Survival of the Weakest? General properties of many competing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

survival of the weakest
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Survival of the Weakest? General properties of many competing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MPI Dresden, July 2011 Survival of the Weakest? General properties of many competing species R.K.P. Zia Physics Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA S.O. Case, C.H. Durney, M. Pleimling EPL 92, 58003 (2010), PRE 83 , 051108


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Survival of the Weakest?

General properties of many competing species

S.O. Case, C.H. Durney, M. Pleimling

EPL 92, 58003 (2010), PRE 83, 051108 (2011) MPI Dresden, July 2011

R.K.P. Zia

Physics Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA

Supported by Materials Theory, Division of Materials Research

R.K.P. Zia, arXiv.org: 1101:0018 (2010-11)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Motivations

– Michel’s fault + 2 students looking for summer projects. – Population dynamics: Venerable, Interesting! – Cyclic competition of 3 species: Survival of the Weakest!?!

  • Competition of M species (NO spatial structure)

– M=4 cyclic competition: Other maxims and novel features – Deterministic MFT vs. stochastic evolution – General properties for any M with arbitrary pairwise interactions

  • Summary and Outlook
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivations

  • Population Dynamics… quick reminder

– Malthus (~1800): 𝜖𝜐𝑦 = 𝜇𝑦 – Verhulst (1838): 𝜖𝜐𝑦 = 𝜇𝑦(1 − 𝑦) …logistic map (Feigenbaum, May, 1970’s) – Lotka-Volterra (1920’s) 𝜖𝜐𝑦 = −𝜀𝑦 + 𝛿𝑦𝑧 𝜖𝜐𝑧 = +𝛾𝑧 − 𝛿𝑦𝑧

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motivations

  • Cyclic competition of three species

– Frey, et.al.: “Survival of the Weakest” – Easier, intuitive picture? and … – Does this apply in other situations?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A+A B+B C+C

A+B B+C C+A A+A B+B C+C

pa pb pc

Cyclic competition of 3 species

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A+A B+B C+C

A+B B+C C+A A+A B+B C+C

pa pb pc

Cyclic competition of 3 species

Simple stochastic model:

  • No spatial structure
  • Bag of N balls, of 3 colors

(e.g., Azure, Black, Cinnamon)

  • Rule is easy: randomly pick a pair; change

color of one ball according to given p’s

N is conserved

(fractions) A + B + C = 1

  • Three absorbing states.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cyclic competition of 3 species

Simple stochastic model:

  • What we really want is:

Given the p’s and initial numbers, …after t picks, what is the probability:

  • Master equation it satisfies:
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cyclic competition of 3 species

Simple stochastic model:

In particular, the eventual survival probabilities:

P(N,0,0;  | …)

i.e., probability of (fraction) A = 1

P(0,N,0;  | …) i.e., B = 1

…etc.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cyclic competition of 3 species

Mean Field version:

  • Take exact master equation for P(A,B,C ; t)
  • …and consider averages: e.g.,
  • Take N   limit, get continuous time 
  • Probabilities, ps , become rates: ks
  • Neglect correlations: e.g., AB  AB
  • Get ODEs for A, etc. (denoted by A, etc.)
  • Result is …

… a couple of lines to see … All (generic) initial populations

evolve periodically !

not into absorbing states!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Cyclic competition of 3 species

Mean Field (rate) Equations

with rescaled time to normalize ka+kb+kc=1 Fixed point:

A = kb , B = kc , C = ka

Invariant:

kb kc ka

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MFT predicts all will survive!

Invariant manifold:

R = const.

Orbits are closed loops

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Survival of the Weakest ???

Berr, Reichenbach, Schottenloher, and Frey, PRL 102 048102 (2009)

pa < pb , pc

A is the “weakest”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Survival of the Weakest!!

Berr, Reichenbach, Schottenloher, and Frey, PRL 102 048102 (2009)

Stochastics enlivens the scene!!

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Survival of the Weakest!!

Berr, Reichenbach, Schottenloher, and Frey, PRL 102 048102 (2009)

100 % !!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

…bottom line: Weakest do NOT always win!

Prey of the prey of the weakest lose.

…leads to weakest doing well in M=3 case!

What about four Species ?

Case, Durney, Pleimling and Zia, EPL 92, 58003 (2010)+…

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What about 4 Species ?

Case, Durney, Pleimling and Zia, EPL 92, 58003 (2010)

A C B D

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What about 4 Species ?

Case, Durney, Pleimling and Zia, EPL 92, 58003 (2010)

Total number of balls, N, is constant.

  • 2(N+1) absorbing states: A-C vs. B-D
  • …forming opposing teams (like Bridge)
  • Winner has larger rate product: kakc vs. kbkd
  • Losers die out exponentially fast
  • If competition is neutral, then there are

− two invariants − one fixed line − saddle shaped closed looped orbits

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What about 4 Species ?

Case, Durney, Pleimling and Zia, EPL 92, 58003 (2010)

A B C D A B C D 2(N+1) absorbing states: A-C vs. B-D

slide-19
SLIDE 19

What about 4 Species ?

Case, Durney, Pleimling and Zia, EPL 92, 58003 (2010)

 > 0: system ends up on A-C line.  < 0: system ends up on B-D line.

 ≡ kakc − kbkd

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What’s special about  ?

  • Looks like a determinant…
  • From Master Equation (for P{Nm;t}) to …

… is really a determinant ! (later) … Rate Equations (for averages Nmt).

slide-21
SLIDE 21

What’s special about  ?

  • Looks like a determinant…
  • From Master Equation (for P{Nm;t}) to …

… is really a determinant ! (later) … Rate Equations (for averages Nmt). linear combinations to…

slide-22
SLIDE 22

What’s special about  ?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

What’s special about  ?

 > 0: system ends up on A-C line.  < 0: system ends up on B-D line.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Two examples of  ≠ 0

 > 0, A-C wins  < 0, B-D wins

(0.35, 0.42, 0.09, 0.14) λ = −0.0273 (0.45, 0.33, 0.14, 0.08) λ = 0.0366

slide-25
SLIDE 25

A better view of say,  > 0

a  c  d  b  In this region both a and c increase In this region both b and d decrease is a stable fixed line

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A better view of say,  > 0

  • Intersection is an irregular tetrahedron,

… in which orbits are monotonic.

  • In particular, there is a straight-line

(dubbed “the arrow”) on which the system evolves like the case with just one species (Verhulst):

  • Other typical orbits spiral around this arrow.

𝜖𝜐ℎ = 𝜕ℎ(1 − ℎ)

If you start anywhere on this line, you just move along it!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

A better view of say,  > 0

  • Intersection is an irregular tetrahedron,

… in which orbits are monotonic.

  • In particular, there is a straight-line

(dubbed “the arrow”) on which the system evolves like the case with just one species (Verhulst):

  • Other typical orbits spiral around this arrow.

𝜖𝜐ℎ = 𝜕ℎ(1 − ℎ)  =  /( )

If you start anywhere on this line, you just move along it!

slide-28
SLIDE 28

An example of  > 0

A B C D D C A

Forward orbit Backward orbit

slide-29
SLIDE 29

More special are =0 cases !

Line of fixed points

and

Invariant manifolds

Neutral !!

slide-30
SLIDE 30

More special are =0 cases !

If you start anywhere on this line, you just stay there!

A+C=γ B+D=1- γ

slide-31
SLIDE 31

More special are =0 cases !

  • Each defines a (generalized) hyperbolic sheet.
  • Intersection is a closed loop (~ edge of a saddle).
  • Average (over an orbit) is a point on fixed line.
  • Extremal points can be found analytically.

… are CONSTANTS under the evolution!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Two views of a  = 0 case

rates: (0.4, 0.4, 0.1, 0.1) and initial values: (0.02, 0.1, 0.48, 0.4)

A B C D A B C D

Fixed line

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Do invariants & Qs always exist ?

R.K.P.Zia, arXiv 1101.0018 (2010)

…insights from studying …

M species

with arbitrary pair-wise interactions

  • Odd/Even M belong to different classes.
  • Odd M

– Fixed point and R necessarily exist (“duality”) – No other possibilities for cyclic competition

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Do invariants & Qs always exist ?

  • Even M

– Q necessarily exist! – Λ, a determinant, generalizes  (and plays same role) – If Λ=0, there are subspaces of fixed points and invariant manifolds (“duality”) – No other possibilities besides fixed line and two invariants for cyclic competition – More interesting results if M are two ‘teams’ with M/2 players (ask me later!)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Brief glimpse of analysis

  • Start with
  • Get rate equations
  • Write in vector/matrix form

M

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Brief glimpse of analysis

  • anti-symmetric, so odd M  det = 0,

with at least one zero.

  • Right e-vector gives fixed point
  • Left e-vector provides invariant

…“duality”

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Brief glimpse of analysis

  • anti-symmetric, so even M  det = Λ

can be anything.

  • If Λ≠0, can invert to get
  • So, and
  • …evolves as

☺ Q in 4 species case is  ! ☺

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Brief glimpse of analysis

  • anti-symmetric, so even M  Λ=0 must

come with even number (2m) of zeros.

  • Each zero corresponds to a fixed point and

an invariant.

  • 2m-1 dimensional subspace of fp’s

…“dual” to…

  • M-1-2m dimensional invariant manifold

☺ 4 species case has line of fp’s and invariant loop! ☺

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Stochastics enlivens the scene !

  • Not surprising:

– MF pretty good if all Nm’s are large. – Unpredictable extinction probabilities – Finding systematic behavior challenging – Either pair may win in neutral (=0) case.

  • Surprises:

– Evolution of Q distributions – Distributions of surviving pairs

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Stochastics enlivens the scene !

rates: (0.4, 0.4, 0.1, 0.1)….. initial values: (0.02, 0.1, 0.48, 0.4)  1000

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Stochastics enlivens the scene !

Most interesting case we found:

– “Extreme” rates: 0.1, 0.0001, 0.1, 0.7999 – Initial values: 100, 700, 100, 100 – 10,000 runs, 90% ends on AC line (>0) – Mostly, D dies first (B weakest!). – MFT shows “3 spirals,” each coming close to the ABC face (D=0) ... – …corresponding to 3 distinct clusters

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Stochastics enlivens the scene !

Most interesting case we found:

– “Extreme” rates: 0.1, 0.0001, 0.1, 0.7999 – Initial values: 100, 700, 100, 100 – 10,000 runs, 90% ends on AC line (>0) – Mostly, D dies first (B weakest!). – MFT shows “3 spirals,” each coming close to the ABC face (D=0) ... – …corresponding to 3 distinct clusters

Prey of the prey of the weakest lose. Prey of the prey of the strongest win.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Stochastics enlivens the scene !

D nearly dies in MF

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Stochastics enlivens the scene !

D nearly dies in MF

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Stochastics enlivens the scene !

D dies in MF

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Summary and Outlook

  • Pairwise competition, ODE or stochastic,

provides many interesting issues to study

  • Some aspects understood; but puzzles remain
  • Many immediate extensions, e.g.,

spatial structures, networks, inhomogeneous environments,…

  • Further generalizations and applications
  • Many exciting things to do … many ways to

get involved …

slide-47
SLIDE 47

S.O. Case, C.H. Durney, M. Pleimling and R.K.P. Zia, EPL 92, 58003 (2010), PRE 83, 051108 (2011) arXiv: 1101:0018 (2010-11)