Stormwater Monitoring Challenges and Trip-ups in search of the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stormwater monitoring challenges and trip ups
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stormwater Monitoring Challenges and Trip-ups in search of the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ASCE Oregon EWRG Stormwater Monitoring Challenges and Trip-ups in search of the elusive EMC January 25, 2017 Presented by Curtis Nickerson Bryan Berkompas ASCE Oregon EWRG Its a challenge! Targeting an ephemeral event Challenge


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Stormwater Monitoring Challenges and Trip-ups

in search of the elusive EMC

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Presented by

Curtis Nickerson Bryan Berkompas

January 25, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ASCE Oregon EWRG

It’s a challenge!

 Targeting an ephemeral event  Challenge to get representative data  Difficult working conditions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Overview

 Stormwater monitoring basics  Planning a monitoring project  Site selection consideration  Instrument selection and installation  Pointers for project implementation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Stormwater monitoring basics

 Water quality sampling  In-situ WQ measurements  Flow metering  Rain gauging  Stormwater sediment sampling

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Water quality sampling approaches

 Manual grab sampling

 instantaneous measurement

 Time-paced composite sampling

 time-averaged concentration

 Flow-weighted composite sampling

 event-mean concentration  can calculate loading

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Monitoring project planning

 Monitoring infrastructure has typically

been an after thought

 Get in on the facility design process  More difficult to retrofit for monitoring

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Start planning early!

 Prepare planning documents  Select site(s)  Procure equipment and materials  Install and test equipment  Train staff

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Allow yourself 4-6 months to prepare

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Before you can implement the project

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Monitoring site selection

 Locations driven by project objectives

 Characterization  Pollutant source tracing  Permit compliance  BMP effectiveness evaluation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Select sites that isolate flows of interest but provide monitorable conditions

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Site selection considerations

 Access  Security  Future changes to

infrastructure

 Confined space  Traffic control  Vandalism  Power source  Cell phone access  Flooding  Flow conditions  Pipe characteristics  Tidal influence  Backwater  Permanent site for

sampling equipment

 Off-site, co-mingled

sources

 Freezing conditions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Ensure access and security

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Flow metering options

flume weir bubbler flow meter pressure transducer look-down sensor area-velocity meter Venturi tube meter mag meter

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Flow monitoring challenges

 Channel or pipe slope too steep  Water depth too shallow  No defined channel  Backwater conditions, including tidal effects  Large range of flows  Straight reaches/ pipe sections too short

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Include monitoring in infrastructure design

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Include monitoring in infrastructure design

flume

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Retrofit with primary devices

Thelmar weir

slide-19
SLIDE 19

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Addressing difficult hydraulic conditions

foam wedge

slide-20
SLIDE 20

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Addressing poorly defined channel

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Flow monitoring at flow control structures

primary orifice secondary orifice measure water level then calculate flow from orifice and weir equations bypass

slide-22
SLIDE 22

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Custom equipment

3-in. magmeter

medium to high flows (max. 160 gpm)

tipping bucket

trickle and low flows (<1.8 gpm)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Custom equipment

secondary drain primary drain

slide-24
SLIDE 24

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Manual grab sampling

Swing arm sampler

slide-25
SLIDE 25

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Passive grab sampler

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Grab sampling from deep manholes

suction from pump

sealed canister

sample bottle sample tubing extension pole

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Grab sampling from deep manholes

slide-28
SLIDE 28

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Catch basin insert sampling

slide-29
SLIDE 29

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Catch basin insert sampling

slide-30
SLIDE 30

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Autosampler examples

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Addressing high velocity or shallow flows

low flow strainer

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Customized samplers

cubitainer

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Customized autosamplers

“drum sampler”

slide-34
SLIDE 34

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Customized autosamplers

“drum sampler”

slide-35
SLIDE 35

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Customized autosamplers

“mega sampler”

slide-36
SLIDE 36

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Rainfall measurement

 Onsite rage gauge or nearby if accessible real-

time

 Need open area  Security a concern

slide-37
SLIDE 37

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Tipping bucket rain gauge

slide-38
SLIDE 38

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Tipping bucket rain gauge

slide-39
SLIDE 39

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Considerations for monitoring station installation

 Don’t believe design plans – always measure

and inspect critical elements

 Orifice sizes/ condition  Weir position  Incorrect construction

slide-40
SLIDE 40

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Considerations for monitoring station installations

slide-41
SLIDE 41

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Considerations for monitoring station installation

slide-42
SLIDE 42

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Expect extreme weather

slide-43
SLIDE 43

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Expect extreme weather

slide-44
SLIDE 44

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Tips for “hardening” monitoring stations

 Sturdy housing  Concrete pad or wooden platform  Conduit for electrical cable and suction line (below

ground if vehicle traffic present)

 Anchor housing if security a concern  Seal gaps to exclude rodents and insects  Stainless steel fasteners if zinc a concern  Use “quick connects” for sampler suction line  Use zip-ties to organize cables “in the hole”  Keep suction line and electrical cables out of flow

line to protect from debris

slide-45
SLIDE 45

ASCE Oregon EWRG

“Un-hardened” monitoring station

slide-46
SLIDE 46

ASCE Oregon EWRG

“Hardened” monitoring station

slide-47
SLIDE 47

ASCE Oregon EWRG

“Hardened” monitoring station

slide-48
SLIDE 48

ASCE Oregon EWRG

“Hardened” monitoring station

slide-49
SLIDE 49

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Above ground installation preferred, but sometimes not possible.

Manhole hanger

slide-50
SLIDE 50

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Underground installation

slide-51
SLIDE 51

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Telemetry is a game changer!

 Provides remote control of samplers and flow

meters

 Frequent automatic downloading of data on a

set schedule

 We use Campbell Scientific data

logger/controllers for flexibility with instrumentation and programming

 Communicate via cellular, radio, and even

satellite option

slide-52
SLIDE 52

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Benefits of telemetry

 Reduced labor to arm samplers prior to storm

events

 Ability to modify instrument settings remotely

immediately prior to or during a storm

 One person (Storm Controller) can monitor

status of numerous stations concurrently

 Automatic notifications based on alarm

settings

 Field staff deployed only as-needed

slide-53
SLIDE 53

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Insert screen shot of logger net Loggernet connect screen

slide-54
SLIDE 54

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Targeting a storm with telemetry

1 .8 1 .9 2 .0 .0 00 .0 05 .0 10 2 4 3 PM 6 Sa t O ct 2 07 6 PM 9 PM 7 Su n 3 AM 6 AM 9 AM

sdn1-tele

Flowlink 4 for Windows ft in m 1 0/6/20 7 2:00 :0 0 PM - 1 0/7/20 7 11 :0 :00 AM L eve l (1.90 6 ft) Ra in fa ll (0 .0 8 in) Sa mp le (1 .4 54 7 m)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Tips for data collection phase

 Make sure you have sufficient, well trained

staff

 Train for confined space entry, instrument

  • peration, sample collection and handling methods

 Rotate storm response assignments – make

schedules as predictable as possible

 Be ready to improvise!

 Storms rarely occur as advertised  Equipment malfunctions  People make mistakes

slide-56
SLIDE 56

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Tips for data collection phase

 Develop and use SOPs for everything  Detailed field sheets –completely filled out!  Double check equipment  Ice samples immediately and thoroughly  Be safe! – often dark, wet, cold and windy

slide-57
SLIDE 57

ASCE Oregon EWRG

slide-58
SLIDE 58

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Sample processing options

Decaport sample splitter for sample compositing/ splitting

slide-59
SLIDE 59

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Sample processing options

Churn sample splitter to fill bottles for laboratory analysis

slide-60
SLIDE 60

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Hydrologic data QC actions

 Conduct routine maintenance and calibration  Download and check flow and rainfall data

regularly

 Is it believable? If not, investigate  Check instrument performance  Check site for potential causes of strange data

slide-61
SLIDE 61

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Check instruments

Rain gauge calibration check

slide-62
SLIDE 62

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Check instruments

Secondary flow measurement

slide-63
SLIDE 63

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Water quality QC actions

 Collect field and trip blanks routinely  Backflush sampler tubing thoroughly  Replace sampler tubing periodically  Adjust laboratory decon procedures if

necessary

 Raise sampler strainer out of baseflow/sump

between sampling events

slide-64
SLIDE 64

ASCE Oregon EWRG

Questions?

Curtis Nickerson

cnickerson@aspectconsulting.com 206.838.8595 www.aspectconsulting.com