Stacy G. Williams, Ph.D., P.E. University of Arkansas, Dept. of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Stacy G. Williams, Ph.D., P.E. University of Arkansas, Dept. of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Stacy G. Williams, Ph.D., P.E. University of Arkansas, Dept. of Civil Engineering NCAUPG Technical Conference February 2012 1 - 5% lower than mat density Cold Lane Hot Lane Low Density Permeability Gradation What should we
Cold Lane Hot Lane
1 - 5% lower than mat density
Low Density Permeability Gradation What should
we measure?
3 Projects
12” 12” 6” 6”
“Good” “Bad” “Ugly”
80 85 90 95 100
12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H Project 1 Project 2 Project 3
Nuclear Density (% of TMD)
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
80 85 90 95 100
12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H Project 1 Project 2 Project 3
Core Density by SSD (% of TMD)
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
80 85 90 95 100
12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H Project 1 Project 2 Project 3
Core Density - CoreLok (% TMD)
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H 12C 6C J 6H 12H Project 1 Project 2 Project 3
Infiltration (cm/hr)
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
Discrimination
Density – all methods significant
▪ CoreLok provided greater discrimination than SSD
Permeability – significant
▪ Joint ≠ away from joint, successfully separated projects
Accuracy
Density – most ranked correctly
▪ CoreLok and SSD best ▪ Nuclear – trouble consistently identifying marginal quality
Permeability - 2/3 ranked correctly Gradation – approx. ½ ranked correctly
2 Jobs 3 testing locations at each section Joint Construction Techniques 8 methods (sections) on each job Testing Density (field and laboratory) Field Permeability / Infiltration
Overlap Safety Edge Aggregate
Interlock
www.transtechsys.com
Bond cold and hot side of joint Reduce permeability
Polymerized
emulsion
Penetrates
surface
Stabilizes joint
Same as used for mainline paving operations
Cold Lane Hot Lane
Cold Lane Hot Lane
Cold Lane Hot Lane
2 Projects 500 ft sections for each of 8 methods 3 locations in each section
12” 12” 6” 6”
12C 12H 6H J 6C M
5’
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 CF CR HO HP JB JH NW TC Density, %
Nuclear Density
12C 6C J 6H 12H
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 CF CR HO HP JB JH NW TC T166 Density, %
Core Density -T166
6C J 6H
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 CF CR HO HP JB JH NW TC T331 Density, %
Core Density -T331
6C J 6H
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CF CR HO HP JB JH NW TC Absorption, %
Core Absorption
6C J 6H
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 CF CR HO HP JB JH NW TC k, cm/s x 10-5
Field Permeability
6C J 6H
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 CF CR HO HP JB JH NW TC Infiltration, cm/hr
Infiltration
6C J 6H
Construction method – significant Distance from joint – significant Interaction – significant Permeability / Infiltration
▪ JB and JH – Low permeability at and away from the joint ▪ Others – High permeability at joint, lower values away from the joint
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95
Infiltration (cm/hr) Nuclear Density (%)
Nuclear Density vs. Infiltration
good poor fair
4% abs 2% abs