assessment

Scores 1 = 1 = Entering g - Knows and uses minimal social language and minimal academic language with visual and graphic support 2 = 2 = Emergi ging g - Knows and uses some English and general academic language with visual and graphic support 3= D Dev evel eloping - Knows and uses social English and some specific academic language with visual and graphic support 4= E Expa pandi nding ng - Knows and uses social English and some technical academic language 5= 5= B Bridgi ging g - Knows and uses social and academic language working with grade level material 6= 6= R Reac aching g - Knows and uses social and academic language at the highest level measured by this test

20

WIDA 2018-2019 Average Scores

Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 6 Grade 8 4.3 3.5 4.8 5.6 5.3 6.0

Areas to C elebrate

• River Vale’s passing rates and average scores were

consistently and significantly above the state average

• Grades 7 and 8 ELA scores
• Algebra 1
• Grade 3 ELA

Curriculum

• Review of standards and pacing guides
• Increased mathematics instruction in grades 3-5 by 80 minutes per week
• Focused instruction on targeted populations (approaching students)
• Adoption of a new math series

Professional Development

• Guided instruction and differentiation - Amy Stark
• Emphasis on metacognitive skills - Nancy Schultz
• PLCs at both elementary schools will focus on mathematics instruction and

data analysis is grades 3-5

22

Next Steps

23

District Vision Congratulations to Roberge Elementary School and Woodside Elementary School on becoming Future Ready Certified!