Rural Forestry ry In Initiative Kirk Johnson, Senior Planner John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rural forestry ry in initiative
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Rural Forestry ry In Initiative Kirk Johnson, Senior Planner John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rural Forestry ry In Initiative Kirk Johnson, Senior Planner John Cooper, Natural Resource Planner/Geologist Planning & Development Services January 24, 2017 RFI Overview The Forest Advisory Board (FAB) asked the County to implement


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Rural Forestry ry In Initiative

Kirk Johnson, Senior Planner John Cooper, Natural Resource Planner/Geologist Planning & Development Services January 24, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

RFI Overview

  • The Forest Advisory Board (FAB) asked the

County to implement the concept of the Rural Foresty Initiative (RFI)

  • Board of County Commissioners placed RFI on

the Department’s work program

  • Department is working on RFI together with

transfer of jurisdiction for forest land conversions from DNR to the County and land clearing rules

slide-3
SLIDE 3

RFI Overview

  • Environmental review for development:

– County reviews under critical areas ordinance (CAO)

  • Environmental review for forest practices:

– Dept of Natural Resources (DNR) reviews under forest practice rules.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

RFI Overview

  • What happens when development and forest

practices are proposed on same parcel?

  • That’s what the Rural Forestry Initiative seeks

to address

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Existing Parcel

Option 1

– County reviews entire parcel under CAO – Critical areas protected under County rules – Forest practices may proceed under DNR review, after critical areas are protected by County – Gives property owner maximum flexibility for development – Option chosen by most landowners

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Existing Parcel – Option 1 Entire parcel reviewed under CAO

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Existing Parcel

Option 2

– County only reviews developed area, plus 200'– 300' buffer, under CAO

  • Review for landslide hazards may consider surrounding

topographic/geologic features

– Forest practices proceed on remainder of parcel under DNR review – This RFI-friendly option already available on existing parcels

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Existing Parcel – Option 2

  • Only developed area reviewed under CAO
  • Review for landslide hazards may consider surrounding

topographic/geologic features

  • Forestry on remainder reviewed under forest practice rules
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Land Division Law Overview

  • State law and county code assume land

divisions are for development purposes

  • Laws seek to ensure all necessary

infrastructure/utilities installed at time of land division

  • Goal is to protect lot purchasers and require

development to cover its costs and impacts

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CaRD Land Division – Current Practice

  • Development parcels

are identified, clustered

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CaRD Land Division – Current Practice

  • Remaining open space

is either:

  • reviewed under

critical areas

  • placed in OS-PA

(protective easement: no development, no forestry)

  • If critical areas are

protected, forest practices under DNR rules may occur

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CaRD Land Div ivis ision – Proposed RFI I Option

County reviews developed area (plus buffer) under CAO

– Review may consider surrounding topography/geology for geohazard risks to the developed lots

Remainder placed in Open Space-Forestry (a new open space designation)

– Forest practices in OS-F, when they occur, would be reviewed by DNR under forestry rules

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CaRD Land Division – RFI Option

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CaRD Land Div ivis ision – RFI I Option

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CaRD Land Division – RFI Option

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CaRD Land Div ivis ision – RFI I Option

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Additional issues being explored:

  • Stormwater management in developed area
  • How to address windthrow risk (blown down trees)
  • Forest Management Plan

CaRD Land Div ivis ision – RFI I Option

slide-18
SLIDE 18

RFI Next xt Steps

  • Department continuing to discuss this issue

with Forest Advisory Board

  • Also reviewing other County examples and

hearings board and case law

  • Expect to have final proposal by meeting of

BCC and PC in early March

slide-19
SLIDE 19

King County Approach

  • Applicant submits forest management plan,

indicating how environmental resources will be protected under forest practice rules

  • King County staff walk site, identify critical

areas that may be affected by/affect development

  • These are placed in Critical Areas tract
slide-20
SLIDE 20

King County Approach

  • Area where development will occur is reviewed

under critical areas ordinance

  • Area where forestry will occur, and there is no

interaction between the developed area and forestry, is placed in a Resource Tract subject only to DNR rules.

  • Critical areas in the Resource Tract that may be

affected by the development, or may negatively affect the development (e.g. landslides), are put in Critical Areas Tract within Resource Tract, and protected under Critical Areas Ordinance