Rolling Resistance Influence on Fuel Consumption Decrease of tires - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rolling resistance influence on fuel consumption decrease
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Rolling Resistance Influence on Fuel Consumption Decrease of tires - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Technical University of Gdansk, Poland Rolling Resistance Influence on Fuel Consumption Decrease of tires Rolling Resistance by 10% results in approximately 3% reduction of fuel consumption Number of vehicles in Poland - 15 000 000, in USA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Technical University

  • f Gdansk, Poland
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Rolling Resistance Influence on Fuel Consumption

[Silka W.: Energochłonność ruchu samochodu, Warszawa, WKŁ 1997]

Decrease of tires Rolling Resistance by 10% results in approximately 3% reduction of fuel consumption

Number of vehicles in Poland - 15 000 000, in USA – 250 000 000 Use of tires with 10% less Rolling Resistance would reduce daily fuel consumption by approximately 1000 tons (USA - 35 000 tons) Daily savings in CO2 emission would amount to 3000 tons (USA – 100 000 tons)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Resistance forces acting on typical passenger car

[Silka W.: Energochłonność ruchu samochodu, Warszawa, WKŁ 1997]

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ECE cycle 90 km/h 120 km/h

Air drag Rolling resistance Inertia forces

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Rolling Resistance

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Rolling Resistance

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rolling Resistance

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Road Methods of Rolling Resistance Evaluation Towing (car or trailer) Coast-down Torque measurements Fuel consumption

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Laboratory Methods of Rolling Resistance Evaluation Measurement of:

* Spindle force * Torque of the power system * Coast-down time

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Laboratory Methods of Rolling Resistance Evaluation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (misalignments / grade)

a

Ry Rr W L F r e

01 . 3 . 3800 200      r e f m r N L N W W L F f R e R r L R F L W R

m y r r y

             ) sin( ) cos( a a

0101 . " 20 0110 . ' 04 0187 . ' 30 0100 . ' 00            

m m m m

f f f f a a a a

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (acceleration)

a

Ry Rr W L F r e I

W L F f a m I I R F L W R

m r y

         

01 . 28 * 4 . 1 20 3 . 3800 200         r e f kg m m kg m m r N L N W

I

0107 . / 1 . 0100 . / .

2 2

     

m m

f s m a f s m a

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (air drag)

Ry Rr W L F r e A V

01 . 20 200 3 . 3800 200        r e f kg m mm B m r N L N W W L F f v r B c A A R F L W R

m x r y

             2 2

2

0172 . / 20 0100 . /      

m m

f s m a f s m v

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Errors in Rolling Resistance Estimations (acceleration)

Generally, equipment constructed for Traction measurements is not appropriate for Rolling Resistance measurements as the Traction and Rolling Resistance forces are of different magnitude. Usually Rolling Resistance force is at about 100 times less than maximal possible Traction force.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Belgian Trailer for Rolling Resistance Measurements

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Principle of Operation

ft = Wt/Z Pf Z 

Ciężar Kierunek jazdy

Wt 

7 4 3 2 6 1 5 8 9

LOAD

1-frame; 2-loading system; 3-axis of frame and loading device; 4-measuring arm; 5-test wheel; 6-adjustable load; 7-damper and spring

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Polish Trailer Mk.1

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Polish Trailer Mk.1

rama przyczepy wahacz pomiarowy

FRAME ARM

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Polish Trailer Mk.2

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Polish trailer Mk. 3

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Calibration

5 3 4 2 1 6 7 9 8 l x a

B

C

A’ A C

α θ P b Wt

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Examples of the results

Nawierzchnia odcinka pomiarowego P1 S5 P2 S3 S2 S1 S4 Wartość współczynnika

0,0106 0,0116 0,0117 0,0118 0,0135 0,0140 0,0159

Test section RR coefficient