Selective Laser Melting of Refractory Metals CIM-Laser One Day - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

selective laser melting of refractory metals
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Selective Laser Melting of Refractory Metals CIM-Laser One Day - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Selective Laser Melting of Refractory Metals CIM-Laser One Day Conference 9 th May 2017 Post Graduate Centre, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh Contents Introduction and Background Materials Development Experimental Work Results


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Selective Laser Melting of Refractory Metals

CIM-Laser One Day Conference 9th May 2017 Post Graduate Centre, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

  • Introduction and Background
  • Materials Development

– Experimental Work – Results

  • Case Studies
  • Future Studies
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Refractory Metals - Properties

Properties of Refractory Metals Tungsten Tantalum Density at 25 °C (g/cm^3) 19.2 16.69 Liquid Density (g/cm^3) 17.6 15 Melting Point (°C) 3422 2996 Thermal Conductivity (W.m^-1.K^-1) 174 57.5 Specific Heat (J.kg.K^-1) 134 140 Thermal Diffusivity (m^2/s) 0.068 0.025 Atomic mass 183.88 180.94 Tension Force (N/m) 2.361 2.07

  • Physical properties of

tungsten and tantalum

  • SLM of refractory metals

difficult due to – high melting point, – high thermal conductivity – high viscosity – oxidation sensitivity.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background and Applications

  • Applications today include medical implants,

rocket nozzles, support hardware, military, electro vacuum, crucible and heating elements

  • High density of tungsten makes it ideal for

radiation attenuation

– Pinhole collimators

  • However, these are difficult to machine because
  • f small dimensions
  • Refractory SLM process being driven slowly by

industries

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Laser Beam Profiling

  • Laser beam profiling on the Renishaw AM125 machine
  • Sufficient intensity for melting Refractory metals can be

reached only for the centre part of the geometry (diameter ∼43 µm) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 50 100 150 200 250

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 Irradiance (kW/cm^2) 13.5% Beam radius (µm) Focus Offset (mm)

13.5% Beam radius (µm) Irradiance (kW/cm^2)

  • Schematic overview of the selective

laser melting (SLM) process

  • Renishaw AM125, ytterbium fibre,

1070nm

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Process Window – W and Ta

  • Single track melting results of tungsten and tantalum powder using different

scan parameters at 200W Laser Power

  • 100 to 200mm/s speed
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Line Width v 1D Energy Density

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Line Width - Mean (µm) 1D line energy density (J/m) Focus Offset=0 (100% Power) Focus Offset=1 (100% Power)

  • Line width vs 1D line energy density

for tungsten (W45) powder

  • Laser focus offset study

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Line Width - Mean (µm) 1D line energy density (J/m) Ta - Focus Offset=1mm W-Focus Offset=1 (100% Power)

  • Line width vs 1D line energy density

for tantalum (Ta45) powder

– 1D Energy Density = Laser Power/ Scanning speed)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Process Window – W45 and Ta45

  • Laser power vs scan speed for

tungsten (W45) powder

  • CP-Ti base plate

50 100 150 200 250 100 200 300 400 Laser Power (W) Scan Speed (mm/s) Very wide lines Wide Lines Smaller line width Thin lines or breaks 50 100 150 200 250 100 200 300 400 Laser Power (W) Scan Speed (mm/s) Very wide lines Wide Lines Small line width or breaks

  • Laser power vs scan speed for

tantalum (Ta45) powder

  • CP-Ti base plate
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Process Window – W and Ta

  • Single layer hatch patterns

for tungsten (W45) using 4 different scanning strategies

  • Single layer hatch patterns for

tantalum (Ta45) using 4 different scanning strategies

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Process Window – W45

Laser Power = 200W, Exposure Time = 200µs Layer Thickness= 30µm Point Distance (µm) Hatch Space (mm) Apparent Speed (mm/s) 3D volume energy density (J/mm3) A C2 (sub 0) 20 0.115 100 578 B C2 (sub 6) 20 0.155 100 434 C C2 (0) 29 0.115 145 399 D C2 (6) 29 0.155 145 299

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SLM of Refractory Blocks

  • Evidence of cracks in Tungsten

– XY Horizontal top surfaces – ZY Vertical side surfaces

  • Less evidence of cracks in

Tantalum

– XY Horizontal top surfaces – ZY Vertical side surfaces

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SLM of Tungsten – SEM and EDS

  • SEM and EDS analysis
  • f a tungsten (W45)

SLM sample

  • Sample B – XY Build

Direction, etched

  • SEM and EDS

analysis of a tantalum (Ta45) SLM sample

– ZY Build Direction, block

slide-13
SLIDE 13

XRD of Tungsten (W45)

  • X-ray diffraction plot showing W powder and SLM processed

traces and peaks

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Intensity (cps) 2 theta (deg.) A B W45 - Powder

W(110)

W(220) W(211) W(200)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Density of SLM – W45

  • Cross-section view (x-y) view
  • Build-direction (z-y) view

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 A B C D Density - xy (%) Density -xy (g/cm^3) Density -xy (g/cm^3) Density - xy (%) 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 A B C D Density - zy (%) Density -zy (g/cm^3) Density -zy (g/cm^3) Density - zy (%)

  • Optically determined density of the cross-section (z-y) view of four

tungsten (W45) samples fabricated using different parameters

  • Highest density – Sample A (Pd=20µm, hatch=115µm), x-y view
slide-15
SLIDE 15

SLM of Tungsten – Grain structure

SLM Tungsten SEM’s showing grain structures

– cross sectional lateral x-y view – build direction cross-sectional z-y view

slide-16
SLIDE 16

EBSD

Pole figure of the 115 µm hatching space sample, suggesting a strong <111> preferential growth along the build direction

  • Maximum intensity of

10 times random Pole figure of the 155 µm hatching space sample, suggesting a relatively weaker <111> preferential growth along the build direction

  • Maximum intensity 7.1

times random

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • The Nuclear physics instrumentation

group previously had a choice of 1mm or 2mm collimation

  • SLM was used to fabricate a finer

collimator which resulted in a narrower beam spot (0.6 mm nominal)

  • More accurate scan results but at the

expense of number of gamma rays per second

  • The SLM Tungsten 0.6mm collimator

allowed higher resolution scans giving better detector characterisation results

Applications - W

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SLM of Refractory Metals

Outlook and future work

  • Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
  • 3D Xray Tomography

– Collaboration with Manchester University

  • Elimination of cracks

– Heat treatment, heated bed or alloying

  • SLM of Tungsten sub 25 µm powder

– Effect of powder particle size

  • SLM of Tantalum
  • System modification
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Thank you for your attention

Acknowledgements - University Of Manchester