SEARCHES OF VERY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS Esteban Roulet CONICET, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

searches of very high energy neutrinos
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SEARCHES OF VERY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS Esteban Roulet CONICET, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SEARCHES OF VERY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS Esteban Roulet CONICET, Centro Atmico Bariloche THE NEUTRINO SKY THE ENERGETIC UNIVERSE multimessenger astronomy p rays (Fermi) (Amanda) UHE Cosmic rays (Auger) TYPES OF COSMIC RAY


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Esteban Roulet CONICET, Centro Atómico Bariloche

SEARCHES OF VERY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

THE NEUTRINO SKY

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE ENERGETIC UNIVERSE

γ rays (Fermi) ν (Amanda) UHE Cosmic rays (Auger)

γ ν p multimessenger astronomy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TYPES OF COSMIC RAY DETECTORS

Cherenkov telescopes Arrays of particle detectors satellites ~ TeV E > PeV E<100 GeV

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pulsar GRB AGN SNR Radio Galaxy Examples of powerful astrophysical Objects/potential CR accelerators Colliding galaxies Diffuse emission

0.1-100 GeV

slide-6
SLIDE 6

IC

brems

π0

Discriminating leptonic vs. hadronic scenarios

(a way to know if protons are indeed accelerated in SNR)

e.g. CasA γ spectrum Brems: Synch: IC: π

0→ γ γ , π −→e+νe+νμ+νμ

CR+γ (p)→π+X e+Xray → γ+e e+Bfield →e+Xray e+gas → γ+... Hadronic: Still inconclusive, observation of neutrinos would be unambiguous!

Leptonic ? Hadronic ?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

z=0.165 BLLac (H2356-309 ) But distant γ sources strongly attenuated by background photons (starlight, CMB, radio, ...): Can measure IR background from observed attenuation Synchrotron IC

TeV

  e

e −

e- B γ e- e- γ γ

beyond few TeV, high redshift Universe is unobservable with photons

Photon attenuation length

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ANTARES NEMO NESTOR

NEUTRINO TELESCOPES (10 GeV to PeV and beyond) Amanda

km3 detector at Mediterranean looking at southern neutrino sky (proposed km3NET & GVD in Baikal)

km3 detector at South Pole, completed by 2011, looking at northern ν sky

(and to southern sky above PeV)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Deep inelastic Neutrino nucleon interactions E > GeV

d

2σCC DIS

dx dy =2 G F

2

π mN Eν M W

4

(Q

2+M W 2 ) 2 [xq(x ,Q 2)+x(1−y) 2̄

q(x ,Q

2)]

Q

2≡−( pν−pl) 2 , x≡Q 2/2m N (Eν−El) , y≡( Eν−El)/ Eν

Eν<M W

2 /2m N≈3TeV

Eν≫3TeV σ

DIS∝ Eν

Earth opaque for E>40 TeV→ Need to look above horizon 

DIS∝ E 0.363

NC≃0.4CC

10 nb

E

slide-10
SLIDE 10

One may even distinguish neutrino flavors muon neutrino (track) electron neutrino (cascade, also from NC) tau neutrino (double bang)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

No point sources observed by Icecube nor Antares

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Antares

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Targeted searches (galactic and extra-galactic candidates): SNR, AGN,...

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ICECUBE stacked search for neutrinos coincident with observed GRB 2008/2010 Bound factor 4 below standard predictions GRB are not main source of → UHECRs or production models need revision

Revised model: (Baerwald et al.) Nature 2012

(~ 200 northern GRB)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Power law flux ~ E-3 higher E larger → detector required Energy Cosmic ray flux

slide-16
SLIDE 16

at the highest energies, only few cosmic rays (CR) arrive per km2 per century ! to see some, a huge detector is required: 1660 detectors instrumenting 3000 km2 and 27 telescopes

THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY the Auger Collaboration: 17 countries, ~ 400 scientists Telescope Array (~ 760 km^2 in Utah) Previous experiments: AGASA, Fly's Eye/HiRes, Haverah Park, Volcano Ranch

slide-17
SLIDE 17

surface detector fluorescence detector

slide-18
SLIDE 18

event reconstruction with the surface detector Event with θ ~ 48º, E ~ 70 EeV

(1 EeV = 1018 eV)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

a hybrid event

Measure Xmax Energy calibration angular resolution studies ... (but duty cycle ~15%) X (grammage)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

E3 x FLUX (before Auger) knee 2nd knee ankle GZK ?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin effect (1966)

PROTONS CAN NOT ARRIVE WITH E > 6x1019 eV FROM D > 200 Mpc

AT THE HIGHEST ENERGIES, PROTONS LOOSE ENERGY

BY INTERACTIONS WITH THE CMB BACKGROUND

Fe

γ=

For Fe nuclei: after ~ 200 Mpc the leading fragment has E < 6x1019 eV ligther nuclei get disintegrated

  • n shorter distances

1 Mpc 100 Mpc

pγ π o p pγ πn

 ⁰

( produce GZK photons)

±

( produce cosmogenic neutrinos)

A  A'nucleons

Aharonian, Cronin Epele, ER

p  p e

e −

(Berezinsky & Zatsepin 69)

(fewer neutrinos produced)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

(ICRC09)

Ankle: Galactic – extragalactic transition

  • r e+e- dip in Xgal protons ?

GZK: proton or Fe suppression ? (and/or exhaustion of sources?)

p attenuation length

AUGER spectrum γπ pairs p-attenuation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Some basics on air showers: ELECTROMAGNETIC SHOWERS ( e+ , e- , γ )

N max≃10

11

E0 10

19eV

X max∝ln(E0)

X N grows exponentially Ionisation losses dominate

slide-24
SLIDE 24

HADRONIC SHOWERS each interaction produces pions (multiplicity) Typically number of pion generations = 5 - 6 Estimating as the maximum of the first generation s: For nuclei: behave as nucleons with

ntot nch=2 ntot/3 

±

E< Edec ( π→μ νν)∼10 GeV

nneut=ntot/3  

0 2

X max En=E0/ A  X max=IX R ln E 0/ntot Ec 

depends on and

I~ p−air

−1

em component reinteract until

A

(EEM≃0.9 Etot)

ntot

slide-25
SLIDE 25

COMPOSITION FROM Xmax

slide-26
SLIDE 26

COSMOGENIC NEUTRINO FLUXES:

Berezinsky et al., arXiv:1003.1496

  • fluxes at EeV comparable to CR fluxes, but cross section tiny (~ 10 nb)

probability of → Interacting in atmosphere small (~10-5 for vertical)

  • ankle models (harder fluxes) lead to larger cosmogenic neutrino fluxes than dip models

Ahlers et al., arXiv:1005.2620

ν γ

slide-27
SLIDE 27

p He O Fe

Hooper, Sarkar, Taylor astro/0407618

If GZK neutrinos were observed, it would be a strong hint favoring a light composition, And could confirm that spectrum attenuation is due to GZK effect

Flux not so much 'guaranteed'

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Neutrino detection in AUGER Only neutrinos can produce young horizontal showers For downgoing showers: (assuming 1:1:1 flavor ratios) 38% from νe, 18% from ν µ, 29% from ντ – air, 15% from ντ – mountain but Earth-skimming ντ searches are more sensitive

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Fargion 2000, Bertou et al '01 Feng et al. '02

Up-going Earth-skimming ντ showers

L< 1 nσCC ∼ 700 km E

0.36

σCC≃10

−32 cm 2 E 0.36

(E [EeV ]) Lloss∼10 km (bremss, pair,

photonuclear)

h<1 km Ldec<γc τ≃E 50 km θ−90

  • <5
  • ⇒Ω<1 sr

Probability of interacting in the last 10 km ~ 0.01 → Effective exposure ~ 0.1 km2 sr (c.f. ~ 104 km2 sr for UHECR)

νμ→ ντ ντ → τ τ decay

slide-30
SLIDE 30

AUGER BOUNDS ON DIFFUSE NEUTRINO FLUX unlike hadronic CRs, neutrinos can produce young horizontal showers above the detector, and upcoming near horizontal tau lepton induced showers young (em) shower

  • ld (muonic) shower

Horizontal young showers? tank signals with large Area / peak Elongated tracks, Propagation with v ~ c ZERO CANDIDATES

slide-31
SLIDE 31

( E-2 )

ApJL 2012

0 events observed bounds scale linearly with exposure →

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The two highest energy neutrino events observed by ICECUBE

slide-33
SLIDE 33

LOOKING TO ν FROM THE SKY ANITA looked for up-going neutrino showers on ice producing radio coherent emission (Askaryan effect) ~ 1 month balloon flights in Antarctica → next generation: EVA ? (x 100 better) ARA: Askaryan Radio Array (prototipe deployment in 2011) Or from the space station? → JEM-EUSO

slide-34
SLIDE 34

69 events with E > 55 EeV

AUGER sky map above 55 EeV

Nearby AGN at < 75 Mpc

Cen A

(AUGER 1009.1855)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Excess around Centaurus A: closest AGN

13 events within 18 deg of CenA, while 3.2 expected for isotropy

slide-36
SLIDE 36

HESS observation of Centaurus A (0.1 – 10 TeV gammas)

arXiv:0903.1582

If γ are hadronic neutrinos from CenA may be observed at ICECUBE/ Auger? → (but predictions ~ 0.01 – 1 per year)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Auger observed no neutrinos (in particular none from Cen A)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

CONCLUSIONS

breakthroughs expected to come from very high energy neutrinos: TeV NEUTRINO SEARCHES (km3 detectors) identify CR accelerators → EeV COSMOGENIC NEUTRINOS CR propagation, GZK effect, CR composition → EXOTIC SOURCES? TOPOLOGICAL DEFECTS, SUPER HEAVY DECAYS, .... POSITIVE DETECTIONS HOPEFULLY NOT VERY FAR AWAY, STAY TUNED