Status and the way forward Audit of the implementation process by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status and the way forward audit of the implementation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Status and the way forward Audit of the implementation process by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Status and the way forward Audit of the implementation process by the enlightened Stakeholders Combines the processes of o Proactive disclosures o Peoples participation in monitoring o Requirements of the audit discipline


slide-1
SLIDE 1

 

Status and the way forward

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Audit of the implementation

process by the enlightened Stakeholders

Combines the processes of

  • Proactive disclosures
  • Peoplesᾼ participation in monitoring
  • Requirements of the audit discipline
  • Independent feedback loop in

implementation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

To streamline service delivery

systems

Ensure transparency and

accountability

Impacts beneficiaries

  • Spreads awareness
  • Improves participation in the

program design,

No other monitoring mechanism

  • f such reach
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Govt point of view:

1.Statutory - as per the Act 2.Improves implementation system

  • Independent feedback
  • Mid course corrections possible

3.Commitment to clean implementation

Stakeholdersᾼ point of view

1.Empowerment through knowledge/access 2.Voices of people heard/Grievance redressal

forum

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Reporting to GS, discussion, adoption Training of stakeholders in reading records 100% check of all payments, all works Audit by stakeholders, from outside Provision of all records ᾶ free of cost

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 1. Setting up non-

bureaucratic/independent SAU

  • 2. Issue of Rules that define all

processes/penalities

  • 3. Putting together expert team at

State/District level

  • 4. Orientation of implementing

agencies/Sarpanches

  • 5. Formulation of calendar for total

coverage

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 1. Getting right village social

auditors ᾶ

  • Free of political, criminal

background

  • Effective training ᾶ

who/how/when

  • 2. Sharing of records ᾶ

reluctance of Admin

  • 3. Keeping auditors away from

corruption

  • 4. Disruption of Gram Sabhas
  • 5. Taking action on reports
slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 1. Assistance in setting up SAUs
  • 2. Assistance in identification of

experts

  • 3. Funding at State/District levels
  • 4. Assistance unit set up at NIRD-PR
  • 5. Conduct of test audits/pilot Social

audits

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Out of 28 States, 18 States have not set up SAUs  Resource persons: State level:

  • Sanctioned: 149
  • Filled : 63
  • Vacant: 86 (notifications issued for only 12)

 Resource persons: District level:

  • Sanctioned: 1182
  • Filled: 582
  • Vacant: 600 (notification issued only for 38

vacancies)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

AP, Telengana ᾶ systematised,

institutionalised, made Statutory

Sikkim, Chhattisgarh Many good efforts made need to

de-bureaucratise

Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan ᾶ

good steps forward

10