Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): An - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

screening brief intervention and referral to treatment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): An - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): An approach to alcohol and drug use prevention for high school students in Southeastern Wisconsin TRIUMPH Intern Presentation Senait Tesfai-Barker, M4 May 2013 W HAT IS SBIRT?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): An approach to alcohol and drug use prevention for high school students in Southeastern Wisconsin

TRIUMPH Intern Presentation Senait Tesfai-Barker, M4 May 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WHAT IS SBIRT?

 Comprehensive, integrated, public health approach

to deliver early intervention and treatment services for persons with substance use disorders and those at risk of developing these disorders.

Reference: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

SBIRT

Screen Brief Assessment Reassure and reinforce

Low risk

Intervene

Intermediate risk

Refer

High risk

Follow-up and support

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CONTINUUM OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE

Absti- nence Heavy use Low risk High risk Mild problems Severe problems Loss of control Cravings Preoccupation

  • UNIVERSAL SCREENING IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE MANY

MORE FALL AT THE HIGH RISK AND MILD PROBLEMS THAN SEVERE PROBLEMS

REFERENCE: MANWELL, JOURNAL OF ADDICTION, 1998

slide-5
SLIDE 5

METHOD: CRAFFT

 Car  Relax  Alone

 Forget  Family/

Friends

 Trouble

Knight JR, Sherritt L, Shrier LA, et al. Validity of the CRAFFT Substance Abuse Screening Test Among Adolescent Clinic

  • Patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156:607.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

WISCONSIN’S PROBLEM

In the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, the Centers for Disease Control ranked Wisconsin:

 1st in the rate of current alcohol use among youth.  3rd in the rate of binge drinking among youth  4th in the rate of youth who rode with a driver who

had been drinking

 5th in the rate of youth who drove after drinking.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

THE PROBLEM: ALCOHOL USE

REFERENCE: CDC YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR SURVEY

slide-8
SLIDE 8

THE PROBLEM: BINGE DRINKING

REFERENCE: CDC YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR SURVEY

slide-9
SLIDE 9

THE PROBLEM: CIGARETTE USE

REFERENCE: CDC YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR SURVEY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

THE PROBLEM: MARIJUANA USE

REFERENCE: CDC YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR SURVEY

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ALLIANCE FOR WISCONSIN YOUTH (AWY)

  • Focus of promotion of positive youth

development since 1999

  • Funded by drug offense citations in each

county

  • 5 Regional Prevention Centers:

Southeastern, Northern, Northeastern, Southern and Western

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AWY- SOUTHEAST REGION

Jefferson, Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Walworth, Washington and Waukesha Counties

Jewish Family Services

The Planning Council for Health and Human Services

slide-13
SLIDE 13

AWY-SE SBIRT GRANT

April 1, 2012 – March 31, 2013 = $50,000

Wisconsin Partnership Program (University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health)

April 2014 - Possible $300,000 implementation grant

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

 Increase AWY-SE coalition members understanding

  • f SBIRT process, utility and benefits.

 Help AWY-SE recruit partners and identify barriers

to implementation and strategize solutions.

 SBIRT implementation agreements are secured

from a minimum of six communities.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PLEASANT SURPRISE……

 The Prevention Network of Washington County

coalition had school districts that were very eager to start implementing SBIRT in their schools.

 With additional funding from the United Way and

the coalition, Hartford and Kewaskum school districts were able to pilot SBIRT.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

LOGISTICS FOR ADMINISTERING SBIRT

 Parents were sent a letter discussing SBIRT and giving them

the option for their child to “opt out” of the screening.

 The United Way gave an $8,000 grant to create a computer

software program that could administer the CRAFFT

  • questionnaire. Students completed the survey independently
  • first. Then the questionnaire was reviewed with the student by

a trained evaluator.

 All 9th grade students were screened. This grade level was

chosen due to the fact that all 9th graders are required to take health class. This allowed the screeners to remove each student one by one for 20 minutes to be evaluated.

 Students were found to need referrals were encouraged to

discuss this with their parents.

 Approximately 500 students were screened in Washington

County.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

NEXT STEPS

 Letter of commitment received from Jefferson

County, Racine County, Waukesha County, and Washington County.

 Applying for the implementation grant.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 The Planning Council for Health and Human

Services, Inc.

 Julie Whelan Capell, Director of Planning and

Development, Planning Council for Health and Human Services, Inc

 Dr. Richard Brown, Academic Advisor, UW School

  • f Medicine and Public Health

 UW School of Medicine and Public Health-

TRIUMPH Program