Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Screen-printing: PECVD: intrinsic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

silicon heterojunction solar cells
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Screen-printing: PECVD: intrinsic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

W INDOW L AYERS FOR S ILICON H ETEROJUNCTION S OLAR C ELLS : Properties and Impact on Device Performance Johannes P. Seif UNSW, Sydney / SPREE Seminar 01.05.2019 Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Screen-printing: PECVD: intrinsic Ag front


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Johannes P. Seif

UNSW, Sydney / SPREE Seminar – 01.05.2019

WINDOW LAYERS FOR SILICON HETEROJUNCTION SOLAR CELLS:

Properties and Impact on Device Performance

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD)

Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells

2

Absorber: n-type c-Si wafer, cleaned and textured PECVD: intrinsic a-Si:H passivation layers PECVD: n-doped a-Si:H electron-collecting layer PECVD: p-doped a-Si:H hole-collecting layer PVD: front and rear transparent conductive oxide (TCO) PVD: silver (Ag) rear electrode Screen-printing: Ag front electrode

c-Si

  • D. Adachi et al., APL, 2015, 107, 233506.
  • K. Yoshikawa, Nature Energy, 2017, 2(5), 17032.

Reported record efficiencies:

  • Std. SHJ: 25.1% [Adachi]

IBC SHJ: 26.7% [Yoshikawa] Physical Vapor Deposition / Sputtering (PVD)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Challenges: optical losses

3

Parasitic absorption in the front layers: generation of charge carriers that recombine before being collected.

  • Z. C. Holman et al. IEEE J. PV, 2 (1) pp. 7-15, 2012.

Free-carrier absorption in the highly doped TCO layer & plasmonic losses in the metal rear reflector.

c-Si(n)

a-Si:H(i) a-Si:H(p) a-Si:H(n) TCO rear TCO front Ag rear

Lower current output of the device, i.e. reduced short-circuit current density (Jsc) −2.1 mA/cm2 −0.5 mA/cm2

Ag front

c-Si(n)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Challenges: electrical losses

4

Recombination

  • Radiative
  • Auger
  • Via defect states in the bulk
  • r at the surface

Lowers the maximal attainable voltage, i.e. the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and limits the voltage at the maximum power point (fill factor, FF)

Ag front

c-Si(n)

a-Si:H(i) a-Si:H(p) a-Si:H(n) TCO rear TCO front Ag rear

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Challenges: electrical losses

5

The Transparent Conductive Oxide (TCO) can have an influence on the a-Si:H layers (Schottky barriers) and the a-Si:H/c-Si interface (increased recombination).

Ag front

  • S. W. Glunz et al., EU-PVSEC, Milan, Italy, 2007.
  • M. Bivour et al., IEEE J-PV, 4, 2014.

c-Si(n)

a-Si:H(i) a-Si:H(p) a-Si:H(n) TCO rear TCO front Ag rear

c-Si(n)

Lowers the maximal attainable voltage, i.e. the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and limits the voltage at the maximum power point (fill factor, FF)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ag front

Motivation

6

a-Si:H(i) a-Si:H(p) a-Si:H(n) TCO rear TCO front Ag rear nc-Si:H(p) nc-Si:H(n) ALD ZnO:Al ALD ZnO:Al a-SiOx:H(i)

c-Si(n)

Using alternative materials to mitigate losses

Goals

  • Development of PECVD processes

for a-SiOx:H and nc-Si:H

  • Understand their impact (material

properties and processing) on device performance (Jsc, Voc, FF)

  • Reduction of optical and

electrical losses

Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Outline

7

Wide-bandgap materials a-SiOx:H for passivation band offsets and transport barriers Alternative transparent electrodes atomic-layer-deposited ZnO:Al as protective layer vs. sputter-damage Organic overlayers spin-coated PVK for work function engineering Nanocrystalline layers Deposition strategies & device performance Temperature coefficients Temperature impact

  • n lifetime and cell performance
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Wide-bandgap materials:

a-SiOx:H – optical gain versus transport

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Motivation

9

a-Si:H+a-SiOx:H(i)

  • J. P. Seif et al., JAP, 115, 2014

More transparent front side  Jsc gain In this section: i-layer Variation of... i-layer thickness, [CO2]/[SiH4] and device structure. NOTE: Using a-SiOx:H only  sub-optimal passivation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

a-SiOx:H: optical properties

10

Increasing [CO2]/[SiH4] ratio leads to a decrease of both:

  • refractive index n and
  • extinction coefficient k
  • Bandgap: + 0.1 eV for

[CO2]/[SiH4] = 2.5 Linked to incorporation of hydrogen and oxygen

  • T. F. Schulze, L. Korte, F. Ruske, and B. Rech,

Physical Review B 83, 165314 (2011).

ref.

  • J. P. Seif et al., JAP, 115, 2014

From spectroscopic ellipsometry

* *

slide-11
SLIDE 11

UHV

a-SiOx:H: structural properties

  • Thermal desorption spectroscopy to

analyse the layer structure

11

  • J. P. Seif et al., JAP, 115, 2014

? What we learn:

  • Structure gets increasingly porous

with increasing CO2/SiH4 ratio

  • The amount of H2 in the layer

increases with CO2/SiH4 What we observe:

  • H2 effusion spectrum varies

high-T peak decreases, low-T peak increases with CO2/SiH4

  • The area under the curves

increases with CO2/SiH4 H2 O2… H2O

slide-12
SLIDE 12

680 700 720 740

a-Si:H CO2/SiH4 0.4 0.8 2.5

implied Voc (mV)

36 37 38

Jsc (mA/cm

2)

5 10 15 20 20 40 60 80 100

i-layer thickness (nm) FF (%)

5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 (d) (c) (b) (a)

efficiency (%)

680 700 720 740

a-Si:H CO2/SiH4 0.4 0.8 2.5

implied Voc (mV)

36 37 38

Jsc (mA/cm

2)

5 10 15 20 20 40 60 80 100

i-layer thickness (nm) FF (%)

5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 (d) (c) (b) (a)

efficiency (%)

680 700 720 740

a-Si:H CO2/SiH4 0.4 0.8 2.5

implied Voc (mV)

36 37 38

Jsc (mA/cm

2)

5 10 15 20 20 40 60 80 100

i-layer thickness (nm) FF (%)

5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 (d) (c) (b) (a)

efficiency (%)

680 700 720 740

a-Si:H CO2/SiH4 0.4 0.8 2.5

implied Voc (mV)

36 37 38

Jsc (mA/cm

2)

5 10 15 20 20 40 60 80 100

i-layer thickness (nm) FF (%)

5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 (d) (c) (b) (a)

efficiency (%)

680 700 720 740

a-Si:H CO2/SiH4 0.4 0.8 2.5

implied Voc (mV)

36 37 38

Jsc (mA/cm

2)

5 10 15 20 20 40 60 80 100

i-layer thickness (nm) FF (%)

5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 (d) (c) (b) (a)

efficiency (%)

680 700 720 740

a-Si:H CO2/SiH4 0.4 0.8 2.5

implied Voc (mV)

36 37 38

Jsc (mA/cm

2)

5 10 15 20 20 40 60 80 100

i-layer thickness (nm) FF (%)

5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 (d) (c) (b) (a)

efficiency (%)

a-SiOx:H: applied to hole contact

12

Good passivation: Implied Vocs between 720–730 mV

Variation in a-SiOx:H thickness with various [CO2]/[SiH4] ratios

Improved current: by up to 0.4 mA/cm2 (no clear trend with thickness due to reduced reflection). BUT drop in fill factor: For a-SiOx:H cells, strongly influenced by [CO2]/[SiH4] ratio and thickness.

  • Z. C. Holman et al., IEEE JPV, 2(1), 2012

* *

slide-13
SLIDE 13

a-SiOx:H permutations

13

reference a-SiOx:H below p a-SiOx:H below n

slide-14
SLIDE 14

20 40 60 80 64 68 72 76

temperature (°C) FF (%)

20 40 60 80 64 68 72 76

temperature (°C) FF (%)

20 40 60 80 64 68 72 76

FF (%) temperature (°C)

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75

  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

V (V) J (mA/cm2)

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75

  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

T (°C) 25 55 35 65 45 85

J (mA/cm2) V (V)

Wide-bandgap a-SiOx:H: impact on FF

14 a-SiOx:H below p

Due to: Transport problem associated with increased valence band offset (confirmed by simulation)

  • M. Liebhaber et al., APL, 106, 2015.
  • J. P. Seif et al., JAP, 120, 2016

reference

slide-15
SLIDE 15

20 40 60 80 64 68 72 76

temperature (°C) FF (%)

20 40 60 80 64 68 72 76

temperature (°C) FF (%)

20 40 60 80 64 68 72 76

FF (%) temperature (°C)

Wide-bandgap a-SiOx:H: impact on FF

15

Potential gain in cells with hole collection at the rear

reference a-SiOx:H below p a-SiOx:H below n

electron contact hole contact hole contact electron contact

  • J. P. Seif et al., JAP, 120, 2016

Confirmation that holes are the carriers that are affected most by the a-SiOx:H(i) layer

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Temperature coefficients:

Ambient-temperature impact on lifetime & performance

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Motivation

17

625 650 675 700 725

Voc (mV)

(a) 37 38 39 (b)

Jsc (mA/cm

2)

20 40 60 80 75 76 77 78 79 (c)

temperature (°C) FF (%)

20 40 60 80 18 20 22 (d)

 (%) 1E14 1E15 1E16 2 4 6 8 10

effective minority-carrier lifetime(ms) effective minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

Auger

Typical temperature evolution

  • f the cell parameters (SHJ solar cell)

Temperature coefficients (TCs) important for operation in the field: cell T up to 90 °C

  • J. P. Seif, et al, IEEE J.PV., 2015.
  • S. Kurtz, et al. Prog. PV Res. Appl. 2011
slide-18
SLIDE 18

1E14 1E15 1E16 5 10 15

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

T (°C) 30 60 90 120 150

effective minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

1E14 1E15 1E16 5 10 15

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

T (°C) 30 60 90 120 150

effective minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

1E14 1E15 1E16 5 10 15

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

T (°C) 30 60 90 120 150

effective minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

1E14 1E15 1E16 5 10 15

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

T (°C) 30 60 90 120 150

effective minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

1E14 1E15 1E16 5 10 15

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

T (°C) 30 60 90 120 150

effective minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

Lifetime(T) measurements: passivated wafers

18

Possibly explained by change in recombination statistics / capture cross-sections with temperature

  • D. M. Goldie, American J. Material Science, 2013

Typical effective lifetime curve: Evolution with temperature cell parameters (Jsc, Voc, FF)

a-Si:H(ip) a-Si:H(in) c-Si(n)

  • J. P. Seif, et al, IEEE J.PV., 2015.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

1E14 1E15 1E16 5 10 15

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

T (°C) 30 60 90 120 150

effective minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

Lifetime(T) measurements: passivated wafers

  • iVoc

– Lifetime Auger-limited  weak increase of the lifetime with T BUT shift to higher injection / voltage

  • iVmpp

– Lifetime NOT Auger-limited yet  increasing the lifetime with T AND shift to higher injection / voltage

19

voltage at maximum power voltage at

  • pen circuit

Impact on temperature coefficients

  • f the iVmpp (i.e. iFF) and iVoc.

c-Si(n)

Typical effective lifetime curve: Evolution with temperature

  • J. P. Seif, et al, IEEE J.PV., 2015.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Temperature coefficients (TC): impact of Voc

20

625 650 675 700 725 750

  • 0.34
  • 0.32
  • 0.30
  • 0.28
  • 0.26
  • 0.24

Voc @ 25 °C (mV)

full BSF hybrid advanced n-PERT n-PERT PERC (A) SHJ CSEM (B) SHJ Seif J-PV15 Linear fit

TCVoc (%/°C)

Samples from:

High-quality passivation (high Voc) crucial for good TCs and FF!

  • M. A. Green, et al., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 58, 1985.

* * * * * *

  • J. Haschke, et al., Energy & Environmental Science, 10, 1196-1206, 2017
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Temperature coefficients (TC): Cells vs. Modules

Study of temperature coefficients (TC) of different state-of-the-art cells and comparison to modules

  • TCVoc and TCJsc are similar BUT

TCVmpp is worse for modules

21

  • J. Haschke, et al., Energy & Environmental Science, 10, 1196-1206, 2017

Additional series resistance induced by the interconnections between the cells in a module. High Voc and low-resistive interconnections are essential for hot and sunny climates.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Alternative transparent electrodes:

Atomic-layer-deposited ZnO:Al & Organic overlayers

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

a.Ann. a.ITO as-depo.

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

a.ITO as-depo.

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

as-depo.

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3 iVmpp iVoc

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

a.Ann. a.ITO as-depo.

Motivation

23

n-type wafer with ip/ip as-depo.: after PECVD a.ITO: after sputtering a.Ann.: after annealing (Permanent) damage associated with sputtering possible Degradation at lower injection: non-

  • ptimal TCO work function / field effect
  • B. Demaurex, et al. APL

101, 171604, 2012.

  • M. Bivour, et al. Energy Procedia, 2013. // W. Favre, et al. APL, 2013. //
  • R. Rỏßler, et al., JAP 2013. // Seif & Demaurex et al. IEEE J-PV, 2015.

Solution: Soft deposition technique or protective layer Solution: TCO with an

  • ptimized work function

Thinner a-Si:H layers at the front Higher current output (increased Jsc)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Interface defect density (× 108 cm-2)

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

a.Ann. a.ITO as-depo.

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

a.ITO as-depo.

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

as-depo.

1E14 1E15 1E16 1 2 3 iVmpp iVoc

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

ip

a.Ann. a.ITO as-depo.

Motivation

24

(Permanent) damage associated with sputtering possible Degradation at lower injection: non-

  • ptimal TCO work function / field effect
  • B. Demaurex, et al. APL

101, 171604, 2012.

  • M. Bivour, et al. Energy Procedia, 2013. // W. Favre, et al. APL, 2013. //
  • R. Rỏßler, et al., JAP 2013. // Seif & Demaurex et al. IEEE J-PV, 2015.

Solution: Soft deposition technique or protective layer Solution: TCO with an

  • ptimized work function

Thinner a-Si:H layers at the front Higher current output (increased Jsc)

  • D. Adachi et al. APL

107, 233506, 2015.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

ALD ZnO:Al layer vs. sputter-damage

25 10 nm ALD ZnO Reference (no ALD) after ITO deposition 5 nm ALD ZnO 20 nm ALD ZnO 40 nm ALD ZnO

Effective protection against sputter damage for ZnO layers >10 nm

Typical SHJ cell Sputtered ITO Higher lifetime Lower lifetime

Seif & Demaurex et al., IEEE J-PV, 4 (6), 1387-1396, 2014.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Lifetime variation: a workfunction effect

26 1E14 1E15 1E16 4 8 12 16 1E14 1E15 1E16 4 8 12 16 effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

minority-carrier density (cm

  • 3)

increasing thickness effective minority-carrier lifetime (ms)

5 nm 10 nm 20 nm 40 nm

Negative effect  lower iFF Positive effect  higher iFF Work function engineering crucial for high FF values.

  • B. Macco et al., Semiconductor Science and Technology, 29, 2014.

Solutions: optimizing ZnO, applying different TCO or

  • rganic semiconductors.

Potential application on the electron-collecting side

  • f the device

ALD ZnO:Al

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Alternative materials: Organic overlayers

27

Inverse effect on in/in (NEGATIVE) and ip/ip (POSITIVE) passivated samples. Work function engineering: Tunable effect with variation

  • f the PVK doping.
  • J. P. Seif et al., APL, 110, 151601, 2017

poly N-vinylcarbazole (PVK)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Nanocrystalline layers

For silicon heterojunction solar cells

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Motivation

29

Benefits of nanocrystalline materials

  • Optically: indirect bandgap of c-Si

– better response at short wavelengths

  • Electrically: higher doping efficiency and

improved transport properties

– suppression of Schottky barriers  improved contact resistivity

Vetterl et al., Sol.

  • En. Mat., 2000

Ghahfarokhi et al., APL, 2014 // Watahiki et al., APExpr., 2015.

Requirements for PECVD nc-Si layers 1. Fast nucleation (thicknesses ~10–20 nm) 2. Sufficiently high crystallinity 3. ‘Soft’ deposition for pristine passivation

slide-30
SLIDE 30

layer crystallinity/ nucleation speed application in devices method

Strategies for nanocrystalline layers

30

CO2 plasma treatments a-SiOx:H buffer layers SiF4 nucleation layers SiH4  Si2H6 H2  D2 Temperature Higher deposition frequency (VHF) Low frequency and higher pressure

  • J. P. Seif et al., IEEE JPV, 6 (5), 1132-1140, 2016
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Deposition regime nc-Si:H(X) position Voc (mV) Jsc (mA/cm2) FF (%) η (%) 81.36 MHz (2 mbar) p front 717 [719] 37.7 [36.8] 72.6 [72.7] 19.6 [19.2] 13.56 MHz (SiF4), 40.68 MHz (> 2 mbar) iSiF4 (nucl.) p front 718 [718] 36.0 [37.1] 78.4 [76.7] 20.3 [20.4] 13.56 MHz (> 2 mbar) p n rear 720 36.5 79.2 20.8 front 719 37.0 78.7 20.9

nc-Si:H(n or p): device results

31

nc-Si:H(n) or nc-Si:H(p) layers implemented into SHJ devices [reference values]

600 900 1200 20 40 60 80 100 600 900 1200 20 40 60 80 100

EQE and 100-R (%) Wavelength (nm) IQE (%)

  • J. P. Seif et al., IEEE JPV, 6 (5), 1132-1140, 2016

All cells

Textured, 1-5 Ωcm, nominal 240 µm, n-type FZ, 2 × 2 cm2, with screen-printed Ag front contacts and full Ag contact at the rear.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

nc-Si:H(n or p): device results

32

Gain in FF up to 2% (abs.) Gain in Jsc up to ~ 1 mA/cm2 Conversion efficiencies up to 20.9%

Standard 2-side-contacted SHJ (full area) Rear-contacted SHJ (reduced contacting area)

Achieved with simple, industry-compatible process using standard gases. Stable Voc values

  • f ~ 720 mV

Requirements 1. Fast nucleation 2. High crystallinity 3. ‘Soft’ deposition Readily applicable without additional costs.

  • J. P. Seif et al., IEEE JPV, 6 (5), 1132-1140, 2016
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Tunnel-IBC

Rear-contacted cells: nc-Si:H(n and p) inside

33

  • A. Tomasi et al., Nature Energy, 2, 17062, 2017

Conventional IBC-SHJ

Two shadow masks required: One for n- & one for p-layer.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Rear-contacted cells: nc-Si:H(n and p) inside

34

  • A. Tomasi et al., Nature Energy, 2, 17062, 2017
  • Efficient interband-tunneling

contact for electrons.

  • Minimized resistive losses (nc-Si)

and optimal carrier selectivity (e-)

  • Low lateral conductance to

prevent shunts, thanks to grain boundaries and incubation layer e- h+

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Rear-contacted cells: nc-Si:H(n and p) inside

35

  • A. Tomasi et al., Nature Energy, 2, 17062, 2017

e- h+

Certified efficiency Area = 9.00 cm2 (da) Jsc = 40.65 mA.cm−2 Voc = 728.49 mV FF = 76.36% η = 22.61%

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Conclusions

Wide-bandgap oxides Electrons may, but holes should not be collected through the window-layer  rear hole collection  gain in Jsc w/o losses in FF + 0.4 mA/cm2 shown Alternative transparent electrodes Atomic-layer-deposited ZnO:Al

  • for effective sputter-damage

protection and promising electron-collecting layer  potential gain in Jsc and FF Nanocrystalline layers can help improve both optical and electrical device performance  gain in Jsc and FF +1 mA/cm2 and +2% shown Ambient-temperature impact

  • increasing lifetime with temperature
  • TCVoc depends on Voc, device

structure and materials

  • Modules need high Vocs and

low-resistive cell interconnections Alternative transparent electrodes Organic overlayers

  • work function engineering for

improved contacts  potential gain in FF

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Faculty of Engineering School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Why PECVD?

  • Common in industry
  • High throughput
  • Wider parameter space (temperature,

pressure, gas ratios,...)

  • Possibility to use other precursor gases

(vary growth mode and material properties)

38

Passivating contacts with Transition Metal Oxides (TMO) deposited by PECVD

State-of-the-art deposition for TMOs

  • Atomic Layer Deposition
  • Sputtering

Why TMOs?

  • Relatively wide band gaps, yet small

conduction and valence band offsets

  • Promising materials for electron-

(e.g. TiOx) and hole-collection (e.g. WOx)

  • Fixed charges for passivation

Our approach

PECVD

Johannes P. Seif, Anh Le, and Ziv Hameiri

Challenges?

  • Uniformity of thin layers
  • Thermal stability
  • Additional passivation layer needed?

SUNRISE GLOBAL SOLAR ENERGY

Partners:

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Modifications of the AK-800 Delivery of new precursors and first TiOx depositions

Johannes P. Seif, Anh Le, and Ziv Hameiri

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

632 nm ~ 2.4

Thickness: 7.2 nm Refractive index: 2.4 @ 632 nm

40

TMO depositions: First results

Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

Johannes P. Seif, Anh Le, and Ziv Hameiri

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Other ongoing projects: With national (incl. UNSW) and international partners

  • Metal work function impact on recombination

(ANU and KAUST)

  • Temperature dependence on cell performance

(KAUST)

  • Hydrogen migration in c-Si wafers

(UNSW, Phill Hamer)

  • Defect parameters of passivated interfaces

(UNSW, Michelle Vaqueiro Contreras)

  • Cell perimeter recombination

(UNSW)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Thanks to…

Christophe Ballif & Stefaan De Wolf PVLAB and CSEM (SHJ groups) and external colleagues: Nicolas Badel, Loris Barraud, Bénédicte Demaurex, Antoine Descoeudres, Luc Fesquet, Miha Filipič, Jonas Geissbühler, Niels Holm, Silvia Martin de Nicolas, Deneb Menda, Gizem Nogay, Bertrand Paviet-Salomon, Yannick Riesen, Andrea Tomasi Meyer Burger Research

The funding partners: European Comission (FP7 projects: 20 plμs, HERCULES, and CHEETAH), EuroTech Universities Alliance, Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI), Axpo Naturstrom Fonds, Office Fédéral de l’Energie (OFEN), Fonds National Suisse (FNS), DOE project FPace II

Thank you for your attention!