Specific Learning Disabilities Webinar 2: Communicating with the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

specific learning disabilities webinar 2 communicating
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Specific Learning Disabilities Webinar 2: Communicating with the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Specific Learning Disabilities Webinar 2: Communicating with the Problem-Solving Team December 2016 Objectives Increase your understanding of: l Importance of information provided by the Problem- Solving Team l Roles and responsibilities


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Specific Learning Disabilities Webinar 2: Communicating with the Problem-Solving Team

December 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives

Increase your understanding of:

l Importance of information provided by the Problem-

Solving Team

l Roles and responsibilities within the Problem

  • Solving

and Evaluation Teams

l Information used to determine whether or not a

Referral for Special Education Evaluation is warranted

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is your team called?

What name does your school or district use to identify the general education problem

  • solving team?
  • Problem
  • solving Team
  • Response to Intervention (RTI) Team
  • Multi
  • tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Team
  • Other

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Intervention Information and Progress Monitoring Data

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RTI Guidance

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Response to Intervention

l RTI is a general education tool that enables schools to

target instructional interventions to children’s areas of specific need as soon as those needs become apparent.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Response to Intervention

l RTI is the practice of matching and providing instruction

and intervention, while systematically monitoring student progress to make decisions about the need for services.

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Response to Intervention

l All students included within this multi

  • tiered system of

support .

l Progress monitoring can also be used with students on

IEPs to identify when a student has met benchmarks and/or identified goals, allowing for a flexible special education service delivery system.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Role of RTI within Evaluation

l IDEA indicates that students must receive appropriate

instruction in general education from qualified personnel before determining a student has a Specific Learning Disability (SLD). RTI practices focus on providing this instruction.

l Data collected during the intervention period may be

used as part of the evaluation.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Advantages

l Earlier recognition of problems l All delays and/or deficits are treated

under the same instructional model

l Identification not necessary to provide

additional support for the student

l Differentiation and intensive instruction

are provided to all students

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Importance of RTI Information

This information establishes the student’s current level of performance within the general education setting.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What do you use?

What progress monitoring information does your Problem- Solving Team typically provide to you as part of referring a student for a Special Education Evaluation?

  • Aimsweb data
  • Data from EasyCBM
  • STAR Reading or Math Results
  • Other

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Information from the Problem-Solving Team

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Problem-Solving Team

l Role of this team lies within general education and the

RTI process

l Matches interventions to the needs of students to

ensure adequate progress is being made

l Members could include teachers, administrators,

counselors, instructional specialists and others

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Evaluation Team

l Role of this team is to make decisions regarding

evaluation, assessment, and eligibility

l Membership includes special education teacher(s),

administrators, school psychologist, general education teacher(s), parent(s), and others as determined by the team

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Intervention Information

l The Evaluation Team might be provided with or request

specific information from the Problem

  • Solving Team.

This information will drive decisions made throughout the student’s comprehensive evaluation.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Intervention Information

l Class assignments, grades, and work samples that

demonstrate a weakness in the identified area(s) of concern

l Notes, evidence, assurances, or documentation that

core instruction is effective in the identified area(s) of weakness

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Intervention Information

l Documentation of parent input during the intervention

period

l Any additional information needed to provide a

thorough background summary

l Attendance records for the student

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Intervention Information

l Documentation of interventions, which includes start

and end dates, frequency, and intensity of each intervention as well as decisions made throughout the intervention period

l Progress monitoring data collected during interventions

to include any graph or visual representation of progress made during the intervention period

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Common Misconceptions

l RTI interventions are a mandatory prerequisite to SLD

Evaluation

l Intervention programs must be implemented for the

entire period of instruction

l In tiered intervention models, all tiers must be

completed prior to referral

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

OSEP Memorandum

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Something to Consider

l Avoid unilateral decisions on general education

interventions which include:

  • decisions on timelines for interventions;
  • choice of available interventions

;

  • schedules for progress monitoring; and/or
  • a point at which to initiate a referral to consider an evaluation.

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

How is information provided?

How does your Problem

  • Solving Team provide information

to the Evaluation Team at your school or district?

  • Mileposts
  • Google forms
  • File folder of information passed from one team to another
  • Other

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Referral to Evaluate for Special Education

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Example

l Student: Ben Ortiz l Grade: Third l Area of Concern:

Basic Reading Skills

l Intervention Period:

9/16 – 1/17

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Referral

l A referral to consider a special education evaluation is

sent to the evaluation team after the problem

  • solving

team has determined:

  • The student has not made adequate progress
  • Language and/or culture differences are not the main source of

the student’s struggles

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Referral

Moving from general to special education

l The Evaluation Team, including the parent(s), reviews

all available records.

l The Evaluation Team determines whether or not an

evaluation is warranted

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Example

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Review

l Intervention and progress-

monitoring data

l Information from the

problem

  • solving team

l Referral to evaluation for

special education

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Next Steps

l If you are taking this course for credit:

  • Complete the quiz with a passing grade (70% or better) prior

to the next webinar

l Attend Webinar 3 on 1

  • 19
  • 17at 4:00 MT/ 3:00 PT
  • Before this webinar, read Chapter 4, Section 5C (pg. 43
  • 44) of

the Idaho Special Education Manual

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Cathy Thornton

Associate Director

Nichole Kristensen

Instructional Coordinator

Dawn Spurlock

Instructional Coordinator

Alayna Gee

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Coordinator

www.IdahoSESTA.org

slide-32
SLIDE 32

SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION