SLIDE 1 Technical University
SLIDE 2 Rolling Resistance Influence on Fuel Consumption
[Silka W.: Energochłonność ruchu samochodu, Warszawa, WKŁ 1997]
Decrease of tires Rolling Resistance by 10% results in approximately 3% reduction of fuel consumption
Number of vehicles in Poland - 15 000 000, in USA – 250 000 000 Use of tires with 10% less Rolling Resistance would reduce daily fuel consumption by approximately 1000 tons (USA - 35 000 tons) Daily savings in CO2 emission would amount to 3000 tons (USA – 100 000 tons)
SLIDE 3 Resistance forces acting on typical passenger car
[Silka W.: Energochłonność ruchu samochodu, Warszawa, WKŁ 1997]
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ECE cycle 90 km/h 120 km/h
Air drag Rolling resistance Inertia forces
SLIDE 4
Rolling Resistance
SLIDE 5
Rolling Resistance
SLIDE 6
Rolling Resistance
SLIDE 7
Road Methods of Rolling Resistance Evaluation Towing (car or trailer) Coast-down Torque measurements Fuel consumption
SLIDE 8
Laboratory Methods of Rolling Resistance Evaluation Measurement of:
* Spindle force * Torque of the power system * Coast-down time
SLIDE 9
Laboratory Methods of Rolling Resistance Evaluation
SLIDE 10 Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (misalignments / grade)
a
Ry Rr W L F r e
01 . 3 . 3800 200 r e f m r N L N W W L F f R e R r L R F L W R
m y r r y
) sin( ) cos( a a
0101 . " 20 0110 . ' 04 0187 . ' 30 0100 . ' 00
m m m m
f f f f a a a a
SLIDE 11 Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (acceleration)
a
Ry Rr W L F r e I
W L F f a m I I R F L W R
m r y
01 . 28 * 4 . 1 20 3 . 3800 200 r e f kg m m kg m m r N L N W
I
0107 . / 1 . 0100 . / .
2 2
m m
f s m a f s m a
SLIDE 12 Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (air drag)
Ry Rr W L F r e A V
01 . 20 200 3 . 3800 200 r e f kg m mm B m r N L N W W L F f v r B c A A R F L W R
m x r y
2 2
2
0172 . / 20 0100 . /
m m
f s m a f s m v
SLIDE 13
Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (acceleration)
Generally, equipment constructed for Traction measurements is not appropriate for Rolling Resistance measurements as the Traction and Rolling Resistance forces are of different magnitude. Usually Rolling Resistance force is at about 100 times less than maximal possible Traction force.
SLIDE 14
Belgian Trailer for Rolling Resistance Measurements
SLIDE 15 Principle of Operation
ft = Wt/Z Pf Z
Ciężar Kierunek jazdy
Wt
7 4 3 2 6 1 5 8 9
LOAD
1-frame; 2-loading system; 3-axis of frame and loading device; 4-measuring arm; 5-test wheel; 6-adjustable load; 7-damper and spring
SLIDE 16
Polish Trailer Mk.1
SLIDE 17
Polish Trailer Mk.1
rama przyczepy wahacz pomiarowy
FRAME ARM
SLIDE 18
Polish Trailer Mk.2
SLIDE 19
Polish trailer Mk. 3
SLIDE 20 Calibration
5 3 4 2 1 6 7 9 8 l x a
B
C
A’ A C
α θ P b Wt
SLIDE 21 Examples of the results
Nawierzchnia odcinka pomiarowego P1 S5 P2 S3 S2 S1 S4 Wartość współczynnika
0,0106 0,0116 0,0117 0,0118 0,0135 0,0140 0,0159
Test section RR coefficient