Solar delta-m squared Oscillations using an Off-axis beam to DUSEL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

solar delta m squared oscillations using an off axis beam
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Solar delta-m squared Oscillations using an Off-axis beam to DUSEL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Solar delta-m squared Oscillations using an Off-axis beam to DUSEL September 16 th , 2006 Robert Davis University of Colorado Goals Perform first terrestrial measurement of solar parameters using neutrinos (not anti-neutrinos) By use of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Solar delta-m squared Oscillations using an Off-axis beam to DUSEL

September 16th, 2006 Robert Davis University of Colorado

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Goals

  • Perform first terrestrial measurement of solar

parameters using neutrinos (not anti-neutrinos)

– By use of Long Baseline Accelerator Experiment

  • Can you improve the delta-m2 measurement beyond

current understanding?

  • Develop sensitivity to theta23 octant
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Considerations

  • Use off axis flux to isolate lower energies
  • Looking for an effect that is at lower energy than

delta m2

23

  • See if it is possible to distinguish between theta12

and theta13

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Physical Equation

P(υµ −> υe) = sin2(2θ12)∗sin2(m2

21L/(4E))*cos2(θ23)

m2

21L/(4E) << 1

P(υµ −> υe) ≈ sin2(2θ12)∗(m2

21L/(4E))2*cos2(θ23)

Therefore plot: cos2(θ23) vs sin2(2θ12)∗(m2

21L/(4E))2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Method

  • Modified T2K Monte Carlo used for beam flux

– Geant 3

  • GLOBES program used to calculate event spectra

– Will be used in the future to calculate sensitivities

  • Construct sensitivity plots
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experiment Assumptions

  • 2º Off Axis
  • Baseline 1497km (FNAL to Henderson)
  • Detector 300 kTon Water Cherenkov

– Performance modeled on existing SuperK

  • 0.77 MW
  • 5 year running time
  • 40 Gev beam

Oscillation Parameters used: sin2(2θ12) = 0.8 sin2(2θ23) = 1 m2

21 = 7e-5 eV2

m2

31 = 2e-3 eV2

cp = 0

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2º Off Axis Beam Comparison at 1497km

  • J-PARC flux
  • ptimized for

½ to 1 GeV energies with small e and 0 backgrounds

  • Taken as a starting

point, other fluxes will be examined

(No Oscillations)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2º Off Axis Beam Comparison 0 to 2 GeV window

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nue Appearance Event Spectra

  • sin2(2θ13) = 0.1 (red)

– Total Events 17

  • sin2(2θ13) = 0.0 (black)

– Total Events 10

Background Signal

  • Experimental Parameters

2º Off Axis

Baseline 1497km

Detector 300 kTon Water Cherenkov

0.77 MW

5 year running time

40 Gev beam

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conclusions

  • There are effects of the solar parameters at this

distance

  • Statistics are too low to look at sensitivities

– Based on extremely conservative estimate of

background rejection, efficiency and beam flux

– Need to look at higher fluxes and variations of detector

parameters

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Near Future

  • Use WBLE flux at 1497km and 2º off axis to

examine solar parameters

  • Include some of the new detector designs to get more

events

  • Look at different off axis angles

– For example: 0.75º, 1º, 1.5º

  • Generate sensitivity plots for the solar

parameters and cos(θ23)

– For example plot:

(m2

21*sin2(2θ12))2 vs sin2(2θ13)

slide-12
SLIDE 12