Strategic Risk Framework Reporting A Case Study: Ballarat Health - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

strategic risk framework reporting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Strategic Risk Framework Reporting A Case Study: Ballarat Health - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strategic Risk Framework Reporting A Case Study: Ballarat Health Services Trudy Shortal, Risk Manager Sue Gervasoni, Exec Director Residential Servs & Clinical Governance Keren Day, Director Governance & Risk Management October, 2015


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Strategic Risk Framework Reporting

A Case Study: Ballarat Health Services

Trudy Shortal, Risk Manager Sue Gervasoni, Exec Director Residential Serv’s & Clinical Governance Keren Day, Director Governance & Risk Management

October, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A timely reminder

  • Role of the Board

– to set the agenda, develop the direction, monitor achievement, hold the executive accountable for progress

  • Quality Manager/team’s role

– to provide innovation, improvement and quality (risk) management infrastructure, reporting, co-

  • rdination and technical support. Advise on

compliance

– Adapted from C Balding – 'Leading a Strategic Quality Governance System‘, Quality Works

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Board needs to know 3 things

  • What are the risks of the organisation?
  • How are we managing those risks?
  • How do we know we are managing the risks?
  • We were only partially meeting the needs of
  • ur Board…..but we didn’t know it at the time
slide-4
SLIDE 4

A story of risk maturity

  • First VMIA Risk Workshop with Executives in

2006

  • First Enterprise Wide Risk Manager role in

2007

  • Risk fairly well embedded
  • Pretty good engagement across the
  • rganisation
  • Doing OK…….or so we thought!
  • How do we know?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

VMIA Risk Framework Quality Review

  • Independent review of

RMF maturity

  • 7 element maturity model
  • Risk culture
  • Governance &

Accountability

  • Resources & Capability
  • Policy and Plan
  • Risk Management Process
  • Validation & Assurance
  • Inter-agency Risk

Management

  • Developing  Integrating

 Effective  Advanced

  • Informed by the Victorian

Government Risk Management Framework and the AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RFQR @ BHS

  • 2011

– “Effective” – Action plan for improvement

  • 2014

– Doing better – or so we thought – “Integrating”

  • 2014 in Summary:

– Management of clinical is firmly embedded – Not clearly aligned to strategic objectives. – Compliance driven and largely clinical risks. – Long term risks that require further assessment and possible archiving

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Risk generation – bottom up
  • Huge risk register
  • Reporting Ground Hog Day
  • Risk reports answered the first two questions,

but not the third…how do we know?

– It was self evident in risks that were reduced quickly (they disappeared from the RR) – but what about the risks that were there forever?

  • Too much risk reporting- monthly, voluminous

On our way, but not yet arrived

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Our development had been unidimensional

– Great management of clinical risks

  • Where were our gaps?

– No strategic risks

  • what was the difference?
  • what does a strategic risk register look like?

– Not through lack of asking or searching for examples

  • Had attempted to ‘theme’ our operational risks

– No way generating strategic risks in our approach

Reflection

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • The RFQR process was also different this time
  • Simply inter-rater differences? Possibly not….

– Post VAGO review of Public Sector Risk Mgt – The landscape had changed…the bar was raised

  • The Vic Gov Risk Management Framework

(updated 2015)

  • “The Victorian Government needs its public sector to be

productive, innovative and efficient and tackling the risk- related issues that affect its ability to deliver the services needed”.

p.2 VMIA Vic Gov Risk Mgt Framework Practice Guide

Reflection

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • It’s one thing to have a risk management

process, it’s another to have a strategic risk management framework

  • If not strategic, it is transactional, focused on

processes and tasks, an end in itself, not driving towards the goal

– Busy, reporting, compliance …. Important, but…

  • If strategic – can be transformational &

purposeful

Adapted from C Balding – 'Leading a Strategic Quality Governance System‘, Quality Works

Reflection

Reactive V’s Proactive

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Strategic risk

– Risks of failing to achieve strategic objectives – Why starting from the bottom didn’t cut it – Responsibility of the board

  • Operational risk

– Risks derived from the provision of the service provided by the business – What is happening on the ground

  • Top Down V’s Bottom Up
  • Both/And

Back to Basics

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • So we stopped – quality & risk brains trust
  • Had the “aha” moment about what is a strategic risk v’s

and operational risk and their relationship

  • Took a good hard look at ourselves in terms
  • f Risk Reporting …took a plan to Exec
  • Started from the top….With VMIA support
  • Strategic Risk Workshop

– Worked with Exec and Board Rep to identify our strategic risks

Moving Forward

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Identified strategic risks from strategic goals
  • Assessed these and formed mitigation plans
  • Established Risk KPIs

– Presenting trends – In way easy to understand for BOM – Used the data to tell the story? Are we reducing the risk? Could the BOM see if the patient experience is safer?

  • Differentiated Contributing (operational) risks

– Developed Risk KPIs for these as well

Moving Forward

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Reviewed (re-thought) our Risk Reporting

Templates

  • Made sure the link between and

responsibilities strategic risk and contributing risks were clear

– Strategic – BOM – Contributing – Management team

  • Reviewed our Risk Reporting Schedule

– As often as needed and no more

Moving Forward

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • After almost a year of hard work by the Risk

Manager, rethinking and designing, checking, various iterations, feedback ………….

Results?

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Focused data rather than volume
  • BOM love it – not overwhelmed, know where

to look

  • A BOM more assured (not looking for

reassurance any more) and so can now use the data ask questions to support and drive improvement

– Don’t get contributing risks, but have access to them if needed

  • Engagement of each Exec Director

Results…..

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Annual strategic risk workshop/KPI review
  • Inter-agency risk

– Was on our radar…now mandatory

  • Further development and evaluation

– The value of the Risk KPIs to be determined as a facilitator of monitoring – Still working out if the KPIs are right – Are the KPIs allowing us to quickly and easily know if we are managing the risk – Is it supporting the board and the ESC as they make decisions?

Moving Forward

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Thanks to our Risk Manager – who has dug

deep and driven the work

  • Thanks to Executive Director – who leads and

champions risk management at the ESC table

  • Trying not to feel too comfortable….there is

always something to learn

  • Like all things in risk management….the proof

will be in the pudding….do we achieve our goals?

Moving Forward…. but always improving

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Thank you for listening
  • We hope that sharing our story

may help your story