Status of the Study Interagency Study Team Modeling Group Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Minnesota River Basin Integrated Watershed, Water Quality and Ecosystem Restoration Study Status of the Study Interagency Study Team Modeling Group Meeting April 20, 2010 Study Purpose To bring local, state and federal entities together
Minnesota River Basin Integrated Watershed, Water Quality and Ecosystem Restoration Study Status of the Study Interagency Study Team Modeling Group Meeting April 20, 2010
Study Purpose • To bring local, state and federal entities together to address problems in the Minnesota River Basin
Objectives • To prepare a plan for watershed management, water quality, and ecosystem restoration • To develop a decision support system
Focus • Flood damage reduction • Ecosystem restoration • Watershed management • Water quality management • Ground water management
Evaluate and Assess Current and future… • Hydrologic regime/basin water budget • Aquatic habitat condition • Sediment transport • Nutrient loading • Watershed condition • Basin social & economic conditions
Outputs • LiDAR • Watershed modeling • Decision support system – Spatially explicit – Technical tools for local use – Developed with stakeholder input • Final report – Basin goals/objectives – Simulated existing & future conditions – Recommended actions
Interagency Study Team • Guides where study goes • Serves as information broker to & from member agencies • Advises Study Coordination Team 7
Technical Groups • Advise the Interagency Study Team on the project… – Public involvement – Plan focus and elements – Decision support system 8
The Planning Group • Identified fundamental planning questions • Will help … – Develop strategic plan for communication and public involvement – Identify ecologically realistic targets and other future scenarios – Identify key users and what they want in a decision support system 9
The Modeling Group • Modeling group will help … – Determine how to apply technical analysis in addressing fundamental project questions • Select, apply and interpret models • Identify and address data collection needs • Scale up to major watersheds and the basin – Translate results into a decision support system 10
Progress to Date • Project management plan • Preliminary modeling discussions • Preliminary outreach/communications discussions • Initial discussion of the form & function of the decision support system • Initial discussion of the fundamental questions the project should answer 11
Minnesota River Watershed Plan (DSS) Technical Analysis Interagency Study Team/Technical Teams Alternatives Scenario Subwatershed Modeling Basin Modeling Development/Analysis Identify Target Future Small Subwatershed Scaling Model Parameters Conditions Modeling to Basin Level Simulate Subwatershed Select Management Hydrology and Materials Simulate River Water Measures Transport – Existing Quality Conditions Simulate Subwatershed Simulated Management Simulate Future Basin Hydrology and Materials Measures and Effects Transport – Reference Conditions 12 (Economic/Ecological) Conditions
2010 Meeting Series (March-May) • Purposes – Come to agreement on the fundamental questions we want the project to answer and how best to do so – Understand what analyses the questions may require – Develop analytical strategies – Select sub-watersheds to represent the basin in addressing the questions 13
2010 Meeting Series (March-May) • March 16 – Planning group – identified fundamental questions that the study should answer • April 20 – Modeling group – identify the most effective tools and ways to answer the questions • May 4 – Interagency Study Team – consider recommendations of two groups; synthesize and identify next steps 14
Next Steps for the Study Team Short Term (2010) • Confirm fundamental questions • Develop the strategy for addressing them – Sub-watershed selection – Model selection – Identify roles/responsibilities for technical analysis – Identify data needs for analysis • Develop communications & public outreach strategies 15
Next Steps for the Study Team Long Term (2011-2012) • Implement communications & public outreach strategies • Develop technical analyses within each sub- watershed to understand possible answers and implications • Identify key users and what they need in a decision support system • Begin to build the DSS 16
Contact Info • John Wells Environmental Quality Board e-mail: john.wells@state.mn.us Phone: 651.201.2475 • Michael Wyatt U.S. Army Corps of Engineers e-mail: michael.d.wyatt@usace.army.mil Phone: 651.290.5216 17
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.