SiC and nd diamond amond as s radiat diation ion hard rd - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sic and nd diamond amond as s radiat diation ion hard rd
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SiC and nd diamond amond as s radiat diation ion hard rd - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SiC and nd diamond amond as s radiat diation ion hard rd semicondu se conductor or det etec ectors ors Annika Lohstroh Department of Physics, University of Surrey, SEPnet, UK Email: A.Lohstroh@surrey.ac.uk Ackn knowl owledgements


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Page 1

Annika Lohstroh

Department of Physics, University of Surrey, SEPnet, UK

Email: A.Lohstroh@surrey.ac.uk

SiC and nd diamond amond as s radiat diation ion hard rd se semicondu conductor

  • r det

etec ectors

  • rs

Ackn knowl

  • wledgements

edgements

Surrey University:

P.J. Sellin

  • S. Gkoumas

A.W. Davies

  • P. Veeramani
  • M. Hodgson
  • P. Bryant
  • F. Schirru

Yusuf Abubakar

Element Six Ltd, Diamond Detectors Limited EPSRC/STFC/PPARC British Council IAEA (CRP: F11016-CR-2) AWE

  • I. Gomez Morilla
  • G. Grime
  • C. Jeynes
  • A. Cansell
  • M. Browton

A.Simon CEA (P. Bergonzo, N. Tranchant, C. Deschamps) ESRF (J. Morse)

  • P. Edwards (Strathclyde)
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Page 2

  • Soft condensed matter (SCM)
  • Astrophysics
  • Photonics & Semiconductor devices - Advanced Technology institute (ATI) -

in collaboration with electronic engineering

  • Centre for nuclear and radiation physics (CNRP)

Experimental & Theoretical Nuclear Physics Medical and Radiation Physics Medical Physics & Imaging Radiation Detector development

2 academics and approx. 12 research students Part of he Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences (FEPS)

Depar artm tment nt of Phys ysics ics ~ 3 ~ 30 ac acad ademi mics cs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Page 3

Tal alk k outl tline ine

  • Basic semiconductor detector operation
  • Advantages of wide band gap semiconductors – Low Z

Radiation hard materials SiC/D

  • (General) Effects of Radiation damage on semiconductor

detector operation

  • Quantifying “radiation hardness”
  • Identifying created defects
  • Conclusion – Future work
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Page 4

Si Signa nal l forma mation tion

The current signal is induced by the movement of the created charge carriers: the current is proportional to

  • the number of carriers lifetime τ > transit time TR
  • the charge carrier velocity mobility μ, electric field

strength

d V E

bias

 

RB VBias charge sensitive pre- amplifier

+ + + _ _ _

Time

Induced current

Signal duration

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Page 5

Si Signa nal l forma mation tion

d V E

bias

 

RB VBias charge sensitive pre- amplifier

+ + + _ _ _

Time

Induced current

Time

Induced charge

Signal amplitude Signal duration

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Page 6

Wid ide e ban and gap ap se semi micon conductor ductor ma mate terials ials for room m te temp mperatur erature e rad adia iation tion dete tector ctor ap applica lication tion

Application areas

  • High energy and nuclear physics
  • Neutron detection & monitoring in nuclear

industry

  • High energy X- and γ-ray detection for medical

and security applications

  • Photon science/Synchrotron instrumentation
  • Medical dosimetry
  • High fluence backgrounds and harsh

environments

  • ....

http://www.ptw.de/diamond_detector0.html

Page 6

Commercially available PTW chambers based on natural diamonds

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page 7

Two ma main in groups ps of ma mate teria ials ls st studied ied

CdxZn1-xTe

http://www.contech.com/Mer curic_Iodide_Detectors.htm

HgI2 & TlBr High Z material for X/ spectroscopy and imaging

CdTe CdZnTe HgI2 TlBr Diamond SiC polymers

Radiation hardness/ Tissue “equivalent” Neutron detection, TOF

Birefringence pattern diamond 3 mm 3 mm

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Page 8

Dia iamo mond nd & Si SiC for se sens nsor r ap applica lication tions

Large heat conductance Low Z (low absorption) Tissue equivalence* Wide band gap (solar blind) Fast charge transport * Tissue equivalence* (Radiation) hardness (s)LHC (X-ray) Dosimetry Beam monitor Neutron detection UV sensor

* stronger advantage in diamond compared to SiC

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Att ttractive active prope perti rties s for dete tector ctor ap applicat lication ions s (I (II)

Page 9

1 μs bunches of 109 of 208Pb67+ ions (400 MeV/u =83.2 GeV). => Stable signal (in the order of Ampere) 80 μm thick pc CVD diamond detector with Al contact

Large band gap “solar blind” (UV detection)  (low intrinsic leakage currents) high temperature operation Resiliance  Chemically inert  Radiation hardness Large heat conductance (5 x copper)

  • J. Bol et al., phys. stat. sol. (a) 204, 9,
  • pp. 2997-3003 (2007)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Chal allen lenges ges in in th the ma mate terial ial sy synt nthesis esis

Page 10

Substrate

Columnar growth increasing grain size towards the top

Common

  • mmon defects

cts Impur puritie ities, s, Vac acancie ncies, s, Interstit rstitia ials ls Dislocations locations Grain in bound

  • undar

aries ies Stac acking king faults ults Poly lyty type pe inclusi lusions

  • ns

1 to 10 μm h-1 Diamond is meta-stable:

  • High Temperature/High Pressure

(HP/HT) limited volume, purity

  • Chemical vapour deposition (CVD)
  • Heteroepitaxy (typically polycrystalline

– large area possible) Diamond on Iridium might be able to provide sufficiently thick, homogenous large areas in the future

  • Homoepitaxy (typically < 1 cm2 area)

Several polytypes of SiC exist

  • Physical Vapour Transport

(bulk – single crystal)

  • Chemical vapour deposition

(CVD)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Si SiC – th thick ick (350 50 m) m) “bulk” material

Page 11

Bryant et al, IEEE TNS 60(2), pp. 1432 – 1435, 2013

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Non-un unif ifor

  • rm

m respon sponse se in in poly lycrysta crystall llline line ma mate teria ial

Page 12 ) 500 μm

Silver paint Contact edge

Substrate

Columnar growth increasing grain size towards the top 270 μm2 296 K Polycrystalline Single crystalline Signal Amplitude

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Page 13

Ele lectro tronic nic grad ade e si sing ngle le crys ystal tal detect tector

  • r

performance

  • rmance

Energy resolution similar to Silicon Time resolution, time of flight: 28 ps

See Figure 8 and 9 in M. Pomorski et al. phys. stat. sol. (a) 203 (12), pp. 3152-3160 (2006) DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200671127 See Figure 22 in M.Ciobanu, IEEE TNS 58 (4), pp. 2073-2083 (2011) DOI:10.1109/TNS.2011.2160282

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Page 14

Towar ards ds la large e ar area a si sing ngle le crys ysta tals ls

Images from E. Berdermanet al, 3rd Carat Workshop at GSI, Dec 2011 Heteroepitaxial growth on Iridium – large area substrates possible Main European player: M. Schreck et al in Augsburg/Germany Continuously improvement in thickness, quality and area with time For illustrations see: http://www- carat.gsi.de/CARAT03/CARAT03Talks/B erdermann_CARAT03.pdf Slide 4 and 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Page 15

Towar ards ds mo more rad adia iation tion har ardness ness

Images from B. Caylar et al, 1st Adamas Workshop at GSI, Dec 2012 Several groups have demonstrated working devices: Full CCE reached at very low applied bias (operate detectors with a 9V battery is possible) For illustrations used see: http://www-adamas.gsi.de/ADAMAS01/talks/caylar.pdf Slide 5 and 19

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Si SiC – excellent ellent Sc Schottky ttky dio iode des s for Sp Spectros troscopy copy hav ave be been n demo monstrated nstrated

Figure 2 in Ruddy et al, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 263 (2007) 163-168

doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2007.04.077

Page 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Hig igh h Temp mperat erature re sp spectroscopy troscopy in in epit itaxial axial Si SiC Sc Schottky ttky dio iodes des deve velo loped ed by R y RD50 50)

Page 17

Alpha emission energy spectrum broad with average energy at 5 MeV (Due to encapsulation of source to be safe to use at elevated Temperature)

Figure 1 inC. Manfredotti et al., Nucl.

  • Instrum. Meth. A 552 (2005) 131–137

doi:10.1016/j.nima.2005.06.018

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Hig igh h Temp mperat erature re sp spectroscopy troscopy in in Si SiC

Page 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Hig igh h Temp mperat erature re sp spectroscopy troscopy in in Si SiC

Page 19

Stability tests under fast neutron and gamma irradition at room temperature show of epitaxial and bulk SiC samples also show good stability at 4.5 to 18.5 mSv/hour (AmBe Source, Co-60)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Page 20

Energy transfer to the lattice atoms moves them from a substitutional to an interstitial site:  Creation of [ V – Ci ] (Frenkel pair)

4 fold

Dissociation and diffusion then can lead to many more defect Complexes…… EK =60 keV

Creat ation ion of defects cts due to to ir irradi adiation ation

Annealing can change the defect types and concentrations further

International Journal of Modern Physics C 9, p1x 1998, D. Saada, J. Adler, and R. Kalish

  • K. Schmetzer, The Journal of

Gemmology / 2010 / Volume 32 /

  • No. 1–4
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Page 21

Effect t of dam amag age e on el n electrica trical l proper perti ties

… changes the type/concentration of defects present in the material and hence introduces/removes energy levels in the band gap

 

 

    

EC EV

  • “Close” to EC / EV:

Dopants

  • Near “mid gap”:

Recombination centres

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Page 22

Effect t of dam amag age e on el n electrica trical l proper perti ties

… changes the type/concentration of defects present in the material and hence introduces/removes energy levels in the band gap

         T k E N n

B G C

2 exp

Nc, density of

states in the conduction band ~ 1019cm-3

Large EG gives lower dark currents, but experimentally “intrinsic” leakage current dominated by free carriers from defect states in the band gap Leakage current:: In an “ideal” intrinsic semiconductor, free charge carrier density is given by EC EV

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Page 23

Effect t of dam amag age e on el n electrica trical l proper perti ties

 

 

    

  • increase leakage
  • increase in effective doping
  • reduce leakage
  • Compensation (reduction in doping)
  • Reduction in carrier life time (recombination)

Signal acquisition:

  • Reduction in free carrier lifetime – possibly reduced signal
  • Trapping/De-trapping – “slower” signal
  • Reduction in active thickness (depletion thickness depends on doping in

diodes)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pola laris isat ation ion a c a cont ntact act problem? lem?

CCE [%] 25 53 77 110 (a) 0 to 20 % of the data file (b) 80 to 100 % of the data file (c) +110 V

CCE [%] 40 60 80 100 Counts 1000 2000 3000 0 to 10 % 10 to 20 % 20 to 30 % 30 to 40 % 40 to 50 % 50 to 60 % 60 to 70 % 70 to 80 % 80 to 90 % 90 to 100 %

+110 V, hole sensitive

Inconsistencies as a function of contacting method also

  • bserved by W. DeFerme, Hasselt Diamond Workshop 2009

Page 24

Surface and temporary effects:

  • “temporary” changes in space charge distribution (polarisation)
  • increase in number of occupied traps – increase in lifetime (priming)
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Page 25

The chal allenge lenge of quan anti tifyin ying g rad adia iation tion har ardness ness for dete tector ctor ap appli lications cations

The NIEL concept – assumes displacement damage cross- section D (MeV mb) – assumes that lifetime scales with # displacements

Figure 4 De Boer, phys. stat. sol. (a) 204, No. 9, 3004–3010 (2007) DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200776327

Seems to work for protons/neutrons > 0.1 GeV Damaging radiation and probing radiation penetrate through the device thickness. (26 MeV H+/ 20 MeV n/ MIPs) Signal halves after p: 4.5 (1.5)x1014 cm-2 n: 1.3 (3)x1015 cm-2

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Page 26

The chal allenge lenge of quan anti tifyin ying g rad adia iation tion har ardness ness for dete tector ctor ap appli lications cations

What if the damaging/probing radiation does not penetrate the whole device? CCE [%] 90 100 (a) 500 μm

Silver paint Contact edge

110 25

  • A. Lohstroh et al, phys. stat. sol. (a) 2008, 205(9); p.2211-2215

SRIM calculation [11,12] Depth [m] 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Vacancy concentration [cm-3] 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 26 MeV 600 keV protons 2.6 MeV protons 2 x 1015 cm-2 1012 cm-2 1014 cm-2 1013 cm-2 1016 cm-2 1012 cm-2 1014 cm-2  5x1014 cm-2

Damaged area not visible in Raman spectra

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Page 27

The chal allenge lenge of quan anti tifyin ying g rad adia iation tion har ardness ness for dete tector ctor ap appli lications cations

What if the damaging/probing radiation does not penetrate the whole device? CCE [%] 90 100 (a) 500 μm

Silver paint Contact edge

D E

A B C μ

110 25

  • A. Lohstroh et al, phys. stat. sol. (a) 2008, 205(9); p.2211-2215

Damaged area not visible in Raman spectra

CCE [%] 40 60 80 100 Counts [x103] 20 40 60 +150 V (holes)

  • 100 V (electrons)

(54)x1015 0.050.04 F (1.00.4)x1015 0.180.08 E ( 51)x1014 0.60.14 D (1.001)x1014 2.60.3 C (1.101)x1013 2.40.3 B (1.101)x1012 2.60.3 A Dose [cm-2] Area [10-3 cm2] Label

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TOF/TCT measurements …

Page 28

1 1012 cm-2 2 1013 cm-2 0 cm-2 0 = (1600  100) cm2 V-1 s-1 vsat = (1.20  0.05) V cm-1 … confirms that damage does not have a strong effect on mobility compared to lifetime (in Diamond)

  • S. Gkoumas, PhD thesis,

University of Surrey 2012

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Page 29

Introducing a “corrected” Damage factor

  • Z. Pastuovic et al, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8725 87251A-1

Figure 4,5, 6 doi:10.1117/12.2015541

  • Assume that trapping probability increases linearly with radiation fluence
  • Take into account damage profile (e.g. SRIM or other code)
  • Ionisation profile of probing radiation (e.g. SRIM or other code)

Works well for “low level damage in Silicon” => Needs to be demonstrated in wider range of materials

IAEA (CRP: F11016-CR-2)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Identify entifyin ing g def efec ect t lev evels els th that t affect ect th the e det etec ector

  • r si

signal nal

Page 30

  • DLTS not useful for high resistivity
  • PICTS light source/limited time scale
  • Luminescence not quantitative/

cannot see non-radiative defects

  • Optical absorption detection

limits/sample size

  • EPR sample size, only sensitive to

paramagnetic

  • PAS sample size

Defect characterisation in semiconductors Direct observation of damaged detector signals

IAEA (CRP: F11016-CR-2) Proton damaged p- type Si Schottky diodes

slide-31
SLIDE 31

TL TL – after er annealin nealing

20 Gy pre-irradiation – 313 K to 650 K, 10 K/s

Page 31

1  1012 n cm-2: 0.5 eV 0.6 eV 1.7 eV 0.7 eV 2  1013 n cm-2: 0.6 eV 0.6 eV 1.8 eV 0.6 eV 1  1016 n cm-2: 0.6 eV 0.6 eV 0.8 eV 0.9 eV B: 2  1012 n cm-2 (A has similar shape) In pc: 1.8 to 1.9 eV observed by Gonon et al. (APL 70 (1997) 2996-2998) and Benabdesselam et al. (DRM 10 (2001) 2084-2091) (substitutional Nitrogen?)

  • S. Gkoumas, PhD thesis,

University of Surrey 2012

slide-32
SLIDE 32

CL – bef efore

  • re annealing

nnealing

Page 32

3H and “3.188 eV” centre – also seen in neutron irradiation study

Almaviva et al JAPP 106 (2009) 073501 Reference for defect levels: A. M. Zaitsev, Optical Properties of Diamond: A Data Handbook, Springer-Verlag, Berlin – Heidelberg, 2001

0 cm-2 1 1012 cm-2 2 1013 cm-2 1 1016 cm-2

  • S. Gkoumas, PhD thesis,

University of Surrey 2012

slide-33
SLIDE 33

CL – after er annealing nnealing

Page 33

1 1016 cm-2 1 1012 cm-2 2 1013 cm-2

slide-34
SLIDE 34

CL – su summary mary

Page 34

 [nm] E [eV] ncm-2 A: 1  1012 ncm-2 B: 2  1013 ncm-2 C: 1  1016 ncm-2

235 5.29     305 4.07 389 3.19 425 2.92   ()  () 470 2.64   503 2.47  533 2.33   575 2.16     741 1.67 () 

Free Exiton 5RL - self interstitial or L band Known as damage signature Band A - dislocations TR12 3H - interstitial N-related [N-V]0

GR1 (single neutral vacancy)

Before annealing After annealing

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Page 35

Conc nclusion lusion

  • Estimating the operational lifetime of detectors needs

more understanding of the effects of radiation induced damage on their characteristics – including self annealing

  • In wide band gap semiconductors, separating

priming/polarisation and structural damage is challenging

  • “Radiation hardness” as a material property

independent of radiation and probe is not trivial

  • Improving our understanding of hardness and defect

characteristic with the help of IAEA coordinated research programme

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Page 36

Than ank k yo you!

Ques estions? tions?